在2025年5月发布的《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》中，"长期"成为高频词。鼓励投资者长期持 有、注重中长期业绩考核、强化对基金长期投资行为的引导、提高对各类中长期资金的服务能力、吸引 长期资金入市，归根结底，离不开基金管理人对"长期主义"的坚守。在国内公募基金经理整体偏年轻化 的背景下，依然有投资"老将"坚守初心，与时俱进、不断迭代，陪伴持有人走过漫长岁月。 数据显示，截至8月24日，公募行业中连续管理同一只主动权益基金超过10年的基金经理仅有120余人， 约占股票型与混合型产品基金经理人数的5%；如果把时间拉长到14年以上，则只有14人，占比更是低 至约0.6%。人数虽少，但老将的长期主义投资却颇有成效。 在这些老将的投资经历中，有多少是时代的贝塔？又有多少是主观能动的阿尔法？中国证券报记者观察 发现，践行长期主义的投资老将没有缺席时代的贝塔。与此同时，在时代的浪潮之中，他们或勤于思、 敏于行，先潮流而动；或守其心、持其行，穿越周期而来……投资老将是时代贝塔和主动阿尔法的综合 体。 老将堪称凤毛麟角 其余9位基金经理的任职以来年化回报率分布在6%-10%之间。梁浩管理的鹏华新兴产业、魏东管理的国 联安 ...

□本报记者 王鹤静 在2025年5月发布的《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》中，"长期"成为高频词。鼓励投资者长期持 有、注重中长期业绩考核、强化对基金长期投资行为的引导、提高对各类中长期资金的服务能力、吸引 长期资金入市，归根结底，离不开基金管理人对"长期主义"的坚守。在国内公募基金经理整体偏年轻化 的背景下，依然有投资"老将"坚守初心，与时俱进、不断迭代，陪伴持有人走过漫长岁月。 Wind数据显示，截至8月24日，公募行业中连续管理同一只主动权益基金超过10年的基金经理仅有120 余人，约占股票型与混合型产品基金经理人数的5%；如果把时间拉长到14年以上，则只有14人，占比 更是低至约0.6%。人数虽少，但老将的长期主义投资却颇有成效。 在这些老将的投资经历中，有多少是时代的贝塔？又有多少是主观能动的阿尔法？中国证券报记者观察 发现，践行长期主义的投资老将没有缺席时代的贝塔。与此同时，在时代的浪潮之中，他们或勤于思、 敏于行，先潮流而动；或守其心、持其行，穿越周期而来……投资老将是时代贝塔和主动阿尔法的综合 体。 老将堪称凤毛麟角 资产管理是瞬息万变的行业，公募基金经理也不断迭代更新。Wind数据显示，截 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article provides a comprehensive overview of the updated active fund manager pool information, focusing on various metrics such as investment style, stock allocation, industry preference, turnover rate, valuation of major holdings, concentration of holdings, and fund size [3][32]. Group 1: Fund Manager Information - The article lists various fund managers along with their respective funds, categorized by investment style such as value, growth, and balanced [2][4]. - It highlights the experience of fund managers, indicating that many have been in the industry for several years, which is crucial for navigating different market cycles [39][41]. Group 2: Fund Metrics - The article discusses key metrics to consider when evaluating funds, including stock allocation, which typically ranges from 85% to 90% for active funds [43][44]. - It emphasizes the importance of industry preference, noting that fund managers often focus on specific sectors where they have expertise [48][50]. - The concentration of holdings is also addressed, with a higher concentration indicating greater potential volatility [53]. Group 3: Valuation and Performance Indicators - The article mentions the valuation of major holdings, suggesting that growth-style funds tend to have higher valuations compared to value-style funds [58]. - It discusses turnover rates, indicating that a turnover rate below 200% is considered low for active funds, which can be influenced by changes in fund size [61][62]. - Fund size is highlighted as a critical factor, with larger funds potentially facing challenges in achieving excess returns due to management difficulties [63][68]. Group 4: Fund Reports and Insights - The article outlines the types of periodic reports available for funds, with annual reports containing the most comprehensive information [32]. - It suggests focusing on factors that impact fund performance, such as investment style, industry preference, and the fund manager's insights on market conditions [32][66].

Core Insights - The article discusses the performance of various funds in the first quarter of 2025, highlighting significant profits and losses among them [1][2][3] Fund Performance Summary - E Fund Blue Chip Selection Mixed Fund (005827.OF) achieved the highest quarterly profit of 3.172 billion, making it the only equity fund to surpass the 3 billion mark [1][2] - The second tier of profitable funds includes Wanji Industry Selection (18.81 million), China Merchants Advantage Enterprises A (16.05 million), and others, indicating a clear performance hierarchy [1][2] - The article notes that the medical sector showed a strong recovery, with China Europe Medical Innovation A reversing a previous loss of 1.718 billion to achieve a quarterly return of 20.33% [2][6] Losses and Challenges - The top loss was recorded by Xingquan Trend Investment (163402.OF) with a quarterly loss of 935 million, reflecting a year-to-date return of -9.64% [3][4] - Other notable losses include Caizhong Value Momentum A (-648 million) and Caizhong Growth Selection A (-521 million), both managed by the same individual, indicating significant challenges in the TMT sector [6][7] - The article emphasizes the risks associated with large funds that may struggle to convert scale into effective returns, as seen with E Fund Blue Chip Selection [6][7] Market Dynamics - The article highlights the contrasting performance of funds, suggesting that investors should be cautious of both oversized funds that may underperform and smaller funds that may show high returns without substantial profit realization [7][8] - The ongoing market differentiation in the second quarter is expected to continue influencing fund performance, with a focus on those that can maintain scale flexibility while efficiently converting profits [7][8]