根据红星新闻报道，当地时间10月7日，美国洛杉矶县法院一陪审团裁定，强生公司须赔偿家属9.66亿美元（约合68.8亿元人民币）。这是强生滑石粉诉讼 持续15年来，单一原告获赔金额最高的一起判决。 （图源：澎湃新闻） 01 88岁老人之死 引发天价判决 来源丨凤凰网财经《公司研究院》 作者丨DW 一位88岁加州老人的离世，将全球医药巨头强生钉在了舆论的审判席上。 2021年，梅·摩尔因间皮瘤——一种与石棉密切相关的罕见癌症不幸去世。她的家属坚信，元凶正是强生婴儿爽身粉中的石棉纤维，并将这家全球巨头告上 法庭。 1886年，罗伯特·强生与他的两个兄弟在美国新泽西州创立了强生公司。如今，这家医疗健康巨头的业务已覆盖医疗科技和创新制药两大领域。 强生的传奇始于1893年。那一年，世界上第一盒以滑石粉为主要成分的婴儿爽身粉问世。凭借其吸湿防痱的功效，这罐白色粉末在随后的数十年间，成为 了全球无数家庭的育儿必备品。 然而，这份信任如今正面临严峻考验。在梅·摩尔案中，陪审团判令强生支付1600万美元补偿金及高达9.5亿美元的惩罚性赔偿金。 摩尔家属的律师团队在法庭上援引强生内部文件，指出一个惊人事实：强生公司早在20世纪7 ...

（原标题：康宝莱中国：模式争议与信任危机双重夹击） 日前，知名健康公司康宝莱在中国深陷多重争议，虚假宣传、退款难题、数据违规、产品安全等问题引 发关注。 在黑猫投诉平台上，康宝莱的投诉不断。例如2025年9月4日，有消费者直指康宝莱虚假招聘，诱导购买 产品后拒绝退款，甚至斥其为"传销公司"。8月26日，有消费者投诉在营养师操作下于康宝莱小程序购 买奶昔和海外购产品，食用三天后出现全身不适，包括游走性疼痛、腹胀、头痛和失眠等症状。8月18 日，有用户投诉衡水康宝莱线下店以加盟为名诱导银行卡套现并购买了产品，使用产品无效后还被催促 贷款购买更多产品。8月14日有消费投诉，康宝莱声称有专业的营养师专门为通风客户搭配套餐，但使 用产品后引发了通风。 除了消费者投诉，康宝莱在数据安全方面也亮起红灯。2025年8月，上海市通信管理局通报康宝莱三款 App，分别是"康宝莱官方商城"、"莱NC新享版"和"莱体管赛"因"未明示个人信息处理规则"违规，被要 求整改，这暴露出其在数据治理上的漏洞，触及《个人信息保护法》底线。 产品安全同样不容乐观。2025年7月，康宝莱在美国全国范围召回5888瓶"放松茶/舒活饮"，原因是供应 商 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company emphasizes its commitment to product safety through stringent measures and has been recognized as a "Green Factory" in Jiangsu Province [1] Group 1: Product Safety Measures - The company prioritizes the use of dyes certified by the ZDHC organization [1] - All products must pass qualified chemical testing before leaving the factory, ensuring only compliant products are shipped [1] - A comprehensive chemical management system is in place, managed by a professional team overseeing the entire lifecycle of chemicals used [1]

Core Viewpoint - The charging treasure industry is undergoing a significant transformation driven by new safety regulations, leading to increased prices and a focus on product quality and safety [3][4][12] Industry Changes - The implementation of 3C certification has become a critical safety threshold, prohibiting the production, import, or sale of non-compliant charging treasures and lithium-ion batteries [4][6] - The new regulations have resulted in the elimination of approximately 30% of low-quality production capacity in the charging treasure industry [6][12] - The cost of compliant battery cells has surged from 1-2 yuan to 40-50 yuan, reflecting the increased focus on safety and quality [7][12] Market Response - Following the announcement of the 3C certification regulations, the prices of charging treasures began to rise, with compliant products now priced between 50 to 100 yuan [9][10] - The market has seen a significant reduction in the availability of non-compliant products, with many low-cost options disappearing from shelves [9][10] - E-commerce platforms have prominently featured the 3C certification label, indicating a shift in consumer purchasing behavior towards safer products [9][10] Consumer Guidance - Consumers are advised to look for the genuine 3C mark, which should be a white background with a black diamond shape directly printed on the product [10] - It is important for consumers to understand the rated capacity in watt-hours (Wh) to avoid purchasing products that cannot be taken on flights [10] - The reasonable price range for compliant 10,000mAh charging treasures is approximately 80 to 130 yuan, with caution advised against both excessively low and high prices [10] Future Outlook - The charging treasure industry is expected to continue evolving towards a healthier and more regulated market, with increased scrutiny from regulatory bodies [12] - Smaller manufacturers face significant pressure due to rising raw material and certification costs, while leading brands are likely to gain market share due to their ability to comply with new regulations [12]

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving Shanghai Soap Factory's "Shanghai Medicine Soap" allegedly containing Sudan Red No. 4 has sparked significant public concern and regulatory investigation [1][2]. Group 1: Company Response - The company claims that all products meet national standards and will issue a formal announcement soon [1][2]. - The company has not confirmed whether the controversial ingredient has been consistently added, stating that an investigation is ongoing [1][2]. - The company asserts that the use of CAS numbers for ingredient labeling is compliant with industry standards, and the amounts of added colorants are minimal and not banned in cleansing products [4][5]. Group 2: Regulatory Investigation - The Shanghai Yangpu District Market Supervision Administration is currently investigating the claims and has not yet confirmed the presence of carcinogenic substances in the products [2][3]. - If the investigation finds issues with the products, the administration will require a complete recall [2]. Group 3: Consumer Concerns - Consumers have expressed worries about product safety, particularly regarding the use of Sudan Red No. 4, which is banned in cosmetics [2][3]. - Some consumers argue that the labeling of ingredients using CAS numbers instead of common names is misleading [3][4]. Group 4: Product Composition - Multiple products from the company also feature ingredient lists with letter-number codes, which correspond to various colorants and additives [4]. - The company maintains that these additives are safe and commonly used in the industry, with no current data indicating safety issues [4][5].

Core Points - A Xiaomi Mitu children's smartwatch reportedly caught fire while sitting on a table, raising safety concerns for the product [1][8] - The incident was captured on surveillance footage, showing the watch suddenly igniting and emitting smoke [1] - The smartwatch was purchased in January 2022, and the owner has not yet taken it for inspection despite being advised to do so by customer service [1][8] Company Information - The Xiaomi Mitu Children's Smartwatch 6C was launched in May 2022 with a retail price of 479 yuan, featuring functions for children's learning and safety positioning [8] - As of the time of reporting, Xiaomi has not provided an official explanation regarding the incident [8]

Group 1 - A Xiaomi Mi Bunny children's watch spontaneously ignited on July 28, causing smoke and sparks, but fortunately no injuries occurred [1][3][5] - The incident was reported by a customer who had purchased the watch for 299 yuan in January 2024, and it was used infrequently [5] - The customer expressed concerns about the safety of electronic watches, especially when left charging unattended, highlighting potential risks [5] Group 2 - After the incident, the customer contacted Xiaomi's official customer service, which requested the watch to be sent for inspection, but the customer refused due to concerns over impartiality [5] - Xiaomi's customer service acknowledged the incident but did not provide specific measures or explanations following the report [5]

Group 1 - The core point of the news is the rapid dissolution of Xinpai New Energy (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Anpueris (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., which was established on June 20 this year and announced its cancellation just 13 days later [1] - Xinpai New Energy had a registered capital of 200 million yuan and its business scope included battery manufacturing and sales [1] - Anpueris (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. holds 99.85% of the shares in Xinpai New Energy [3] Group 2 - Recent quality issues with power banks have brought Anpueris (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. into the spotlight, as it has been implicated as a supplier of battery cells for brands like Romoss and Anker, which recalled over one million units due to safety concerns [3] - Anpueris's chairman stated that production would not resume until the reasons for the quality issues were clarified, and the local market supervision bureau is conducting comprehensive inspections of the company's products [3][4] - Anpueris has supplied battery cells to several major brands, including Xiaomi, OPPO, and Meituan, but only Romoss and Anker have issued recalls so far [3] Group 3 - Anpueris claims that the battery cells involved in the recalls are not the same as those supplied to other brands, indicating a distinction in product batches [4] - Ugreen and Xiaomi have stated that they used a different batch of battery cells that do not pose risks, while Anker's vice president raised concerns about the safety of the 2.0 batch cells after six months of use [5][6] - The situation has led to skepticism regarding the safety of Anpueris's products, with various brands remaining unresponsive to inquiries about their product safety [8]

Core Viewpoint - The recent recall of multiple power bank brands, including Romoss and Anker, is primarily driven by safety concerns following 15 incidents of power banks catching fire on flights this year, leading to new regulations prohibiting the transport of non-compliant power banks on domestic flights [1][2] Group 1: Industry Response - Several power bank brands have announced recalls of their products, and multiple brands' 3C certification has been "suspended" [1] - The Civil Aviation Administration of China has issued an emergency notice banning passengers from carrying power banks without clear 3C markings or those that have been recalled [1] Group 2: Consumer Impact - The new regulations have rendered many power banks as "prohibited items," causing confusion among consumers, with many power banks being abandoned at airport security [1] - There are concerns regarding the usability of previously purchased non-compliant power banks after the mandatory 3C certification requirement takes effect in August 2024 [1] Group 3: Recommendations for Stakeholders - Manufacturers are urged to implement effective recall solutions, such as establishing convenient return points in urban areas and ensuring safe return channels for problematic power banks [2] - Transportation hubs like airports and stations should proactively inform travelers about policy changes through clear signage and online announcements, and consider providing temporary storage services [2] - Regulatory bodies and companies need to offer clear guidelines for the disposal or recycling of recalled products to prevent consumer confusion [2] - The industry should use this opportunity to enhance standards and dynamic regulation to prevent problematic power banks from re-entering the market [2]

Core Viewpoint - The investigation by Wuxi Market Supervision Administration into the battery cell supplier of Romoss and Anker is due to safety concerns related to material changes in the battery cells, which may pose a fire risk under extreme conditions [1] Group 1: Company Actions - Romoss has recalled 491,745 power banks, while Anker has recalled 710,000 units due to the identified safety issues [1] - The supplier in question, Anpulis (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., has multiple 3C certification certificates for related battery products currently in a "suspended" status [1] Group 2: Industry Insights - The power bank industry is highly competitive, with many brands operating under OEM and ODM models, leading to low profit margins for manufacturers [1] - Battery cells account for 40%-50% of the total cost of a power bank, making them a critical component where cost-cutting may compromise safety [1] - The production of battery cells requires significant technical expertise and investment, indicating that not all manufacturers can produce them safely [1] - Issues with battery cells can have widespread implications across various brands, highlighting the need for increased regulatory scrutiny and routine inspections in this area [1]