Market Overview - On September 12, the domestic futures market saw mixed results, with the main contracts showing varied performance. Notably, silver rose over 2%, while the shipping index for Europe fell over 5%, and low-sulfur fuel oil dropped more than 3%. Additionally, crude oil, fuel, and asphalt all declined by over 2% [2]. Silver Market Analysis - Analysts from Everbright Futures attribute the recent rise in silver prices to the U.S. August Consumer Price Index (CPI) which remained at 2.9%, aligning with expectations and showing a slight increase from the previous value of 2.7%. The core CPI also matched expectations at 3.1% year-on-year and 0.3% month-on-month [4]. - The market is reacting to the low inflation environment and disappointing employment data, which may lead to more frequent or larger interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. The initial jobless claims for the week ending September 6 reached 263,000, the highest since October 2021, significantly exceeding the market expectation of 235,000 [4]. - The gold-silver ratio has decreased to approximately 87.5, indicating a potential rebound in silver prices as it aligns with expectations. However, there is a noted decline in market positions following silver's price surpassing 10,000, suggesting caution against chasing high prices [4].

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the nomination of E.J. Antony by President Trump to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) following the dismissal of the previous director due to dissatisfaction with employment data [1][4]. - The U.S. labor market shows signs of cooling, with July's non-farm payrolls adding only 73,000 jobs, significantly below the expected 110,000, and the unemployment rate rising by 0.1 percentage points to 4.2% [2][4]. - Antony, who has been critical of the previous employment data, is expected to ensure the accuracy of the data published by the BLS, which has faced scrutiny regarding its reliability [1][5]. Group 2 - The nomination comes just before the scheduled release of July inflation data, with expectations that consumer prices will rise for the third consecutive month due to the impact of Trump's tariff policies [4]. - Concerns have been raised about the reliability of U.S. economic data, with a significant number of economists expressing worries about the declining quality of data collection and reporting by the BLS [5]. - The BLS has faced challenges such as reduced staffing and budget cuts, leading to a decrease in the sample size for the Consumer Price Index and the cessation of certain data releases, which may further compromise data integrity [5].

Group 1 - The core point of the news is the nomination of E.J. Antony by President Trump to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) following dissatisfaction with the employment data released by the BLS [1] - The U.S. unemployment rate increased by 0.1 percentage points to 4.2% in July, with non-farm payrolls adding only 73,000 jobs, significantly below the market expectation of 110,000 [1] - The previous employment data for May and June was revised down sharply, indicating a cooling job market, with May's jobs revised from 144,000 to 19,000 and June's from 147,000 to 14,000 [1] Group 2 - The nomination of Antony is expected to face little resistance in the Senate, where the Republican Party holds a majority [2] - The announcement of the nomination came just before the scheduled release of July inflation data, with predictions of a continued rise in the Consumer Price Index due to Trump's tariff policies [2] - Concerns have been raised regarding the reliability of U.S. economic data, particularly due to declining response rates and difficulties in data collection faced by the BLS [2][3] Group 3 - A survey conducted by Reuters among 100 economists and policy experts revealed widespread concern about the declining quality of U.S. economic data [3] - Former BLS director Erica Groshen expressed worries that staffing reductions could lead to unnoticed biases or errors in economic reports [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve's balance sheet has decreased significantly, indicating a potential shift in monetary policy as employment data shows weakness and inflation trends downward [2][7][8]. Group 1: Balance Sheet Overview - The total size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet is $6.6408 trillion, down $17.35 billion from the previous week [2]. - The asset side includes $4.2045 trillion in Treasury securities and $2.1207 trillion in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) [2]. - The reserve balance reached $3.3304 trillion, showing an increase from the previous week [6]. Group 2: Liquidity Release - A total liquidity release of approximately $332.02 billion occurred this week, driven by a decrease in reverse repos and an increase in fiscal deposits [4][5]. Group 3: Employment Data and Economic Outlook - The U.S. added only 73,000 jobs in July, significantly below expectations, with the unemployment rate rising to 4.2% [7]. - Job data for the previous two months was revised downwards, indicating a weakening hiring momentum [7]. - Mary Daly, President of the San Francisco Fed, suggested that the Fed may need to consider rate cuts in the coming months due to the cooling job market [7][8]. Group 4: Inflation Trends - Excluding tariff impacts, inflation in the U.S. is showing a gradual decline, supported by economic slowdown and tightening monetary policy [8]. - The probability of the Fed maintaining interest rates in September is low at 6.4%, while the likelihood of a 25 basis point rate cut is high at 93.6% [8].

Group 1 - The July employment report in the U.S. was unexpectedly weak, raising concerns among Federal Reserve officials about the economic outlook [1] - Non-farm payrolls increased by only 73,000 in July, significantly below the market expectation of 110,000, while June's data was revised down from over 200,000 to just 14,000 [1] - Despite the disappointing employment data, the labor market is still considered "healthy" by some officials, with the unemployment rate remaining within a normal range over the past year [2] Group 2 - The manufacturing sector also showed signs of weakness, with the Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) falling from 49.0 in June to 48.0 in July, indicating continued contraction for the fifth consecutive month [1] - Federal Reserve officials are cautious about predicting further rate cuts in 2025, emphasizing the need for businesses to adjust pricing strategies in the current complex economic environment [1] - There are notable divisions among policymakers regarding the economic situation, reflecting the complexity of the current period [3]

Core Viewpoint - The simultaneous occurrence of the $39 billion 10-year U.S. Treasury auction and the critical Consumer Price Index (CPI) report is expected to create significant market volatility, breaking the recent calm in the U.S. Treasury market [1][4][6] Group 1: CPI Data Impact - The upcoming CPI report for May is a key indicator of U.S. inflation, directly influencing consumer living costs, business production costs, and the Federal Reserve's monetary policy direction [3][5] - If the CPI data exceeds market expectations, it may lead to increased inflation pressure, raising expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate hikes, which could result in falling bond prices and rising yields [5] - Conversely, if the CPI data is below expectations, it may ease inflation pressure, enhancing the appeal of U.S. Treasuries as a safe-haven asset, leading to rising bond prices and falling yields [5] Group 2: Treasury Auction Dynamics - The outcome of the 10-year Treasury auction will reflect market demand for U.S. Treasuries, influencing yields and the overall bond market [3][4] - A strong auction demand, indicated by a high bid-to-cover ratio, would suggest high market confidence in U.S. Treasuries, potentially stabilizing yields [5] - Conversely, weak auction results, such as a low bid-to-cover ratio or even a failed auction, could lead to a significant rise in yields and spread panic in the market [5] Group 3: Market Outlook - The combination of the CPI report and the Treasury auction is likely to signal the end of the recent period of calm in the U.S. Treasury market, prompting investors and financial institutions to reassess their strategies [4][6] - Global investors, financial institutions, and policymakers need to closely monitor these events, as they will influence future market dynamics and economic policies [6]