Core Viewpoint - Nine joint-stock banks in China have followed state-owned banks in rapidly lowering deposit interest rates, focusing on medium to long-term deposits, particularly three-year and five-year terms [2][4][5] Group 1: Deposit Rate Adjustments - As of May 21, seven banks including Ping An Bank and CITIC Bank have announced reductions in deposit rates, with three-year and five-year fixed deposit rates lowered by 25 basis points (BP) [2][4] - The adjusted rates for Ping An Bank are now 0.70% for three months, 0.95% for six months, 1.15% for one year, 1.20% for two years, and 1.30% for three years, reflecting a decrease of 15 BP for shorter terms and 25 BP for longer terms [3][4] - Minsheng Bank has also reduced its deposit rates, with similar decreases across various terms, including a 25 BP drop for three-year and five-year deposits [3][4] Group 2: Market Expectations and Reactions - Investors had anticipated the recent reductions in deposit rates, with no significant rush to lock in rates observed at bank branches [4][5] - The speed of the banks' responses to the need for lower deposit rates aligns with market expectations, indicating a proactive approach to stabilize net interest margins and support the real economy [5][6] Group 3: Implications for Banking Sector - The adjustments in deposit rates are seen as necessary to reduce financing costs for the real economy, with banks needing to lower their liability costs to maintain profitability [5][8] - The current trend shows that the reductions in deposit rates are larger than the Loan Prime Rate (LPR) decreases, which may help banks manage interest expenses and improve their financial performance [8]

Core Insights - In 2024, three listed city commercial banks in Shandong presented differentiated performance, with Qingdao Bank leading in net profit growth at 20.16%, while Weihai Bank had the highest net interest margin at 1.77% [1][2]. - Qilu Bank achieved the largest net profit of 4.986 billion yuan, followed by Qingdao Bank at 4.264 billion yuan and Weihai Bank at 1.992 billion yuan [1]. Financial Performance - Qingdao Bank ranked first in revenue with 13.498 billion yuan, followed by Qilu Bank at 12.496 billion yuan and Weihai Bank at 9.316 billion yuan, with Qingdao Bank also showing a revenue growth of 8.22% [3]. - Qilu Bank led in asset scale growth at 14.01%, with Qingdao Bank and Weihai Bank at 13.48% and 12.65% respectively [4]. Asset Quality - Qilu Bank had the highest return on equity (ROE) at 12.52%, while Qingdao Bank followed at 11.51% and Weihai Bank at 8.47% [6]. - Weihai Bank reported the highest non-performing loan (NPL) ratio at 1.41%, with Qilu Bank and Qingdao Bank at 1.14% and 1.19% respectively [7]. Business Structure - Qilu Bank's corporate banking business accounted for over 56% of its revenue, while Qingdao Bank's retail banking contributed significantly, with 27.61% of its revenue [8]. - Weihai Bank had the highest proportion of corporate banking business at 62.45%, while Qingdao Bank excelled in retail banking [8]. Loan and Deposit Growth - Qingdao Bank's total loans reached 340.69 billion yuan, growing by 12.53%, while Qilu Bank's loans were 337.14 billion yuan, growing by 12.31% [3]. - All three banks maintained double-digit growth in loans and deposits, although deposit growth rates showed a decline compared to the previous year [3].

Core Viewpoint - The recent reduction in deposit rates by major banks in China is a response to macroeconomic pressures and aims to lower the banks' funding costs, thereby supporting the economy and enhancing financial stability [1][3]. Group 1: Deposit Rate Adjustments - Six major state-owned banks and some national joint-stock banks have lowered their deposit rates, with the maximum reduction reaching 25 basis points [1][2]. - After the adjustments, the interest rates for various deposit products are as follows: - Demand deposit rate is now 0.05% - 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year fixed deposit rates are 0.65%, 0.85%, 0.95%, and 1.05% respectively - 3-year and 5-year fixed deposit rates are 1.25% and 1.3% respectively [2]. Group 2: Impact on Banking Sector - The coordinated reduction in deposit rates and LPR (Loan Prime Rate) is seen as a significant measure to support the real economy and alleviate the pressure on banks' net interest margins [4]. - The net interest margin for commercial banks has narrowed to 1.43% in Q1, down 9 basis points from the previous quarter, indicating ongoing challenges for banks [4]. Group 3: Strategic Recommendations for Banks - Banks are encouraged to optimize their deposit product structures and dynamically adjust the scale of different types of deposits to reduce high-cost deposits [5][6]. - There is a call for banks to enhance their market analysis capabilities and implement differentiated pricing strategies for various customer segments and deposit terms [6]. - Emphasizing regional operations and adapting to local market characteristics can help banks develop flexible deposit pricing strategies [6].

资产端贷款利率仍将处于下行通道。 5月20日，一年期及五年期贷款市场报价利率（LPR）年内迎来首次下调，均下调10个基点（BP）。与 此同时，国有大行及招行率先启动年内首次人民币存款利率下调，其中一年期存款首次跌破"1%"。 此次LPR和存款利率的同时下调引发了市场的广泛关注。此前监管数据显示，一季度商业银行净息差已 降至1.43%，处于历史较低水平。在此背景下，银行息差是否会进一步受到压力成为市场焦点。 综合来看，业内人士的看法存在分歧。一部分人士认为，LPR报价下调带动存款利率同步下调，将有助 于缓解商业银行净息差的下行压力；然而，还有部分观点指出，在新一轮降息的推动下，利率中枢整体 继续下移，资产端贷款利率仍将处于下行通道，银行息差仍将面临一定的压力。 房贷利率再下行 LPR下调的直接影响之一是新发放房贷利率的降低。对于购房者来说，这意味着更低的融资成本和更轻 松的还款压力，但对于银行而言，资产端收益可能在一定时期内有所减少。 央行数据显示，今年4月份，全国个人住房新发放贷款加权平均利率约3.1%。据此测算，以一笔100万 元的房贷为例，贷款期限为30年，采用等额本息还款方式，LPR下调前的利率为3.1 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent adjustment of deposit rates by major state-owned banks, which has a larger decline than the Loan Prime Rate (LPR), indicates a strategic move to alleviate internal pressures and prepare for potential economic fluctuations [1][5][10]. Summary by Sections Deposit Rate Adjustments - On May 20, 2025, major state-owned banks lowered various deposit rates, with the 1-year and 5-year fixed deposit rates reduced by 15 and 25 basis points respectively, while the LPR was only reduced by 10 basis points [2]. - The cumulative reduction in deposit rates since September 2022 has been greater than that of the LPR, with the 1-year and 5-year fixed deposit rates down by 80 and 145 basis points respectively, compared to the LPR's decline of 70 and 110 basis points [10]. Economic Context - The adjustments in deposit rates are influenced by external factors such as the easing of exchange rate constraints and progress in US-China trade negotiations, which have led to a stronger RMB [5]. - Internally, the need to balance net interest margins and the pressure on banks due to declining profitability, with the net interest margin dropping to a historical low of 1.33% in Q1 2025, has prompted these rate cuts [7]. Future Implications - The larger reduction in deposit rates compared to the LPR creates room for potential further rate cuts, which may be necessary to address economic volatility and insufficient demand, particularly in investment [10]. - The current economic environment, characterized by fluctuating tariffs and their impact on corporate investment and local finances, necessitates a proactive approach to monetary policy [10].

Group 1 - The six major banks collectively announced a reduction in deposit rates, with cuts ranging from 5 basis points (BP) to 25 BP, while the People's Bank of China (PBOC) lowered the Loan Prime Rate (LPR) by 10 BP for both one-year and five-year terms [1][2] - The reduction in deposit rates is the largest in recent years, with the one-year deposit rate falling below 1% for the first time, potentially leading to a shift of deposits towards non-bank financial institutions [1][6] - According to CICC's static calculations, the impact of the LPR and deposit rate cuts on banks' net interest margin (NIM), revenue, and profit is an increase of 7 BP, 3 BP, and 6 BP respectively, indicating a generally positive effect on banks [2][3] Group 2 - The adjusted interest rates for fixed-term deposits are now 0.95% for one year, 1.05% for two years, 1.25% for three years, and 1.3% for five years, with significant reductions in the longer-term rates [2] - The average reduction in deposit rates is approximately 16 BP, which is greater than the LPR cut, reflecting a protective measure for banks' interest margins [2][3] - The ongoing low interest rate environment is expected to alleviate debt burdens for enterprises and households, stimulate economic activity, and stabilize banks' asset quality, despite causing a significant impact on listed banks' operating income [2][4] Group 3 - The net interest margin for listed banks is projected to decline by 2.20% year-on-year in 2024, marking the second consecutive year of decline, with the average NIM expected to be 1.52% [4][5] - The first quarter of 2025 saw a further decrease in the net interest margin to 1.43%, which is significantly below the 1.8% warning level [4][5] - The trend of funds flowing from banks to non-bank financial institutions is exacerbated by the reduction in deposit rates, with a notable increase in bank liabilities to other financial companies [6]

5月20日，工商银行、中国银行、建设银行、农业银行、邮储银行、交通银行六大国有行下调人民币存 款利率。其中，活期存款下调0.05个百分点至0.05%，各期限定期存款挂牌利率下调0.15-0.25个百分 点，一年期存款利率均跌破1%。 同日，新一期贷款市场报价利率（LPR）出炉，1年期和5年期以上LPR双双下降0.1个百分点至3%、 3.5%。市场对本轮LPR与存款利率下调已有预期，此前在国新办新闻发布会上，中国人民银行行长潘功 胜宣布，下调政策利率0.1个百分点，预计将带动贷款市场报价利率（LPR）同步下行约0.1个百分点； 同时，潘功胜表示，央行也将通过利率自律机制引导商业银行相应下调存款利率。 建设银行最新存款利率。（数据来源：建设银行网站） 5月20日，工商银行、中国银行、建设银行、农业银行、邮储银行、交通银行六大国有行宣布下调人民 币存款利率；其中，活期存款下调0.05个百分点至0.05%，各期限定期存款挂牌利率下调0.15-0.25个百 分点，一年期存款利率均跌破1%。 以建设银行为例，活期利率下调5个基点至0.05%；定期整存整取三个月期、半年期、一年期、二年期 均下调15个基点，分别为0.65% ...

Core Viewpoint - The accumulation of OCI floating profits in banks has largely been consumed, primarily due to passive consumption from a weak bond market rather than active selling by banks [1][2][3] Group 1: OCI Floating Profit Consumption - Most banks have consumed over half of their OCI floating profit accumulation, with some banks even turning to floating losses; large banks have a relatively smaller consumption ratio, around one-third [1] - Among the six major banks, only one has consumed about half of its floating profit accumulation, while the others have consumed approximately one-third [1] - Out of 33 listed banks with available data, 25 have consumed more than half of their floating profit accumulation, with 7 turning to floating losses [1][2] Group 2: Impact on Revenue - The low performance of bond market investments has significantly dragged down the revenue performance of listed banks, with non-interest income negatively impacting revenue growth by 3.81 percentage points for joint-stock banks and 6.42 percentage points for city commercial banks [1] - For rural commercial banks, the contribution from non-interest income dropped from 7.30 percentage points to 4.52 percentage points [1] Group 3: Net Interest Margin Pressure - The pressure on net interest margins (NIM) is primarily observed in large banks, with a notable narrowing in Q1 due to a "lack of liabilities" leading to a shift towards interbank certificates of deposit [3] - In Q1, the average NIM for large banks narrowed by 0.10 percentage points to a low of 1.39%, significantly weaker than seasonal trends [3] - The recovery trend for NIM is not stable, as interbank deposits saw a seasonal decline in March, although there was a notable rebound in April due to a more relaxed funding environment [3]

Group 1: Financial Investment Trends - The financial investment growth rate for listed banks showed divergence, with rural commercial banks rebounding to 8.30% in Q1 2025 after a decline in 2024[2] - State-owned banks' financial investment growth was weaker compared to other types of banks due to liability pressures[2] - The average contribution of investment net income to revenue increased, with contributions for state-owned, joint-stock, city commercial, and rural commercial banks at 6.95%, 18.56%, 25.86%, and 28.85% respectively in Q1 2025[2][31] Group 2: OCI Account and Profit Realization - The average proportion of OCI accounts increased to 32.5%, while the average AC proportion decreased to 47.5% in Q1 2025, indicating a greater reliance on OCI accounts for profit adjustment[2][28] - Estimated remaining sellable old bonds for listed banks is approximately 4.5 trillion yuan, with state-owned banks holding about 2.8 trillion yuan[4] - The pressure to sell bonds may re-emerge in Q2, raising questions about the remaining space for selling old bonds[3] Group 3: Profitability and Cost Management - The average net profit growth rate for listed banks declined from 4.83% in 2024 to 2.29% in Q1 2025, with some banks experiencing negative growth[19] - Average interest margin narrowed to 1.58% in Q1 2025, down from 1.61% in 2024, indicating ongoing profitability pressure[21] - Interest income remains the primary revenue source, but the average interest net income for state-owned banks decreased by 2.75% year-on-year[23] Group 4: Asset Quality and Risk - Overall asset quality improved, but potential risks accumulated, particularly with an increase in the proportion of special mention loans for rural commercial banks[5] - The capital adequacy ratio for various banks declined, with state-owned banks experiencing the most significant drop, indicating pressure on capital retention capabilities[5]

Core Viewpoint - Huishang Bank has shown steady growth in total assets while experiencing a slowdown in revenue growth and moderate profit growth, positioning itself favorably among urban commercial banks in China [2][3][7]. Group 1: Company Overview - Huishang Bank was established in 1997 and has undergone several name changes and mergers, currently operating 21 branches and 464 outlets, primarily in Anhui province [1]. - As of the end of 2024, Huishang Bank's loans in Anhui accounted for 88.87% of its total loans, indicating a strong regional focus [1]. Group 2: Financial Performance - By the end of 2024, Huishang Bank's total assets exceeded 2 trillion yuan, reaching 2.01 trillion yuan, with a year-on-year growth of 11.49% [2]. - The bank achieved operating income of 37.175 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 1.62%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 15.414 billion yuan, up 6.80% year-on-year [2]. Group 3: Comparative Analysis - Huishang Bank ranks approximately seventh among urban commercial banks in terms of total assets, surpassing Hengfeng Bank and Bohai Bank in total assets, operating income, and net profit [7]. - In 2024, Huishang Bank's net interest margin was 1.71%, a decrease of 17 basis points from 2023, which is considered moderate among major commercial banks [12]. Group 4: Asset Quality - As of the end of 2024, Huishang Bank's non-performing loan (NPL) ratio was 0.99%, down 27 basis points from the previous year, with a provision coverage ratio of 286.47%, an increase of 14.53 percentage points [14]. - The bank's corporate loan NPL ratio improved to 0.86%, while the personal loan NPL ratio rose to 1.51%, indicating a divergence in asset quality between corporate and personal loans [16].