Core Viewpoint - China's dominance in the semiconductor sector is extending into the memory chip domain, where South Korea's Samsung and SK Hynix have traditionally held the lead. Despite U.S. export tariffs, China remains the second-largest player globally in memory technology [3][4]. Group 1: Semiconductor Landscape - A recent report by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP) indicates that China's semiconductor capabilities are increasingly evident in key technology areas, surpassing South Korea in almost all semiconductor technology fields, including memory [3][4]. - The report highlights a significant shift in the global semiconductor landscape, with China now leading in memory chip technology, a domain where South Korean companies have maintained dominance for a generation [3][4]. Group 2: Technological Assessment - China's high-density resistive memory technology scored 94.1%, surpassing South Korea's 90.9%, marking a critical development in a sector where South Korea has historically excelled [5]. - In various semiconductor fields, China has shown notable progress: 88.3% in high-performance low-power AI semiconductors (South Korea: 84.1%), 79.8% in power semiconductors (South Korea: 67.5%), and 83.9% in next-generation high-performance sensing technology (South Korea: 81.3%) [5]. Group 3: Industry Challenges and Opportunities - The report emphasizes concerns regarding geopolitical tensions affecting South Korea's semiconductor industry, including risks of decreased exports due to U.S. export controls and potential withdrawal from the Chinese market [7]. - To maintain its leading position, South Korea must address weaknesses in its foundational capabilities and design technologies, as its economic success heavily relies on its semiconductor market leadership [7]. - Despite facing international restrictions, China's rapid development in the semiconductor sector, particularly in memory technology, indicates the effectiveness of its national strategy aimed at achieving technological self-sufficiency [7].

Core Viewpoint - Continental Group's automotive division has established the Advanced Electronic and Semiconductor Solutions (AESS) department to enhance resilience and ensure future success by developing automotive semiconductors internally, in partnership with GlobalFoundries (GF) [1][2]. Group 1: Strategic Initiatives - The establishment of AESS aims to design and validate semiconductors to meet internal demands, addressing the growing need for semiconductors in software-defined vehicles [1]. - The global automotive semiconductor market is projected to reach approximately €110 billion by 2032, necessitating increased investment in semiconductor development for long-term success [1]. - The move to create a fabless semiconductor company is intended to reduce geopolitical risks and enhance Continental's autonomy in the semiconductor field [1][2]. Group 2: Collaboration and Technology - GF will serve as the manufacturing partner for AESS, leveraging its advanced automotive-grade process technology and global manufacturing capabilities to support the development of innovative solutions for next-generation vehicles [2]. - The collaboration with GF is part of a broader strategy to enhance semiconductor production design and management capabilities, thereby improving market position and self-sufficiency [2]. Group 3: Organizational Impact - The new organizational structure is designed to support the automotive group's business by creating a resilient supply chain, improving product quality, and reducing time-to-market [3]. - AESS is expected to generate value through cost savings and efficiency improvements, which will enhance the company's cash flow [3]. - The establishment of AESS is seen as a way to solidify Continental's position as a leading automotive parts manufacturer and create new internal development opportunities [4].

如果您希望可以时常见面，欢迎标星收藏哦~ 来源：内容 来自网络 。 美国总统唐纳德·特朗普近日宣称，政府将"审视半导体和整个电子供应链"。考虑到他多次承诺要 对进口芯片征收关税，我们可以预见一些措施即将出台。但问题是，这些措施会是什么类型？目的 又是什么？ 根据贸易数据，美国每年进口约300亿美元的芯片，主要来自东南亚。但征收关税是否会促使企业 以本土制造的芯片取代进口芯片？答案是否定的。美国几乎不具备早在20世纪60年代起就外包到 亚洲的那类劳动密集型封装和组装能力。 因此，如果美国真的对半导体征收关税，企业可能反而会为了抵消成本上升而将更多制造环节转移 到海外。原本是进口芯片并在本土组装到电器或汽车上的供应商，可能会选择将整个制造流程搬到 海外。虽然这些成品最终仍需缴纳关税，但至少制造成本更低。 实际上，大多数芯片已经是作为其他设备的一部分进入美国的。为了捕捉这类贸易，美国政府正在 考虑一项更为激进的措施：对半导体征收所谓的"组件关税"。这意味着要计算设备中所含外国芯片 的价值，并据此征税。 这种做法符合现代供应链的多国化特点。例如，一部iPhone可能是在中国大陆组装的，但大多数 关键组件却来自其他地区 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of potential tariffs on semiconductors and the electronic supply chain in the U.S., highlighting that such measures may not achieve their intended goals and could lead to increased manufacturing costs and further offshoring of production [1][3]. Group 1: Tariff Implications - The U.S. imports approximately $30 billion worth of chips annually, primarily from Southeast Asia, and imposing tariffs may not encourage domestic manufacturing due to a lack of labor-intensive packaging and assembly capabilities [1]. - If tariffs are implemented, companies might shift more manufacturing processes overseas to mitigate rising costs, potentially leading to a situation where entire manufacturing processes are relocated rather than just the assembly of imported chips [1][2]. - The U.S. government is considering a more aggressive approach by implementing "component tariffs," which would tax the value of foreign chips embedded in imported devices, reflecting the complexities of modern supply chains [2][3]. Group 2: Challenges of Domestic Manufacturing - The article raises the question of what issues the semiconductor tariffs aim to address, noting that targeting Chinese chips could be a low-cost solution, but the broader goal of reshaping trade relations with China is more complex [3]. - The construction of new chip factories takes years, and immediate tariff implementation could exacerbate economic pressures, potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession [3][4]. - The ambition for semiconductor self-sufficiency in the U.S. faces significant challenges, including reliance on critical manufacturing equipment produced by a limited number of companies in Japan and the Netherlands, which could increase domestic production costs and reduce competitiveness [3][4]. Group 3: Global Semiconductor Industry - A large-scale tariff approach is unlikely to achieve the goal of self-sufficiency, as the U.S. economy heavily relies on chips, particularly for AI ambitions that require substantial computing power [4]. - A more viable strategy would be to develop a global semiconductor industry that is both reliable and efficient, rather than attempting to isolate and self-sustain the domestic market [4].