Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent controversy surrounding Yushu Technology's A-share listing, emphasizing that the company has not applied for a "green channel" and that its listing process is proceeding normally [1][3]. Group 1: Listing and Market Concerns - Yushu Technology issued a strong statement denying reports of its listing being halted, clarifying that it has never applied for a "green channel" and that its listing work is progressing as planned [1][3]. - The market is more concerned about whether there is a bubble in the robotics sector, with the founder of Yushu Technology, Wang Xingxing, suggesting that current concerns about a bubble may not hold true in the long term [4][11]. - Wang argues that the perception of a bubble should be viewed as a natural phase in industry development rather than a moral judgment, as many important industries have gone through similar processes before maturing [5][6]. Group 2: Technological Challenges and Ethical Concerns - The core issue facing humanoid robots is not a wrong direction but rather the failure to cross a critical threshold, with hardware and algorithmic limitations hindering efficiency and reliability [8][10]. - Wang compares the current state of robotics to early automobiles, suggesting that while technology may be "usable but not perfect," it is approaching a critical transformation [9]. - Ethical concerns are highlighted, with Wang emphasizing the risks of robots being misused and the potential for public misunderstanding, which could lead to negative perceptions of the technology [10][11]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The article concludes that for Yushu Technology, the listing is merely a matter of time, and the real determinants of its future will be product demand, technological leadership, and cost sustainability after any market corrections [12]. - The presence of bubbles is acknowledged as part of the industry's evolution, with the expectation that only companies that focus on genuine product development will survive the inevitable market fluctuations [12].

技术伦理绝不应是弱不禁风的"纸面防线"。部分开发者和企业以"技术中立"为幌子，故意降低操作门 槛、内置规避审核功能，一边制造风险一边推卸责任，让技术伦理沦为空谈。技术无罪，但使用技术的 人和平台必须有责。明确平台、开发者、使用者三方责任，给技术装上"刹车"，让溯源标识成为"身份 证"，让违法者付出代价，技术才能真正造福于人，而非沦为滋生乱象的温床。 朱绍岳/文张书信/图 近日，国家广电总局部署开展"AI魔改"视频的专项治理和重点清理，认定部分网络账号滥用AI工具，对 经典影视、动画片等进行颠覆性篡改、魔性解构与低俗化改编的内容严重背离经典作品精神内核，扰乱 网络传播秩序，助长侵权行为，危害行业发展，干扰未成年人形成正确文化认知和现实感知。 ...

你有没有发现一个怪现象？ 现在去买菜，机器比你自己还清楚你爱吃什么；凌晨嗓子疼，AI医生比朋友回消息还快。爽是真的爽，但心里那点慌，也是真 的。 很多人以为这是"消费升级"，其实更准确的说法是——消费逻辑换代了。 过去是商家决定你买什么，现在是你的每一次点击、停留和吐槽，直接在"指 挥"生产线。直播间AI导购、智能家电自动维护，本质不是讨好你，而是在减少资源错配、压缩浪费成本。 更深的变化，是边界正在消失。 线上、线下、娱乐、医疗、服务，被技术揉成一个整体。戴上VR逛圆明园、AI先诊断再无缝挂号，消费不再是"付钱买 货"，而是"进入一个场景"。交易只是顺手完成的动作，不再是主剧情。 问题也随之而来。 个性化越精准，数据就越"贪吃"；算法越聪明，"杀熟"和歧视的风险就越高。技术如果只追效率、不讲伦理，就会从"懂你"变成"算 你"。 这不是技术问题，而是规则和底线的问题。 真正的分水岭，在于"向善"。智慧消费不能只服务一二线城市，也不能以牺牲隐私为代价。当县城老人用得起智能设备，当普通人的数据被认真保护，聪明 才配得上信任。 《刷脸买菜、AI问诊，这届智慧消费为什么让人既爽又慌？》 ——万亿级市场狂奔，技术在加速 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 高端跨学科对话平台"玉河夜话"创办十周年之际，近日在北京大华城市演艺中心歌剧院举办了一场 以"AI时代的浮士德"为主题的思想盛会。活动开创性地以沉浸式"思想剧场"形式，汇聚十位顶尖跨界嘉 宾，与观众共同展开了一场关于技术伦理、人性本质与创造未来的深度思辨。 本次活动突破传统论坛模式，舞台由著名导演易立明与资深舞台设计师曾力联袂构建，以《浮士德》哲 学意象为基底，营造出充满象征与沉浸感的对话空间。开场环节，"玉河夜话"创始人、主导人翁菱身着 灵感源自梅菲斯特的先锋服饰，于乐池中缓缓登场，宛若向当代知识界发出探索技术与人性边界的邀 约，奠定了全场深刻而富有张力的思辨基调。 面对时代之问，十位来自不同领域的嘉宾化身"当代浮士德"，从多维度展开深度应答。思想家、经济学 家朱嘉明剖析了歌德时代浮士德1.0版本和AI时代的浮士德2.0的精神演变，环境数据专家马军探讨科技 赋能生态治理的潜力与局限，解读技术与社会的共生关系。物理生物学家汤超院士阐述了AI推动科研 范式变革、重塑科学方法的深远影响，同时指出可解释性与人类价值重定等挑战。人工智能专家冯俊兰 博士以熵减为脉络，对比生命与AI在自组织、涌现、 ...

Core Viewpoint - A video demonstrating a battery ejection technology during thermal runaway has sparked controversy, highlighting public concerns about safety and ethical implications in automotive technology development [3][4][6]. Group 1: Technology Development - The battery ejection technology, developed by the China Collision Repair Technology Center in collaboration with Joyson Electronics, aims to separate the battery from the vehicle during thermal runaway, potentially ejecting it 3 to 6 meters away [3]. - The technology was initially conceived during research on a "side-in battery swapping" method, leading to the idea of battery ejection to prevent more severe damage to the vehicle in extreme situations [5]. - The developers emphasized that the ejection mechanism would only activate in absolutely safe environments, and the technology is still in the experimental stage with no immediate plans for implementation [5][6]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Ethical Concerns - The public reaction to the technology has been mixed, with some expressing distrust towards the "black box" nature of the technology and concerns about being the "sacrificial third party" in case of failure [6]. - There is skepticism regarding manufacturers' motives, questioning whether they might prioritize cost-saving over public safety, reflecting a broader demand for transparency in risk assessment and social dialogue [6][7]. - Historical examples of companies prioritizing profit over public interest, such as the emissions scandal involving a foreign automotive brand, underscore the need for ethical considerations in technology development [6][7]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The emergence of new technologies in the electric vehicle sector presents both opportunities and challenges, with manufacturers facing increased pressure to balance innovation with ethical responsibilities [7]. - The battery ejection technology serves as a reminder of the ethical blind spots in technology design, emphasizing the importance of social responsibility and public safety in future innovations [7].

Core Viewpoint - The recent demonstration of a battery ejection technology by a vehicle affiliated with the "China Collision Repair Technology Center" has sparked significant public debate and concern regarding safety and ethical implications of such innovations [1][2][4]. Group 1: Technology Development - The battery ejection technology was developed in response to research on a "side-in battery swap" method, leading to the idea of ejecting the battery in extreme situations to prevent greater damage to the vehicle [3]. - The developers emphasized that the ejection mechanism would only activate in absolutely safe environments, indicating a commitment to safety [3]. - The technology is currently in the experimental stage, with no immediate plans for practical application, and aims to enhance understanding of battery thermal runaway mechanisms and safety strategies [3][4]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Ethical Concerns - The public's reaction to the technology has been mixed, with concerns about becoming "sacrificial third parties" and skepticism towards manufacturers' motives, fearing cost-cutting measures at the expense of safety [4]. - The incident highlights a broader societal issue regarding trust in "black box" technologies and the need for transparency in risk assessments related to public safety [4][5]. - Historical examples of companies prioritizing profit over public safety, such as the "Dieselgate" scandal, have fueled public apprehension about new technologies [4]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The emergence of new technologies in the electric vehicle sector presents both opportunities and challenges, with manufacturers facing increased pressure to adhere to ethical standards [5]. - The battery ejection technology serves as an extreme example, but many new technologies may pose safety risks that the public cannot easily identify, necessitating strict self-regulation by developers and rigorous oversight by regulatory bodies [5]. - The industry must balance innovation with social responsibility and public safety to mitigate potential negative impacts of technological advancements [6].

原标题：以技术向善守护用户权益 近日，某短视频平台出现利用人工智能深度伪造全红婵、孙颖莎、王楚钦等奥运冠军的声音推销土 鸡蛋的现象，引发公众对技术伦理失范的讨论。 人工智能、大数据等新兴技术蓬勃发展，为数字经济注入强劲动力，在提升社会效率、优化用户体 验等方面发挥了重要作用。但技术是把"双刃剑"，技术创新惠及经济社会发展的同时，也伴生着诸多不 可忽视的风险。 前端研发是技术创新的源头，也是伦理保障的第一道防线。研发团队在追求技术创新与市场效益的 同时，应高度重视新技术、新事物可能带来的社会风险，不能以"价值中立"回避责任。应主动将伦理标 尺置于设计研发之初，将责任意识嵌入技术创新基因，通过"伦理先行"构筑防范技术体系，才能让技术 创新始终围绕用户需求、贴合社会价值。 新兴技术功能越是强大，被黑灰产滥用的风险越高。整治打击网络黑灰产是后端治理的重点，需要 社会各界形成协同共治合力。其中，平台企业应更好承担主体责任，充分运用大数据、人工智能等技 术，提升识别精度与处置效率；同时，畅通用户举报渠道，建立快速响应机制，确保侵权行为得到及时 处理。 守住技术伦理底线，不仅是新兴技术持续发展的前提，更是数字时代服务亿万用 ...

8月12日，埃隆·马斯克在社交平台X上发布了一则爆炸性指控。 他声称，苹果正在利用App Store的机制，使得除了OpenAI之外的任何AI公司都无法登上榜首。 马斯克将此行为称作"明确的反垄断行为"，并表示其旗下公司xAI将立即采取法律行动。 这条指控迅速引发轰动，浏览量迅速突破千万级，在科技圈和投资圈掀起轩然大波。 马斯克的原文措辞直接，他断言"只有OpenAI能上榜一"。马斯克是在OpenAI与苹果宣布合作之后提出这一指控。他所指的，是2024年6月10日，OpenAI 与苹果正式宣布合作，ChatGPT集成到Siri及系统级体验。 不过，这一说法很快遭到打脸。 有网友贴出数据指出，2025年1月，DeepSeek曾登上App Store总榜榜首；2025年7月18日，Perplexity也在印度市场登顶。 这些现象都发生在OpenAI和苹果合作之后。 这说明，即便存在合作，也并未阻止其他AI产品登顶，马斯克"只有OpenAI能上榜一"的说法并不成立。 01 奥特曼强势反击 面对马斯克的指控，OpenAI CEO萨姆·奥特曼第一时间做出回应。 这句话直指马斯克老底，把战火引向了X平台本身。 奥特曼甚至 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence of the "AI Migrant" generation, a group that navigates the complexities of life in an AI-dominated world, experiencing both disconnection and adaptation as they transition from pre-AI to post-AI realities [4][12]. Group 1: AI's Impact on Work and Education - AI is reshaping the nature of work, creating new job types while eliminating traditional roles, as highlighted in the World Economic Forum's 2023 report [4][17]. - The "AI Migrant" generation has experienced a significant shift in education from standardized teaching to personalized learning, influenced by AI technologies [7][16]. - The skills required in the workforce are evolving rapidly, with the skill update cycle shrinking from ten years to as short as three years, necessitating continuous learning and adaptation [18][19]. Group 2: Social and Cultural Dynamics - The distribution of the "AI Migrant" generation is uneven across urban and rural areas, with varying levels of AI penetration affecting their experiences [5][13]. - This generation embodies a mix of passive migration and active adaptation, reflecting a blend of old and new identities shaped by technological advancements [12][20]. - The cultural identity of the "AI Migrant" generation is characterized by a unique subculture that values efficiency, innovation, and freedom, while also facing challenges like anxiety and burnout [13][24]. Group 3: Ethical Considerations and Responsibilities - The "AI Migrant" generation is increasingly aware of ethical issues surrounding AI, such as algorithmic bias and data privacy, and they advocate for responsible AI development [21][23]. - Their ethical awakening emphasizes the importance of individual rights and the need for diverse perspectives in technology development to ensure fairness and inclusivity [22][23]. - The generation's commitment to ethical practices reflects a broader responsibility towards society and future generations, as they navigate the complexities of AI's impact on human life [25][27].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential benefits and risks of AI companions in alleviating loneliness, emphasizing that while they may provide comfort, they could also undermine personal growth and the value of real human relationships [3][5][24]. Group 1: AI Companions and Loneliness - AI companions can offer solace to marginalized groups, such as the elderly and socially isolated individuals, acting as a digital painkiller [5][24]. - AI's ability to simulate empathy may surpass that of human caregivers, as studies show AI like ChatGPT often performs better in expressing understanding and empathy compared to human doctors [5][8]. - The phenomenon of loneliness is increasingly recognized as a serious issue, prompting government attention in countries like Japan and the UK, which have appointed ministers to address loneliness [6][24]. Group 2: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives - The article explores the dual nature of AI companions, presenting them as both a source of hope and a potential threat to human emotional needs [3][5]. - Loneliness serves as a biological signal that drives individuals to seek social connections, and if AI alleviates this pain too effectively, it may diminish the motivation to foster real relationships [5][20]. - The concept of "artificial empathy" raises ethical questions about the nature of relationships formed with AI, as true understanding is simulated rather than genuine [5][13]. Group 3: Societal Implications - The increasing reliance on AI for companionship may lead to a societal shift where genuine human connections become less valued, particularly among younger generations [24]. - Critics argue that AI companions could exacerbate cognitive biases and mental health issues by failing to challenge users, potentially leading to a lack of personal growth [5][22]. - The article suggests that while AI can provide immediate comfort, it may also lead to a loss of essential human experiences and the motivation to connect with others [24].