2025年7月，全国单月用电量首次突破10,226亿千瓦时，这个数字有多震撼？ 它相当于东盟国家全年的用电量总和（2023年东盟十国全年发电量约1.1万亿度），而中国仅用一个月就达到了这一规模。 更惊人的是，这一数字比2015年7月的5,031亿千瓦时整整翻了一番，十年间中国用电规模实现了指数级跨越。 网友@电工李哥感叹： "十年前我在车间数电表，一个月才几千度；现在一条芯片封装线一天就上万度！" 这种翻天覆地的变化，既是中国经济腾飞的缩影，也是全球能源格局重塑的起点。 官方原声：用电量十年翻番 国家能源局2025年1月发布的数据显示，2024年全社会用电量达98,521亿千瓦时，同比增长6.8%，其中7月单月10,226亿千瓦时的峰值尤为瞩目 。 中电联报告指出，以2020年为基期，2024年全行业用电指数增长29.5%，年均增幅6.7%。 这组数据背后，是中国经济稳中向好的基本面——高技术及装备制造业用电量增速连续四年领跑，互联网、充换电等新兴产业更是以年均超20%的速度增 长，成为拉动用电需求的核心引擎。 网友@数据小马甲直言："官方盖章，十年翻倍，牛！" 1万亿度电花在哪？——官方分项账本 （一）第一 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights the challenges faced by Chinese companies in India, particularly focusing on the case of Baobian Electric, which sold its 90% stake in its Indian subsidiary for approximately 137 million RMB after incurring significant losses over six years [1][2][29] - Baobian Electric aimed to establish a foothold in the Indian market in 2016 but faced continuous losses, ultimately leading to its exit from the market [2][29] - The article discusses the advanced technology of Baobian Electric in the field of ultra-high voltage transformers, emphasizing its critical role in China's power infrastructure [3][4][12] Group 2 - The article points out that India's strategy of acquiring foreign technology often results in a lack of capability to fully industrialize or implement these technologies effectively [6][9][12] - It provides examples of previous collaborations where Indian companies have benefited from Chinese technology but struggled to replicate the success due to systemic industrial shortcomings [7][9][12] - The article argues that India's approach to foreign investment and technology acquisition is driven by a combination of historical factors and current political strategies, leading to a focus on short-term gains rather than sustainable industrial development [18][26][39] Group 3 - The article suggests that the current global industrialization window has closed for India, making it increasingly reliant on opportunistic strategies to acquire technology from foreign companies [23][25][26] - It discusses the implications of India's political and social structure on its industrialization efforts, highlighting the challenges posed by regional governance and resource allocation [21][23][39] - The article concludes that the contrasting historical experiences of China and India shape their respective approaches to globalization and industrialization, with China having a more cohesive strategy for development [40][41]