澳媒报道模糊了更宏大的现实：北京的影响力源于满足太平洋国家的实际需求——修路建港、兴办学校 医院、提供奖学金与投资。中国还带来在减贫和基础设施建设方面来之不易的经验，这些经验引起仍在 为发展而奋斗的多个国家的共鸣。正是这些贡献赋予了北京公信力。澳大利亚评论若只纠缠于指摘，就 会错失更重要真相：中国赢得太平洋地区国家的关注，是因为满足了澳大利亚长久忽视的需求。 来源：环球时报 澳大利亚"珍珠与刺激"网站1月7日文章，原题：如果我们想赢得太平洋，首先要学会倾听并停止将一切 问题归咎于中国从在霍尼亚拉（所罗门群岛首都——编者注）捐赠车辆到"功夫外交"，澳大利亚媒体描 绘了澳中两国持续竞争的熟悉景象。然而，这种固化思维的叙事框架已屡次损害澳大利亚国家利益。长 期以来，澳大利亚将太平洋视为专属势力范围，这种态度让我们付出沉重代价。所罗门群岛与北京的安 全协议并非仅因中国因素，而是堪培拉多年来忽视太平洋国家关切、漠视其优先事项的必然结果。这不 仅关乎体面，更涉及战略核心。当太平洋国家感到被忽视时，自然接受其他伙伴关系（中国）。 《悉尼先驱晨报》将中国当前在太平洋的角色类比为二战时期日本对所罗门群岛的占领——这是错误的 且 ...

莱茵河畔孕育的工业文明，曾以精密、理性与开放著称。而近期德国政坛围绕中国电动汽车的两起争议，却让外界看到了与这种传统并不相符的焦虑心 态。 一是德国财长克林拜尔公开对德国铁路公司向比亚迪采购公交车表示不满，提出所谓"健康的本土产业爱国主义"，认为德铁更应向德国或欧洲制造商下 单；二是德国政府宣布将恢复电动汽车购买补贴，引发德勤的汽车专家对"补贴资金流向中国"的担忧，试图用制度设计为中国品牌设置隐形门槛。这些讨 论本质上折射出的是一种将正常市场选择政治化的倾向。 真正负责任的"本土产业爱国主义"，应当着眼于国家产业的长期竞争力，而非对短期市场份额的画地为牢，更不能将其异化为对外国产品和投资的排斥。 以德铁公交车采购为例，在总规模超过3000辆的订单中，比亚迪中标数量仅约200辆，而且车辆产自匈牙利工厂，严格意义上属于"欧洲制造"。这既是全 球化分工下的正常商业选择，也是企业基于成本、效率与可靠性的理性判断。 历史反复证明，通过政治手段为落后产能"筑墙"，只能带来暂时的心理安慰，却会让被保护者在温室中丧失活力。德国汽车工业的未来，不取决于是否把 竞争对手挡在门外，而取决于能否在新赛道上重拾敢于自我否定的工程师精神 ...

真正负责任的"本土产业爱国主义"，应当着眼于国家产业的长期竞争力，而非对短期市场份额的画地为 牢，更不能将其异化为对外国产品和投资的排斥。以德铁公交车采购为例，在总规模超过3000辆的订单 中，比亚迪中标数量仅约200辆，而且车辆产自匈牙利工厂，严格意义上属于"欧洲制造"。这既是全球 化分工下的正常商业选择，也是企业基于成本、效率与可靠性的理性判断。 莱茵河畔孕育的工业文明，曾以精密、理性与开放著称。而近期德国政坛围绕中国电动汽车的两起争 议，却让外界看到了与这种传统并不相符的焦虑心态。 一是德国财长克林拜尔公开对德国铁路公司向比亚迪采购公交车表示不满，提出所谓"健康的本土产业 爱国主义"，认为德铁更应向德国或欧洲制造商下单；二是德国政府宣布将恢复电动汽车购买补贴，引 发德勤的汽车专家对"补贴资金流向中国"的担忧，试图用制度设计为中国品牌设置隐形门槛。这些讨论 本质上折射出的是一种将正常市场选择政治化的倾向。 历史反复证明，通过政治手段为落后产能"筑墙"，只能带来暂时的心理安慰，却会让被保护者在温室中 丧失活力。德国汽车工业的未来，不取决于是否把竞争对手挡在门外，而取决于能否在新赛道上重拾敢 于自我否定的工程 ...

Group 1 - China has issued longer-term rare earth export licenses to some European companies, which initially seemed like a positive development, but the EU responded with investigations and inspections, indicating a sudden shift in stance [1][3] - The EU's actions are not merely trade disputes but are driven by political motives, particularly concerns over China's rising influence in key sectors like electric vehicles and digital technology [3][5] - The EU's investigations into Chinese companies are seen as a way to align with the U.S. amidst changing political dynamics, particularly with the return of Trump and his "America First" policies [5][10] Group 2 - China's approval of rare earth exports is based on the stability of global supply chains and international responsibilities, maintaining control over the export process [7][10] - The EU's discriminatory and uncertain business environment is causing unease among investors, including European companies that have deep ties with Chinese firms [10][12] - The relationship between China and the EU is characterized by mutual dependence, and any attempts by the EU to simultaneously benefit from China's supply while restricting Chinese companies will likely lead to a lose-lose situation [12][13]

萨克斯认为，应推动区域合作而非对抗。全球可以划分为若干互联区域，每个区域通过合作与协调，实 现经济繁荣和安全稳定。这种模式比"单极主导"或"两强对抗"模式更可持续，也更有利于各方发展。 （文章来源：新华社） 萨克斯说，中国经验为全球治理提供了重要参考。中国政府对行业和技术进行系统布局，使其在新兴技 术领域持续保持全球领先地位。这一成功经验显示，有效规划和长期投资能够推动国家经济持续发展， 而无需以损害他国为代价。 萨克斯说，中国的发展不应被视为威胁。他说："我一点也不害怕中国。我喜欢那里的食物、文化、旅 游景点、民众以及学术氛围。"美国社会中存在"中国是敌人"的陈词滥调，但这通常是那些从未去过中 国的人说的。"我对美国国会议员的建议是：办个护照，去看看世界，看看事情的真相。" 新华社贝尔格莱德12月16日电（记者石中玉）美国知名经济学家杰弗里·萨克斯16日在塞尔维亚首都贝 尔格莱德举行的一场对话会上说，世界经济并非零和博弈，中国的发展应被视为机遇而非威胁。世界各 国应通过区域合作实现共同繁荣与可持续发展。 萨克斯现任哥伦比亚大学可持续发展中心主任。他说，零和思维源于19世纪和20世纪盛行的社会达尔文 主义观念 ...

【环球时报综合报道】编者的话：本系列上篇文章阐释了在全球产业链深度交织的今天，贸易差额是市 场规律与分工协作的自然结果。中国超过1万亿美元的贸易顺差数字背后，是中国深度融入全球产业分 工体系、为世界经济发展作出重要贡献的体现。值得强调的是，中国希望看到本国进出口平衡以及全球 贸易长期供需平衡，但这无法仅靠一国进行调整。如果一些美欧国家放不下零和思维，继续对中国采取 双标做法、施加不合理限制，阻碍中国进一步扩大进口、增加投资、开展生产合作，这样的做法才是对 全球贸易长期开放、稳定、平衡的破坏。 除炒作贸易顺差外，美欧一些国家一方面加大对本国有关产业的补贴力度，另一方面却炮制所谓"中国 补贴造成产能过剩"论调，对中国产业政策横加指责，也是典型的"双标"做法。 美国第一任财政部长汉密尔顿在1791年就提出用关税与补贴扶持本土制造业的主张。2022年，美国总统 接连签署《芯片和科学法案》和《通胀削减法案》，赤裸裸地通过歧视性补贴政策争夺产业优势。欧盟 则在"战略自主""去风险化"框架下定向支持本土产业，比如法国自去年起实施电动汽车补贴激励措施， 采用中国产电池的电动汽车可能由于"碳足迹"评分低而不能获得补贴。欧盟去年 ...

过去两三年，在AI发展路径上中美各自形成了差异化模式。美国普遍倾向于闭源，聚焦通用能力突 破，通过强化技术壁垒维持商业优势。中国的路径则展现出开源与闭源并举、技术攻关与场景落地深度 融合的特点，形成了"应用反哺技术"的生态，力求从底层硬件、框架到上层模型与应用的系统性自主创 新。实际上，双方的差异绝非对立，而是呈现出一种深刻的互补与竞争并存的态势，共同将AI技术的 天花板不断推高，形成了一种全球性的"良性循环"。 当中美在经贸领域达成共识后，放松对华芯片出口管制本应是技术合作的新起点，但美国政策界一些人 仍抱持零和思维，不遗余力地制造障碍。2025年11月，美中经济与安全审查委员会在年度报告中仍将中 国定位为"系统性战略挑战"，延续对抗性叙事。他们强调，美国必须在算力维度"守住乃至扩大领先边 际"，推动更严厉的技术封锁。这完全是以"美国独霸"为出发点，毫无AI发展应服务人类共同福祉的天 下担当。 来源：环球时报 近段时间，中美两国都在持续推进人工智能（AI）领域的战略布局。国办印发了《关于加快场景培育 和开放推动新场景大规模应用的实施意见》，聚焦22类场景培育和开放重点领域，与此前深入实施"人 工智能+"行动 ...

Group 1: Core Perspectives - The essence of China-US economic and trade relations is mutual benefit and win-win cooperation, as highlighted by the recent meeting between President Xi Jinping and President Trump [1][6] - Economic cooperation should serve as a stabilizing force and a driving engine for bilateral relations, rather than a source of conflict [1][3] - The recent negotiations in Kuala Lumpur reflect the complexity and resilience of China-US economic relations, emphasizing that mutual benefit is the only viable path to resolving differences [3][4] Group 2: Economic Data and Trends - Despite a 15.6% year-on-year decline in trade volume in the first three quarters of 2025, the trade scale remains substantial at $425.816 billion, indicating a rigid demand for cooperation [4] - The trade volume in September alone reached $45.792 billion, with a reduction in the decline of Chinese exports to the US from 33.1% in August to 27% [4] - The long-term trend shows that trade between China and the US has grown from less than $2.5 billion in 1979 to an estimated $688.28 billion in 2024, demonstrating the inherent stability of their economic ties [4][6] Group 3: Global Economic Implications - The trajectory of China-US economic relations not only affects bilateral interests but also has systemic implications for global economic stability [6] - The high degree of interdependence between the two economies creates an irreplaceable collaborative ecosystem within the global supply chain [6] - Any form of decoupling or disruption in this relationship could lead to catastrophic consequences for the global economy [6] Group 4: Conflict Resolution and Future Directions - Effective management of differences requires abandoning zero-sum thinking, as the scale and complexity of economic interactions between the two nations make conflicts inevitable [7] - Engaging in equal dialogue and seeking mutually beneficial solutions is the correct approach to handling disputes [7] - The future of China-US economic relations may still involve negotiations and competition, but a cooperative model based on mutual respect and benefit is gradually becoming clearer [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's justified export controls on rare earth materials in response to perceived economic coercion from the U.S., emphasizing China's readiness to engage in dialogue while firmly opposing unilateral trade measures [1][2][3]. Group 1: China's Position on Export Controls - China asserts that its export controls on rare earth materials are legitimate and necessary for national security, as foreign entities have misused these materials for military purposes, posing threats to China's interests [1]. - The Chinese government maintains that these export controls do not equate to a complete ban, as applications that meet regulations will continue to be approved [1]. Group 2: U.S. Actions and Responses - The U.S. has been accused of abusing the concept of "national security" and implementing discriminatory practices against China, particularly through extensive export controls on semiconductors and related technologies [2]. - Since the Madrid economic talks in September, the U.S. has introduced numerous restrictive measures against China, undermining the atmosphere for bilateral economic discussions [2]. Group 3: Call for Constructive Dialogue - China emphasizes the need for dialogue based on equality, respect, and mutual benefit, while also expressing readiness to confront challenges if necessary [3]. - The article highlights that U.S. officials have shown a desire for talks but must demonstrate genuine intent without resorting to threats or new restrictions [3].

Core Viewpoint - Digital trade has become a significant aspect of China's economy, showcasing its potential for growth and international cooperation through events like the Global Digital Trade Expo [1][2]. Group 1: Digital Trade Growth - During the expo, the "China Digital Trade Development Report 2025" was released, indicating that by the first half of 2025, China's digitally deliverable service trade is expected to reach 1.5 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 6% [2]. - Cross-border e-commerce imports and exports are projected to hit 1.32 trillion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 5.7%, marking a historical high for the same period [2]. - China's digital service trade growth rate significantly outpaces the global average, positioning it as the fastest-growing economy in this sector [2]. Group 2: Competitive Advantages - China's digital trade is supported by technological leadership, a vast market, and a complete industrial chain, which together form its core competitive advantages [2]. - The country advocates for multilateralism and has consistently rejected a zero-sum mindset, promoting global public goods through its digital solutions in areas like artificial intelligence and fintech [2]. Group 3: International Cooperation - The digital trade initiatives are enhancing economic and social development in Africa, with products like Ethiopian coffee and Kenyan tea entering the Chinese market through cross-border e-commerce [2]. - Cooperation between China and Africa focuses on key areas such as small and medium-sized enterprises, digital infrastructure, healthcare, and education, aiming to bridge the digital divide [3]. - China's initiatives like "Silk Road E-commerce" and "Digital Silk Road" are designed to inject new momentum into the economy and help developing countries benefit from the digital age [3].