Group 1 - The core idea of the article revolves around the principle "the initiator of war controls the start, while the opponent controls the end" [1][2][5] - The historical context of the Pacific War illustrates that Japan underestimated the United States' strategic resolve and industrial capacity, leading to a deviation from their initial war objectives [4][5] - The article emphasizes that modern warfare often begins with limited goals, but can escalate uncontrollably, as seen in historical examples like World War I and the Vietnam War [6][7][8] Group 2 - In the context of business competition, the principle "the initiator of war controls the start, while the opponent controls the end" applies, highlighting the challenges of ending competitive conflicts [12][14] - The example of the food delivery market illustrates how companies like JD.com and Meituan engage in competitive battles, where the control of the endgame shifts among players like Alibaba and Pinduoduo [13][15][20] - The article notes that the ultimate control over the competition may also lie with regulatory bodies, which can intervene if competition becomes disorderly [21] Group 3 - The concept of "the initiator of war controls the start, while the opponent controls the end" is also relevant in public opinion battles, where initial control can lead to unforeseen consequences [23][25] - The case of the Wuhan University library controversy demonstrates how the initiator can lose control over the narrative, leading to backlash [24][25] - The article discusses how silence and restraint can preserve the "endgame control" in public opinion scenarios, as seen with Nongfu Spring's response to controversies [27][28] Group 4 - In investment, the principle is reflected in the saying "buying is easy, selling is hard," where the buyer initiates the action, but market conditions dictate the outcome [30][31] - Experienced investors prepare for various scenarios, ensuring they have strategies in place to manage their exit points effectively [32][33] - The article highlights that successful investors often focus on long-term strategies, allowing them to navigate market fluctuations without the pressure to sell prematurely [34][35]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a video collection activity themed around "business wars," showcasing unconventional storytelling approaches by creators, diverging from traditional narratives of brand and price battles [2]. Summary by Sections Featured Works - The first highlighted video, "The Behind-the-Scenes Struggle Comparable to Palace Dramas: The Inside Story of the Wahaha Inheritance Dispute," provides a detailed exploration of the controversy, engaging viewers for its thoroughness despite some disputed information [3]. - The second video, "Why Did the Dumpling King 'Yuanji Yunjiao' Fail?" addresses food safety concerns that resonate with consumers, reflecting the impact of such issues on brand reputation [4]. - The third entry, "The State Steps In to Halt the Takeout Three Kingdoms: What Will the Future of the Single Economy Look Like?" discusses the implications of regulatory actions on the evolving single economy, garnering significant viewer engagement with nearly 200,000 views and over 8,000 comments [5]. - The fourth video, "Starting from 'Nezha 2', Discussing the Power Games of Hong Kong's 'Four Big Families'," presents a conventional topic but maintains an engaging narrative style characteristic of Hong Kong cinema [6]. - The fifth piece, "A Pie from the Sky? Think Again, Starbucks Should Pay You Instead," employs humor and a logical twist to engage the audience, illustrating that business conflicts can occur in various settings beyond corporate environments [7]. About the Video Platform - The platform, Tiger Sniff Video, aims to become a brand with insights, expressiveness, and viewpoints in the fields of business, technology, and social observation, currently hosting over 500 talented video creators [6]. - Creators are encouraged to submit their works for potential features on the homepage, weekly prize opportunities, and chances for their quality content to be shared on the Tiger Sniff video account, increasing visibility [7].

Core Insights - The article discusses a video contest themed around "business warfare," showcasing unconventional approaches to storytelling in the commercial world [1] Group 1: Contest Overview - The contest invited creators to submit videos focusing on various aspects of business competition, with an emphasis on unique narratives rather than traditional brand or price wars [1] - Five standout videos were selected based on metrics such as views and interactions, highlighting innovative takes on business conflicts [1] Group 2: Featured Videos - Video 1: "Behind the Scenes of Wahaha's Inheritance Battle" by "Self-Talking CEO," praised for its detailed exploration of a controversial topic, engaging viewers for 30 minutes [2] - Video 2: "Why Did Dumpling King 'Yuanji Yunjiao' Fail?" by "Big Eye Theory," addressing food safety concerns that resonate with consumers [4] - Video 3: "Government Intervention in Food Delivery Wars: What’s Next for the Single Economy?" by "Xijing Comrade," which garnered nearly 2 million views and over 8,000 comments, reflecting the interests of young singles [6] - Video 4: "Discussing the Power Games of Hong Kong's 'Four Families' Starting from 'Nezha 2'" by "Canned Fish Ball," noted for its engaging narrative style [8] - Video 5: "Starbucks Should Pay You Instead of the Other Way Around" by "Half Buddha," recognized for its humorous and thought-provoking content [12] Group 3: Conclusion - The article emphasizes that business conflicts can occur in various settings beyond traditional corporate environments, illustrating the diverse nature of commercial competition [12] - The contest encourages further participation from creators, inviting them to share their unique perspectives on business themes [13]

Group 1 - The article highlights a significant consumer event in July 2025, marked by a "0 yuan milk tea purchase" subsidy war, which captivated young people's social circles [1] - A legal battle over a 15 billion RMB inheritance involving Wahaha has emerged, challenging the public perception of the company's heiress [1] - Sam's Club is facing a trust crisis among middle-class consumers, leading to a wave of membership cancellations and widespread skepticism about its membership model [1] Group 2 - The article suggests that 2025 is a pivotal year for business wars, with notable power shifts in companies like Vanke, Gree, and Wahaha [1] - Intense competition is observed in sectors such as liquor, dairy, e-commerce, and automotive industries [1] - The article notes the price wars among new automotive companies and the overwhelming crowds outside milk tea shops, indicating a vibrant consumer market [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the historical relationship and rivalry between Huawei and Cisco, highlighting key events that shaped their interactions and the competitive landscape in the telecommunications industry. Group 1: Historical Context - The first contact between Huawei and Cisco occurred in 1997, but it was missed due to Cisco's CEO, Chambers, being on a business trip [4][5]. - After the missed meeting, Huawei learned from IBM, which significantly improved its research and development capabilities [7]. Group 2: Competitive Dynamics - In 2002, Huawei showcased its products at a telecom equipment exhibition in Atlanta, offering prices 20% to 50% lower than Cisco's comparable products [9]. - Following this, Chambers visited Huawei's booth, leading to the establishment of a task force at Cisco to counter Huawei's growing presence [14]. Group 3: Legal Battles and Resolutions - Cisco filed a lawsuit against Huawei in 2003, claiming infringement of intellectual property rights, which lasted over a year before both companies reached a settlement [16][14]. Group 4: Evolving Relationship - After the lawsuit settlement, Chambers visited Huawei in 2005, where he expressed admiration for Huawei's competitiveness [19]. - Over the years, both leaders acknowledged each other as worthy opponents, with Chambers inviting Ren Zhengfei to visit the U.S. and Ren humorously declining, citing a preference for Europe [25]. Group 5: Learning from Competitors - In 2020, Ren emphasized the importance of learning from great competitors like Chambers, despite Huawei facing significant challenges from U.S. pressures [27].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent price increases in the gaming industry, particularly focusing on Xbox, Nintendo, and Sony, highlighting how Sony has unexpectedly emerged as a moral leader in the gaming space due to the aggressive pricing strategies of its competitors [1][3]. Group 1: Price Increases - Xbox has announced a price increase across its entire product line, including consoles, accessories, and games, marking a significant shift in the market [1]. - Nintendo has also raised the price of its upcoming console, the NS2, and increased game prices to $80, contributing to the overall trend of rising costs in the gaming industry [1][3]. - Sony has not made any recent price changes, which has led to a perception of it being the most reasonable option among the three major companies [3][4]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The article notes that the gaming industry has shifted from a focus on technological competition to a "race to the bottom" in terms of pricing and product quality [6]. - The price of AAA games has increased from $60 to $70 over 15 years, and the jump to $80 occurred in just three years, indicating a rapid escalation in costs without a corresponding increase in game quality [8]. - The perception of Sony as a moral company is contrasted with its historical reputation, suggesting that simply maintaining current pricing strategies can position a company favorably in a competitive landscape [4][6]. Group 3: Consumer Sentiment - Players are increasingly frustrated with the quality of games, often receiving "early access" versions instead of fully completed products, despite paying premium prices [8]. - The article implies that the current market environment allows companies to gain a positive reputation simply by not engaging in aggressive pricing strategies, highlighting a shift in consumer expectations [8].

中国互联网两个时代的碰撞。 2017 年，腾讯是中国市值最高的互联网公司，除了阿里，没有公司能真正和它叫板。但字节跳动却 凭算法异军突起，让腾讯遭遇几年来最大的威胁。随后六年间，两家公司在多条业务上全线开战， 上演了中国互联网历史上最重要的商战之一 。 这期视频我们就来还原这场跌宕起伏的商战，分析不同时代诞生的两代互联网巨头，如何此消彼 长、渐行渐远又殊途同归。 点击下方，观看视频。 欢迎大家关注我们的微信视频号，此外，你还可以在各大平台搜索 "晚点 LatePost" 找到并关注我 们，不错过每一期视频的更新。如果你有希望晚点制作的视频内容，也欢迎在后台留言告诉我们。 各平台搜索 "晚点LatePost" 关注我们 好的商业故事不仅值得被读到，更值得被看到、听到、感受到。借助影像、动画、声音，视频这种载体让我们得以用更丰 富的手法去呈现复杂的商业世界，也让被讲过一遍的故事有了新的生命力。如果你是《晚点 LatePost》的读者，相信你也 会成为我们的观众。 · FIN · 战争与和平:字节跳动与腾讯的六年纠葛 ★ 星标指南 04:01 1. 点击右上角 < 晚点 LatePost 北京晚达科技有限公司 参 ...