Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "In-Line" [5][10]. Core Insights - China's total absolute non-domestic Available Seat Kilometers (ASK) was 76% of 2019's level as of June 9, 2025, reflecting a 12% year-over-year increase but a slight decrease of 1% week-over-week [10]. - Excluding US routes, the recovery of China's absolute non-domestic ASK reached 86% of 2019's level [10]. - Capacity additions were noted on Hong Kong (+2%) and US (+1%) routes, while reductions occurred on Macau (-1%) and Korea (-1%) routes [10]. - Significant year-over-year increases in ASK were observed for Japan (+35%), Korea (+25%), Hong Kong (+17%), and US (+13%) routes, while Macau (-15%) and Thailand (-31%) saw decreases [10]. - Seat capacity for Japan, Thailand, and Korea routes reached 106%, 47%, and 94% of 2019 levels, respectively, while US routes were at 29% [10]. Summary by Relevant Sections International Air Capacity - Non-domestic ASK was 76% of 2019's level as of June 9, 2025, compared to 77% the previous week [2]. - Total seat capacity has recovered to approximately 80% of 2019's level [5]. Capacity Recovery - The report highlights that total absolute non-domestic ASK was -1% week-over-week and +12% year-over-year [10]. - Specific route recoveries include Japan at 106%, Korea at 94%, and US routes at 29% of 2019 levels [10]. Company Ratings - Air China Limited (601111.SS) rated Equal-weight, Air China Limited (0753.HK) rated Overweight [62]. - Cathay Pacific Airways (0293.HK) rated Equal-weight, China Eastern Airlines (600115.SS) rated Equal-weight [62]. - China Southern Airlines (600029.SS) rated Equal-weight, COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation (1138.HK) rated Overweight [62].

经查，隋军丧失理想信念，长期参与迷信活动；罔顾中央八项规定精神，收受可能影响公正执行公务的 礼品、礼金，接受可能影响公正执行公务的宴请；无视组织原则，违反个人有关事项报告规定隐瞒不报 境外房产，未报经组织批准擅自出入国境，在员工录用中违规为他人谋取利益；廉洁底线失守，将应当 由本人支付的费用交由与其任职公司有业务往来的民营企业支付；不正确履行职责，滥用职权，虚增业 务环节，套取公款，致使公司遭受重大损失。利用职务便利以及职权或地位形成的便利条件，为他人在 船代业务、运输业务、亲属入职、承接工程等方面谋取利益，并非法收受巨额财物；非法挪用公司巨额 资金为他人进行营利活动等。 央视网消息：据中央纪委国家监委网站消息，日前，经中央纪委国家监委批准，中央纪委国家监委 驻中国远洋海运纪检监察组、上海市监委对中国远洋海运原党组管理正职领导干部隋军严重违纪违法问 题进行了纪律审查和监察调查。 隋军严重违反党的政治纪律、中央八项规定精神、组织纪律、廉洁纪律和工作纪律，构成严重职务违法 并涉嫌职务犯罪，且在党的二十大后依然不收敛、不收手，性质严重，影响恶劣，应予严肃处理。根据 《中国共产党纪律处分条例》《中华人民共和国监察法》 ...

Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.44% on June 10, with six industries experiencing gains, led by beauty care and banking, which rose by 1.10% and 0.48% respectively [1] - The transportation sector saw a slight increase of 0.17% [1] - A total of 26 industries experienced net outflows of capital, with the electronics sector leading the outflow at 7.532 billion yuan, followed by the computer sector with 7.427 billion yuan [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The transportation industry had a net inflow of 635 million yuan, with 125 stocks in the sector, of which 54 rose and 62 fell [2] - The top three stocks with the highest net inflow in the transportation sector were Lianyungang (180 million yuan), Nanjing Port (149 million yuan), and COSCO Shipping Holdings (140 million yuan) [2] - The leading stocks with net outflows included Debon Logistics (-39.14 million yuan), CITIC Offshore Helicopter (-34.45 million yuan), and Chongqing Port (-30.83 million yuan) [4] Transportation Sector Performance - The transportation sector's top gainers included Lianyungang (9.99%), Nanjing Port (10.02%), and COSCO Shipping Holdings (0.50%) [2] - The sector's stocks with significant net outflows included Debon Logistics (-1.94%), CITIC Offshore Helicopter (-1.87%), and Chongqing Port (5.17%) [4]

Core Viewpoint - The shipping sector has shown a positive performance with a 2.00% increase, ranking fifth among concept sectors, driven by significant gains in several stocks [1][2]. Group 1: Stock Performance - 43 stocks within the shipping sector experienced gains, with notable performers including: - China National Aviation Holding (国航远洋) reaching a 30% limit up - HNA Technology (海航科技) up by 10.12% - Ningbo Maritime (宁波海运) up by 10.05% - Nanjing Port (南京港) up by 10.02% [1][3] - The top gainers in the sector also included Huaguang Source Sea (华光源海) and Feilida (飞力达), which rose by 26.88% and 9.63% respectively [1]. Group 2: Capital Inflow - The shipping sector attracted a net inflow of 534 million yuan, with 32 stocks receiving net inflows, and 6 stocks exceeding 50 million yuan in net inflow [2][3]. - Leading the net inflow was Lianyungang (连云港) with 180 million yuan, followed by Nanjing Port (南京港) with 149 million yuan, and COSCO Shipping Holdings (中远海控) with 140 million yuan [2]. Group 3: Capital Flow Ratios - The top stocks by net inflow ratio included: - Nanjing Port (南京港) at 17.40% - Ningbo Maritime (宁波海运) at 15.08% - COSCO Shipping Holdings (中远海控) at 11.16% [3]. - Other notable stocks with significant net inflow ratios included HNA Technology (海航科技) at 6.43% and Ningbo Port (宁波港) at 8.00% [3].

Financial Sector - The banking sector showed positive performance with Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China, and Zhao Bank reporting market capitalizations of 1,977.40 billion, 1,610.30 billion, and 576.28 billion respectively, with respective trading volumes of 1.62 billion, 1.25 billion, and 0.83 billion [3] - Construction Bank and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China also performed well, with market capitalizations of 2,255.10 billion and 2,548.30 billion, and trading volumes of 0.61 billion and 2.13 billion respectively [3] - The overall trend in the banking sector was positive, with most banks showing slight increases in stock prices [3] Insurance Sector - The insurance sector saw China Life Insurance, China Pacific Insurance, and Ping An Insurance with market capitalizations of 370.60 billion, 982.99 billion, and 340.46 billion respectively, and trading volumes of 1.31 billion, 0.57 billion, and 0.50 billion [4] - All three companies experienced slight increases in stock prices, indicating a stable performance in the insurance market [4] Semiconductor Sector - The semiconductor sector had mixed results, with North China Huachuang, Cambricon Technologies, and Haiguang Information reporting market capitalizations of 224.69 billion, 254.35 billion, and 329.78 billion respectively [4] - Trading volumes varied significantly, with Cambricon Technologies leading at 6.80 billion, while North China Huachuang had a trading volume of 1.36 billion [4] - The sector experienced fluctuations, with some companies showing declines in stock prices [4] Automotive Sector - The automotive sector was led by BYD and Great Wall Motors, with market capitalizations of 282.79 billion and 1,068.63 billion respectively [4] - Trading volumes were significant, with BYD at 3.50 billion and Great Wall Motors at 0.21 billion [4] - The sector showed a positive trend with BYD's stock price increasing by 1.00% [4] Energy Sector - In the energy sector, China Petroleum and Sinopec reported market capitalizations of 699.59 billion and 1,599.60 billion respectively, with trading volumes of 0.62 billion and 0.46 billion [4] - The sector showed slight increases in stock prices, indicating a stable performance [4] Other Sectors - The liquor industry, represented by Kweichow Moutai, Shanxi Fenjiu, and Wuliangye, had market capitalizations of 1,860.43 billion, 216.46 billion, and 485.09 billion respectively, with Kweichow Moutai experiencing a slight decline [4] - The food and beverage sector, including companies like Zhongjin Securities and Haitai, showed varied performance with slight fluctuations in stock prices [5]

Insurance - China Pacific Insurance has a market capitalization of 366.17 billion, with a trading volume of 680 million, and a stock price change of -0.27 (-0.77%) [3] - China Life Insurance has a market capitalization of 336.52 billion, with a trading volume of 2.19 billion, and a stock price change of -0.58 (-1.07%) [3] - Ping An Insurance has a market capitalization of 972.61 billion, with a trading volume of 593 million, and a stock price change of -0.09 (-1.07%) [3] Automotive - BYD has a market capitalization of 284.26 billion, with a trading volume of 3.23 billion, and a stock price change of -0.79 (-0.22%) [3] - Great Wall Motors has a market capitalization of 1,093.94 billion, with a trading volume of 290 million, and a stock price change of -0.08 (-0.35%) [3] Semiconductor - North Huachuang has a market capitalization of 229.96 billion, with a trading volume of 992 million, and a stock price change of +0.86 (+0.20%) [3] - Cambricon Technologies has a market capitalization of 254.65 billion, with a trading volume of 2.51 billion, and a stock price change of -9.86 (-1.59%) [3] Power and Utilities - Yangtze Power has a market capitalization of 195.19 billion, with a trading volume of 1.64 billion, and a stock price change of +0.19 (+0.64%) [4] - China Nuclear Power has a market capitalization of 330.15 billion, with a trading volume of 523 million, and a stock price change of +0.03 (+0.32%) [4] Food and Beverage - Kweichow Moutai has a market capitalization of 1,892.32 billion, with a trading volume of 3.78 billion, and a stock price change of -1.27 (-0.69%) [3] - Wuliangye Yibin has a market capitalization of 485.55 billion, with a trading volume of 972 million, and a stock price change of -7.61 (-0.50%) [3] Financial Services - CITIC Securities has a market capitalization of 385.04 billion, with a trading volume of 1.31 billion, and a stock price change of -0.20 (-0.76%) [4] - Guotai Junan has a market capitalization of 326.15 billion, with a trading volume of 1.39 billion, and a stock price change of +0.07 (+0.38%) [4] Electronics - Luxshare Precision has a market capitalization of 226.99 billion, with a trading volume of 1.73 billion, and a stock price change of -0.31 (-0.98%) [4] - Industrial Fulian has a market capitalization of 355.27 billion, with a trading volume of 1.85 billion, and a stock price change of -0.08 (-0.15%) [4]

Market Overview - The FTSE China A50 Index components showed mixed performance with oil and coal stocks strengthening while brokerage, consumer electronics, and logistics sectors declined [1] Sector Performance Oil and Coal - Oil sector stocks like China Petroleum and China National Offshore Oil Corporation saw positive movements with market capitalizations of 697.16 billion and 1,555.68 billion respectively, with China Petroleum gaining +0.03 (+0.52%) [3] - Coal sector stocks such as China Shenhua and Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry also performed well, with China Shenhua's market cap at 785.20 billion and a gain of +0.22 (+0.56%) [3] Brokerage and Financial Services - Brokerage firms like China Pacific Insurance and China Ping An experienced declines, with China Pacific Insurance down -0.40 (-1.13%) and a market cap of 972.97 billion [3] Consumer Electronics - Consumer electronics companies such as Industrial Fulian and Luxshare Precision saw declines, with Industrial Fulian down -0.30 (-0.95%) and a market cap of 404.53 billion [4] Logistics - Logistics sector, represented by SF Holding, showed a slight increase with a market cap of 172.25 billion and a gain of +0.60 (+1.11%) [4] Food and Beverage - The food and beverage sector, including companies like Haitian Flavoring and Seasoning, faced declines, with Haitian down -0.22 (-0.51%) [4] Automotive - Automotive stocks like Great Wall Motors and BYD showed mixed results, with Great Wall Motors down -1.25 (-0.35%) [3] Power and Utilities - Power sector stocks such as China Yangtze Power and China Nuclear Power experienced slight gains, with China Yangtze Power up +0.16 (+0.54%) [4] Pharmaceuticals - Pharmaceutical companies like Heng Rui Medicine faced declines, with Heng Rui down -0.44 (-0.82%) [4] Construction and Engineering - Construction sector stocks like China State Construction and China Unicom showed stable performance, with China State Construction up +0.18 (+1.01%) [4]

6月下半月价格坚挺，关注船司7月份涨价函情况 市场分析 线上报价方面。 Gemini Cooperation：马士基上海-鹿特丹25周开出为1680/2800；HPL 6月份上半月船期报价1635/2535，6月下半月 船期报价2235/3535，7月上半月船期报价2635/4435。 MSC+Premier Alliance：MSC 上海-鹿特丹6月上半月船期报价1580/2640；ONE上海-鹿特丹 6月份上半月船期报 价2381/2437，6月下半月船期报价2831/2937；HMM上海-鹿特丹6月上半月船期报价1467/2504，6月下半月上海-鹿 特丹价格1717/3004。 Ocean Alliance：COSCO上海-鹿特丹 6月上半月船期报价2125/3225，6月下半月船期报价2625/4225；CMA上海- 鹿特丹 6月上半月船期报价1635/2845，6月下半月船期报价1835/3245，CMA上海-安特卫普7月份报价挂出 2385/4345；EMC 6月上半月船期报价2305/3260，6月下半月船期报价2555/3610；OOCL 6月下半月报价2200/3800. 部分船司宣布6月 ...

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities State-Owned Enterprises Dividend Index (000824) has experienced a decline of 0.66% as of June 5, 2025, indicating a mixed performance among its constituent stocks, with some stocks rising while others fell significantly [1][2]. Group 1: Index Performance - The China Securities State-Owned Enterprises Dividend Index (000824) has decreased by 0.66% as of June 5, 2025 [1]. - The National Enterprise Dividend ETF (159515) has also seen a decline of 0.54%, with the latest price at 1.1 yuan [1]. - Notable gainers include Ninghu Expressway (600377) up by 1.75%, and notable losers include Caibai Co., Ltd. (605599) down by 6.15% [1]. Group 2: Market Analysis - Recent reports indicate that dividend assets have rapidly "shrunk," with the exception of the banking sector, which has shown lackluster performance [1]. - The proportion of stocks with a Sharpe Ratio higher than the index among dividend assets has reached an extreme historical low, suggesting a potential market adjustment followed by upward movement [1]. - Despite the rising valuation levels of dividend assets, there remains significant room for further increases when compared to historical peaks [1]. Group 3: Top Holdings - As of May 30, 2025, the top ten weighted stocks in the China Securities State-Owned Enterprises Dividend Index include COSCO Shipping Holdings (601919) and Jizhong Energy (000937), with the top ten accounting for 15.83% of the index [2].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided in the content. 2. Core View of the Report - The freight rates of the US route in June increased significantly due to the mismatch between supply and demand. The demand on the China-US route has rapidly increased, and the freight rates have soared under the background of the mismatch between supply and demand. The freight rates of the European route in June have a downward trend, and the Maersk's second-half-of-June quotation is relatively high, with a price increase expected in July. The 06 contract will gradually return to the "real" end trading as the delivery deadline approaches, and the 08 contract has a strong game between expectation and reality. It is recommended to conduct arbitrage operations. The main strategy is that the main contract fluctuates, and the arbitrage strategies are to go long on 08 and short on 10, and go long on 06 and short on 10 [3][5][7]. 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Futures Price - As of June 4, 2025, the total open interest of all contracts of the container shipping index European route futures was 91,264 lots, and the single-day trading volume was 113,681 lots. The closing prices of EC2602, EC2604, EC2506, EC2508, EC2510, and EC2512 contracts were 1399.80, 1239.20, 1970.30, 2199.10, 1383.00, and 1570.10 respectively [6]. 3.2 Spot Price - On May 30, the SCFI (Shanghai - Europe route) price was 1587.00 US dollars/TEU, the SCFI (Shanghai - US West route) price was 5172.00 US dollars/FEU, and the SCFI (Shanghai - US East) price was 6243.00 US dollars/FEU. On June 2, the SCFIS (Shanghai - Europe) was 1252.82 points, and the SCFIS (Shanghai - US West) was 1718.11 points [6]. 3.3 Container Ship Capacity Supply - In 2025, it is still a big year for container ship deliveries. As of May 30, 2025, a total of 34 ships of 12,000 - 16,999 TEU were delivered, with a total of 513,200 TEU; 4 ships of over 17,000 + TEU were delivered, with a total of 94,864 TEU. From January to May, a total of 115 container ships were delivered, with a total of 903,900 TEU [6]. 3.4 Supply Chain - There was an attack on Israel's Ben - Gurion International Airport by the Houthi armed forces, which may have an impact on the supply chain [3]. 3.5 Demand and European Economy - The demand on the China - US route has increased rapidly due to the reduction of Sino - US tariffs, and the demand on the European route has a downward trend. The monthly average weekly capacity of the Shanghai - European route in June was about 268,200 TEU, and the weekly capacity in weeks 23/24/25/26 was 273,200/227,100/298,400/273,700 TEU, an increase of more than 20% compared with the same period last year [3][4].