为此，市场监管部门专门采取"揭榜挂帅"的做法，调度全社会优势的科研力量，来组织开展科技攻关。 目前已收到了近百项申报材料，有望在检测技术上实现突破。 11月25日，市场监管总局召开的专题新闻发布会通报了一起掺杂掺假食用油典型案例。 市场监管部门抽检发现，重庆五鼎坊食品有限公司生产的纯芝麻油脂肪酸组成异常。经查，该企业存在 的主要违法行为：一是在生产的纯芝麻油中掺有廉价的大豆油和棉籽油。二是生产的食用植物调和油违 规添加香精，标签未如实标识成分比例，未注明使用的大豆油原料为转基因食品。三是香辛料调味油添 加了香精，但未在配料表中标注，且未如实标注压榨工艺。属地市场监管部门依法对该企业吊销食品生 产许可证，罚没2000余万元；对企业主管人员龙某实施五年行业禁入，并处罚款5万余元。 "食用植物油中掺杂其他油脂，有的号称是特级初榨橄榄油，其实里面混入了一定比例的大豆油、玉米 油。肉及肉制品中掺杂其他动物源性物质，有的号称是羊肉卷，其实里面掺了鸭肉等，这类食品安全问 题，受到社会广泛关注，人民群众反映强烈。"市场监管总局食品安全总监孙会川介绍，要全面解决这 些问题，检测技术是突破口，但是放眼全球，目前各国都还没有研发出 ...

食品抽检中发现食用油掺杂掺假、紫苏酱非法添加非食用物质、以马肉等冒充驴肉……在市场监管总局 25日召开的"开展全链条抽检 强化全链条监管"食品安全专题新闻发布会上，市场监管总局食品抽检司 司长卫国锋通报了今年以来全国市场监管系统在食品抽检中发现的5起典型案例。 在重庆五鼎坊食品有限公司生产掺杂掺假食用油案中，市场监管部门抽检发现异常，该公司生产的纯芝 麻油中掺有廉价的大豆油和棉籽油；生产的食用植物调和油违规添加香精，标签未如实标识成分比例， 未注明使用的大豆油原料为转基因食品；香辛料调味油添加了香精，但未在标签标识配料表中标注，且 未如实标注压榨工艺。属地市场监管部门依法对该企业吊销食品生产许可证，罚没2000余万元；对企业 直接负责的主管人员龙某实施五年的行业禁入，并处罚款5万余元。 新华社北京11月25日电 题：市场监管总局通报5起食品安全典型案例 新华社记者赵文君 在武汉市江夏区天翼食品加工厂非法添加非食用物质案中，市场监管部门抽检发现，该厂生产的紫苏酱 中添加了罂粟碱、吗啡、可待因、那可丁等非食用物质。属地市场监管部门依法对该企业作出吊销食品 生产许可证的行政处罚，将涉嫌犯罪线索移送公安机关追究刑事责 ...

市场监管总局公布5起食品安全违法犯罪典型案例 记者今天了解到，市场监管总局公布5起食品安全违法犯罪典型案例。 市场监管部门抽检发现，福州市仓山区诚品盛食品有限公司生产的多批次糕点酸价、过氧化值、食品添 加剂等不合格。属地市场监管部门对该企业作出行政处罚，罚没18万余元，最终吊销该企业食品生产许 可证。之后，属地市场监管部门再次收到该企业被吊销许可证前生产的食品不合格检验报告，经查，该 企业主体资格并未消除，再次作出没收违法所得1560元、罚款5万元的行政处罚。 五、杭州临安少华小吃部制售含非食用物质食品案 市场监管部门通过大数据网络监测平台销售数据追踪溯源，发现杭州临安少华小吃部多次在网上购买硼 砂，推测其可能在销售的食品中违法添加。市场监管部门对该店销售的所有可能添加硼砂的食品进行抽 样，在小馄饨中检出高含量硼酸。经查，该店多次通过网络渠道购买硼砂违法添加到馄饨皮中，销售金 额达20余万元。属地市场监管部门依法将涉嫌犯罪线索移送公安机关追究刑事责任，法院以犯生产、销 售有毒、有害食品罪，判处该店负责人林某敬有期徒刑五年六个月，并处罚金25万元，判处该店负责人 林某华有期徒刑二年三个月，并处罚金5万元。属地市 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article reports on the recent food safety inspection conducted by the Market Supervision Administration of Chibi City, revealing that out of 166 food samples tested, 158 were compliant while 8 were found to be non-compliant, highlighting ongoing food safety concerns in the region [4]. Summary by Category Food Categories Inspected - A total of 24 food categories were inspected, including grain products, edible oils, seasonings, meat products, dairy products, beverages, convenience foods, snacks, canned foods, frozen foods, and more [4]. Inspection Results - Out of 166 samples tested: - 158 samples were compliant - 8 samples were non-compliant - Breakdown of non-compliant samples: - Catering food: 29 samples tested, 7 non-compliant - Edible agricultural products: 29 samples tested, 1 non-compliant - Grain products: 11 samples tested, all compliant - Edible oils and fats: 3 samples tested, all compliant - Seasonings: 3 samples tested, all compliant - Meat products: 8 samples tested, all compliant - Dairy products: 4 samples tested, all compliant - Beverages: 7 samples tested, all compliant - Convenience foods: 6 samples tested, all compliant - Snacks: 2 samples tested, all compliant - Canned foods: 2 samples tested, all compliant - Frozen foods: 4 samples tested, all compliant - Potato and puffed foods: 8 samples tested, all compliant - Candy products: 2 samples tested, all compliant - Alcohol: 6 samples tested, all compliant - Vegetable products: 8 samples tested, all compliant - Fruit products: 2 samples tested, all compliant - Nuts and seeds: 3 samples tested, all compliant - Egg products: 1 sample tested, all compliant - Sugar: 1 sample tested, all compliant - Aquatic products: 2 samples tested, all compliant - Starch and starch products: 3 samples tested, all compliant - Pastries: 19 samples tested, all compliant - Bean products: 3 samples tested, all compliant [4].

Core Viewpoint - The report from Yichun Market Supervision Administration highlights the results of food safety inspections, revealing that out of 118 samples tested across 14 categories, 100 were found to be compliant, while 18 were deemed non-compliant, indicating a compliance rate of approximately 84.7% [4]. Summary by Category - **Overall Inspection Results** - Total samples tested: 118 - Compliant samples: 100 - Non-compliant samples: 18 - Compliance rate: 84.7% [4] - **Food Categories and Compliance** - **Catering Foods**: 9 samples tested, 8 compliant, 1 non-compliant - **Condiments**: 3 samples tested, 2 compliant, 1 non-compliant - **Convenience Foods**: 3 samples tested, all compliant - **Pastries**: 5 samples tested, all compliant - **Alcoholic Beverages**: 8 samples tested, all compliant - **Dairy Products**: 1 sample tested, compliant - **Edible Agricultural Products**: 57 samples tested, 47 compliant, 10 non-compliant - **Edible Oils and Fats**: 12 samples tested, all compliant - **Vegetable Products**: 1 sample tested, compliant - **Fruit Products**: 2 samples tested, all compliant - **Frozen Foods**: 1 sample tested, compliant - **Special Dietary Foods**: 1 sample tested, compliant - **Beverages**: 12 samples tested, 10 compliant, 2 non-compliant - **Health Foods**: 3 samples tested, all compliant [4]. - **Details of Non-Compliant Products** - Non-compliant products included items with excessive residues of harmful substances such as: - Restaurant utensils with a detected level of anionic synthetic detergent at 0.0218 mg/100 cm², which should not be detectable - Chili powder with a sulfur dioxide residue of 1.01 g/kg, exceeding permissible limits - Agricultural products with pesticide residues above acceptable levels, such as 0.81 mg/kg of pyraclostrobin in chili peppers [4].

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The Jiangxi Jingdezhen Market Supervision Administration conducted a special food inspection for the National Day holiday in 2025, revealing that out of 58 samples tested, 56 were qualified and 2 were unqualified [1][2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 58 food samples were inspected, with 56 passing and 2 failing the quality standards [1]. - The unqualified samples included reusable bowls from two different restaurants, indicating potential hygiene issues [3]. Group 2: Qualified Products - Various food products received qualified reports, including: - "Tianjiao Half Chicken" from Zhu District Lingchuang Catering Store [1]. - "Buffalo High Calcium Milk" from Zhejiang Baifei Dairy Co., Ltd. [1]. - "Pineapple Jelly" from Yangjiang Happy Jelly Manufacturing Co., Ltd. [2]. - The inspection covered a wide range of products, including dairy, snacks, and beverages, highlighting the overall compliance of food safety standards in the region [1][2]. Group 3: Specific Details of Unqualified Products - The unqualified products were identified as reusable bowls from: - Meishan Kitchen Private Restaurant in Jingdezhen High-tech Zone [3]. - Xunwei Changnan Catering Co., Ltd. [3]. - These findings suggest a need for improved hygiene practices in the food service industry [3].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement from Fuzhou Market Supervision Administration reveals the results of food safety inspections, indicating that out of 43 batches tested, 36 were compliant while 7 were found to be non-compliant, primarily concerning agricultural products [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 43 batches were inspected, with 36 passing and 7 failing the safety standards [2]. - The non-compliant products mainly included agricultural items, with specific failures related to pesticide residues and microbial contamination [2]. - Consumers are encouraged to report any non-compliant products they encounter by calling the complaint hotline "12315" [2]. Group 2: Non-Compliant Products - The non-compliant products included: - Litchi with pesticide residue exceeding the limit (0.76 mg/kg vs. 0.5 mg/kg) [2]. - Chili pepper with cadmium levels above the permissible limit (0.080 mg/kg vs. 0.05 mg/kg) [2]. - Kiwi with chlorpyrifos residue exceeding the limit (0.16 mg/kg vs. 0.05 mg/kg) [2]. - Specific companies and locations of the non-compliant products were detailed, highlighting the need for improved quality control in food production [2]. Group 3: Compliant Products - The compliant products included various food items such as cucumbers, reusable dining utensils, and cooking oils, all passing safety inspections [3][4]. - The list of compliant products reflects a range of categories, including agricultural products, restaurant supplies, and condiments [3][4]. - The compliance of these products indicates a generally positive trend in food safety within the inspected categories [3][4].

Group 1 - The announcement from the Binzhou Market Supervision Administration details the results of food safety inspections, highlighting nine batches of food products that failed to meet safety standards [1][2][3] - Specific violations include pesticide residues and microbial contamination, with examples such as chlorpyrifos exceeding the limit of 0.3 mg/kg, detected at 0.87 mg/kg [1][2] - The report emphasizes the importance of food safety and regulatory compliance for local food producers and retailers [1][3] Group 2 - The inspection results indicate a range of food categories affected, including poultry, vegetables, and processed foods, which raises concerns about overall food safety in the region [2][3] - The report lists the names and addresses of the companies involved, along with the specific products and the nature of the violations, providing transparency for consumers [1][2] - The findings may impact consumer trust and could lead to increased scrutiny and regulatory actions against the listed companies [1][3]

Core Points - The food safety supervision and sampling inspection conducted in Qingpu District, Shanghai, revealed that out of 86 batches tested, 83 were qualified and 3 were unqualified [1] - The unqualified products have been subjected to legal investigation and action by the local market supervision authority [1] Summary of Unqualified Products - The unqualified products included: - Pesticide residue in ginger from a supermarket, with a detected level of 0.030 mg/kg against a standard of ≤0.02 mg/kg [1] - Pesticide residue in carrot from a dining establishment, with a detected level of 0.50 mg/kg against a standard of ≤0.2 mg/kg [1] - Detected anionic synthetic detergent on a bowl from a restaurant, with a level of 0.037 mg/100 cm², which is not permissible [1] Summary of Qualified Products - The qualified products included various food items such as: - Handcrafted potato chips from a company in Jiangsu, packaged in 500g bags [1] - Edible vegetable oil from a Shanghai-based company, packaged in 5-liter bottles [1] - Various other food products including snacks, rice, and cooking oils from different manufacturers [1][2]

根据《中华人民共和国食品安全法》规定,赤壁市市场监督管理局近期组织对粮食加工品、食用油、油脂及其制品、调味品、肉制品、乳制品、饮料、方便 食品、饼干、罐头、茶叶及相关制品、酒类、蔬菜制品、水果制品、炒货食品及坚果制品、蛋制品、水产制品、淀粉及淀粉制品、糕点、豆制品、餐饮食 品、食品添加剂、食用农产品共22类食品238批次进行抽检。抽样检验项目合格样品231批次,不合格样品7批次,具体情况公告如下: 餐饮食品21批次,不合格3批次;食用农产品71批次,不合格4批次;粮食加工品17批次,食用油、油脂及其制品15批次,调味品5批次,肉制品6批次,乳制品15批次,饮 料9批次,方便食品1批次,饼干3批次,罐头2批次,茶叶及相关制品9批次,酒类6批次,蔬菜制品11批次,水果制品4批次,炒货食品及坚果制品2批次,蛋制品8批次,水产 制品4批次,淀粉及淀粉制品4批次,糕点14批次,豆制品10批次,食品添加剂1批次均未检出不合格样品。具体信息详见附件。 赤壁市市场监督管理局 | 赤壁市优客鲜 | 14 XBJ25421281487245994 | / | / | | 湖北 | 红油豆干 | 计量称重 | 2025- | 豆制 ...