（原标题：商务部：对部分加拿大进口商品取消加征关税的反歧视措施） 商务部公告2026年第13号 公布调整对加拿大反歧视措施 根据商务部2025年第11号公告，在出现以下情况时，反歧视措施可以按程序调整、中止或取消，包括： （一）被调查国（地区）政府已经调整或者取消被调查的措施或者做法；（二）被调查国（地区）政府 已经就造成的损害向中国提供适当的补偿；（三）被调查国（地区）和中国通过磋商等方式达成一致解 决方案；（四）被调查国（地区）政府进一步采取实质性措施；（五）其他适当情形。 2025年3月8日，商务部（以下称调查机关）发布2025年第11号公告，公布就加拿大对华相关限制性措施 进行反歧视调查的裁定并采取反歧视措施。鉴于目前情况发生变化，调查机关决定对反歧视措施进行调 整。现将有关事项公告如下： 一、反歧视调查情况 根据《中华人民共和国对外贸易法》第七条、第三十六条和第三十七条规定，2024年9月26日，商务部 发布2024年第40号公告，决定就加拿大对自中国进口相关电动车辆和钢铝产品采取的加征关税等限制措 施进行反歧视调查。 2025年3月8日，商务部发布2025年第11号公告，根据《中华人民共和国对外贸 ...

Group 1 - Canada has adjusted its tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum products, which aligns with China's announcement of adjustments to its anti-discrimination measures against Canada [1] - The Ministry of Commerce of China initiated an anti-discrimination investigation against Canada on September 26, 2024, and announced additional tariffs on March 8, 2025 [1] - From March 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026, China will not impose anti-discrimination tariffs on certain imported goods from Canada, following the recent adjustments by the Canadian government [1] Group 2 - Both countries aim to resolve trade issues in sectors such as electric vehicles, steel, aluminum, and agricultural products, based on the consensus reached by their leaders [1] - China is committed to promoting healthy, stable, and sustainable development of economic and trade relations with Canada [1]

与此同时，受韩国美妆与食品热潮带动，韩国线上海外直接销售额也持续增长，全年达到3.02万亿 韩元，同比增长16.4%。从地区看，美国、欧盟、日本、中国等主要市场均实现增长；从品类看，化妆 品、食品饮料、音像制品表现亮眼，而通信设备、农水产品及服装类销售则相对低迷。 根据国家数据处当日发布的《2025年12月及全年网络购物动向》，2025年韩国线上购物交易额达 272.04万亿韩元，同比增长4.9%。其中，移动端交易额为211.14万亿韩元，增幅（6.5%）高于整体水 平。按商品类别看，餐饮服务（12.2%）、食品饮料（9.5%）交易增长明显；而受消费信心下降及此前 电商平台结算风波影响，电子券服务（-27.5%）、箱包（-11.1%）、鞋类（-4.5%）交易额明显下滑。 （原标题：2025年韩自华直购激增） 据韩国《首尔新闻》2月2日报道, 2025年韩国海外在线直接购买额首次突破8.5万亿韩元，创历史新 高。其中，美国直购放缓之际，中国直购迅速扩大，交易额达到5.57万亿韩元，占整体比重的65.5%， 较2024年上升5.5个百分点，所谓"C电商冲击"在统计数据中得到充分体现。 ...

商务部新闻发言人何亚东。 商务部新闻发言人何亚东表示，加拿大总理1月访华期间，中加双方就妥善解决电动汽车、钢铝产品、油菜籽、农水产品等领域的经贸问题作出具体安 排。加方将就针对中国电动汽车、钢铝产品等采取的单边措施作出积极调整。中方也将相应地根据有关法律法规调整对加反歧视措施。 关于对加油菜籽反倾销措施，何亚东指出，鉴于案件情况复杂，该案调查期限已延长至2026年3月9日，商务部将在该日期前发布终裁公告，并在规则框架 内充分考虑加方合理诉求，基于事实和证据作出客观公正的最终裁决。 封面新闻记者 粟裕 2月12日，商务部举行例行新闻发布会。会上，有记者提问，商务部何时公布加拿大菜籽和相关农产品的关税调整？传闻加菜籽的反倾销关税会在5.5%— 6%之间，请问是否属实？ ...

（文章来源：期货日报网） 据新华社电商务部新闻发言人何亚东12日在回应关于对加拿大油菜籽和相关农产品关税调整的提问时 说，关于对加油菜籽反倾销措施，鉴于案件情况复杂，该案调查期限已延长至2026年3月9日，商务部将 在该日期前发布终裁公告。 在商务部当天举行的例行新闻发布会上，何亚东表示，加拿大总理卡尼1月访华期间，中加双方就妥善 解决电动汽车、钢铝产品、油菜籽、农水产品等领域的经贸问题作出具体安排。加方将就针对中国电动 汽车、钢铝产品等采取的单边措施作出积极调整。中方也将相应地根据有关法律法规调整对加反歧视措 施。商务部将在规则框架内充分考虑加方合理诉求，基于事实和证据作出客观公正的最终裁决。 ...

Group 1 - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce held a press conference addressing the anti-dumping case regarding Canadian canola imports, with spokesperson He Yadong providing updates on the situation [1][3] - During Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau's visit to China in January, both countries agreed to address trade issues in various sectors, including electric vehicles, steel and aluminum products, canola, and agricultural products [3] - The investigation period for the anti-dumping measures on Canadian canola has been extended to March 9, 2026, due to the complexity of the case, with a final ruling to be announced by the Ministry of Commerce before this date [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the recent arrangements made between China and Canada to address trade issues in sectors such as electric vehicles, steel and aluminum products, canola, and agricultural products [1] - Canada will actively adjust its unilateral measures against Chinese electric vehicles and steel and aluminum products [1] - China will also adjust its anti-discrimination measures against Canada based on relevant laws and regulations [1] Group 2 - The investigation period for the anti-dumping measures on Canadian canola has been extended to March 9, 2026, due to the complexity of the case [1] - The Ministry of Commerce will issue a final ruling before the extended deadline, considering Canada's reasonable demands within the framework of rules [1] - The final decision will be made objectively and fairly based on facts and evidence [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions between the United States and Canada following Canada's recent trade agreement with China, with U.S. officials threatening to impose significant tariffs on Canadian goods if Canada continues to engage with China [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Response to Canada-China Agreement - U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin indicated that Canada's agreement with China represents a "180-degree turn" and warned that Canada could face 100% tariffs on goods entering the U.S. if it signs a free trade agreement with China [1][3]. - President Trump criticized the Canada-China agreement, labeling it as "bad" and threatening to impose tariffs on all Canadian goods entering the U.S. [3][4]. - The U.S. is concerned that the Canada-China agreement could undermine its efforts to maintain a trade blockade against China, prompting increased pressure on Canada [4]. Group 2: Canada's Position - Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau downplayed U.S. threats, asserting that the agreement with China regarding electric vehicles and agricultural products aligns with the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) [1][5]. - Trudeau emphasized that Canada has no intention of entering into a free trade agreement with China, aiming to maintain compliance with USMCA obligations [5]. - Canadian officials, including the Minister of Natural Resources, are actively pursuing trade diversification efforts, including upcoming visits to India to discuss cooperation in critical minerals and liquefied natural gas [7]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The article highlights the geopolitical implications of Canada's actions, suggesting that Canada is attempting to position itself as a leader among middle powers, distancing itself from U.S. influence [4]. - The upcoming review of the USMCA in 2026 is seen as a critical moment for negotiations, with the U.S. using tariff threats as leverage in discussions with Canada [4].

Group 1 - Canadian Prime Minister Carney's recent visit to China resulted in a trade agreement aimed at reducing trade barriers and rebuilding bilateral relations [1][4] - The agreement includes specific arrangements for addressing trade issues in sectors such as electric vehicles, steel, aluminum, and agricultural products [4][6] - In 2024, the bilateral trade volume between Taiwan and Canada is projected to be 6 billion CAD (approximately 30 billion RMB), while trade with mainland China is expected to reach 117.444 billion CAD (approximately 591.8 billion RMB) [3] Group 2 - The Carney government is seen as recalibrating Canada's trade relations with China, moving away from the previous administration's approach that prioritized alignment with U.S. policies [6][7] - A recent poll indicated that 54% of Canadians support the trade agreement with China, with over 60% favoring the complete removal of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles [6] - The agreement has been positively received by Canadian financial analysts, who view it as a correction of the previous government's approach that often prioritized moral posturing over business interests [6][7]

Group 1 - Canadian Prime Minister Carney's visit to China marks a thaw in Sino-Canadian relations, with both countries seeking renewed cooperation [1] - On January 16, China and Canada signed the "China-Canada Economic and Trade Cooperation Roadmap," allowing Canada to export 49,000 electric vehicles to China annually, benefiting from a 6.1% most-favored-nation tariff rate [1] - Canada will eliminate the 100% additional tariff on Chinese vehicles, with annual quotas set to increase gradually [1] Group 2 - U.S. officials, including Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Trade Representative Greer, expressed strong opposition to Canada's agreement with China, warning that Canada may regret its decision [3] - Greer emphasized that Chinese electric vehicles entering Canada would not be allowed to access the U.S. market, indicating a protective stance towards American interests [3] - In contrast, former President Trump viewed the agreement positively, suggesting it was a normal diplomatic action and beneficial for Canada [5] Group 3 - The differing reactions from U.S. officials may stem from their roles, with Greer being more sensitive due to his direct involvement in trade negotiations [7] - Trump's upcoming visit to China in April may also influence his more lenient stance, as maintaining commitments to China could foster better U.S.-China relations [7] - Despite warnings from U.S. officials, immediate extreme measures against Canada seem unlikely, as the annual quota of 49,000 vehicles represents only about 3% of Canada's annual production [9] Group 4 - Canada's decision to engage with China reflects a strategic choice that aligns with its long-term interests and highlights China's growing influence in the global economy [9] - The situation illustrates the complexities of international relations, where countries must navigate their own interests while considering the broader geopolitical landscape [9]