Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for China and the EU to work together to prepare for important economic and trade agendas, promoting a healthy and stable development of their economic relationship [1][3] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has maintained close communication with the EU at all levels, focusing on enhancing bilateral trade and investment cooperation, and addressing trade disputes through dialogue [3][4] - China is committed to high-level openness and aims to provide European companies with a broad market and development opportunities, while opposing any actions that undermine China's development rights [5][6] Group 2 - The EU has been implementing various industrial policies and providing substantial subsidies to support European companies, with over €1.44 trillion in subsidies planned from 2021 to 2030, and more than €300 billion already disbursed by 2024 [4][6] - The Chinese government criticizes the EU's protectionist measures, which it views as a double standard, and calls for a fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises [6][7] - The EU's recent decision to restrict Chinese companies from participating in public procurement projects over €5 million has raised concerns about fairness and the impact on long-standing cooperation in the medical sector [7][8]

Group 1 - The U.S. is pressuring Vietnam to reduce reliance on Chinese technology in equipment assembled and exported to the U.S., indicating a broader strategy to decouple from China in high-tech sectors [1] - Since April, the U.S. has been using "reciprocal tariffs" as a tool to exert unilateral pressure on trade partners, significantly impacting the international trade system and increasing economic pressures on export-oriented economies [1][2] - Historical examples, such as Canada's concessions in the past, illustrate that appeasement does not guarantee protection from U.S. tariffs, as the U.S. continues to impose additional tariffs regardless of prior agreements [2] Group 2 - The unilateral concessions by trade partners do not lead to U.S. economic prosperity, as high tariffs negatively affect both supply and demand, ultimately increasing costs for U.S. suppliers and reducing global competitiveness [2][3] - The World Trade Organization (WTO) has played a crucial role in maintaining a multilateral trade system based on mutual respect and equal benefits, and any unilateral concessions could undermine this foundational principle [3] - Countries are prioritizing the maintenance of a stable international order and enhancing supply chain resilience, recognizing that the U.S. market, while important, is not the only option for export-oriented economies like Vietnam [4]

Core Viewpoint - China is willing to implement a 100% zero-tariff policy on products for 53 African countries with diplomatic relations, through the signing of a Joint Development Economic Partnership Agreement, as part of efforts to enhance economic cooperation and respond to global trade challenges [1][2]. Group 1: Joint Development Economic Partnership Agreement - The Joint Development Economic Partnership Agreement is an innovative free trade agreement between China and African countries, aimed at promoting economic cooperation and implementing the zero-tariff policy [1]. - This initiative reflects the spirit of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and aims to expand autonomous opening-up, serving as a concrete action to further the outcomes of the Beijing Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation [1][2]. - The agreement is expected to provide institutional guarantees for deepening economic and trade cooperation between China and Africa, setting a new benchmark for South-South cooperation [2]. Group 2: Implementation and Future Steps - The Ministry of Commerce will collaborate with relevant departments to promote the signing of the agreement based on principles of equality and mutual benefit, considering the specific needs of African countries [2]. - The agreement will focus on facilitating trade, inclusive growth, resilient supply chains, and modern development areas, aiming for a swift conclusion that aligns with World Trade Organization rules [2]. - As of December 1, 2024, China has already granted 100% zero-tariff treatment to products from 33 African countries and other least developed countries with diplomatic relations with China [3].

Core Viewpoint - The statement emphasizes that there are no winners in trade wars and that unilateralism, protectionism, and hegemonism ultimately harm all parties involved [1] Group 1 - The current global situation is characterized by accelerated changes and a new period of turmoil and transformation [1] - The importance of fairness, justice, and mutual benefit is highlighted as essential for maintaining world peace and achieving common development [1] - The call for unity and the rejection of a return to the "law of the jungle" is made, advocating for the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the significance of the Economic Partnership Agreement as an innovative free trade agreement between China and African countries, aiming to implement zero tariffs on 100% of products for 53 African countries that have diplomatic relations with China [1] - This agreement is a concrete action to expand autonomous opening-up and reflects the spirit of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, further promoting the outcomes of the China-Africa Cooperation Forum Beijing Summit [1] - The initiative is a response to the rising trends of unilateralism and protectionism, showcasing the determination of China and Africa to jointly address challenges and inject stability and positive energy into global trade development [1] Group 2 - The agreement aligns with the direction of economic globalization, meets the expectations of African countries, and complies with World Trade Organization rules [1]

新华社阿斯塔纳6月17日电 当地时间6月17日上午，国家主席习近平在阿斯塔纳出席第二届 中国－中亚峰会期间会见吉尔吉斯斯坦总统扎帕罗夫。 习近平指出，建交33年来，中吉关系实现跨越式发展，处于历史最好时期。今年2月我 们在北京举行富有成果的会晤，达成一系列重要共识，为两国合作注入新的强劲动力。中方 愿同吉方一道，持续深化发展战略对接，在涉及彼此核心利益和重大关切问题上继续坚定相 互支持，维护好双方共同和长远利益。 习近平强调，中吉合作大有可为。双方要扩大贸易和投资规模，深化金融合作；完善互 联互通网络，高质量推进中吉乌铁路建设；拓展新兴领域合作，在清洁能源、绿色矿产、人 工智能等方面培育新的增长点；深化文化、旅游、教育、卫生等领域交流，实施更多惠民项 目。中吉两国都是经济全球化的受益者，要共同反对单边主义，坚定维护国际经贸秩序，推 动构建更加公正合理的全球治理体系。双方将先后担任上海合作组织轮值主席国并主办峰 会，中方愿同吉方相互支持，共同推动上合组织取得更大发展。 扎帕罗夫表示，在习近平主席卓越领导下，中国沿着繁荣富强的道路奋力前行，取得伟 大发展成就，在国际舞台上发挥着关键引领作用。吉方高度重视发展对华关 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article critiques the United States' approach to trade, particularly its emphasis on "reciprocal tariffs," which the author argues is a double standard that overlooks the significant service trade surplus the U.S. enjoys [3][5]. Trade Balance - The U.S. service trade surplus is projected to reach nearly $300 billion in 2024, highlighting a significant imbalance in how the U.S. discusses its trade position, focusing on goods trade deficits while ignoring service trade advantages [3]. - The U.S. often claims to be at a disadvantage in goods trade, yet fails to acknowledge its substantial gains in service trade, which is seen as a selective narrative [3][5]. Global Trade Dynamics - The global service industry now accounts for over two-thirds of GDP, with high-value services like finance and IT predominantly controlled by the U.S. and other developed nations, raising questions about the fairness of the U.S. trade narrative [5]. - The article suggests that the U.S. is not genuinely advocating for free trade but rather seeks to maintain a system that benefits itself while imposing restrictions on others [7]. International Reactions - The European Union, particularly Germany, is expressing concerns over unilateral trade actions and the need for stronger multilateral coordination to avoid a trade war, indicating a shift in sentiment among global partners [7]. - China's recent statements at the WTO are framed as a call for a more equitable global trade environment, challenging the notion that might makes right in international trade [9]. Future Implications - The article raises concerns about the sustainability of the U.S. trade strategy, questioning how long it can continue to operate under a logic that demands reciprocity while maintaining flexibility for itself [9].

Group 1 - The global multilateral trade system is facing unprecedented challenges, particularly since the implementation of U.S. tariff policies, which contradict the fundamental principles of multilateral trade and impact economic stability in developing regions, including Africa [4] - The U.S. unilateral actions have led to inflation, rising unemployment rates, and economic slowdown, significantly affecting African countries [4] - Countries, including China, are attempting to mitigate the impacts of U.S. tariff policies through consensus and agreements, reflecting a protective and alternative approach to multilateralism [4] Group 2 - The rise of BRICS nations is providing real momentum to the long-standing calls for a new international economic order, contributing approximately one-quarter of global GDP and half of the world's population [5] - BRICS countries are working towards creating a more inclusive new mechanism to replace the old Western-dominated system, with plans to use local currencies for settlements and promote the emergence of new currencies to reduce the dominance of the U.S. dollar [5] - Despite the profound changes and challenges in the international order, there is a belief that these challenges will lead to new response mechanisms, revitalizing multilateralism through the efforts of global South countries [5]

Core Viewpoint - The recent joint statement by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and representatives from 53 African countries criticizes the United States for its unilateralism and economic bullying, calling for fair and reciprocal solutions to trade disputes [1][3]. Group 1: Context and Background - The joint statement follows the U.S. imposing high tariffs on several African countries, with some reaching as high as 47% [3]. - The timing of the statement is significant, occurring immediately after the conclusion of U.S.-China negotiations in London, indicating China's firm stance on trade issues [3][7]. Group 2: China's Position and Strategy - The statement serves as a counter to U.S. claims of aiding Africa, highlighting that while the U.S. imposes high tariffs, China is genuinely assisting African nations through infrastructure and agricultural projects [5][9]. - The declaration aims to strengthen China's influence in the Global South, expanding its diplomatic relationships and positioning itself as a more reliable partner compared to the U.S. [7][9]. Group 3: Implications for International Relations - The joint statement is seen as a strategic move in the ongoing U.S.-China rivalry, with China leveraging this opportunity to assert its moral high ground and agenda-setting power in future negotiations [7]. - The document reflects a broader effort by China to reshape the current international order, moving beyond traditional platforms like G7 and WTO to engage with developing nations [7][9].

新华社法国尼斯6月13日电 记者手记｜美国海洋科学家缺席国际会议的背后 新华社记者乔本孝 在职业社交网站领英上，美国科学家萨拉·库利目前显示的状态为"求职"。她曾是美国国家海洋和大气 管理局的海洋酸化研究项目负责人。今年2月，她在美国政府换届后的联邦机构"裁员潮"中失业。 职业突变打乱了库利的计划。她原本受邀作为9名主旨发言嘉宾之一，计划参加6月初在法国尼斯举办 的"同一个海洋科学大会"，被裁后不得不向主办方建议换人。这是正在尼斯举行的第三届联合国海洋大 会的配套活动，吸引全球超过2000名科学家参与，旨在为参加联合国海洋大会的决策者提供科学建议。 同样从事海洋酸化研究的法国海洋开发研究所研究员法布里斯·佩尔内向新华社记者证实了库利的遭 遇。佩尔内说，库利相当于被"开掉两次"，第一次库利提出申诉后得以停薪留职，但无权进入实验 室，"对方告诉她，你可以回来，但你所做的工作我们不感兴趣"，不久后她被彻底辞退。 这样的遭遇不只发生在库利一个人身上。据"同一个海洋科学大会"联合主办方法国国家科学研究中心的 消息，除了库利，还有几名来自美国国家海洋和大气管理局的科学家无奈缺席。 佩尔内说，美国在海洋科研等领域近期的政策 ...