同业存单指数基金

Search documents
上百只基金启动大额限购
Di Yi Cai Jing Zi Xun· 2025-09-29 16:00
2025.09.29 本文字数:2547,阅读时长大约5分钟 作者 |第一财经 曹璐 封图 |AI生成 "本想趁长假前买点短债基金赚点利息,结果打开APP一看,好几个产品都'限大额'了!" 近期,不少持有货币基金、短债基金的投资者发现,多只低风险产品陆续挂出"大额限购令"。Wind数 据显示,截至9月29日,近十天里已有超百只基金密集启动大额限购,且部分产品将恢复时间精准卡在 长假后首交易日。 双节假期前夕,公募基金市场迎来一波密集的限购潮。 9月29日,国寿安保添利发布公告称,自当日起暂停机构投资者的大额申购、转换转入及定期定额投资 业务,单日机构投资者的单个账户申购金额不得超过10万元,并将在10月9日恢复,与长假后首个交易 日衔接。 此之前,长江乐享也同样表示将于9月25日起暂停办理该基金A、B、D类份额在代销机构的大额申购 (含定期定额投资)业务,上限为100万元,恢复时间同样定于10月9日。长江资管在公告中说明,此举 是根据国务院节假日安排及交易所休市安排,为保护份额持有人利益。 为何限制大额申购?业内人士直指两大关键:一是假期债券票息、存款利息照常生钱,大额资金短期涌 入若未及时配置,易摊薄老持有 ...
节前限购节后重启 多家公募机构稳健应对
Zheng Quan Ri Bao Wang· 2025-09-29 13:12
9月下旬以来,景顺长城基金、银华基金、汇安基金、中金基金等多家公募机构陆续发布公告,对旗下 货币基金、中短债基金、同业存单指数基金等低风险产品实施国庆节、中秋节假期前限购或暂停申购, 并明确节后恢复申购。 资讯数据显示,截至记者发稿时统计,9月29日有3111只基金(统计全部份额)实施限购,环比8月29日 的2950只增加161只。对比来看,目前10月9日预计实施单日限购的基金产品数量回落至2963只。 从产品类型看,本次节前限购覆盖货币市场型、中短债型、同业存单指数型及纯债型基金,均属于风险 等级较低、资金进出频次高的品类,是普通投资者假期闲置资金配置的主要选择。 多家公募机构在公告中均强调,此举是"为保证基金平稳运作,保护基金份额持有人利益"。 兼顾资金需求与策略稳定性 为何基金管理人会在节前集中启动限购?从运作逻辑看,核心是降低"假期资产无法交易"与"资金频繁 波动"的风险,兼顾流动性安全与投资者收益公平。 业内人士称,这种"节前关闸、节后开门"的操作,体现了基金管理人对流动性风险的精准把控,更重要 的是通过平滑资金波动,保护存量投资者收益,彰显公募行业以投资者利益为核心的专业运作逻辑。 多类低风险基金 ...
债券型基金重占主导,分红险新发占比大增:理财产品跟踪报告2025年第9期(9月6日-9月19日)
Huachuang Securities· 2025-09-26 12:15
Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints of the Report From September 6th to September 19th, 2025, the bank wealth - management market was dominated by fixed - income products, especially fixed - income plus products. The fund new - issue market showed the characteristics of "total volume recovery and structural differentiation", with bond - type funds regaining the mainstream. The insurance market's new - issue products' quantity stabilized, and the structural adjustment trend continued to strengthen, with dividend - type insurance products becoming more prominent [2][3][8]. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs Bank Wealth - Management Products - **New - Issue Overall Situation**: In this bi - weekly period, 1214 new wealth - management products were issued. Fixed - income products accounted for 97.69%, with fixed - income plus as the mainstream. Wealth - management subsidiaries were the main issuers (72.82%), and medium - to long - term products (1 - 3 years) were the most popular. Product yields were significantly differentiated, and leading institutions achieved excess returns through multi - asset strategies [11]. - **New - Issue Market Trend Summary** - **Fixed - income plus Products**: 818 new fixed - income plus products were issued, accounting for over 60% of the market. They met investors' income needs and balanced risks, and wealth - management institutions' strategies were evolving [13]. - **Medium - to Long - term Products**: Medium - to long - term products accounted for nearly 80%. They could obtain higher coupon rates by locking in the duration and smooth net - value fluctuations. Policy guidance also encouraged their issuance [16]. - **Outstanding Products and Institutions** - **Bohai Bank Wealth - Management "Caishou Youlue" Series**: It was the largest - issued product series this period, with one - year closed - end fixed - income plus products as the core, attracting a large amount of retail funds [17]. - **BlackRock CCB Wealth - Management "Beiyuan US Dollar Fixed - Income" Products**: It could access high - interest US dollar assets through the global research platform, forming a differentiated advantage in foreign - currency wealth - management [18]. Fund Products - **New - Issue Fund Market Overall Situation**: From September 6th to 19th, 2025, 95 funds were newly issued, with a total share of 96.622 billion. Bond - type funds with a share of 51.318 billion became the mainstream again, accounting for 53.11%. Market hotspots were concentrated on science - innovation bond ETFs and technology - themed funds [19]. - **Fund New - Issue Rule Summary** - **Issuance Scale and Rhythm**: The issuance showed a pattern of "slow in the first week, explosive in the second week". The second week of September was affected by the concentrated issuance of science - innovation bond ETFs, but short - term issuance heat might be affected by market sentiment [20]. - **Product Type Structure**: Bond - type funds dominated, with 26 issues and a scale of 5.1318 billion yuan, accounting for 53.11%. Stock - type funds had 45 issues but only 3.2522 billion shares, and hybrid funds had 19 issues with 0.9053 billion shares [23]. - **Representative New - Issue Fund Products Analysis** - **Active Equity - type**: Active equity - type products had outstanding returns, but their scales were generally small, and their performance was affected by short - term market fluctuations [27]. - **Science - innovation Bond ETFs**: Many new - issue science - innovation bond ETFs had large scales, driven by policies and meeting institutional low - risk allocation needs [29]. - **Low - risk Products**: The New China CSI Inter - bank Certificate of Deposit Index 7 - day Holding Fund supplemented the market's demand for liquidity management tools [30]. Insurance Products - **Overall Situation**: From September 6th to 19th, 2025, 64 new insurance products were issued, a 79.81% decrease from the previous period. The proportion of dividend - type products in life insurance and annuity insurance increased significantly, mainly due to the asymmetric reduction of the predetermined interest rate [8]. - **Life Insurance**: Among the 43 newly issued life insurance products, 23 were dividend - type, accounting for 53.49%, replacing traditional products as the main force [34]. - **Annuity Insurance** - **New - Issue Situation**: Among the 21 newly issued annuity insurance products, 17 were dividend - type, accounting for 80.95%. Traditional products were absent this period [37]. - **IRR Calculation**: Dividend - type annuity insurance's IRR was mainly measured by the dividend IRR. Pension annuity dividend - type insurance was more suitable for long - term holding, and in the short - term, the IRR might decline slightly, while in the long - term, it was expected to stabilize and rise [41].
长假临近 基金公司为何纷纷限购低风险固收类产品?
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-25 15:35
临近双节假期,许多基金公司开始调整旗下部分产品的申购政策。9月25日,又有南方基金、汇添富基 金、华泰柏瑞基金等多家机构公告了旗下部分产品的限购措施。 从产品类型来看,债券型、货币型等低风险基金的限购公告较多;从实施限购的时间来看,它们普遍定 于9月29日开始限购,并且于10月9日恢复日常申购。 公司将从9月29日开始,限制个人投资者单个账户申购基金上限为50万元,这一限制将在10月9日取消。 同一天,浦银安盛基金也发布公告称,将从9月29日开始,暂停浦银中短债A、C的申购业务,直到10月 9日恢复。此外,还有中海基金、财通基金、国联安基金、红土创新基金等多家公募基金机构针对节前 暂停申购的相关计划进行了说明。 值得注意的是,在此期间,还有一些权益类基金也将实施限购,如华泰柏瑞港股通量化,也将于9月29 日开始限制大额申购,单日申购上限为1000元,到10月9日恢复。 有分析指出,基金公司在节前资金流入高峰期进行规模调控,节后再恢复正常,以此平滑资金曲线、稳 定运作环境。 多只低风险产品节前限购 今年国庆、中秋双节假期共持续八天时间,近日,已经有不少基金公司陆续对旗下基金产品的申购政策 做出调整,普遍针对低风 ...
R1等级基金真能稳赚不赔?当前市场下,真正安全的基金就这三类!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-24 02:41
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the characteristics and risks associated with R1-rated funds, emphasizing that "low risk" does not equate to "zero risk" and provides guidance for conservative investors on selecting suitable low-risk funds [1]. Fund Risk Level System - The fund risk level system ranges from R1 to R5, indicating increasing levels of risk and corresponding investor risk tolerance [2]. - R1 funds are considered "quasi-savings" but still carry three main potential risks: yield fluctuation risk, liquidity risk, and minimal credit risk [4][5][6]. R1 Fund Characteristics - R1 funds are suitable for cautious investors seeking capital safety and stable returns, with maximum drawdown typically controlled within 0.5% [7]. - The average annualized return for R1 funds over the past decade is 2.4%, with the maximum single-day decline not exceeding 0.05% [6]. Types of Low-Risk Funds - Money Market Funds: Known for liquidity, suitable for cash management [9]. - Interbank Certificate of Deposit Index Funds: Enhanced yield version of money market funds, with higher yield volatility [9]. - Pure Bond Funds: Core for stable returns, requiring differentiation between short and long-term [9]. Investment Characteristics - Money Market Funds: Seven-day annualized yield ranges from 1.8% to 2.8% [10]. - Interbank Certificate of Deposit Index Funds: Annualized yield over the past three years is between 2.8% and 3.5%, with volatility 1.5 times that of money market funds [10]. - Pure Bond Funds: Short-term pure bond funds yield between 2.5% and 3.2%, while long-term pure bond funds yield between 3.5% and 4.5% [10]. Investment Strategy for Conservative Investors - For conservative investors, a combination of money market funds for cash management, interbank certificate of deposit funds for enhanced yield, and pure bond funds for core returns can achieve a stable annualized return of 2.8% to 4% [13].
同业存单产品遇冷,红塔红土一同业存单基金面临清盘风险
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-18 09:51
深圳商报·读创客户端记者 詹钰叶 首批同业存单指数基金诞生于2021年12月,这类基金是跟踪中证同业存单AAA指数(由银行间市场主 体评级为AAA,发行期限1年以下、上市时间7天以上的同业存单组成)的指数债券基金。其卖点主要 为"货基替代",一度受到市场追捧,爆款频出,首批产品曾"吸金"超百亿元。尽管同业存单指数基金数 量不断增长,但总体规模显著缩水。同花顺数据显示,至今年年中,全市场共有101只同业存单指数基 金,合计规模为1258.26亿元;而上述产品发行规模共计3551.49亿元,整体规模缩水幅度接近65%。 | | | | 2025年年中规模 | 较发行规模缩水 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 证券代码 | 基金简称(官方) | 基金成立日 | (力元) | (%) | | 019984. OF | 南华同业存单指数7天持有 | 2024-03-19 | 345. 98 | -99. 59 | | 018343. OF | 汇安中证同业存单AA指数7天持有期 | 2023-06-29 | 563. 63 | -99. 52 | | 019754. OF | 交银 ...
9.17犀牛财经早报:基金费率改革或影响短债基金 华为发布面向智能世界2035十大技术趋势
Xi Niu Cai Jing· 2025-09-17 01:49
基金费率改革或影响短债基金 理财公司考虑三大替代路径 近日,证监会就《公开募集证券投资基金销售费用管理规定(征求意见稿)》公开征求意见,拟针对不 同持有期限设置基金赎回费率下限。业内人士认为,此举或提高短期持有基金的赎回成本,进而影响短 债基金等高流动性产品的投资价值。作为短债基金的重要机构投资者,理财公司正积极寻求应对之策。 记者从业内获悉,理财公司主要考虑三条替代路径:直接进行债券交易、通过专户配置债券、投资债券 ETF及同业存单指数基金。(中国证券报) 月内122只基金开启募集 环比增长45.24% 9月份以来,公募基金发行市场持续活跃。公募排排网数据显示,9月1日至9月16日,全市场共有122只 基金启动募集,相较于8月份同期的84只环比增长45.24%。同时,基金发行市场的"开门红"不仅表现在 数量的增长上,更体现在募集效率的提升上。9月份以来,新基金的平均认购天数较8月份同期的17.42 天缩短了近30%,部分热门产品甚至出现了"一日售罄"的火爆现象。"权益类基金业绩表现突出,赚钱 效应显著,是推动基金发行市场活跃的重要动力。"排排网集团旗下融智投资FOF基金经理李春瑜表 示。(证券日报) 退市公 ...
基金费率改革或影响短债基金 理财公司考虑三大替代路径
Zhong Guo Zheng Quan Bao· 2025-09-16 22:33
征求意见稿针对不同持有期限设置了基金赎回费率下限:对持续持有期少于七日的投资者,收取不低于 赎回金额1.5%的赎回费;对持续持有期满七日、少于三十日的投资者,收取不低于赎回金额1%的赎回 费;对持续持有期满三十日、少于六个月的投资者,收取不低于赎回金额0.5%的赎回费。 业内人士认为,征求意见稿意在引导投资者进行长期投资,但对于部分将债券基金作为流动性管理工具 或交易工具的投资者而言,赎回成本或增加,进而压缩投资者实际的持有收益。 换言之,以短债基金为代表的高流动性产品,其投资价值恐将受到影响。中信证券首席经济学家明明认 为,短债基金的底层资产以短期债券为主。在低利率环境下,票息收益本就有限。根据征求意见稿,基 金赎回费率或上调,这将增加投资者的短期持有成本,进而削弱该类产品在流动性管理和交易工具方面 的价值。 近日,证监会就《公开募集证券投资基金销售费用管理规定(征求意见稿)》公开征求意见,拟针对不 同持有期限设置基金赎回费率下限。业内人士认为,此举或提高短期持有基金的赎回成本,进而影响短 债基金等高流动性产品的投资价值。 作为短债基金的重要机构投资者,理财公司正积极寻求应对之策。中国证券报记者从业内获悉, ...
基金费率改革或影响短债基金理财公司考虑三大替代路径
Zhong Guo Zheng Quan Bao· 2025-09-16 20:20
● 李静 李蕴奇 近日,证监会就《公开募集证券投资基金销售费用管理规定(征求意见稿)》公开征求意见,拟针对不 同持有期限设置基金赎回费率下限。业内人士认为,此举或提高短期持有基金的赎回成本,进而影响短 债基金等高流动性产品的投资价值。 作为短债基金的重要机构投资者,理财公司正积极寻求应对之策。中国证券报记者从业内获悉,理财公 司主要考虑三条替代路径:直接进行债券交易、通过专户配置债券、投资债券ETF及同业存单指数基 金。 短债基金持有成本或提升 征求意见稿针对不同持有期限设置了基金赎回费率下限:对持续持有期少于七日的投资者,收取不低于 赎回金额1.5%的赎回费;对持续持有期满七日、少于三十日的投资者,收取不低于赎回金额1%的赎回 费;对持续持有期满三十日、少于六个月的投资者,收取不低于赎回金额0.5%的赎回费。 业内人士认为,征求意见稿意在引导投资者进行长期投资,但对于部分将债券基金作为流动性管理工具 或交易工具的投资者而言,赎回成本或增加,进而压缩投资者实际的持有收益。 换言之,以短债基金为代表的高流动性产品,其投资价值恐将受到影响。中信证券首席经济学家明明认 为,短债基金的底层资产以短期债券为主。在低利率 ...
存款、理财、基金,谁终将被替代?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-02 08:49
Core Insights - The article discusses the competition and transition between bank deposits, wealth management products, and funds, particularly in the context of declining interest rates and changing investor preferences [1][2]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - With the backdrop of declining deposit interest rates, many depositors are seeking alternative investment products, leading to increased interest in short-term fixed-income wealth management products [1]. - Wealth management products have maintained a scale of approximately 31 trillion yuan, despite regulatory pressures and the need for companies to offer competitive returns [1][2]. - The shift towards low-volatility and stable investment strategies has become prominent among wealth management companies, contrasting with the initial ambition to offer higher-risk products [2]. Group 2: Product Comparison - Credit bond ETFs have seen a tenfold increase in scale, indicating a growing preference for these products due to their lower management fees compared to traditional wealth management products [3]. - Wealth management products may struggle to compete with ETFs if they solely rely on credit bonds for returns, as the advantages of wealth management products diminish in a fully net-value fluctuating environment [4]. - The importance of non-standard assets and strategies such as IPOs and private placements is highlighted as critical for wealth management products to differentiate themselves and maintain market share against funds [4].