转债强赎

Search documents
可转债周报:2025H2转债强赎与不强赎的变化-20250915
Huachuang Securities· 2025-09-15 06:10
债券研究 证 券 研 究 报 告 【债券周报】 2025H2 转债强赎与不强赎的变化 ——可转债周报 20250915 不强赎承诺期时长回落稳定,结构上以 1-3 个月内的为主。从 2020 年下旬开 始发行人设置不强赎承诺期时长基本呈稳定增长的形态,直至 2024 年初达到 最高点:承诺期普遍在 200 天左右。但 2024 年下半年至今不强赎承诺期回落 至 100-150 天左右实现稳定。究其原因:一方面,早期由于信披规则不成熟, 部分公司选择反复做本次不强赎或者一个月内不强赎的公告,所以使得均值不 高,后续 3 个月或 6 个月及以上的承诺期逐渐成为市场主流。另一方面,由于 2023 年后较长时间权益市场走势偏弱,使得触发强赎的转债也偏少,公告不 强赎的转债基本为长期不考虑的发行人故在短期内将承诺期拉长。 上周爱科科技、中仑新材、南芯科技新增董事会预案、5 家新增股东大会通过、 3 家新增发审委审批通过、2 家新增证监会核准,较去年同期分别+3、+5、+2、 +1。 承诺期长短对转债估值影响不大。2025 年初以来不强赎公告次日的转股溢价 率从 2%一直抬升至 8%左右,但较 2022 年的高位仍有部分 ...
高估值+回调背景下的择券新思路
2025-09-07 16:19
Summary of Conference Call on Convertible Bond Market Industry Overview - The convertible bond market has experienced a significant adjustment, leading the stock market in this trend. Recent stabilization has been noted, but high-priced and small-cap convertible bonds have seen substantial declines, while large and mid-cap bonds remain relatively stable. Current bond prices are around 128 RMB, with premium rates at historical highs, necessitating attention to bonds with high redemption expectations, such as Jintian, which have limited upside potential [1][4]. Key Insights and Arguments - **Market Performance**: The convertible bond market remains active despite stock market volatility, with daily trading volumes between 700 billion to 900 billion RMB. The market's adjustment has been more pronounced than that of the stock market, with the Zhongzheng Convertible Bond Index dropping 2.82% on a specific day [2]. - **Future Outlook**: A positive outlook is maintained for the period from September to December, although some adjustments are expected. High-priced, mid-priced, and small-cap bonds have seen significant declines, while large and mid-cap bonds are more stable. Bonds with high premium rates or high P/E ratios should be excluded from investment considerations [3][12]. - **Selection Strategy**: The selection of convertible bonds is categorized into three types: - **Core Holdings**: Low-volatility bank bonds held for 6 months to 3 years. - **Allocation Type**: Focused on sectors like robotics and low-altitude economy, held for 1 to 6 months. - **Trading Type**: Driven by short-term events such as restructuring or shareholder changes, focusing on small-cap stocks with high turnover rates [7][10]. - **Risk Management**: Approximately 18 high-risk bonds have been identified for exclusion, including Fangyuan, Dongfang Shishang, and Wenke, due to management issues or poor financial conditions. Emphasis is placed on managing positions and optimizing investment portfolios [5][12]. Additional Important Content - **Bond Classification by Redemption Status**: Convertible bonds can be classified based on their redemption status, which influences their price ceilings and investment strategies. Categories include bonds unlikely to be redeemed in three months, those approaching redemption, and those with low conversion values [9][12]. - **Investment Opportunities**: Specific sectors such as solid-state batteries and photovoltaic panels are highlighted for their potential. Companies like Enjie and Tiantian Tianci are noted for their attractive valuations and market positions [6][20]. - **Performance Comparison**: Enjie and Tiantian Materials are both leaders in the lithium battery industry, but Enjie shows better investment value due to lower premium rates and a more favorable market position [21][22]. - **Operational Strategies**: For bonds nearing redemption, such as Lilo and Niutai, the recommendation is to avoid long-term investments due to limited upside and higher risks. Instead, focus on bonds with potential for price appreciation based on underlying stock performance [18]. - **Factor Selection Methodology**: Key indicators for selecting convertible bonds include stock valuation, terms, and industry conditions. The focus is on strong redemption clauses and overall market sentiment [19][25]. - **Adjustments in Selection Strategy**: Current strategies emphasize the importance of terms in response to market pressures and frequent redemptions, with a focus on small-cap stocks and high turnover rates to enhance overall portfolio performance [26].
南京银行:业绩稳健增长,转债强赎可期-20250605
HTSC· 2025-06-05 10:45
证券研究报告 南京银行 (601009 CH) 2025 年中期策略会速递— 业绩稳健增长,转债强赎可期 | 华泰研究 | | | 更新报告 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2025 年 | 6 月 | 05 日│中国内地 | 区域性银行 | 6 月 4 日南京银行出席我们组织的 2025 年中期策略会,核心要点包括:1) 预计全年信贷同比多增,但零售需求与风险改善趋势仍待观察;2)存款迎 重定价高峰,负债成本持续优化;3)转债转股可期,夯实公司资本。 信贷有力投放,资产质量稳健 南京银行 24 年/25Q1 贷款同比+14.3%/+14.7%,新增贷款 1573/897 亿元。 Q1 信贷有力投放,为全年奠定较好基础,公司预计能够顺利完成目标,实 现同比多增。年初以来零售投放回暖,主要系按揭增势较好。消费贷方面, 南银法巴在两年快速增长后逐步进入稳定期,平台贷款方面更加谨慎,今年 整体会在管控风险的前提下进行零售投放安排。资产质量表现看,公司不良 走势平稳,25Q1 不良率环比持平至 0.83%。零售不良生成短期或仍有波动, 但随存量不良出清,更多核销资源向零售倾斜,25Q1 零 ...
南京银行(601009):业绩稳健增长,转债强赎可期
HTSC· 2025-06-05 10:19
证券研究报告 南京银行 (601009 CH) 2025 年中期策略会速递— 业绩稳健增长,转债强赎可期 | 华泰研究 | | | 更新报告 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2025 年 | 6 月 | 05 日│中国内地 | 区域性银行 | 6 月 4 日南京银行出席我们组织的 2025 年中期策略会,核心要点包括:1) 预计全年信贷同比多增,但零售需求与风险改善趋势仍待观察;2)存款迎 重定价高峰,负债成本持续优化;3)转债转股可期,夯实公司资本。 信贷有力投放,资产质量稳健 南京银行 24 年/25Q1 贷款同比+14.3%/+14.7%,新增贷款 1573/897 亿元。 Q1 信贷有力投放,为全年奠定较好基础,公司预计能够顺利完成目标,实 现同比多增。年初以来零售投放回暖,主要系按揭增势较好。消费贷方面, 南银法巴在两年快速增长后逐步进入稳定期,平台贷款方面更加谨慎,今年 整体会在管控风险的前提下进行零售投放安排。资产质量表现看,公司不良 走势平稳,25Q1 不良率环比持平至 0.83%。零售不良生成短期或仍有波动, 但随存量不良出清,更多核销资源向零售倾斜,25Q1 零 ...
转债强赎退出比例接近70%,业内:有望吸引更多资金流入转债市场
news flash· 2025-05-13 21:45
据统计,2024年上半年,由于市场行情比较低迷,以强赎方式退出的转债占比为52.94%;下半年,在 正股价格攀升、政策利好叠加的推动下,转债强赎退出比例提升至64%。今年以来,转债强赎退出比例 进一步提升,截至目前已接近70%。多位受访人士指出,今年以来,A股市场持续保持稳定走势,是可 转债市场提前赎回现象增多的重要因素,也为存量可转债估值提升和活力改善创造有利条件。可转债强 赎案例增多,将进一步提升转债市场的吸引力,吸引更多资金流入转债市场。(证券时报) ...
转债策略系列报告之五:强赎全拆解:让人欢喜让人忧
Shenwan Hongyuan Securities· 2025-04-27 13:17
2025 年 04 月 27 日 强赎全拆解:让人欢喜让人忧 ——转债策略系列报告之五 《转债下修条款的"攻守之道"——转债策 略系列报告之四》2025/3/27 《转债仓位择时指标初探——转债策略系 列报告之三》2025/3/16 证券分析师 黄伟平 A0230524110002 huangwp@swsresearch.com 徐亚 A0230524060002 xuya@swsresearch.com 徐亚 (8621)23297818× xuya@swsresearch.com 证 券 研 究 报 告 请务必仔细阅读正文之后的各项信息披露与声明 本研究报告仅通过邮件提供给 中庚基金 使用。1 债 券 研 究 债 券 策 略 ⚫ 转债触发强赎是"皆大欢喜"的事情,但是强赎对于转债本身又是风险事件,本文将对此 分析。 ⚫ 1. 强赎概念:转债主流退出途径,流程逐渐规范 ⚫ 转债在 6 年存续期内往往会在牛市期间触发强赎,因此强赎也是转债退出的主流方式, 80%左右的转债通过强赎退市。截止到 2025/4/18 共有 512 只转债退市,退出方式共计 5 种,其中通过强赎退出的转债为 422 只、占比 82% ...