（来源：经济日报） 针对"刷评炒信"行为，新法明确禁止经营者通过组织虚假评价等方式，帮助其他经营者进行虚假或者引人误解的商业宣传。 转自：经济日报 在市场监管总局1月9日举行的新闻发布会上，市场监管总局法规司副司长王丹介绍，去年6月修订出台的《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》，针对近年来 反不正当竞争领域面临的突出问题，在总结实践经验的基础上，进一步加强了对新型、典型"内卷式"恶性竞争的规制。 针对有的经营者钻平台规则"空子"，恶意下单并退货、恶意"刷评"，扰乱其他经营者正常经营活动等行为，新法禁止经营者滥用平台规则，直接或者指使他 人对其他经营者实施虚假评价、虚假交易或者恶意退货等行为，损害其他经营者的合法权益，扰乱市场竞争秩序。 针对平台违背平台内经营者意愿，强制要求平台内经营者降价促销，甚至必须是"全网最低价"等行为，新法禁止平台经营者强制或者变相强制平台内经营者 按照其定价规则，以低于成本的价格销售商品，扰乱市场竞争秩序。 针对大型企业拖欠中小企业账款、导致中小企业资金短缺的困局，新法划定行为红线，禁止大型企业等经营者滥用自身优势地位，要求中小企业接受明显不 合理的付款期限、方式、条件和违约责任等交易条 ...

新华财经北京12月12日电中国光伏行业协会12日在其官方微信号上发布的文章中提到，近日，北京光和 谦成科技有限责任公司完成注册，标志着光伏行业酝酿已久的"多晶硅产能整合收购平台"正式落地。这 一由相关主管部门联合指导、多家龙头骨干企业共同发起的产业治理创新，被业内视为破解光伏"内卷 式"恶性竞争的关键之一。该平台拟采取"两条腿走路"的创新模式，实行"承债式收购+弹性封存压产 能"的双轨模式运行，旨在通过市场化、法治化的机制，参考历史上如：日本水泥行业、我国电解铝行 业化解供需错配的成功经验，通过"政府引导+行业协同+市场化并购"的路径，以产业链源头环节为抓 手，探索整治全行业"内卷式"恶性竞争问题，具有巨大的战略价值。经济金融层面，该平台承接数百亿 元级潜在债务，可帮助化解银行与供应商危机，推动价格回归合理区间，恢复全产业链"造血"功能；产 业战略层面，扭转亏本出口、"内卷外化"困局，企业盈利后可持续投入研发，巩固全球核心竞争力；制 度创新层面，作为"有效市场+有为政府"结合下的治理探索，若成功可为其他深陷内卷式恶性竞争行业 提供可复制范本。 （文章来源：新华财经） ...

Core Viewpoint - The meeting held on October 23 aimed to analyze the operational situation of the non-ferrous metals industry for the third quarter of 2025 and the entire year, addressing issues and conflicts faced by enterprises and gathering policy suggestions [1] Group 1: Industry Analysis - The meeting was attended by representatives from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, as well as leading companies such as China Aluminum, Minmetals, and Northern Rare Earth [1] - The vice president of the association, Chen Xuesen, emphasized the need for the industry to maintain confidence, strengthen self-discipline, and prevent "involution-type vicious competition" to protect a healthy industrial ecosystem [1] Group 2: Future Development - Discussions focused on the preparation of the industry's "14th Five-Year" plan, concentrating on resource security, high-end development, intelligence, and green development directions [1] - The goal is to guide the industry towards achieving higher quality and more sustainable development [1]

Group 1: Economic Indicators and Consumer Behavior - The Consumer Price Index (CPI) has shifted from decline to increase, indicating a need to further stimulate consumer activity in the economy [1] - Consumer spending is a major component of GDP, and its growth is essential for economic development [1] - The "trade-in" and "consumer loan interest subsidies" policies have effectively boosted consumer vitality and spending [1] Group 2: Trends in Consumer Spending - There is a significant trend towards increasing the proportion of consumer spending in GDP, which is currently lower compared to developed countries [2] - Enhancing consumer income through industrial upgrades is crucial for increasing consumption [2] - The demand for sports events and related products indicates untapped consumer potential [2] Group 3: Competition and Market Dynamics - "Involution" in competition is detrimental to consumer welfare and disrupts market order [3][4] - The need for improved industry concentration and profitability is emphasized to combat "involution" [5][6] Group 4: Government Policies and Consumer Opportunities - Government subsidies for trade-ins cover various sectors, and consumers are encouraged to take advantage of these limited-time offers [7] - Traditional and new consumption sectors hold significant potential for growth, and consumers should embrace digital economic opportunities [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to distinguish between normal market competition and "involutionary" competition, highlighting the importance of maintaining fair competition in the market while addressing the challenges posed by extreme price subsidies in the food delivery sector [1][4]. Group 1: Market Competition and Subsidies - The China Chain Store and Franchise Association has raised concerns about recent price subsidy wars initiated by certain platforms, which disrupt fair competition and threaten the sustainable development of the industry [2][3]. - A call to action was made by the Zunyi City Honghuagang District Catering Industry Association, urging food delivery platforms to cease extreme subsidy practices that lead to a vicious cycle of low-cost competition, endangering many restaurants [2][3]. - The ongoing food delivery subsidy wars have resulted in increased orders and consumer benefits, but they also pose risks to the quality of goods and services provided by merchants [2][3]. Group 2: Regulatory and Self-Regulatory Measures - Industry associations advocate for the identification and condemnation of monopolistic and unfair competitive behaviors, urging market regulators to take action against such practices [3][4]. - The distinction between normal competition and "involutionary" competition is crucial, as the presence of harmed participants indicates the latter, while the absence suggests healthy market dynamics [4][5]. - Strengthening self-regulation and introducing collective litigation and dispute resolution mechanisms are recommended to enhance consumer rights and ensure fair competition [5][6]. Group 3: Legal Framework and Fair Competition - The article stresses that effective protection of fair competition relies on a robust legal framework, including adherence to antitrust and consumer protection laws [4][6]. - The concept of fair competition is described as fragile, necessitating a commitment to legal principles to safeguard market integrity and promote equitable competition [4][6]. - The ultimate goal is to create an environment where market transactions enhance the welfare of all participants, thereby fostering a culture of fair competition [6].

Group 1 - The recent recall of over a million power banks by well-known brands such as Anker Innovations and Romoss highlights significant safety hazards, including overheating and potential fire risks [1][2] - Anker Innovations attributed the quality issues to a supplier's unauthorized change of raw materials, indicating a breakdown in quality control within the industry [1][2] - The competitive landscape in the power bank market has led to a focus on price reduction rather than quality enhancement, resulting in substandard components entering production lines [2] Group 2 - The recall of defective power banks is seen as a first step in addressing deeper issues within the industry, emphasizing the need to shift from price competition to quality competition [2] - The suspension of 3C certification for multiple models from brands like Romoss and Anker Innovations serves as both a setback and an opportunity for these companies to rebuild trust and prioritize safety [2] - The "involution" or unhealthy competition observed in the power bank sector is a warning for other industries, suggesting that a lack of competitive integrity can harm long-term industry interests [3]

Core Viewpoint - The phenomenon of "zero-kilometer used cars" is rampant, and its negative impact should not be underestimated. This sales model helps car manufacturers reduce inventory but compresses profit margins and exacerbates losses, hindering product quality improvement and innovation resource investment [1] Industry Analysis - The prevalence of "zero-kilometer used cars" is essentially a continuation of price wars in the automotive market, reflecting a "involutionary" vicious competition within the industry [1] - Addressing these issues requires collective efforts, strong governance, and the establishment of regulatory frameworks to guide the industry towards self-discipline, ultimately fostering a healthy market order and promoting high-quality development in the automotive sector [1]

Core Viewpoint - The phenomenon of "zero-kilometer used cars" has gained attention due to its implications for the automotive industry, reflecting a trend of unhealthy competition and market distortion [1][2][3]. Group 1: Industry Dynamics - Some car manufacturers are selling vehicles to third parties to boost sales figures, leading to the registration of new cars as used cars, which disrupts market order [1][2]. - The practice of registering new cars as used cars is a response to intense market competition, where dealers aim to meet sales targets and quickly recover funds [1][2]. - This creates a gray circulation chain from production to consumption, affecting the integrity of sales data and market dynamics [1][2]. Group 2: Impact on Companies - The "zero-kilometer used car" sales model may help companies reduce inventory but compresses profit margins and exacerbates losses, hindering product quality and innovation [2][3]. - The ongoing price war in the automotive market is reflected in the prevalence of "zero-kilometer used cars," indicating a deeper issue of vicious competition within the industry [2][3]. Group 3: Consumer Risks - Consumers purchasing "zero-kilometer used cars" may face risks such as loss of exclusive rights from the first owner, potential battery health issues, and greater depreciation upon resale [2][3]. - The market distortion caused by this practice misleads resource allocation and squeezes the survival space of compliant manufacturers and dealers [2][3]. Group 4: Regulatory Response - Regulatory bodies are focusing on addressing market irregularities and standardizing competition to maintain a fair market environment [2][3]. - Initiatives are being taken to regulate the "zero-kilometer used car" phenomenon and guide the export of used cars, signaling a clear intent to combat unhealthy competition [2][3]. Group 5: Future Directions - Strengthening regulations on used car registration and establishing a vehicle lifecycle traceability system are essential for improving industry standards [3]. - The industry is encouraged to shift focus from sales volume to quality, technology, and service, fostering a healthier competitive landscape [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for automotive companies to control their scale and focus on internal improvements to address the issue of vicious competition in the industry [2][4]. Group 1: Industry Consensus - At the "China Automotive Chongqing Forum," leading companies expressed deep concerns about vicious competition and committed to eliminating this phenomenon through internal efforts and technological innovation [2][3]. - The forum reached a consensus that the automotive industry must unite to maintain a fair market environment and enhance global competitiveness, particularly in the new energy vehicle sector [2]. Group 2: Capacity Control - To curb vicious competition, it is essential to strictly control production capacity, as uncontrolled expansion is a significant cause of this issue [3]. - Despite a challenging environment, the automotive industry continues to see capacity expansion, with over 20 million units of new energy vehicle capacity awaiting utilization as of Q1 2025, and a domestic capacity utilization rate of 71.9% [3]. Group 3: Internal Focus and Innovation - Companies are encouraged to focus on internal capabilities, improve technological levels, and enhance core competitiveness to gain consumer recognition [6]. - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology advocates for technological innovation to promote sustainable industry development and improve product quality and service [6]. Group 4: Regulatory Environment - The government has shown a strong commitment to addressing vicious competition, with initiatives announced in various meetings and reports aimed at maintaining fair competition in the automotive sector [7][8]. - The China Automotive Industry Association has issued an initiative to support normal market competition and oppose bottomless price wars, indicating a regulatory push against harmful competitive practices [7]. Group 5: Industry Reflection - Companies are urged to reflect on their core technologies and market competitiveness, emphasizing the importance of sustainable development over short-term gains [6][8]. - The article warns against the dangers of capital-driven strategies that prioritize short-term profits, which could lead to unsustainable business practices [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The automotive industry must adopt an inward-looking approach to control scale and address the issue of vicious competition, emphasizing self-regulation and technological innovation to enhance global competitiveness [1][4]. Group 1: Industry Challenges - The phenomenon of vicious competition is exacerbated by uncontrolled capacity expansion, with over 20 million units of new energy vehicle capacity remaining to be digested in the domestic market as of Q1 2025, where the capacity utilization rate stands at 71.9% [2]. - Major automotive companies, including Geely, are halting the construction of new production facilities to avoid redundant capacity and are focusing on utilizing existing global surplus capacity [2][3]. Group 2: Technological Innovation - Companies are urged to enhance their core competencies and technological capabilities to gain consumer recognition and ensure sustainable development [4]. - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology emphasizes the importance of quality and innovation, encouraging firms to reflect on their core technologies and long-term market competitiveness [4]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The government has shown a strong commitment to addressing the issue of vicious competition, with initiatives outlined in various meetings and reports aimed at maintaining fair competition and preventing price wars [5][6]. - The China Automotive Industry Association has called for adherence to fair competition practices and has opposed bottomless price wars, indicating a shift towards stricter regulatory measures [5][6].