最近一周，有很多朋友在纯债基金、低风险银行理财、债券ETF里边亏钱了，那边股市涨得这么好，自 己却在纯债中亏钱，那么债市为什么跌？该怎么办呢？ ...

Core Viewpoint - In a rapidly changing economic environment, individuals with 200,000 yuan in cash face a crucial financial decision regarding whether to deposit it in a bank or explore alternative investment options. Financial professionals emphasize the importance of considering safety, liquidity, and yield when making this decision, tailored to individual financial situations and risk tolerance [1]. Investment Strategies - Traditional fixed deposits may not be the only option; a diversified investment strategy is recommended. A pyramid asset allocation model is suggested, distributing funds across different risk levels to balance returns and risks [1]. Conservative Base (40-60% of funds) - Large Time Deposits: Starting from 200,000 yuan, rates typically exceed regular fixed deposits by 30-50 basis points. For instance, a three-year large time deposit from a joint-stock bank can yield up to 3.25% [3]. - Savings Bonds: Backed by national credit, these are highly secure. The three-year savings bond for 2025 has a coupon rate of 3.12%, while the five-year bond offers 3.32%, making them ideal for conservative investors [3]. Balanced Middle (30-40% of funds) - Cash Management Products: These offer high liquidity, often allowing T+0 redemption, with annual yields ranging from 2.3% to 2.8%. For example, the "Zhaozhao Bao" from China Merchants Bank is flexible and accessible [4]. - Pure Bond Funds: Primarily investing in the bond market, these have relatively low risk, with a three-year annualized return of approximately 4.5% to 5.2% and volatility below 1.5% [4]. Aggressive Top (10-20% of funds) - Index Fund Regular Investment: Taking the CSI 300 index as an example, the annualized return over the past decade has reached 6.8%, indicating substantial long-term investment returns [6]. - Gold ETFs: With inflation-resistant properties, these saw a 9.2% increase in the first half of 2025, serving as an effective tool against currency depreciation [8]. Innovative Deposit Products - In response to market competition, banks are launching innovative deposit products to balance yield and liquidity [9]. - Tiered Interest Products: For example, the "Tianjin Jinbao" from Bohai Bank offers a rate of 3.0% to 3.2% for 1-3 years, allowing for tiered interest even with early withdrawals [9]. - Special Savings: The "Happiness Savings" from Citic Bank supports monthly interest payments, with a five-year rate of up to 3.85%, providing stable cash flow [9]. - Structured Deposits: These capital-protected products typically linked to foreign exchange or indices have expected returns between 1.5% and 2.0% [11]. Personalized Investment Strategies - Different asset allocation strategies should be adopted based on individual risk tolerance and financial goals [11]. - Conservative Investors (55+ years): Recommended to allocate 70% to large time deposits, 20% to bonds, and 10% to money market funds for capital safety [13]. - Steady Investors: Suggested allocation includes 50% in smart deposits, 30% in pure bond funds, 15% in gold ETFs, and 5% in equity funds for stable growth [13]. - Aggressive Investors (under 35 years): Recommended to invest 40% in index fund regular investments, 30% in mixed products from bank wealth management subsidiaries, 20% in structured deposits, and 10% in QDII funds for higher returns [13]. Key Operational Reminders - Interest Rate Cycle Assessment: When the central bank is in a rate-cutting phase, longer-term deposit products are advisable; conversely, short-term products should be chosen during rate hikes for flexibility [14]. - Fund Planning Techniques: The "12 Time Deposit Method" involves depositing 16,000 yuan monthly in fixed deposits to maintain liquidity while enjoying higher rates [14]. - Tax Optimization: Interest income from bonds is exempt from personal income tax, while large time deposit interest must be reported as part of comprehensive income, necessitating tax planning [14]. - Bank Selection: City commercial banks typically offer deposit rates 30-50 basis points higher than state-owned banks, warranting investor attention [15]. Market Trends - The proportion of clients opting for pure fixed deposits has decreased to 38% in 2025, down 23 percentage points from 2020, indicating a shift towards a "core-satellite" strategy, where stable products form the core, supplemented by a small portion of high-risk, high-reward products for diversified asset growth [15].

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No industry investment rating information is provided in the report. Group 2: Core Views of the Report - The logic of "buying on every dip" in the bond market still holds as the logic supporting the long - term bull market in the bond market remains intact. The future outlook is long - term bullish but short - term bottom - grinding [1][2][20]. - The core cause of the four rounds of redemption tides since September 24, 2024, is the unexpected rise in the equity market. The consensus of a slow - bull market in equities is strengthening, leading to more frequent bond market adjustments and redemption tides [1][8]. - The redemption risk index rose to 62 on August 18, indicating the risk of a redemption tide. Although the fund selling sentiment was strong in July, the active purchase by rural commercial banks and insurance companies effectively alleviated market pressure. It is expected that the scale of wealth management products will not be significantly negatively affected this time. If the 10Y Treasury yield touches 1.8% due to unexpected performance in the equity market, core buyers such as banks and insurance companies may enter the market, and investors can consider right - side allocation at this point [1][9][14]. Group 3: Summary by Directory 1. August Redemption Tide Returns - On August 18, the A - share market value exceeded 100 trillion yuan, and the Shanghai Composite Index reached a new high in nearly a decade, triggering a bond market adjustment and bond fund redemptions. The core cause of the four rounds of redemption tides since September 24, 2024, is the unexpected rise in the equity market [8]. - A comprehensive redemption risk index was constructed. On August 18, the index rose to 62, mainly affected by bond fund redemptions, equity market rises, high - valuation transactions of Tier 2 and perpetual bonds, and tightened liquidity [9]. 2. When Will the Redemption Tide Market Reach the Right Side? - In terms of time, the median duration of historical redemption tides is 6 - 7 trading days. Although the market slightly recovered on August 19, the redemption risk index has been triggered, and the redemption disturbance may last for 4 - 5 days [14]. - In terms of adjustment range, the 10Y Treasury yield rose 4bp on August 18 and fell 1bp on August 19, currently reaching about half of the adjustment range of small - scale redemption tides since 2023. The 1.8% level of the 10Y Treasury yield is a key observation point [14]. - The main sellers are funds and securities firms. On August 19, funds net - sold 126.6 billion yuan of bonds. In July, rural commercial banks and insurance companies actively bought bonds, and currently, wealth management products are still net buyers [14]. - The core factors for the end of the redemption tide include equity market adjustments and weakening of the stock - bond seesaw effect, central bank liquidity support, and self - repair of the market after reaching a certain adjustment level [15][16]. 3. Is the Logic of "Buying on Every Dip" Subverted? - The long - term bull market in the bond market is supported by factors such as weak economic recovery, declining income and employment expectations, long - term asset shortage, real estate bubble burst, fiscal tightening of general urban investment, moderately loose monetary policy, and difficulties in bank credit issuance [2][21]. - From the perspective of credit and bank fund flow, the high correlation between social financing credit and the bond market remains. Weak financing demand in general urban investment and real estate leads to weak credit growth, causing bank funds to flow into the bond market, making it difficult for the bond bull market to reverse. In July, the new credit in the social financing scale was - 426.3 billion yuan, a year - on - year decrease of 345.5 billion yuan [2][22]. - From a technical perspective, the long - term interest rate is currently in a relatively right - side position, with good odds and relatively high winning probabilities. However, the liquidity of credit products is relatively weak, and a clearer right - side opportunity is still awaited. It is recommended to enter the market on the right side of this adjustment, take profits moderately, and maintain a defensive position [2][26].

Core Viewpoint - The bond market is experiencing significant pressure and adjustments, contrasting with the strong performance of the equity market, leading to concerns among bond fund managers about redemption pressures and declining net asset values [1][3][6]. Market Performance - On August 18, the bond market faced its worst day in August, with 10-year and 30-year government bond yields rising by 5 basis points and 6 basis points respectively, closing at 1.79% and 2.06% [1]. - The average performance of pure bond funds was negative, with mid-to-long-term pure bond funds averaging -0.19% and short-term bond funds averaging -0.03% for the week [6][7]. Market Dynamics - The bond market is under pressure due to increased risk appetite in the equity market, leading to a "stock-bond seesaw" effect, where funds are being diverted from bonds to equities [3][4]. - The current bond market adjustment is driven more by expectations rather than changes in the funding environment, with a potential shift from deflation to mild inflation anticipated [3][4]. Fund Manager Strategies - Fund managers are adopting strategies such as shortening duration and adjusting portfolio structures to cope with the steepening yield curve [8][9]. - There is a consensus among fund managers that the bond market does not have the foundation for a long-term decline, with continued demand from institutional clients and a stable funding environment [2][8]. Investor Sentiment - Personal investors are expressing mixed feelings, with some feeling pessimistic about the bond market while others see potential buying opportunities [8][10]. - Fund managers suggest that investors consider extending their holding periods and maintaining a balanced approach to their portfolios, especially during market adjustments [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The bond market is experiencing significant adjustments, with fund managers expressing concerns about pressure and actively shortening duration and adjusting structures to cope with future steepening of the yield curve [1][2][4]. Group 1: Market Conditions - The bond market faced a severe downturn on August 18, with 10-year and 30-year government bond yields rising by 5 basis points and 6 basis points respectively, closing at 1.79% and 2.06% [1]. - Despite a brief recovery earlier in August, the bond market has been under pressure again due to increased market risk appetite, with the 10-year government bond yield surpassing the high point from July [1][4]. Group 2: Fund Manager Insights - Fund managers are facing redemption pressures, particularly in bond funds, but they believe that the bond market does not have a foundation for a long-term decline, as the 10-year government bond yield of 1.8% reflects current expectations [2][9]. - The performance of pure bond funds has been poor, with average returns for medium to long-term pure bond funds at -0.19% and short bond funds at -0.03% [7]. Group 3: Factors Influencing the Bond Market - The bond market's adjustment is driven more by expectations rather than changes in the funding environment, with a potential shift from deflation to a mild inflation scenario impacting long-term bonds negatively [4][5]. - There is a notable lack of configuration funds from small and medium-sized banks, with a significant decrease in bond investment balances reported [4]. Group 4: Future Outlook and Strategies - Fund managers are adjusting their strategies to focus on shorter durations and are maintaining a neutral to high duration stance while reducing exposure to long-term rates [9]. - The overall sentiment is that while the bond market may not see significant positive catalysts in the short term, it remains within a range of support and resistance, with a cautious approach recommended [9]. Group 5: Recommendations for Investors - Fund managers suggest that credit bond funds may yield over 2% in the coming year, and investors should consider gradually increasing their exposure to these funds [11]. - For individual investors, maintaining a long-term perspective and potentially increasing allocations during market adjustments is advised, while also considering a balanced portfolio with some equity exposure [11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the development of a quantitative framework for pure bond fund strategy and portfolio construction, focusing on future return predictions based on historical data and experience [2]. Group 1: Functions of Pure Bond Funds in Portfolios - Pure bond funds serve three main functions in a portfolio: 1. **Core Holding**: They act as a stabilizing force in the portfolio, providing reliable returns through long-term allocation [4][13]. 2. **Tactical Allocation**: In a context of compressed static yields, short-term trading operations can enhance portfolio returns by capturing timing signals and credit spread opportunities [4][16]. 3. **Cash Management**: A portion of the portfolio is allocated to cash management products to mitigate liquidity risks during market downturns or unexpected redemptions [4][17]. Group 2: Required Capabilities and Characteristics of Pure Bond Funds - **Core Holding Products**: These funds should exhibit strong individual bond selection capabilities, stable long-term holding experiences, and a proven risk-return profile [5][20]. - **Tactical Allocation Products**: They should be identified based on their extreme style attributes and redemption fee structures, focusing on liquidity and tracking capabilities [5][31]. - **Cash Management Products**: The emphasis is on stability and risk control, with a focus on indicators that reflect consistent performance and low liquidity risk [5][34]. Group 3: Indicators for Predicting High-Performing Pure Bond Funds - A factor testing framework is established to validate the predictive power of selected indicators for future performance, including bond selection ability and net asset value evaluation metrics [6][35]. - Key indicators include: 1. **Bond Selection Ability**: Metrics such as the contribution of bond coupon income and the performance of individual bond selection strategies [6][28]. 2. **Performance Metrics**: Historical return comparisons and win rates against benchmarks to assess fund stability and performance [6][29]. 3. **Holding Experience**: Indicators that measure the average returns over different holding periods to gauge the fund's reliability [6][30]. Group 4: Portfolio Construction Insights - The article presents three constructed portfolios based on different strategies: 1. **Individual Bond Selection Portfolio**: Achieved an annualized return of 4.38% with a maximum drawdown of -1.98% over the period from August 2017 to April 2025 [7]. 2. **Holding Experience Portfolio**: Delivered an annualized return of 4.13% with a maximum drawdown of -1.87%, outperforming the benchmark by 44 basis points [7]. 3. **Cash Management Short-Duration Fund Portfolio**: Recorded an annualized return of 2.88% with a maximum drawdown of -0.96%, also outperforming its benchmark [7]. Group 5: Selection of Representative Pure Bond Fund Products - The article concludes with a focus on identifying potential pure bond fund products across various strategies, including individual bond selection, interest rate trading, and scarce investment opportunities, based on the established indicator system [8].

Market Overview - The A-share market has shown strong upward momentum, with the Shanghai Composite Index breaking through the key level of 3674.40 points, reaching a new high since the "9·24" rally last year, with a year-to-date increase of nearly 10% [1] - On August 14, the index continued to rise, surpassing 3700 points, marking the highest level since December 2021, with trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets reaching 2.18 trillion yuan, indicating a significant increase in market activity [1][2] Equity Market Dynamics - The current rally in the equity market is driven by multiple factors, including improved expectations from "anti-involution" policies, increased participation from retail investors, institutional funds, and foreign capital, as well as resilient macroeconomic fundamentals and proactive fiscal policies [2] - Various sectors are experiencing structural opportunities, with significant gains in securities, semiconductors, and insurance, indicating a shift away from a market dominated solely by bank stocks [2] Bond Market Analysis - The bond market has shown a mixed performance, with the yield on 10-year government bonds rising from 1.6855% on August 11 to 1.7350% on August 13, reflecting a lack of clear catalysts for bond price increases [1][2] - The bond market is currently influenced by two main factors: the strong performance of the equity market reducing the willingness of bond investors to increase positions, and a divergence in institutional behavior, with funds and brokerages being net sellers while banks and insurance companies are net buyers [3][5] Tax Policy Impact - The recent restoration of value-added tax on interest income from newly issued government and local bonds has led to an increase in selling pressure from funds, impacting their future bond allocation strategies [5][6] - Despite the tax changes, the overall impact on the bond market is expected to be limited, as the demand for fixed-income products remains relatively stable [8] Future Outlook - The bond market is perceived to be in a "top and bottom" range, with limited potential for significant yield declines due to the strong equity market and investor risk appetite, while still supported by a loose monetary policy [7] - Analysts suggest that the "look at stocks, do bonds" strategy may continue, but the coexistence of a "dual bull" market for stocks and bonds is also possible as the capital market recovers [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the source of funds when investing, suggesting that aligning investment strategies with the nature of the funds can reduce anxiety and improve decision-making [5][6][8]. Group 1: Investment Strategies - The article outlines a shift in focus from "what products to buy" to "what money to allocate to which products," highlighting the common pitfalls of following media trends and making impulsive decisions [5][10]. - It suggests categorizing funds based on their source, such as "spare money," "idle funds," and "earned income," to determine appropriate investment strategies and products [9][7]. Group 2: Emotional Management - The article discusses the need to manage emotions in investing, advocating for a focus on emotional stability rather than solely on profit strategies [10][11]. - It highlights the benefits of systematic investment plans (SIPs) to alleviate emotional stress during market downturns, allowing investors to maintain a long-term perspective [12][11]. Group 3: Asset Allocation - The article stresses the importance of asset allocation, particularly the role of pure bond funds as stabilizers in a portfolio, which can help manage volatility and emotional responses to market fluctuations [14][15][19]. - It recommends diversifying investments to mitigate risks, emphasizing that proper asset allocation can lead to smoother investment experiences, especially during bear markets [23][24].

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods 1. Model Name: Risk Factor Exposure Regression for Fixed Income+ Funds - **Model Construction Idea**: The model regresses the net asset value (NAV) of Fixed Income+ funds against pure style factor returns of various asset classes to determine the risk exposure of these funds to different asset categories [4][19] - **Model Construction Process**: 1. The NAV of Fixed Income+ funds is regressed on the pure style factor returns of various asset classes, including bonds, stocks, and convertible bonds [4][19] 2. For bond assets, the model identifies changes in duration and credit strategy exposure by comparing the average risk factor exposure between the current and previous months [4][19] 3. For convertible bonds, the model calculates the exposure to parity risk factors and tracks changes in overall positioning [4][23] - **Model Evaluation**: The model effectively captures the dynamic risk exposure of Fixed Income+ funds across different asset classes, providing insights into their allocation strategies [4][19] 2. Model Name: Fixed Income+ Fund Optimal Portfolio Construction - **Model Construction Idea**: The model selects 10 funds quarterly based on multiple dimensions such as win rate and odds, and allocates them equally to construct an optimal portfolio [5][26] - **Model Construction Process**: 1. Quarterly selection of 10 funds based on criteria such as win rate and odds [5][26] 2. Equal-weight allocation of the selected funds to form the optimal portfolio [5][26] - **Model Evaluation**: The constructed portfolio demonstrates more stable performance compared to the secondary bond fund index, outperforming it by 0.36% in the current month [5][27] 3. Model Name: Pure Bond Fund Optimal Portfolio Construction - **Model Construction Idea**: The model selects funds with alpha characteristics within one standard deviation of market averages across various style exposures and allocates them equally to construct an optimal portfolio [7][45] - **Model Construction Process**: 1. Identify funds with style exposures within one standard deviation of market averages [7][45] 2. Select 10 funds with high alpha characteristics on a quarterly basis [7][45] 3. Allocate the selected funds equally to form the optimal portfolio [7][45] - **Model Evaluation**: The portfolio outperformed the mid-to-long-term pure bond fund index by 0.16% year-to-date, demonstrating its effectiveness in generating excess returns [7][46] --- Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods 1. Factor Name: Bond Risk Factors - **Factor Construction Idea**: The factors include duration, slope, convexity, credit, and default, which are used to measure the risk exposure of pure bond funds [6][42] - **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Regress the NAV of pure bond funds on the five factors: duration, slope, convexity, credit, and default [6][42] 2. Analyze the mean changes in factor exposures between the current and previous months [6][42] 3. Assess the dispersion of factor exposures to evaluate consistency in fund strategies [6][42] - **Factor Evaluation**: The analysis reveals a significant increase in credit exposure and a decrease in convexity exposure, with low dispersion in credit exposure, indicating consistent adoption of credit strategies among funds [6][42] --- Backtesting Results of Models 1. Risk Factor Exposure Regression for Fixed Income+ Funds - No specific numerical backtesting results provided 2. Fixed Income+ Fund Optimal Portfolio Construction - Outperformed the secondary bond fund index by 0.36% in the current month [5][27] 3. Pure Bond Fund Optimal Portfolio Construction - Outperformed the mid-to-long-term pure bond fund index by 0.16% year-to-date [7][46] --- Backtesting Results of Factors 1. Bond Risk Factors - Credit exposure increased significantly, while convexity exposure decreased [6][42] - Low standard deviation in credit exposure indicates consistent strategy adoption [6][42]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In H1 2025, the scale of pure - bond funds increased by nearly 100 billion yuan. Credit medium - and long - term bond funds showed outstanding performance in a volatile market, but the overall performance of pure - bond funds was inferior to the same period in previous years. Meanwhile, the expansion of pure - bond funds was hindered, and "Fixed Income +" funds became popular in the market [1]. - The scale of index funds increased significantly beyond the seasonal trend. Credit - based index bond funds witnessed explosive growth, while interest - rate based ones had a recovery. For medium - and long - term bond funds, the equilibrium and interest - rate styles grew in scale, while the credit style declined. Short - term and medium - short - term bond funds ended three consecutive quarters of scale reduction [3][4]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 2025 H1, the scale of pure - bond funds increased by nearly 100 billion yuan 3.1.1 Credit medium - and long - term bond funds showed outstanding performance in a volatile market - In Q1 2025, affected by multiple negative factors, the bond market was under pressure, and the yield center of pure - bond funds dropped significantly. In Q2, due to factors such as increased risk - aversion sentiment and abundant liquidity, the bond market strengthened, and the single - quarter yield center of pure - bond funds turned positive [11]. - The median return of pure - bond funds in H1 2025 was 0.76%, recovering the losses in Q1 but underperforming the same period in 2024 and 2023. Credit - style products were more popular, with the return center of medium - and long - term credit bond funds reaching 1.00%, leading other styles [1][14]. 3.1.2 The expansion of pure - bond funds was hindered, and "Fixed Income +" became popular in the market - The total scale of pure - bond funds increased from 9.50 trillion yuan at the end of 2024 to 9.59 trillion yuan in mid - 2025, with an increase of only 93.8 billion yuan. In contrast, the total scale of "Fixed Income +" funds increased by 256.9 billion yuan to 1.48 trillion yuan. The "market share" of pure - bond funds decreased by nearly 2 percentage points [18]. 3.1.3 Most of the top - tier fund managers saw an increase in scale - In H1 2025, 67 fund managers had positive scale growth, with 16 managers having a scale increase of over 10 billion yuan and 28 managers over 5 billion yuan. Among the 21 top - tier managers, 14 had a net scale increase, mainly in Q2 [23]. - Index - type bond funds quickly replaced medium - and long - term bond funds as the focus of fund managers. Among the 15 fund managers with rapid scale growth in Q2, index - type bond funds contributed 250.4 billion yuan, accounting for over 50% [2][28]. 3.2 By type, the scale growth of index funds was significantly beyond the seasonal trend 3.2.1 Index bond funds: credit - based ones had explosive growth, and interest - rate based ones had a recovery - In Q1 2025, due to the seasonal effect, the scale of index - type bond funds decreased by 92.6 billion yuan. In Q2, the scale increased by 308.3 billion yuan, reaching the highest level since 2019 [33]. - Credit - bond index funds grew rapidly, with a net increase of about 220 billion yuan in Q2, and their proportion in index - type bond funds rose from 12% at the end of Q1 to 24%. Policy - financial bond index funds had a recovery, but their proportion decreased from 71% to 60% [35]. 3.2.2 Medium - and long - term bond funds: the equilibrium and interest - rate styles grew in scale, while the credit style declined - The medium - and long - term bond fund market was first depressed and then rebounded in H1 2025. The scale decreased by 394.6 billion yuan in Q1 and rebounded by 275.1 billion yuan in Q2 but did not fully recover the losses in Q1 [48]. - There was a significant style rotation in H1 2025. In Q1, funds flowed into credit - style products, while in Q2, the equilibrium and interest - rate styles grew, and the credit style shrank. The main reason was the active adjustment of the holding structure of existing funds [48][49]. 3.2.3 Short - term and medium - short - term bond funds: ended three consecutive quarters of scale reduction - In Q2 2025, the scale of short - term and medium - short - term bond funds rebounded, ending the downward trend since Q3 2024. The scale of short - term bond funds increased by 17.1% to 545.5 billion yuan, and that of medium - short - term bond funds increased by 18.5% to 600.5 billion yuan [59]. 3.3 Appendix: Fund classification method - For the selection of the fund list each quarter, start from the initial funds of bond - type funds in the Wind first - level classification and partial - debt hybrid funds in the second - level classification. Eliminate funds that do not meet the requirements to ensure that they are pure - bond funds [67]. - Classify short - term and medium - short - term bond funds based on the full - name matching of fund products, investment scope, performance comparison benchmark, and weighted duration of heavy - position bonds. Classify medium - and long - term bond funds according to the bond - holding situation in the quarterly report and assign style labels [68].