Group 1 - The 2025 Sustainable Global Leaders Conference will be held from October 16 to 18 in Shanghai, focusing on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) principles and sustainable development performance [1][4] - Vuk Jeremić, the Chairman of the International Relations and Sustainable Development Center and former Serbian Foreign Minister, emphasized the importance of global cooperation in addressing challenges to sustainable development [2][3] - Jeremić highlighted China's achievements in sustainable development as a successful practice and advocated for a collaborative approach to overcome geopolitical and economic challenges [2][3] Group 2 - The conference will feature around 500 prominent guests, including approximately 100 international attendees, such as former political leaders, representatives from international organizations, Nobel Prize winners, and leaders from Fortune 500 companies [4] - The event will cover nearly 50 topics, including energy and "dual carbon" initiatives, green finance, sustainable consumption, and technology and public welfare [4] - Sina Finance's ESG Rating Center aims to promote sustainable development and responsible investment, establishing a platform for ESG information and ratings in China [5][6]

Core Insights - Since 2022, China has become the largest contributor to global sustainable development (SDG) related papers, playing an increasingly important role in global policy-making related to sustainability [1][2] - The report, released during the 30th UN Climate Change Conference (COP30), is the most comprehensive to date, analyzing over 12 million policy documents to reveal how academic research influences sustainable development policies [1][2] Summary by Sections Contribution to Sustainable Development - China’s research outputs are widely cited in sustainable development policy documents, with 25% of citations coming from intergovernmental organizations like the WHO and the UN, followed by the US (22%), the UK (8%), and the EU (7%) [1] - In global health and environmental policy, China plays a significant role, with 37% of its research citations related to SDG3 (Good Health and Well-being) and 13% related to SDG13 (Climate Action) [1] Research Impact and Policy Integration - Sustainable development policy documents tend to cite more research findings compared to non-sustainable development documents, indicating a connection between science and actions addressing global challenges such as health and climate [2] - Open Access (OA) articles are cited in policy documents approximately one year earlier than non-OA articles, highlighting the importance of accessibility in research [2] - Briefs, reviews, and news articles, despite their smaller share in academic output, are frequently cited in policy documents, suggesting that concise and understandable content has a greater impact [2] Recommendations for Stakeholders - The report provides actionable recommendations for researchers, publishers, and research institutions to ensure evidence-driven solutions to global challenges, including expanding open access and prioritizing content that is useful for policy [2] - It emphasizes the need for effective partnerships among all members of the knowledge ecosystem to facilitate communication with policymakers [2] Methodology and Future Implications - The report quantifies the impact of research on various sustainable development goals and aims to stimulate collaboration within the research ecosystem to bridge existing gaps [3] - The unique approach focuses on how research findings are utilized in sustainable development policies, providing clearer insights into their practical application for driving policy change [3]

Core Viewpoint - The company emphasizes its commitment to innovation and self-reliance in technology and key raw materials, asserting that it does not depend on Japanese enterprises for core technologies or materials [1]. Group 1: Technology and Innovation - The company has no reliance on Japanese companies for core technologies, as all patents are independently developed [1]. - The company annually advances its patent applications, showcasing a strong focus on self-driven innovation [1]. Group 2: Raw Materials and Production - The polyurethane resin used by the company is primarily produced by its subsidiary, Hefei Anli Polyurethane New Materials Co., Ltd., with approximately 90% of the resin being self-produced [1]. - The company claims to have significant advantages in integrated research and production, with strong collaborative innovation capabilities [1]. Group 3: Sustainability and Development - The company asserts that it has full control over core technologies and key raw materials, which effectively ensures its sustainable development [1].

Core Points - The China-Cambodia Coastal Protection Project focuses on mangrove ecological protection and community sustainable development, achieving significant results through a joint working group [1][2] - The project includes the establishment of a mangrove nursery demonstration base, which provides quality seed sources and technical models for local species cultivation and ecological restoration [1] - The initiative aims to enhance community engagement in ecological protection and sustainable development, promoting awareness and participation among local residents [1] Group 1 - The joint working group consists of experts from the National Ocean Technology Center and the Cambodian Ministry of Environment, conducting activities in the Kampong province [1] - The project is part of the implementation of the Sustainable Ocean Cooperation Initiative Agreement signed by the Chinese Ministry of Natural Resources and the Cambodian Ministry of Environment [2] - The project aims to create a model for Sino-Cambodian marine cooperation, focusing on sustainable development and community benefits [2] Group 2 - The project is supported by the China Ocean Development Foundation and aims to explore new models for multi-stakeholder participation [2] - The initiative is designed to strengthen the blue partnership between China and Cambodia, contributing to marine sustainable development [2]

中国外文局美洲传播中心(北京周报社)主任辛峰、巴西弗鲁米嫩塞联邦大学副校长法比奥·帕索斯(Fábio Barboza Passos)、中国驻里约热内卢总领事田敏和巴西国际旅游推广局国际市场协调员安德烈·内托 (Andre Netto)发表致辞。 辛峰在视频致辞中表示，中国和巴西分别是东西半球最大的发展中国家，同为金砖创始成员国和"全球 南方"大国，在维护多边主义、改革完善全球治理体系方面有着相同或相似的立场主张。中国和巴西在 参与应对气候变化全球治理和推动可持续发展方面都作出了许多积极努力和重要贡献。 法比奥·帕索斯表示，中国和巴西都重视能源转型和可持续发展领域的研究，弗鲁米嫩塞联邦大学也计 划建设一个相关领域的研究中心。中巴高校已经在很多领域开展研究合作，期待进一步拓展合作领域。 会议现场。中国外文局美洲传播中心供图 "规划与发展：可持续发展的启示与经验"交流会在巴西里约举办 中新网圣保罗11月20日电 (记者 林春茵)当地时间11月18日，"规划与发展：可持续发展的启示与经验"交 流会在巴西里约热内卢州举行。 交流会由中国外文局美洲传播中心(北京周报社)、巴西国际旅游推广局(Embratur)和巴西弗鲁米 ...

Core Insights - The conference on sustainable development for listed companies in 2025 was held in Beijing, aiming to enhance understanding and recognition of listed companies by domestic and foreign institutions, and to promote value creation and sustainable development capabilities [1][2] Group 1: Conference Objectives and Participants - The event was organized by the China Listed Companies Association (CLCA) and included over 500 representatives from listed companies and relevant professional institutions [1] - The conference emphasized the importance of listed companies in demonstrating resilience and vitality in a complex global market environment, with a clearer path towards sustainable development [1] Group 2: Research Reports and Findings - Four research reports were released during the conference, focusing on ESG development, industry analysis, value accounting, and ESG ratings for listed companies in 2025 [2] - The conference also presented 210 best practice cases for sustainable development among listed companies [2] Group 3: Experience Sharing - Representatives from leading companies shared their insights on sustainable development, including strategies for zero-carbon initiatives and integrating sustainability into corporate strategy [3] - Notable contributions came from executives of CATL, China Shenhua, and Tencent, highlighting the role of sustainable practices in enhancing corporate growth and social responsibility [3] Group 4: Roundtable Discussion - A roundtable discussion addressed core issues in sustainable development, including management practices, strategic approaches, and the challenges of information disclosure for listed companies [4] - The discussion involved experts from various sectors, emphasizing the need for collaboration and resource integration to support sustainable development efforts [4]

Core Insights - The conference aimed to enhance understanding and recognition of listed companies by domestic and foreign institutions, promoting corporate mission fulfillment and social responsibility [1][2] - There has been significant progress in the sustainable development practices of listed companies, with a clearer path towards high-quality development [2] Group 1: Conference Objectives and Participants - The conference was organized by the China Listed Companies Association and attended by over 500 representatives from listed companies and relevant professional institutions [1] - The event focused on sharing experiences from exemplary listed companies and expert discussions to foster value creation and enhance sustainable development capabilities [1] Group 2: Key Statements and Trends - Listed companies have shown resilience and vitality in a complex global market, with a stronger foundation for high-quality development and clearer sustainable development paths [2] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission noted substantial progress in sustainable disclosure practices among listed companies, leading to more determined steps towards sustainable development [2] - OECD highlighted trends such as expanding coverage of corporate sustainability disclosures, convergence of disclosure standards, and enhanced board supervision as essential for a resilient and sustainable future [2] Group 3: Research Reports and Best Practices - Four research reports were released during the conference, focusing on ESG development, industry analysis, value accounting, and ESG ratings for listed companies [3] - The conference also presented 210 best practice cases for sustainable development among listed companies for 2025 [3]

Core Points - The 12th Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Award Ceremony was held by the China-EU Chamber of Commerce in Nanjing, recognizing 16 leading companies for their outstanding CSR practices [1][2] - The event featured a keynote speech on "New Trends in China-EU ESG Rules" by Dr. Bu Maoliang, providing forward-looking industry insights [1] - The awards covered key areas of CSR and sustainability, including supply chain, decarbonization, and gender equality, promoting deeper communication and cooperation between Chinese and European enterprises [2] Award Highlights - Companies such as Deka, Bosch Home Appliances, DSV, and Arkema received the "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development Leadership Award" [2] - The "Green Impact Pioneer Award" was awarded to Gaillard and BASF Shanghai Coatings [2] - Ericsson Nanjing, Airbus, and Schaeffler were recognized with the "Climate Action Leader Award" [2] - Ernst & Young and Dittop received the "Gender Equality and Empowerment Excellence Award" [2] - Siemens, Vitas, and BMW were honored with the "Employee Development and Engagement Award" [2] - Susphor won the "Sustainable Supply Chain Award" [2] - Netspring received the "Social Innovation Excellence Award" [2]

以常州瑞声科技为例，在高精密的生产过程中，瑞声科技运用人工智能和机器学习技术提升产品检测效率，通过自动化实现模具循环使用和铜材回收等工 艺，减少材料浪费，践行可持续发展承诺。 崔玉善说："苹果公司也致力于让世界更美好，过去十年间，已将全球碳足迹降低了超过60%，并大幅提升了再生材料的使用比例。苹果公司承诺到2030 年，在供应链和整个产品生命周期中实现百分百碳中和。" 据悉，目前，苹果公司产品在中国已有超过90%的生产制造采用可再生能源，立讯精密等供应商已完全实现使用清洁能源生产苹果公司产品，并在关键 iPhone部件中100%使用再生稀土元素、再生铜和再生钨。 【环球网科技报道 记者 张阳】11月18日，以"汇聚新质生产力开放合作赢未来"为主题的2025年产业链供应链国际合作交流会暨企业家太湖论坛在无锡成功 举办。作为商务部"投资中国"系列活动重要组成部分，论坛搭建起跨国界、跨行业的交流合作平台，吸引了苹果、辉瑞、LG新能源等全球知名企业代表齐 聚，共探产业链供应链高质量发展新路径。 论坛现场披露的数据显示，江苏已成为外资企业投资兴业的优选地。2024年江苏实际使用外资190.5亿美元，占全国比重16.4% ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the "dual-speed" phenomenon in global ESG practices, where developed countries and developing countries exhibit significant differences in their pace, policy strength, and corporate responses to environmental actions, particularly in climate change [1][3][5] Group 1: Differences in ESG Practices - Developed countries have historically contributed more to carbon emissions during their industrialization, leading to a lighter burden in achieving carbon reduction goals compared to developing countries, which are still in critical economic development phases [1][3] - Developing countries face immense pressure to reduce emissions while striving for economic growth and poverty alleviation, resulting in a challenging balancing act [1][2] Group 2: Capacity and Resource Disparities - Developing countries are disproportionately affected by climate change impacts, such as extreme weather events, due to their weaker infrastructure and economic foundations, which limits their ability to respond effectively [2][3] - In contrast, developed countries possess advanced warning systems, robust infrastructure, and greater financial resources to tackle climate change, exacerbating global inequalities [2][3] Group 3: Funding and Technology Gaps - The research and application of green technologies are primarily concentrated in developed countries, which also have the financial strength for large-scale green investments, while developing countries struggle to access these technologies and necessary funding [2][3] - High costs associated with technology licensing and export restrictions from developed nations hinder the ability of developing countries to deploy advanced low-carbon technologies [2][3] Group 4: Recommendations for ESG Evaluation - To address the "dual-speed" dilemma, the article suggests redefining and quantifying "differentiation" in ESG evaluations based on historical emissions, economic development levels, and technological capabilities of different countries [3][4] - It recommends designing additional scoring criteria for industries with high historical emissions and providing extra points for companies involved in green technology development and transfer to developing nations [4][5] - The evaluation process should consider the impact of energy-saving and carbon reduction efforts on traditional industries, allowing time for green transitions and focusing on trends in carbon reduction and investments in green transformation [4][5]