1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content 2. Core Viewpoints - The overall scale of the ETF market has slightly shrunk compared to the beginning of the year, with the number of listed funds increasing. The performance of different types of ETFs has shown significant differentiation, and the flow of funds has also changed marginally. The trading congestion of bond ETFs has decreased, while the trading of stock ETFs has shifted towards growth and technology. The issuance of ETFs has shown a trend of decline in the number of ongoing issuances and an increase in the number of waiting - to - be - issued products [3][58][72] 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Scale: Total Expansion and Structural Stratification (Market/Product/Institution) 3.1.1 Market/Product Scale - As of March 20, 2026, the total scale of the entire market's ETFs reached 5.10 trillion yuan, a decrease of 0.92 trillion yuan from the beginning of the year. The number of listed funds increased to 1,458, with 55 new funds added. Stock - type ETFs were the main force in scale, but their scale decreased by 0.89 trillion yuan compared to the beginning of the year. Bond - type ETFs had the largest shrinkage in scale, while commodity - type ETFs increased by 8.2092 billion yuan. Cross - border ETFs added 10 new funds, indicating an increasing demand for diversified asset allocation [3][11][36] 3.1.2 Institution Scale - Last week, the ETF scale of leading institutions decreased by over 10 billion yuan, with the equity side generally under pressure. Only a few fixed - income and money - market directions received marginal support. The differentiation among institutions increased, with some institutions experiencing significant declines in both equity and ETF scales, while others showed relatively stable performance in the money - market segment [13][16] 3.2 Performance: Rise - Fall Differentiation and Valuation Position 3.2.1 Major Types of ETFs - Last week, the domestic equity market was generally weak, with broad - based indexes generally retreating. Small - and medium - cap indexes had larger declines, and their valuation quantiles were at high levels. Defensive sectors also failed to avoid the decline. Bond - type ETFs provided a hedge, and cross - border (QDII) ETFs were also weak. The valuation structure showed that core broad - based indexes were relatively stable, while growth and small - and medium - cap indexes had higher valuations and greater volatility [19][20][24] 3.2.2 CITIC First - Level Industry Index - The performance of industries last week showed obvious differentiation. Most industries had high valuation quantiles but different涨跌 trends. High - valuation sectors were concentrated in strong - performing industries, while low - valuation sectors were generally weak. High - valuation cyclical sectors were particularly under pressure [28] 3.2.3 Representative ETF Products - The current market shows obvious differentiation between high and low valuations, with defensive and risk - averse funds being active. In terms of scale, Huatai - Peregrine CSI 300 ETF ranked first. In terms of trading activity, bond - type ETFs were prominent, reflecting risk - averse sentiment. Some ETFs such as military - leading ETFs and dividend ETFs had high valuation quantiles, while others like Hang Seng Tech ETF and pharmaceutical ETFs had low valuations, which were attractive for long - term investors [30] 3.3 Funds: Sector Liquidity and Net Inflow Structure 3.3.1 Overall Market Overview: Scale and Net Redemption/Subscription - As of March 20, 2026, the market continued to expand, but different types of ETFs had different scale changes. Stock - type ETFs were still the main force, bond - type ETFs had the largest shrinkage, and commodity - type ETFs increased due to risk - averse demand [36] 3.3.2 Inside the Equity Market: Broad - Based vs. Industry/Theme vs. Strategy - As of March 20, 2026, the funds of major broad - based ETFs showed marginal improvement in the short - term, but the medium - term pressure of net outflows still existed. Long - term funds continued to migrate towards themes and cyclical sectors, while short - term funds showed a style - switching trend [48] 3.3.3 Leveraged Funds - Last week, there was an obvious differentiation between redemption/subscription and margin trading. Some broad - based ETFs had strong inflows of funds through both margin trading and subscription, while some products were mainly dominated by leveraged funds, and most products had weak short - term fund popularity [51] 3.4 ETF Trading Congestion 3.4.1 Trading Intensity - As of March 22, 2026, the total trading volume of the ETF market decreased compared to the previous week. Funds shifted from bonds to equities and cross - border assets. The trading activity of bond - type ETFs declined, and the turnover structure of stock - type ETFs shifted from defensive to growth and technology sectors [58][61][64] 3.5 Issuance Dynamics - Last week, the ETF issuance market continued to decline, with the number of ongoing issuances decreasing and the number of waiting - to - be - issued products increasing. The number of newly established funds increased significantly, and the supply side improved. However, the number of ETFs scheduled to be listed in the next two weeks is limited [72][74]

Market Overview - As of March 20, 2026, the total market size of ETFs reached 5.10 trillion yuan, a decrease of 0.92 trillion yuan since the beginning of the year, with the number of listed ETFs increasing to 1,458, adding 55 new ones [2][26] - The stock-type ETFs accounted for 2.95 trillion yuan, while commodity-type ETFs saw a significant increase of 820.92 billion yuan to 3325.55 billion yuan, indicating sustained demand for hedging [2][26] - The top 20 fund companies experienced a general decline in ETF volumes, with significant pressure on equity sectors, leading to increased differentiation among leading institutions [2][8] Performance Analysis - The domestic equity market saw a substantial pullback, with the CSI 500 and CSI 1000 indices dropping by 6.00% and 5.29% respectively, while valuation levels remained historically high [11][12] - Defensive sectors did not perform well, with the power ETF declining by 2.97%, indicating that even traditionally safe investments were affected by market conditions [11][12] - The military and dividend ETFs had high PE ratios of 96.54 and 99.26 respectively, while the Hang Seng Technology ETF and pharmaceutical ETF remained at lower valuation levels, suggesting potential long-term investment appeal [11][18] Fund Flows - There was a marginal shift in fund flows, with broad-based ETFs seeing a net inflow of 126.08 billion yuan over the past five days, marking a return to positive territory for the first time recently [3][32] - However, over a 60-day period, broad-based ETFs still experienced a net outflow of 10,101.11 billion yuan, indicating ongoing mid-term pressure [3][32] - The recent inflow into the ChiNext index of 52.59 billion yuan suggests a notable shift of funds from safe-haven assets towards growth-oriented equities [21][32] Trading Activity - The trading volume of ETFs reached approximately 2.58 trillion yuan, reflecting a decrease from the previous week, with a notable shift of funds from bonds to equities and cross-border investments [39][41] - The trading activity of bond ETFs decreased significantly, while stock-type ETFs, particularly those related to the A500 index, remained highly active [41][45] - The turnover rate for bond ETFs showed a downward trend, indicating a shift in trading frequency and a potential move towards more stable asset allocations [42][45] Issuance Dynamics - A total of 10 ETFs were listed last week, with a combined share of 3.633 billion, indicating a recovery in supply [49][51] - The number of ETFs currently in issuance decreased to 49, while the number of newly established funds increased significantly to 47, suggesting a more robust supply side for the market [49][51] - Future listings are expected to be limited, with only three ETFs announced for the next two weeks, reflecting a potential contraction in supply [51]

Market Performance Overview - In the week from March 2 to March 6, 2026, oil prices surged while domestic equity market indices experienced a pullback [4] - The oil and petrochemical, coal, and public utilities sectors saw the highest gains, while media, non-ferrous metals, and computer sectors faced the largest declines [4] Fund Product Issuance - A total of 12 new funds were established in the domestic market this week, with a combined issuance of 13.464 billion units [5] - The new funds included 3 bond funds, 6 equity funds, 2 mixed funds, and 1 fund of funds (FOF) [5] - Overall, 45 new funds were issued across various types, including 19 equity funds, 9 FOFs, 8 bond funds, 8 mixed funds, and 1 international (QDII) fund [5] Fund Product Performance Tracking - The net value of industry-themed funds declined across the board this week, with financial and real estate-themed funds performing relatively better [6] - As of March 6, 2026, the net value changes for various themed funds were as follows: financial and real estate -1.10%, cyclical -1.66%, industry rotation -2.30%, pharmaceuticals -2.43%, consumer -2.59%, balanced industry -2.62%, new energy -2.72%, national defense and military -3.54%, and TMT -4.53% [6] ETF Market Tracking - This week, stock ETFs saw a net inflow of funds, with significant increases in cyclical theme ETFs, while mid-cap and large-cap broad-based ETFs experienced notable reductions [7] - The median return for stock ETFs was -2.37%, with a net inflow of 1.424 billion yuan [7] - Hong Kong stock ETFs had a median return of -3.89% and a net inflow of 3.039 billion yuan, while cross-border ETFs had a median return of -2.30% and a net inflow of 1.031 billion yuan [7] - Commodity ETFs had a median return of -0.33% and a substantial net inflow of 13.181 billion yuan [7][8] - Broad-based ETFs maintained net inflows, while other categories experienced net outflows, particularly mid-cap theme ETFs, which saw a total outflow of 17.252 billion yuan [7] ESG Financial Product Tracking - This week, 13 new green bonds were issued, with a total issuance scale of 20.777 billion yuan [9] - The domestic green bond market has steadily developed, with a cumulative issuance scale of 5.29 trillion yuan and a total of 4,569 bonds issued as of March 6, 2026 [9] - The domestic market currently has 210 ESG funds with a total scale of 154.846 billion yuan [9] - In terms of fund performance, the median net value changes for active equity, passive equity index, and bond ESG funds were -2.46%, -0.69%, and +0.10%, respectively, with clean energy, low-carbon environmental protection, and green electricity-themed funds performing better [9]

- The report introduces a quantitative timing model based on volume signals, referred to as the "Volume Timing Signal" model. The model evaluates market sentiment by analyzing the volume of major indices. As of March 6, 2026, the volume timing signals for all indices, including the Shanghai Composite Index, Shanghai 50, CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, ChiNext Index, and Beijing 50, indicate a cautious outlook[23][24] - The "HS300 Rising Stock Proportion Sentiment Indicator" is introduced to assess market sentiment by calculating the proportion of stocks in the CSI 300 index with positive returns over a specific period (N days). The formula is: $ \text{HS300 N-day Rising Stock Proportion} = \frac{\text{Number of CSI 300 stocks with positive returns over N days}}{\text{Total number of CSI 300 stocks}} $ This indicator is effective in capturing upward opportunities but has limitations in predicting market downturns. As of March 6, 2026, the indicator showed a slight increase, with the proportion of rising stocks exceeding 60%, indicating high market sentiment[24][25] - The "HS300 Rising Stock Proportion Timing Tracking" applies two different smoothing windows (N1=50 and N2=35) to the above sentiment indicator. When the short-term smoothed line (fast line) exceeds the long-term smoothed line (slow line), it signals a bullish market sentiment. As of March 6, 2026, both the fast and slow lines were rising, with the fast line above the slow line, suggesting a continued bullish outlook[26][28] - The "Moving Average Sentiment Indicator" is based on the eight-moving-average system, which uses the closing prices of the CSI 300 index and calculates moving averages with parameters 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, and 233. The indicator assigns values of -1, 0, or 1 based on the position of the current price relative to the moving averages. When the current price exceeds more than five of the moving averages, it signals a bullish sentiment. As of March 6, 2026, the CSI 300 index was in a non-prosperous sentiment zone[32][36] - The report also analyzes cross-sectional volatility and time-series volatility as indicators of short-term alpha opportunities. Cross-sectional volatility for CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 index components increased week-over-week, indicating an improved short-term alpha environment. Over the past quarter, cross-sectional volatility for CSI 300 and CSI 1000 was in the upper-middle percentile of the past six months, while CSI 500 was in the middle percentile. Time-series volatility for the same indices also increased week-over-week, with CSI 1000 in the upper-middle percentile of the past six months, indicating a favorable alpha environment[37][38][41]

Core Viewpoint - The total trading volume of ETFs in the market reached 525.29 billion yuan as of the market close on February 27 [1] Summary by Category Stock ETFs - The trading volume for stock ETFs amounted to 141.7 billion yuan [1] Bond ETFs - The trading volume for bond ETFs was 281.448 billion yuan [1] Money Market ETFs - The trading volume for money market ETFs reached 22.716 billion yuan [1] Commodity ETFs - The trading volume for commodity ETFs was 10.253 billion yuan [1] QDII ETFs - The trading volume for QDII ETFs totaled 46.672 billion yuan [1]

Core Viewpoint - The total trading volume of ETFs in the market reached 449.37 billion yuan as of the market close on February 25 [1] Group 1: ETF Trading Volume - The trading volume of stock ETFs amounted to 160.5 billion yuan [1] - The trading volume of bond ETFs was 185.58 billion yuan [1] - The trading volume of money market ETFs reached 28.95 billion yuan [1] - The trading volume of commodity ETFs was 14.01 billion yuan [1] - The trading volume of QDII ETFs totaled 37.84 billion yuan [1]

Core Viewpoint - The total trading volume of ETFs in the market has reached 249.243 billion yuan, with significant contributions from various types of ETFs [1] Group 1: Trading Volume Breakdown - The trading volume for stock ETFs is 91.68 billion yuan [1] - The trading volume for bond ETFs is 100.315 billion yuan [1] - The trading volume for money market ETFs is 14.525 billion yuan [1] - The trading volume for commodity ETFs is 7.66 billion yuan [1] - The trading volume for QDII ETFs is 21.842 billion yuan [1] Group 2: Top Performing ETFs - The highest trading volume non-money market ETFs are as follows: - Huaxia CSI A500 ETF (512050) with a trading volume of 6.851 billion yuan [1] - A500 Fund (563360) with a trading volume of 5.876 billion yuan [1] - Guotai CSI A500 ETF (159338) with a trading volume of 5.169 billion yuan [1]

Market Overview - The A-share market experienced a week of fluctuations with major indices rebounding, including a 0.36% increase in the CSI 300 Index and a 1.22% rise in the ChiNext Index [1] - Despite the rebound, smart money has shifted direction, with stock ETFs continuing to shrink, particularly the CSI 300-linked ETFs, which have halved in size this year [1][4] ETF Performance - The total ETF market saw an increase of 374.84 billion yuan this week, bringing the total market size to 5.36 trillion yuan, primarily driven by bond and cross-border ETFs [2] - Bond ETFs gained 225.82 billion yuan, ending a five-week decline, while stock ETFs saw a slight decrease of 72.7 billion yuan [2][3] ETF Category Breakdown - As of February 14, 2023, the number of listed ETFs reached 1,435, with stock ETFs totaling 31,339.82 billion yuan, down 7,078.37 billion yuan year-to-date [3] - Bond ETFs and money market ETFs also experienced year-to-date declines of 765.78 billion yuan and 119.95 billion yuan, respectively, while cross-border and commodity ETFs saw increases of 522.41 billion yuan and 799.28 billion yuan [3] Index-linked ETF Trends - The CSI 300-linked ETF has seen a significant year-to-date decline of 5,975.29 billion yuan, with its current size at 5,880.28 billion yuan [6][7] - Other indices like the CSI 1000 and the SSE 50 also experienced substantial declines, exceeding 1,000 billion yuan each [7] Fund Management Insights - Hai Fu Tong Fund capitalized on the rebound in bond ETFs, achieving a weekly growth of 144.18 billion yuan, while other major funds like E Fund and Bosera also saw increases of over 40 billion yuan [8] - Conversely, major funds such as Huatai-PB and Huaxia Fund experienced declines in ETF sizes, with reductions of 40.64 billion yuan and 13.32 billion yuan, respectively [8] Top ETF Products - Gold ETFs have emerged as the top performers in terms of year-to-date growth, with significant increases from funds managed by Huaxia, Guotai, and Bosera [15] - The top 20 products saw limited growth, with only two in the top tier increasing in size, while the second tier showed more activity with several industry and thematic ETFs growing [12]

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The total trading volume of ETFs in the market has reached 230.79 billion yuan, indicating significant activity across various ETF types [1][2]. Trading Volume by ETF Type - Stock ETFs have a trading volume of 82.71 billion yuan - Bond ETFs have a trading volume of 85.31 billion yuan - Money market ETFs have a trading volume of 10.86 billion yuan - Commodity ETFs have a trading volume of 9.15 billion yuan - QDII ETFs have a trading volume of 26.59 billion yuan [1][2]. Top Non-Money Market ETFs - The highest trading volumes among non-money market ETFs are: - Huaxia CSI A500 ETF (512050) with 8.19 billion yuan - A500 Fund (563360) with 5.90 billion yuan - GF CSI Hong Kong Innovative Medicine QDII ETF (513120) with 5.19 billion yuan [1][2].

Market Performance Overview - In the week from February 2 to February 6, 2025, gold prices increased while domestic equity market indices experienced fluctuations downward [4] - The food and beverage, beauty care, and power equipment sectors showed the highest gains, while non-ferrous metals, communication, and electronics sectors faced the largest declines [4] Fund Product Issuance - A total of 40 new funds were established in the domestic market this week, with a combined issuance of 30.859 billion units [5] - The breakdown of new funds includes 9 FOF funds, 16 equity funds, 7 bond funds, and 8 mixed funds [5] - Across the entire market, 33 new funds were issued, comprising 14 equity funds, 7 mixed funds, 6 FOF funds, and 6 bond funds [5] Fund Product Performance Tracking - Long-term thematic fund indices showed that consumer and new energy thematic funds increased in net value, while other thematic funds performed poorly, with TMT thematic funds experiencing significant declines [6] - As of February 6, 2026, the net value changes for various thematic funds were as follows: consumer (+0.94%), new energy (+0.38%), financial real estate (-0.03%), pharmaceuticals (-0.61%), national defense and military (-1.37%), industry rotation (-2.23%), industry balance (-2.56%), cyclical (-4.60%), and TMT (-5.74%) [6] ETF Market Tracking - This week, the pace of profit-taking in equity ETFs slowed, with a total outflow of 24.3 billion yuan from small and large-cap thematic ETFs, while Hong Kong stock ETFs saw a net inflow exceeding 10 billion yuan [7] - The median return for equity ETFs was -1.75%, with a net outflow of 7.801 billion yuan [7] - Hong Kong stock ETFs had a median return of -2.12% and a net inflow of 18.493 billion yuan, while cross-border ETFs had a median return of -2.51% with a net inflow of 3.210 billion yuan [7] - Commodity ETFs recorded a median return of -6.07% and a net outflow of 2.887 billion yuan [7] Broad-based ETF Insights - The week saw significant net inflows into the Sci-Tech Innovation Board thematic ETFs, totaling 5.507 billion yuan [8] - TMT thematic ETFs also experienced notable net inflows, amounting to 9.964 billion yuan [8] ESG Financial Product Tracking - This week, 21 new green bonds were issued, with a total issuance scale of 20.191 billion yuan [9] - The domestic green bond market has steadily developed, with a cumulative issuance scale of 5.26 trillion yuan and a total of 4,548 bonds issued as of February 6, 2026 [9] - The existing ESG funds in the domestic market total 211, with a combined scale of 156.021 billion yuan [9] - In terms of fund performance, the median net value changes for active equity, passive stock index, and bond ESG funds were -1.15%, -0.84%, and +0.05%, respectively, with low-carbon economy, clean energy, and carbon neutrality thematic funds performing well [9]