Workflow
内卷式竞争
icon
Search documents
快递费上调确认!继义乌后 广东也涨了:底价上调0.4元 各家不得低于1.4元揽收
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-08-13 09:01
Core Viewpoint - The express delivery industry in Guangdong has implemented a price increase, raising the minimum charge to 1.4 yuan per ticket, which is expected to stabilize the financial situation of many delivery points [1][2]. Group 1: Price Increase Details - Starting from August 5, the overall base price for express delivery in Guangdong has been raised by 0.4 yuan per ticket, with the average price exceeding 1.4 yuan [1]. - The increase in base price is aimed at ensuring that no express company can collect below the cost price of 1.4 yuan, particularly affecting e-commerce customers who have high delivery demands [1]. - Prior to Guangdong, the city of Yiwu in Zhejiang had already initiated a price increase mechanism, raising the base price from 1.1 yuan to 1.2 yuan [1]. Group 2: Industry Context - The express delivery industry has been plagued by a "low-price for volume" competition, leading to reduced profit margins for delivery points and poor service quality [2]. - The average price per ticket for express delivery has significantly decreased from 28.55 yuan in 2007 to 7.49 yuan in June of this year [2]. - Major express companies like SF Express, Shentong, Yunda, and Zhongtong have seen their average ticket revenue drop by approximately 40% since 2017, with only Zhongtong showing a slight increase [2]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The State Post Bureau has emphasized the need for stronger industry regulation and has taken steps to combat "involutionary" competition and improve service quality [3]. - Following regulatory discussions, stocks of major express companies have surged, with Yunda's stock increasing by 22.4%, Shentong by 47.54%, and others also showing significant gains [3].
对话山东大学曲创:治理内卷,应注重保护平台企业竞争积极性
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-08-12 15:33
Core Viewpoint - The recent "takeaway war" has intensified due to marketing strategies like "the first cup of milk tea in autumn," highlighting the tea and coffee sectors as primary battlegrounds for delivery subsidies [1][8] Group 1: Nature of Competition - Price competition is a common market strategy, but attention should be paid to whether platforms force merchants to participate in subsidies and if these subsidies favor leading brands over smaller businesses [3][5] - The essence of the "takeaway subsidy war" is competitive behavior, driven by optimistic economic expectations, which should be protected [4][20] - "Involutionary" competition is characterized by low-price, low-quality dynamics, necessitating a focus on the underlying causes and key players involved [5][6] Group 2: Market Dynamics - "Involutionary" competition often arises from external forces, such as government subsidies in the new energy vehicle sector, which distort normal market competition [7] - The current competition landscape is shifting towards instant retail, appealing to the consumption habits of younger generations [9][10] - Platforms are willing to invest heavily in subsidies as an effective customer acquisition strategy, reallocating funds from traditional advertising to user subsidies [10][17] Group 3: Impact on Merchants - The surge in orders due to subsidies can overwhelm merchants' production capacities, leading to potential quality degradation or operational challenges [12][14] - Smaller merchants, particularly niche shops and family-run businesses, face significant challenges in participating in subsidy programs, which may threaten their survival [15][16] - The competitive advantage of smaller merchants may diminish as larger brands benefit more from subsidy programs, even when subsidies are applied uniformly [14][16] Group 4: Regulatory Considerations - Regulatory focus should be on whether platform subsidies harm market competition or consumer interests, with a need for nuanced, case-by-case analysis rather than blanket restrictions [16][21] - Encouraging platforms to support small merchants through favorable policies can help maintain a diverse market and effective competition [16][21][22] - The current economic climate suggests that regulatory measures should not stifle competitive behavior, as active competition reflects market vitality [20][21]
碳酸锂狂飙的4天:多空决战宜春,投资者半夜蹲守矿山
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-08-12 10:09
Core Viewpoint - The recent developments in the lithium mining sector, particularly the suspension of operations at Ningde Times' lithium mine in Yichun, are seen as a significant signal of supply contraction in the context of the "anti-involution" campaign initiated by the government [2][5][8]. Industry Summary - On August 7, a statement from the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association highlighted the dangers of "involution" competition, which triggered a surge in market interest and speculation regarding lithium supply [2][3]. - Following the announcement of the suspension of operations at Ningde Times' Yichun lithium mine due to the expiration of its mining license, lithium carbonate futures experienced a dramatic price increase, with a rise of 18.5% from August 7 to August 12, reaching a price of 82,520 yuan per ton [3][5]. - The Yichun mining operations are critical, with eight involved mining companies accounting for approximately 20% of China's monthly lithium production, and the suspension is viewed as a major indicator of potential supply issues [4][11]. - The market is currently engaged in a tug-of-war between bullish and bearish sentiments, with investors closely monitoring the situation as they speculate on the future of lithium prices and supply dynamics [6][10]. - The deadline of September 30 for the submission of resource verification reports by the eight mining companies is seen as a pivotal point for the market, with potential implications for future lithium supply and pricing [8][11]. Company Summary - Ningde Times' lithium mine in Yichun has been a focal point of market speculation, with the company expressing optimism about the renewal of its mining license prior to the suspension [6][7]. - Other companies involved in lithium mining, such as Guoxuan High-Tech and Keli Yuan, have reported that their operations remain normal and their mining licenses are still valid [11]. - Analysts suggest that if Ningde Times' mine resumes operations after three months and other mines remain unaffected, the overall impact on lithium supply may be limited to a reduction of approximately 30,000 to 35,000 tons [11].
“消费升级背景下即时零售的创新、竞争与治理”研讨会在京召开
Zheng Quan Ri Bao Wang· 2025-08-11 07:13
近日,由对外经济贸易大学数字经济与法律创新研究中心、中国人民大学数字经济研究中心联合主办 的"消费升级背景下即时零售的创新、竞争与治理"研讨会在中国人民大学顺利召开。本次会议结合《反 不正当竞争法》修订和"内卷式竞争"的政策背景,汇聚经济学、法学、公共管理等领域专家学者,探讨 即时零售行业的创新、竞争与治理。 本报讯(记者李春莲) 本次研讨会在即时零售的创新、竞争与治理方面进行了深入研讨。首先,即时零售作为技术迭代与市场 需求共振催生的创新业态,其发展不仅突破了传统零售的时空限制,更通过服务半径拓展、算法优化等 实现了行业效率升级,展现出强劲的创新活力与增长潜力;其次,针对行业热议的"内卷式竞争",需要 反对简单化、标签化解读,强调需回归法律与经济学本质。既要警惕"被迫参与补贴""商品质量下 降""成本转嫁"等具体问题,也要区分正当价格竞争与破坏性竞争的边界,避免将正常市场创新纳入"内 卷"范畴;最后,在治理路径上依托现有法律框架精准规制"低于成本倾销""强制商家压价"等具体行 为,而非对价格竞争进行"一刀切"限制;通过优化补贴方向、平衡多方关系、强化事前风险评估等举 措,推动平台、商家、消费者、骑手实现利益 ...
杭州硕丰自有资金投资有限公司:外卖大战降温,专家吁多管齐下破内卷
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-10 17:46
Group 1 - The competition among food delivery platforms in China has intensified, leading to a "subsidy war" characterized by extremely low prices, such as 0 RMB milk tea and 1 RMB hamburgers, but recent regulatory actions have started to cool this competition [1][3] - Delivery riders and merchants are experiencing increased pressure; while order volumes and incomes have surged temporarily, the intense workload is causing physical strain, and the exit of subsidies may lead to challenges for new riders [3] - A medium-tier fast food company's management reported a 12%-15% decline in dine-in customer traffic due to delivery subsidies, with delivery orders increasing from 15% to 22% of total sales, resulting in losses of approximately 8 RMB per order [3] Group 2 - The phenomenon of "involution" in platform economics is twofold: platforms compete for user traffic through substantial subsidies, while merchants are compelled to offer discounts to gain visibility on these platforms [4] - Experts emphasize the need for regulatory measures to prevent "involution" in competition, suggesting that the government should utilize existing laws to regulate predatory pricing and promote fair competition [4] - Recommendations for companies include avoiding short-sighted subsidy wars and instead focusing on differentiated development through improved service quality and technological innovation to gain competitive advantages [4]
美国财长贝森特:希望中方转向消费型经济体
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-10 15:30
Group 1 - The core focus of the recent US-China trade talks is whether to extend the current tariff suspension period by another 90 days, indicating ongoing negotiations and significant differences between the two parties [2][3][23] - The discussions have evolved from narrow topics, such as rare earth issues, to broader economic framework concerns, reflecting a deepening dialogue between the two nations [8][23] - US Treasury Secretary Bessent expressed satisfaction with the progress of negotiations, suggesting that both sides are taking the talks seriously and are willing to engage in more substantial discussions [6][7] Group 2 - Bessent emphasized the need for China to transition to a consumption-driven economy, a sentiment echoed by previous US officials, highlighting the long-standing concerns about China's reliance on manufacturing and exports [8][10][21] - The potential shift towards a consumption-based economy is seen as a necessary response to external pressures, including tariffs, which may force China to adapt its economic structure [10][15][18] - Recent measures in China, such as financial incentives for childbirth and discussions around free education, are aimed at stimulating domestic consumption and addressing demographic challenges, aligning with the broader goal of economic transformation [21][22][23]
经济观察丨外卖大战降温 专家吁多管齐下破内卷
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-10 06:59
Group 1 - The external delivery platform subsidy war is cooling down following a meeting with China's State Administration for Market Regulation, which emphasized the need to avoid irrational promotions [1] - The "involution" competition issue remains a concern, as delivery riders and merchants face increased pressure despite short-term gains in order volume and income [1][2] - A medium-sized fast-food company's management reported a 12%-15% decline in dine-in customer flow due to delivery subsidies, with delivery orders increasing from 15% to 22% [1] Group 2 - Over-competition and "involution" can harm market efficiency and fairness, with subsidies failing to cultivate user habits or expand overall market size [2] - The subsidy war may accelerate the "Matthew effect," where financially strong platforms use extensive subsidies to squeeze out competitors, leading to increased market concentration [2] - The dual "involution" in platform economics involves both competition among platforms for user traffic and merchants being forced to participate in subsidies to gain private traffic [2] Group 3 - Recommendations for government regulation include flexible enforcement, such as reminders to platforms to standardize competitive behavior, and utilizing existing laws to regulate predatory pricing [3] - Platforms are advised to avoid short-sighted subsidy competition and instead pursue differentiated development paths through service quality improvement and technological innovation [3]
外卖大战降温 专家吁多管齐下破内卷
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-10 00:41
Core Viewpoint - The competition among food delivery platforms in China is cooling down following regulatory interventions, but the underlying issue of "involution" in competition remains a concern [1][2]. Group 1: Impact of Subsidy Wars - The recent subsidy wars led to a significant increase in order volume, but delivery riders reported heightened stress and physical exhaustion due to the intense workload [1]. - A mid-tier fast-food company's management noted a 12%-15% decline in dine-in customer traffic due to subsidies, with the proportion of delivery orders rising from 15% to 22% [1]. - Platforms are pressuring merchants to offer additional discounts, resulting in losses of approximately 8 RMB per order for some businesses, which could jeopardize the financial stability of small and medium-sized restaurants in the long term [1]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Competition - Experts argue that excessive competition and "involution" harm market efficiency and fairness, with subsidies failing to cultivate genuine user habits or expand overall market size [2]. - The "Matthew effect" may be accelerated by subsidy wars, where financially strong platforms dominate the market, leading to increased market concentration [2]. - The dual nature of "involution" in platform economies is highlighted, where platforms compete for user traffic through large subsidies, while merchants are compelled to participate in these subsidies to gain visibility [2]. Group 3: Regulatory and Strategic Recommendations - Recommendations for government regulation include flexible enforcement, such as reminders to platforms to standardize competitive behavior, and utilizing existing legal frameworks to regulate predatory pricing [3]. - Platforms are advised to avoid short-sighted subsidy competition and instead pursue differentiated development strategies by enhancing service quality and technological innovation to gain competitive advantages [3].
外卖大战降温,专家吁多管齐下破内卷
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-08-10 00:13
Group 1 - The core issue of the article revolves around the "involution" competition in the food delivery industry, highlighted by the recent discussions among major platforms like Meituan, Ele.me, and JD.com, which have committed to ending irrational promotions [1][3] - The intense competition has led to significant pressure on delivery riders and merchants, with riders experiencing increased order volumes but also physical strain, while merchants face declining dine-in traffic and increased losses per order due to platform demands for further discounts [3][4] - Experts emphasize that excessive competition harms market efficiency and fairness, with subsidies failing to cultivate user habits or expand market size, instead leading to a substitution effect between online and offline businesses [3][4] Group 2 - The phenomenon of "double involution" in platform economies is characterized by both inter-platform competition for user traffic through large subsidies and intra-platform merchants being forced to participate in subsidies to attract private traffic [4] - Recommendations for addressing involution competition include flexible regulatory approaches, such as platform reminders to standardize competitive behavior and the use of existing legal frameworks to regulate predatory pricing [4][5] - Experts suggest that platforms should shift from short-sighted subsidy competition to differentiated development strategies, focusing on service quality and technological innovation to gain competitive advantages [5]
反内卷才能赢未来
Chang Sha Wan Bao· 2025-08-09 23:52
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of "involution" in various industries in China, highlighting the negative impacts of excessive price competition and the resulting decline in product quality and innovation [2][4][5]. Group 1: Involution in Various Industries - The external environment has led to severe price wars across multiple sectors, including the automotive, food delivery, and renewable energy industries, with price reductions reaching as high as 45% in the electric vehicle market [2][3]. - The food delivery platforms like Meituan and Ele.me are engaged in a subsidy war, resulting in profits for certain products, such as milk tea, dropping below 1 yuan, and in some cases, leading to negative profit margins [3][4]. - In the automotive sector, profit margins have plummeted to 3.9%, forcing companies to engage in aggressive price cuts to stimulate sales, creating a vicious cycle of declining sales and further price reductions [3][4]. Group 2: Consequences of Involution - Involution leads to a reduction in necessary operational costs, which ultimately harms research and development investments, resulting in a cycle of innovation stagnation and product homogenization [4][5]. - The excessive competition has created systemic risks, with the potential for overcapacity and a decline in industry competitiveness, ultimately harming consumer rights and high-quality development [5][6]. - The government has recognized the issue, with multiple meetings emphasizing the need to prevent "involution" and regulate low-price competition among enterprises [6][7]. Group 3: Government and Industry Response - The National Market Supervision Administration has begun addressing the issue by engaging with major platforms to regulate promotional activities and encourage rational competition [8]. - Industry self-regulation is showing positive signs, with leading automotive companies taking steps to stabilize supply chains and various associations urging food delivery platforms to cease irrational subsidies [8][9]. - The focus is shifting from price competition to value creation, with an emphasis on innovation and differentiation to enhance market competitiveness and consumer experience [9].