Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the psychological struggle of investors in the current A-share market, where many are torn between the fear of missing out on potential gains and the anxiety of losing their recently gained profits as the market rebounds [4][10]. Group 1: Investor Sentiment - Investors like Xiao Hu, who have been in a prolonged state of loss, are experiencing a shift in mindset as their funds begin to recover, leading to increased anxiety about whether to redeem their investments or hold on for further gains [6][10]. - The recent market recovery has seen over 1,450 active equity funds achieve returns exceeding 50%, with 166 funds doubling their performance, which has intensified the emotional turmoil among investors [7][8]. - The phenomenon of "loss aversion" is prevalent, where investors feel the pain of losses more acutely than the joy of equivalent gains, prompting them to lock in profits as soon as they break even [11]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - As of August 19, nearly 1,300 funds have seen their net asset values rise above 1 yuan, a significant recovery from the previous year when over half of the funds were below this threshold [8]. - The market has witnessed a structural shift, with a notable increase in redemption requests as investors opt to "cash out" amidst the recovery, while new investors are more inclined to diversify their investments rather than concentrate on single products [13][14]. - Despite the redemption pressures, many equity funds are still experiencing net inflows, indicating a complex market environment where investor confidence is gradually rebuilding [14][15]. Group 3: Fund Management Strategies - Fund managers are advised to respect investor decisions regarding redemptions and focus on providing tailored product solutions that align with current market conditions and investor needs [12][15]. - The shift in focus from merely preventing redemptions to enhancing service for remaining clients is emphasized, suggesting that fund companies should offer customized investment strategies to cater to varying risk appetites and financial goals [15].

Core Viewpoint - The recent rise in the Shanghai Composite Index has led to a recovery in many actively managed equity funds established in 2021, with over 170 funds returning to positive net asset values as of August 13, 2023, and an average return exceeding 20% this year, outperforming the overall market average [1][2][3] Fund Performance - More than 170 of the 600+ actively managed equity funds established in 2021 have achieved positive returns, with over 98% of products gaining positive returns this year [2] - Notable performers include the Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Fund, which has a total return of 137.21%, and several other funds with returns exceeding 80% [2] - Funds focused on AI computing power, such as E Fund Pioneer Growth A and E Fund Vision Growth A, have also shown strong performance, with returns over 80% this year [3] Redemption Pressure - Despite the recovery, many funds are facing significant redemption pressures, particularly as their net asset values approach 1 yuan, leading to concentrated redemption behaviors [3][4] - For instance, the Jiashi Hong Kong Stock Advantage Fund saw its shares drop from 64.34 billion to 49.44 billion due to nearly 15 billion shares being redeemed in a single quarter [4] Market Trends - The current redemption pressure is notably concentrated in sectors such as new energy, liquor, and pharmaceuticals, aligning with the "track-based" funds issued between 2019 and 2021 [5] - The market is transitioning from a rebound to a reversal, with the previous trend of "rising but facing redemptions" weakening, and new fund issuance is accelerating [6] Fundraising and New Issuance - As of August 13, 2023, newly established actively managed equity funds have raised over 60 billion yuan this year, with several products exceeding 10 billion yuan in initial offerings [6] - The issuance of traditional fee-based actively managed equity funds has rebounded to around 10 billion yuan in July, indicating a recovery in fundraising [6] Future Outlook - The redemption funds are likely to flow into financial assets, with a preference for higher-risk products such as public funds, stocks, and margin trading, while some may also move into lower-risk insurance products [7]

Core Viewpoint - The recent recovery in the equity market has led to a significant rebound in the net value of actively managed equity funds, with nearly 90% of these funds showing positive returns over the past year, providing hope for investors who had previously suffered losses [3][5]. Group 1: Fund Performance - As of August 6, 2023, 4304 out of 4349 actively managed equity funds reported positive returns over the past year, representing 99% of the total [5]. - Among these, 40 funds achieved a doubling of their performance, with the top performer, CITIC Construction Investment North Exchange Select Two-Year Open A, showing a return of 212.25% [5]. - Over 70% of funds with over 10 billion in assets achieved returns exceeding 10%, with some funds like China Merchants Advantage Enterprises A and Galaxy Innovation Growth A exceeding 60% [6]. Group 2: Investor Behavior - Investor behavior has shown significant divergence, with three main strategies emerging: some investors choose to redeem their funds upon recovery, others redeem after a significant reduction in losses, and a third group waits until they fully recover their investments [9][10]. - Despite the recovery, there is a notable redemption pressure as many investors opt to cash out when the net asset value approaches their initial investment [10]. - In the second quarter, actively managed equity funds experienced a net redemption of 1,076.04 million units, a 56.43% increase from the previous quarter, indicating a trend of investors withdrawing funds despite improved performance [10][11]. Group 3: Market Sentiment and Trust - The recovery in fund performance has not yet translated into increased investor trust, as many investors remain cautious due to past losses from 2022 to 2024, leading to a prevalent "redeem upon recovery" behavior [11]. - Analysts suggest that the current situation represents a critical period for "cognitive repair" in the market, where fund managers need to enhance their professional capabilities and improve the industry ecosystem to regain investor confidence [11].

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has released an "Action Plan for Promoting the High-Quality Development of Public Funds," which links fund managers' compensation to long-term performance, addressing the industry's focus on scale over returns [2] Group 1: Fund Manager Compensation - Fund managers with products underperforming their benchmarks by more than 10 percentage points over three years will see a significant decrease in their performance-based compensation [2] - Conversely, fund managers whose performance significantly exceeds benchmarks may see reasonable increases in their compensation [2] Group 2: Underperforming Funds - As of May 21, nearly 6000 public funds have been managed for over three years, with 1341 funds underperforming their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, involving 735 fund managers [3] - Among these, 31 funds have underperformed their benchmarks by over 50 percentage points, including notable managers like Yao Zhipeng from Harvest Fund and Shi Cheng from Guotai Junan [3] - The worst performer is Morgan Fund's Guo Chen, whose fund has a cumulative return of -23.03%, lagging behind the benchmark by 128 percentage points [3] Group 3: High-Performing Funds - There are 543 funds that have outperformed their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, with 33 funds exceeding benchmarks by over 50 percentage points [6] - Notable high performers include the Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Fund, managed by Guo Xin, which achieved a cumulative return of 194%, surpassing its benchmark by 176 percentage points [6][7] - The North Exchange theme funds have emerged as a concentrated area of excess returns, with several funds exceeding their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points [7] Group 4: Adjustments to Performance Benchmarks - In response to the new action plan, many fund companies have begun to adjust their performance benchmarks, with over 100 funds changing their benchmarks by May 26 [8][10] - Adjustments are made to ensure benchmarks accurately reflect the risk-return characteristics of the funds, addressing previous inadequacies in benchmark design [10][11] - The CSRC emphasizes the need for strict regulation of benchmark selection and modification to ensure alignment with investment strategies and product positioning [11]

Core Viewpoint - The overall performance of the domestic A-share market has been lackluster in 2023, with the CSI 300 index down by 1.34% and the STAR 50 index down by 0.84% as of May 23. However, some funds have shown significant gains, with 21 open-end funds achieving over 50% net value growth this year [1][2]. Fund Performance Summary - The top-performing funds this year can be categorized into three main types: 1. Four funds focused on innovative enterprises listed on the Beijing Stock Exchange, including products from Huaxia, CITIC, Wanjia, and Huitianfu [3]. 2. Four funds investing in advanced manufacturing, particularly in the AI industry chain, from Penghua, Qianhai Kaiyuan, Ping An, and Yongying [3]. 3. Two funds heavily invested in Hong Kong consumer and pharmaceutical stocks, namely Guangfa Growth Navigator and Bank of China Hong Kong Stock Connect Medical A [3]. Performance Against Benchmarks - All top 10 funds have outperformed their respective performance benchmarks. For instance, Huaxia's fund has increased by 66.2% against a benchmark growth of 25.4%, outperforming by 40.8% [3][4]. Similarly, Guangfa's fund has risen by 62.1% compared to a mere 1.9% benchmark increase, outperforming by 60.2% [3][4]. Long-term Performance - Over the past year, the top 10 funds have maintained strong performance, with the lowest growth at 48% and five funds exceeding 100% returns. All have significantly outperformed their benchmarks [4][5]. Historical Performance - Since their inception, all top 10 funds have shown positive returns, with the best performer, Qianhai Kaiyuan, achieving a net value increase of 138.5% against a benchmark growth of 30% [6][7]. Annualized Returns - As of May 23, the annualized returns for these funds range from 10.9% to 36.9%, with newer funds generally showing higher annualized returns [8][9]. Fund Manager Assessment - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has mandated that fund companies assess fund managers based on medium to long-term performance, emphasizing the importance of benchmarks over three-year periods [5][6]. Fund Size and Manager Experience - The top 10 funds have accumulated significant assets, with some exceeding 10 billion yuan in size. However, many of these funds and their managers do not meet the industry standard of having over 10 years of experience [9][10].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the introduction of a new policy by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) aimed at enhancing the long-term performance of public fund managers by linking their compensation to the performance of their funds relative to benchmarks [2][3] - The policy targets fund managers whose products have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 10 percentage points over three years, leading to a significant reduction in their performance-based compensation [2][3] - The initiative is expected to align the interests of fund managers with those of investors, encouraging a shift away from short-term speculation towards a focus on long-term investment capabilities [2][3] Group 2 - As of May 21, 2023, there are 5,898 public funds managed by fund managers with over three years of experience, with 1,341 funds underperforming their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points [3][4] - Among these, 31 funds have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points, including notable funds managed by well-known managers such as Zheng Chengran from GF Fund and Yao Zhipeng from Harvest Fund [3][4][5] - The worst-performing fund, Morgan Small Cap A, managed by Guo Chen, has a cumulative return of -23.03% over three years, underperforming its benchmark by 127.69 percentage points [4][5] Group 3 - Conversely, there are 543 funds that have outperformed their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, with 33 funds exceeding their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points [7][9] - The top-performing fund, Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Selected Fund, managed by Gu Xin Feng, achieved a cumulative return of 194.13%, surpassing its benchmark by 175.89 percentage points [9][10] - The North Exchange theme funds have emerged as a significant area for excess returns, with several funds exceeding their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points [10] Group 4 - In response to the new policy, many fund companies are adjusting their performance benchmarks to better reflect the risk-return characteristics of their funds [11][12] - Recent adjustments include changes to benchmarks for various funds, such as the adjustment of the performance benchmark for the浦银安盛稳健增利债券 from "CSI All Bond Index" to a more complex composite benchmark [11][12] - The trend of benchmark adjustments is expected to continue as fund companies seek to align their performance metrics with regulatory expectations and improve their competitive positioning [13][14]

Core Viewpoint - The North Exchange experienced significant volatility on May 22, with the North Certificate 50 Index plunging 6.15% in a single day, contrasting sharply with its previous historical high of 1500 points [1][3]. Market Performance - The North Certificate 50 Index had a year-to-date increase of 42.03% before the sudden drop, outperforming major indices like the CSI 300 [3]. - On the day of the drop, only 17 stocks rose, while over 134 stocks fell by more than 5%, with Jinbo Biological leading the decline at 14.55% [3]. - Despite the volatility, some actively managed funds performed well, with the Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Select Fund achieving a year-to-date return of 78.57% [3]. Fund Management Responses - In response to the rapid market rise, several fund companies, including E Fund and GF Fund, implemented purchase limits on North Exchange-themed products, with daily subscription limits as low as 3000 yuan [2][5]. - The average price-to-earnings ratio for North Exchange stocks reached 46.46, indicating a high valuation level, prompting fund managers to limit purchases to mitigate risks [7]. Fund Performance - Leading passive funds, such as GF North Certificate 50 Component A, reported year-to-date returns exceeding 40%, with a one-year return of 103.62% [4]. - The North Certificate 50 Index fund scale grew by 22.63% year-on-year, reflecting significant inflows of passive funds [5]. Investor Behavior - Retail investors accounted for over 96% of individual investments in certain funds, indicating a strong retail presence in the North Exchange market [5]. - The current market sentiment is shifting from a broad-based rally to a more selective stock-picking approach, as investors become more cautious amid declining risk appetite [7].

- The report provides an overview of the major asset markets, including equities, bonds, commodities, and foreign exchange markets[4][9][10][26][27][32][33][39] - The report highlights the performance of various indices in the A-share market, such as the Shanghai Composite Index, Shenzhen Component Index, and others, with their respective percentage changes[9][11][12][13][15] - The report also covers the performance of the Hong Kong stock market, including the Hang Seng Index and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index, along with their percentage changes[10][18][19][22] - The report includes the performance of the US stock market, with indices like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq Index, and S&P 500, along with their percentage changes[10][24][25] - The bond market section discusses the yield changes of various government and corporate bonds, including the yield spread between different maturities[26][27][28][29][30][31] - The commodities market section provides the weekly percentage changes of various commodities such as crude oil, gold, copper, aluminum, and others[32][33][34][35][36][37][38] - The foreign exchange market section details the exchange rate changes of major currencies against the Chinese Yuan[39][41][42][43] - The report summarizes the newly established funds for the week, including their types, sizes, and fund managers[44][46] - The report provides an overview of the total number and scale of open-end public funds in China, categorized by different types of funds[47][48][49][50] - The performance of different types of funds over the past week, month, year, and year-to-date is compared, highlighting the best and worst performers[51][52][54][55][56][57][59]