新京报讯 据北京市文化和旅游局消息，日前，北京市文化和旅游局发布通知，认定北京工美集团有限责 任公司、北京市丰台区巧娘手工艺发展中心、北京石光长城民宿有限公司等首批25家北京市非遗工坊。 被评为首批北京市非遗工坊的单位要积极探索"非遗+"创新发展路径，各区文旅部门要加强对辖区内非遗 工坊的指导服务，共同推动其在非遗人才培育、技艺传承、促进就业等方面发挥示范作用。 | 序号 | 推荐单位 | 推荐企业名称 | 依托区级及以上 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | 非物质文化遗产代表性项目名称 | | 13 | 石景山区文 | 隆和恒泰（北京）文化旅游产业有限公司 | 和香制作技艺 | | | 化和旅游局 | | | | 14 | 门头沟区文 | 北京明珠琉璃制品有限公司 | 琉璃烧制技艺 | | | 化和旅游局 | | | | 1 ਦੇ | 房山区文化 | 北京仁和酒业有限责任公司 | "菊花白"酒传统酿制技艺 | | | 和旅游局 | | | | 16 | 顺义区文化 | 北京吉祥八宝葫芦手工艺品产销 | 火绘葫芦技艺 | | | 和旅游局 | 专业合作社 | | | 17 ...

Group 1 - The core theme of the event is the exploration of how traditional brands can innovate while preserving cultural heritage, aiming for brand rejuvenation and leading the new trend of domestic consumption [1] - The event is guided by the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Commerce and organized by Beijing Business Daily and the Beijing Time-honored Brand Association, with Deep Blue Media Think Tank serving as the think tank platform [1] Group 2 - Beijing Red Star, a time-honored liquor brand, is leveraging museum initiatives to enhance its cultural and commercial appeal [4] - Red Star is recognized as the first state-owned brewery in Beijing and holds titles such as a time-honored brand and a famous Chinese trademark, along with being a national intangible cultural heritage entity [4] - The company operates multiple museums, each focusing on different aspects of the Beijing Erguotou liquor heritage, integrating modern technology and styles while maintaining traditional elements [4] - The dual attributes of cultural and commercial aspects in museums present both opportunities and challenges for time-honored brands in driving consumption innovation [4] - Red Star emphasizes the need to enhance cultural leadership, focus on core competitiveness, and develop sustainable operational capabilities in its museum initiatives [4]

Core Viewpoint - The announcement from Fuzhou Market Supervision Administration reveals the results of food safety inspections, indicating that out of 43 batches tested, 36 were compliant while 7 were found to be non-compliant, primarily concerning agricultural products [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 43 batches were inspected, with 36 passing and 7 failing the safety standards [2]. - The non-compliant products mainly included agricultural items, with specific failures related to pesticide residues and microbial contamination [2]. - Consumers are encouraged to report any non-compliant products they encounter by calling the complaint hotline "12315" [2]. Group 2: Non-Compliant Products - The non-compliant products included: - Litchi with pesticide residue exceeding the limit (0.76 mg/kg vs. 0.5 mg/kg) [2]. - Chili pepper with cadmium levels above the permissible limit (0.080 mg/kg vs. 0.05 mg/kg) [2]. - Kiwi with chlorpyrifos residue exceeding the limit (0.16 mg/kg vs. 0.05 mg/kg) [2]. - Specific companies and locations of the non-compliant products were detailed, highlighting the need for improved quality control in food production [2]. Group 3: Compliant Products - The compliant products included various food items such as cucumbers, reusable dining utensils, and cooking oils, all passing safety inspections [3][4]. - The list of compliant products reflects a range of categories, including agricultural products, restaurant supplies, and condiments [3][4]. - The compliance of these products indicates a generally positive trend in food safety within the inspected categories [3][4].

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The announcement from the Dandong Market Supervision Administration reveals the results of a recent food safety inspection, indicating that out of 53 batches of food tested, 50 were found to be compliant while 3 were deemed non-compliant, highlighting ongoing efforts to ensure food safety in the region [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 53 batches of food were tested, with 50 passing and 3 failing the safety standards [2]. - The non-compliant items included 1 batch of catering food and 2 batches of condiments [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - Relevant regulatory authorities have initiated investigations and actions regarding the non-compliant food products [2].

Core Viewpoint - Baoding Qianjing Wine Co., Ltd. was penalized for serious violations of food safety regulations, resulting in a warning, confiscation of illegal products, and a fine of 60,000 RMB on July 17, 2025 [1][4]. Summary by Relevant Sections Violation Type - The company violated Article 33, Paragraph 1, Items (1) and (4), and Article 34, Item (10) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China [3]. Violation Facts - On May 29, 2025, inspectors found that the company was producing three types of "Beijing Erguotou" liquor with false production dates: - 56% VOL, 4L/barrel marked as produced on January 25, 2025 - 52% VOL, 500mL/bottle marked as produced on May 25, 2024 - 42% VOL, 100mL/bottle also marked as produced on May 25, 2024 [3][4]. Sanction Basis - The penalties were based on Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (13) and Article 124, Paragraph 1, Item (5) of the Food Safety Law [3][4]. Penalty Details - The regulatory authority confiscated all involved products, including: - 25 boxes of 56% VOL, 4L/barrel (1×4 barrels/box) - 90 boxes of 52% VOL, 500mL/bottle (1×12 bottles/box) - 20 boxes of 42% VOL, 100mL/bottle (1×40 bottles/box) - A total of 135 boxes were confiscated, and a fine of 60,000 RMB was imposed [4]. Company Information - Baoding Qianjing Wine Co., Ltd. was established on October 31, 2022, with a registered capital of 490,000 RMB. The legal representative is Ding Ze, and the company is located in De Shan Er Jie Village, Xushui District, Baoding City, Hebei Province, operating in the liquor, beverage, and refined tea manufacturing industry [4].

Summary of Key Points - The article reports on the food safety inspection results conducted by the Jixian County Market Supervision Administration for the year 2025, highlighting the number of samples tested and their compliance status [2][3] - A total of 40 batches of ordinary food were sampled, all of which passed the inspection, while 71 batches of agricultural products were tested, with 69 passing and 2 failing [2][3] - The report emphasizes the importance of these inspections in ensuring food safety and eliminating potential hazards in the food supply [2][3] Group 1: Inspection Results - 40 batches of ordinary food were tested, with a 100% pass rate [2][3] - 71 batches of agricultural products were tested, with 69 passing and 2 failing, indicating a compliance rate of approximately 97.2% [2][3] - The specific failures involved residues of agricultural chemicals exceeding the national safety standards [3] Group 2: Non-compliance Details - The two non-compliant agricultural products were found to have residues of chloramphenicol exceeding the maximum allowable limit of 0.3 mg/kg, with one sample showing 0.770 mg/kg and another showing 1.44 mg/kg [3] - The report provides detailed information about the non-compliant products, including the names of the producers and the specific locations where the samples were collected [3][4]

Core Points - The article reports on the results of food safety inspections conducted on 209 samples across 18 categories of food products, revealing that 205 samples passed while 4 samples failed due to pesticide residue and food additive violations [3][4]. Food Safety Inspection Results - A total of 209 food samples were tested, with 205 passing and 4 failing the safety standards [3]. - The non-compliant samples included: - Pesticide residue exceeding limits in green peas sold by a local supermarket [3]. - Food additives exceeding limits in: - Yangmei sold by a local supermarket, where dehydroacetic acid and its sodium salt were found non-compliant [4]. - Yangmei sold by two fruit stores, where sweeteners were found non-compliant [4]. Regulatory Actions - Local market supervision departments have been instructed to take immediate actions such as removing the non-compliant products from shelves [4]. - The identified units are required to disclose their risk control measures within 7 days of the announcement and report their findings to the local market supervision bureau within 3 months [4].