对于当下的博物馆而言，均兼具了商业属性与文化属性。而如何借助双属性赋能消费创新与博物馆运营，成为摆在老字号面前的机遇与挑战。吴佩海认为， 在博物馆建设上，要提高文化引领力、聚焦核心竞争力、打造持续经营能力。博物馆从某种意义上来说是一个消费场景，因此要将这个场景利用起来。 作为北京白酒老字号品牌，近年来北京红星也在借助博物馆"向C而行"。北京红星股份有限公司文化顾问、原副总经理吴佩海指出，红星作为第一家北京的 国营酿酒厂，是中华老字号、中国驰名商标，又是国家级非物质文化遗产，北京二锅头酒传统酿造技艺的申报和保护单位。同时，今年红星也入选了首批中 国消费名品。 吴佩海表示，在博物馆的建设中，无论是建设特色，抑或是运营思路都需要有差异化思路。红星位于前门的博物馆主打二锅头技艺起源；位于怀柔的北京二 锅头酒博物馆主打北京二锅头酒技艺的起源、传承、发展、传播；位于山西的红星二锅头博物馆主打红星二锅头的发展历程。三家博物馆，从内容上，各个 博物馆主题集中、结构鲜明、重点突出。而从形式上，在形成传统的基础上融入现代技术与风格，并加入红星自有的特色。 北京商报讯（记者 刘一博 冯若男）在全方位构筑消费新格局的大语境中，老字号 ...

Core Viewpoint - The announcement from Fuzhou Market Supervision Administration reveals the results of food safety inspections, indicating that out of 43 batches tested, 36 were compliant while 7 were found to be non-compliant, primarily concerning agricultural products [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 43 batches were inspected, with 36 passing and 7 failing the safety standards [2]. - The non-compliant products mainly included agricultural items, with specific failures related to pesticide residues and microbial contamination [2]. - Consumers are encouraged to report any non-compliant products they encounter by calling the complaint hotline "12315" [2]. Group 2: Non-Compliant Products - The non-compliant products included: - Litchi with pesticide residue exceeding the limit (0.76 mg/kg vs. 0.5 mg/kg) [2]. - Chili pepper with cadmium levels above the permissible limit (0.080 mg/kg vs. 0.05 mg/kg) [2]. - Kiwi with chlorpyrifos residue exceeding the limit (0.16 mg/kg vs. 0.05 mg/kg) [2]. - Specific companies and locations of the non-compliant products were detailed, highlighting the need for improved quality control in food production [2]. Group 3: Compliant Products - The compliant products included various food items such as cucumbers, reusable dining utensils, and cooking oils, all passing safety inspections [3][4]. - The list of compliant products reflects a range of categories, including agricultural products, restaurant supplies, and condiments [3][4]. - The compliance of these products indicates a generally positive trend in food safety within the inspected categories [3][4].

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The announcement from the Dandong Market Supervision Administration reveals the results of a recent food safety inspection, indicating that out of 53 batches of food tested, 50 were found to be compliant while 3 were deemed non-compliant, highlighting ongoing efforts to ensure food safety in the region [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 53 batches of food were tested, with 50 passing and 3 failing the safety standards [2]. - The non-compliant items included 1 batch of catering food and 2 batches of condiments [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - Relevant regulatory authorities have initiated investigations and actions regarding the non-compliant food products [2].

近日，保定市徐水区市场监督管理局对保定乾璟酒业有限公司（以下简称"乾璟酒业"）作出行政处罚（保徐市监处罚﹝2025﹞16-2号），该公司因严重违反 食品安全法规被处以警告、没收违法产品并罚款6万元整，处罚决定日2025年7月17日。 52%VOL、500mL/瓶装产品标注为 2024年5月25日； 42%VOL、100mL/瓶装产品同样标注为 2024年5月25日。 外包车间与灌装车间未按规定进行有效物理隔离；生产车间整体环境卫生状况堪忧；酿造车间环境脏乱，违规堆放着包装箱及其他杂物。 乾璟酒业的上述行为，直接违反了《中华人民共和国食品安全法》第三十三条第一款关于食品生产经营环境卫生要求以及第三十四条关于禁止生产经营标注 虚假生产日期食品的规定。依据《食品安全法》第一百二十四条第一款（对标注虚假生产日期等行为的处罚）及第一百二十六条第一款（对未按规定实施生 产经营过程控制要求的处罚）的规定，徐水区市场监管局作出处罚，没收全部涉案产品：包括标注虚假生产日期的56%VOL、4L/桶装酒25箱（1×4桶/ 箱），52%VOL、500mL/瓶装酒90箱（1×12瓶/箱），42%VOL、100mL/瓶装酒20箱（1×4 ...

Summary of Key Points - The article reports on the food safety inspection results conducted by the Jixian County Market Supervision Administration for the year 2025, highlighting the number of samples tested and their compliance status [2][3] - A total of 40 batches of ordinary food were sampled, all of which passed the inspection, while 71 batches of agricultural products were tested, with 69 passing and 2 failing [2][3] - The report emphasizes the importance of these inspections in ensuring food safety and eliminating potential hazards in the food supply [2][3] Group 1: Inspection Results - 40 batches of ordinary food were tested, with a 100% pass rate [2][3] - 71 batches of agricultural products were tested, with 69 passing and 2 failing, indicating a compliance rate of approximately 97.2% [2][3] - The specific failures involved residues of agricultural chemicals exceeding the national safety standards [3] Group 2: Non-compliance Details - The two non-compliant agricultural products were found to have residues of chloramphenicol exceeding the maximum allowable limit of 0.3 mg/kg, with one sample showing 0.770 mg/kg and another showing 1.44 mg/kg [3] - The report provides detailed information about the non-compliant products, including the names of the producers and the specific locations where the samples were collected [3][4]

Core Points - The article reports on the results of food safety inspections conducted on 209 samples across 18 categories of food products, revealing that 205 samples passed while 4 samples failed due to pesticide residue and food additive violations [3][4]. Food Safety Inspection Results - A total of 209 food samples were tested, with 205 passing and 4 failing the safety standards [3]. - The non-compliant samples included: - Pesticide residue exceeding limits in green peas sold by a local supermarket [3]. - Food additives exceeding limits in: - Yangmei sold by a local supermarket, where dehydroacetic acid and its sodium salt were found non-compliant [4]. - Yangmei sold by two fruit stores, where sweeteners were found non-compliant [4]. Regulatory Actions - Local market supervision departments have been instructed to take immediate actions such as removing the non-compliant products from shelves [4]. - The identified units are required to disclose their risk control measures within 7 days of the announcement and report their findings to the local market supervision bureau within 3 months [4].