Group 1 - The core issue is the imposition of a 30% tariff on EU goods exported to the US, which threatens €379 billion of EU exports and could cost each European citizen nearly €1,000 [1][2] - Germany, heavily reliant on exports to the US, faces significant risks, with a potential one-third reduction in profits for car manufacturers like Mercedes and BMW [2][3] - The immediate market reaction saw a €50 billion loss in European stock market value, with the DAX index dropping 2.3% [1][2] Group 2 - Internal discord within the EU is evident, with leaders like German Chancellor Merkel advocating for a softer approach towards the US, while French President Macron pushes for strong countermeasures [3][5] - The EU's trade ministers' meeting highlighted the divisions, resulting in a reduced countermeasure list from €72 billion to €50 billion, showcasing ineffective negotiation [5][6] Group 3 - The EU's relationship with China has deteriorated due to actions taken by Ursula von der Leyen, including sanctions that have led to a projected 40% drop in EU orders from China in 2024 [6][7] - The EU's long-standing dependence on the US has been exacerbated by strategic miscalculations, particularly in energy procurement, leading to higher costs for European consumers [7][8] Group 4 - The geopolitical landscape shows that the EU could have balanced relations among the US, China, and Russia, but has instead aligned closely with the US, jeopardizing access to the Chinese market [9] - Reports indicate that the combination of the US tariffs and worsening EU-China relations could lead to a 1.2% decline in German GDP and potential unemployment for 3 million people [9]

Group 1 - Philippine President Marcos visited the United States to enhance cooperation amid a trade war, with the U.S. imposing a 20% tariff on the Philippines starting August 1, up from 17% previously [1][3] - The U.S. is unwilling to link tariffs with security issues, leading to unmet expectations from Marcos's visit [3][9] - The Philippines seeks U.S. support against China, but the U.S. has shown limited commitment to security guarantees despite existing defense treaties [5][7] Group 2 - Marcos's administration has shifted the Philippines' stance towards a more confrontational approach against China, contrasting with the previous administration's close cooperation [7] - The Philippines attempted to negotiate tariff concessions in exchange for clearer security assurances from the U.S., but the U.S. did not agree to this proposal [9] - The U.S. has historically treated its allies without leniency, as seen in its tariff policies towards the EU, indicating a tough stance on trade negotiations [9]

Group 1 - The South Korean government is urgently seeking to reach a trade agreement with the U.S. before the August deadline to avoid a 25% tariff on automobile imports, which poses a significant threat to its economy heavily reliant on exports [1][3] - In 2022, South Korea's automobile exports to the U.S. exceeded $20 billion, accounting for approximately 18% of U.S. imported vehicles, indicating the substantial impact of the proposed tariffs on South Korea's automotive industry [3][8] - The South Korean government is under pressure not only from economic threats but also from military negotiations regarding the transfer of wartime operational control from U.S. forces to South Korean forces, which is seen as a critical issue of national sovereignty [4][6] Group 2 - The U.S. has expressed skepticism about the reliability of South Korea's military command structure, which complicates the transfer of wartime command and highlights the challenges South Korea faces in meeting U.S. standards for military capability [4][6] - The South Korean government is exploring specific trade agreements to mitigate the broad tariff threats, potentially focusing on areas highlighted during Trump's campaign, such as electric vehicle subsidies and export quotas [6][8] - The looming tariffs and military negotiations reflect deeper structural tensions in the U.S.-South Korea alliance, with South Korea needing to enhance its military autonomy while navigating economic pressures from the U.S. [6][8]

央视网消息：日本近日公布2025年版《防卫白皮书》，把中国、俄罗斯、朝鲜列为所谓的"安全威胁"。日本制造地缘安全焦虑的真实意图 是什么？来看相关报道。 《日本华侨报》："威胁叙事"折射战略焦虑 这份白皮书不仅折射出日本的战略焦虑，更暴露其为自身军事松绑铺路的深层动机。其"威胁叙事"无论是曲解中国军事活动，还是"夸大 化"渲染核力量和中俄合作，真实用意都是为了转移国内矛盾、借机强化日美同盟。这样的"威胁叙事"既缺乏事实依据，也违背地区和平发展 的大势。日本若想真正维护自身安全，必须正视历史、尊重邻国安全关切。 新加坡《联合早报》：或陷入更大的"安全困境" 日本新版《防卫白皮书》以周边局势为由，强调必须提升强化军力，重点将放在研发有利于扩大反击能力的导弹系统。日本军费持续飙 升，将投资人工智能、自动化，并解决人员不足等问题。日本政府此前指出，到2027年国防预算将提高到占GDP的2%。但美国仍要求日本大 幅增加防卫费以分摊自身开支。日本若继续追随美国的对抗政策，可能陷入更大的"安全困境"。 俄罗斯卫星通讯社：暴露日本一贯的偏见 在日本新版《防卫白皮书》中，继续称中国为"前所未有的最大战略挑战"，并提及俄罗斯与朝鲜 ...

近期，据智通财经报道，特朗普宣布，自8月1日起，美国将对日本输美产品加征25%关税。与此同时，日本防卫省于7月15日发布《防卫白皮书》，再次将 中国定义为"最大战略挑战"。 贸易（资料图） 这份长达534页的《防卫白皮书》，充斥着对中国的恶意解读与无端抹黑。日本宣称中国在南海、台海的行动是"单方面改变现状"，对其及国际社会构成"前 所未有的关切"。同时，白皮书还特别强调中国与俄罗斯的战略协作，渲染"今日乌克兰，明日东亚"的紧张氛围。这种毫无根据的指责，完全是日本为实现 自身政治目的而编造的谎言。 在外交政策方面，中国始终奉行独立自主的和平外交政策，坚持走和平发展道路，积极推动构建人类命运共同体。中国在国际事务中秉持公平、正义、合作 的原则，致力于与各国共同发展，促进世界和平与繁荣。反观日本，却将中国的和平发展视为威胁，企图通过抹黑中国来转移国内矛盾，提升自身在国际舞 台上的地位。这不仅是对中国的不尊重，也是对国际秩序的公然挑战。 贸易（资料图） 从军事角度来看，中国的军事现代化建设是为了维护国家主权、安全和发展利益，是基于自卫的需要。中国的国防政策始终坚持防御性，军事活动严格遵守 国际法和国际关系基本准则。中 ...

Group 1 - The United States has imposed a 25% tariff on Japanese products, surprising Japan which had hoped for a 10% limit [1] - Japan's Defense Ministry submitted a new defense white paper on July 15, highlighting China as the largest strategic challenge and exaggerating military threats [3][4] - The white paper, spanning 534 pages, uses the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict to amplify fears regarding China and Russia's strategic cooperation [3] Group 2 - Japanese Prime Minister Kishida quoted "Today Ukraine, tomorrow East Asia," indicating strong support for the US Indo-Pacific strategy while facing US-imposed tariffs [4] - Japan's Self-Defense Forces have surpassed the military capabilities of most countries, indicating a strategic purpose behind the perceived military threats from China and Russia [4] - The US has supplied Japan with advanced weaponry, including F-35 fighter jets and Tomahawk missiles, to bolster its military capabilities in the Asia-Pacific region [4] Group 3 - Japan's aggressive stance is largely dependent on US support, yet the ongoing tariff war indicates Japan may pay a price for its reliance on the US [6] - Despite close economic ties with China, Japan has adopted a hardline political and military stance, exemplified by recent provocations in the East China Sea [6]

特朗普关税大棒砸向菲律宾，让马科斯认清了一个现实：替美国卖命，不会有好下场。 菲律宾总统马科斯 菲律宾这回被彻底打懵了，没想到辛辛苦苦替美国"冲锋陷阵"、在南海碰瓷中国，结果一转头，特朗普却毫不留情的对亲密盟友"痛下杀手"。 就在近日，美国总统特朗普宣布了第二轮加税措施，包括菲律宾在内的8个国家，都被美国警告：将于8月1日起加征额外关税。 其中，菲律宾将被征收的关税税率为20%，高于4月初美国拟定的17%。想当初，特朗普"对等关税"措施刚落下的时候，菲律宾还暗自庆幸，认为自己是东 盟中被美国加税最少的国家，得到了华盛顿的"优待"。 结果现在，马科斯政府就笑不出来了，因为3%的税率，对美国来说或许不算什么，但对菲律宾来说，就是不可承受之重了。 菲律宾驻美大使罗穆亚尔德兹 从一组数据来看，美国作为菲律宾重要的出口市场，仅仅在今年前5个月，美国就占到了菲律宾出口总额的将近16%。如果再背上20%的额外关税，那么菲 律宾对美出口贸易将全面承压。 但有了越南的例子在前，再加上菲律宾主动"放弃抵抗"的软弱姿态，只怕会让特朗普更加胃口大开，开出更多的谈判条件，比如让菲律宾购买更多的美国农 产品、对美国完全"开放市场"等等。 ...

2025年的吉隆坡，一场东亚外长会议正悄然改写全球经济格局。 此前，美国总统特朗普在白宫向媒体抛出挑衅："你们准备好了吗？" 这句问话预示着第三 轮对华关税加码计划的启动——对价值超过3000亿美元的中国商品征收高达50%的惩罚性关税。全球市场为之震荡，盟友们观望，媒体一片哗然。然而，不 到一周后，这场本该是例行外交的会议，却意外地成为美国战略的滑铁卢。 会议进行到一半，王毅关于构建共赢合作机制的发言赢得了持续的掌声，而鲁比奥试图提出的提案，却在一片沉默中黯然退场。"中国提出的共赢合作机 制，才是当前全球贸易困局下的可行之道。"马来西亚作为东盟轮值主席国的外长，这句话掷地有声，其背后的立场转变，足以让华盛顿寝食难安。 形势急转直下。美国原本企图通过加征关税和拉拢盟友，形成对中国的经济包围圈。然而，现实却狠狠地打了他们的脸。王毅外长不仅巩固了与东盟国家的 伙伴关系，更是在日韩代表面前亮出了"中日韩自贸协定"的推进计划，其坚定和明确的姿态，无疑给在美国加税政策下苦苦挣扎的日韩企业带来了雪中送 7月10日，马来西亚吉隆坡，热带的湿热空气中，中国外交部长王毅步入东亚合作系列外长会议大厅。他身着深色西装，神情沉稳，笑容 ...

金十数据7月12日讯，2025年7月12日，中共中央政治局委员、外交部长王毅在吉隆坡会见斯里兰卡外长 赫拉特。王毅表示，中方是斯方可信赖的伙伴，双方应深化高质量共建"一带一路"和各领域务实合作。 要共同实施好科伦坡港口城和汉班托塔综合开发两大旗舰项目，加快中斯自贸协定谈判，在绿色能源、 数字经济、现代农业、海洋经济等领域打造合作新增长点。中斯海洋合作是互利共赢的，不针对第三 方，也不应受第三方干扰。中方愿同斯方在东盟地区论坛等东亚合作平台加强协调合作，共同维护本地 区稳定发展。所谓"印太战略"，挑动阵营对抗，胁迫各方选边站队，不符合时代潮流，也不会得到地区 国家支持。 （外交部） 王毅会见斯里兰卡外长赫拉特 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the traditional friendship between China and Sri Lanka, with a focus on deepening the strategic partnership and cooperation in various fields [1][2] - China expresses willingness to enhance high-quality cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative, particularly in flagship projects like Colombo Port City and Hambantota Comprehensive Development [1] - Both parties aim to accelerate negotiations on the China-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement and explore new growth areas in green energy, digital economy, modern agriculture, and marine economy [1] Group 2 - Sri Lanka values its relationship with China and adheres firmly to the One China principle, expressing gratitude for China's support in maintaining its independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity [2] - The cooperation between Sri Lanka and China is seen as beneficial for the Sri Lankan people and contributes to regional development and connectivity [2] - Sri Lanka is committed to implementing the consensus reached by the leaders of both countries and strengthening practical cooperation in trade, investment, infrastructure, and marine sectors [2]