广西南宁综合保税区(二期)内，车辆往来穿梭，招商引资工作持续推进。 国家发展改革委会同有关部门针对建议中提出的问题予以积极回应。"我们赴重庆、海南、江苏、广东 等地开展实地调研，听取有关地方、企业和人大代表的意见建议，深入了解地方融入服务全国统一大市 场建设、规范招商引资、统一电力市场建设等有关情况。与有关代表在京座谈，认真研究办理相关建 议。"国家发展改革委体制改革综合司有关负责人说。 "金点子"转化为推动工作的良策实招，系列政策举措加快出台。如今，超大规模市场优势进一步巩固拓 展，招标投标秩序持续好转，公平竞争环境不断优化。 2025年，国家发展改革委共承办全国人大代表建议和全国政协委员提案4405件，认真研究、深入挖掘建 议提案中的好思路、好点子，努力转化为完善政策措施、提升工作效能的良策实招。 有全国政协委员提出关于加快推动金沙江干热河谷生态修复的提案，国家发展改革委结合有关规划落 实，安排中央预算内投资3.8亿元，支持四川省实施了金沙江干热河谷(川西)生态保护与修复等一批重点 项目。 这样的景象，令全国人大代表、南宁产城投资开发集团有限责任公司项目管理部经理韦洪波感到十分欣 慰："南宁综合保税区(二 ...

（原标题：他们，将影响你的生意和生活丨国家市场监管管理总局党组书记、局长罗文） 关键词：强大国内市场、经营主体活力 6.不断深化国际交流合作，强化规则标准互联互通，主动服务我国企业出海，深度参与国际组织工作。 要坚持既要"放得活"又要"管得好"，努力开创全国统一大市场建设新局面；要充分运用质量技术基础手 段，持续助力现代化产业体系建设；要进一步强化风险意识，坚决守牢"三品一特"安全底线。 ——2025年12月28日召开的全国市场监管工作会议指出 核心关注： 市场监管部门要更好统筹活力与秩序的关系，做到既"放得活"又"管得好"，不断放大中国市场的规模效 应和集聚效应，在更大范围内深化分工协作、促进充分竞争，实现市场整体运行效率的提升。 政策扫描： 1.持续深化公平竞争治理，加力破除行政性垄断，加强反垄断反不正当竞争执法，深入整治"内卷式"竞 争。 2.推动提高经营主体发展质量，完善市场准入退出制度，提升经营主体信用水平，强化知识产权和商业 秘密保护。 3.强化平台经济常态化监管，压实平台企业"守门人"责任，突出抓好平台规则治理，加快平台监管"一 库一码一系统"建设。 4.深入推进质量强企、强链、强县（区、镇）建 ...

新华社记者魏弘毅、张晓洁 广西南宁综合保税区（二期）内，车辆往来穿梭，招商引资工作持续推进。 这样的景象，令全国人大代表、南宁产城投资开发集团有限责任公司项目管理部经理韦洪波感到十分欣 慰："南宁综合保税区（二期）建设完成、封关运营，一期交通枢纽配套的短板填补上了，实现了'港区 联动'发展，为推动国内大循环与国际大循环良性互动，发挥大市场优势加了把劲。" 新华社北京2月25日电 题：集聚良策实招 推进全国统一大市场建设——国家发展改革委扎实推动落实代 表委员建议提案 近年来，全国统一大市场建设成果频出：从《全国统一大市场建设指引（试行）》的发布，到《市场准 入负面清单（2025年版）》的出台，一项项举措在破除市场壁垒、推动设施互联、规范涉企执法等方面 有力有效、可感可及，全国统一大市场建设的"四梁八柱"基本建立。 这些举措的推出，离不开全国人大代表、全国政协委员和国家发展改革委的共同努力。 一些代表在调研中发现，建设全国统一大市场存在难点堵点，需进一步规范地方招商引资行为、推进统 一能源市场建设、全面整治"内卷式"竞争等。2025年全国两会期间，他们围绕稳步推进全国统一大市场 建设，提出了10件具体建议。 国 ...

（原标题：他们，将影响你的生意和生活｜国家发改委主任郑栅洁） 关键词："十五五"规划、投资止跌回稳 坚持因地制宜，提高规划质量，加强规划内容审核衔接，把党的二十届四中全会《建议》确定的各项决 策部署和工作要求落到实处。同时，加强经济监测预警分析，完善政策工具箱，加强预期管理，做好今 明两年政策衔接、工作衔接，推动政策靠前发力，实现良好开局。 ——2025年12月12日召开的全国发展和改革工作会议指出 核心关注： 政策扫描： 1.编制实施好"十五五"规划。 2.多措并举促进投资止跌回稳。 3.提振消费要出实招出新招。 4.综合整治"内卷式"竞争和培育发展新动能。 5.进一步全面深化改革。 充分发挥"两重"建设、新增地方政府专项债券等各类政府投资资金作用，适当增加中央预算内投资规 模，继续发挥新型政策性金融工具作用。 优化实施消费品以旧换新政策，积极扩大服务消费，加快清理消费领域不合理限制性措施，推动消费供 给提质升级。 完善重点行业产能治理和重大基础设施调控，大力培育壮大新兴产业和未来产业，培育壮大若干新兴支 柱产业，深化拓展"人工智能+"行动，补齐科技服务业短板，完善低空经济产业生态，深入推进数字经 济高质量 ...

文章指出，法治既是抵御不正当竞争的"防火墙"，也是企业安心发展的"定心丸"，是破解"内卷式"竞争 的重要手段。当前，破解"内卷式"竞争是全国统一大市场建设中的一个重要课题。强保护才能激励创新 创造。以法治维护市场公平竞争秩序，才能更好破除"内卷"。法治有保障，经营主体就有信心。用好法 治之钥破"内卷"，需以严格公正执法司法划出公平竞争底线。用好法治之钥破"内卷"，需加大规则供给 和引领。当下，随着平台经济、数字经济发展，人工智能、数据权益保护等领域出现很多新挑战。例 如，某短视频平台的"变身漫画特效"，其人工智能模型结构和参数被其他公司直接使用，如何追责？有 公司非法爬取海量数据、使用搬家软件"盗图抄店"，如何规制？这些都是新类型不正当竞争案件。及时 通过完善立法、明晰司法裁判规则等予以回应，才能让规则成为引领行业健康发展、维护新兴领域市场 竞争秩序的"风向标"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government is intensifying efforts to regulate "involutionary" competition and promote a unified national market, shifting from rule-setting to institutionalized regulation in 2026 [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Since the beginning of 2026, regulatory bodies have conducted over ten actions to address "involutionary" competition, focusing on potential monopoly risks among leading enterprises [2]. - The State Administration for Market Regulation has explicitly prohibited leading companies from engaging in practices such as capacity agreements and price fixing during discussions with top photovoltaic companies [2]. - Recent irrational competitive behaviors among platform enterprises, particularly in the food delivery sector, have drawn regulatory scrutiny due to practices like "subsidy dumping" and "choose one from two" [2][3]. Group 2: Policy Framework and Implementation - The regulatory framework for addressing "involutionary" competition has been continuously improved, forming a comprehensive governance loop covering pre-, mid-, and post-implementation stages [3]. - The focus of regulatory enforcement in 2026 will be on institutionalization and normalization, with an emphasis on inter-departmental collaboration and industry self-regulation [3][4]. Group 3: Market Transition - The shift in focus from "price competition" to "quality and innovation" is aimed at fostering high-quality competition across various sectors, including photovoltaic and new energy vehicles [4][5]. - The revision of pricing laws and the introduction of rules for internet platform pricing behavior are designed to curb unfair pricing practices and clarify market competition boundaries [4]. Group 4: Economic Implications - The return to reasonable pricing is expected to enhance profit margins, creating a positive cycle where profits drive research and development, ultimately leading to higher quality outputs [5][7]. - The government aims to resolve the issue of oversupply and improve price relationships, which are essential for transitioning from "involutionary" competition to "value-oriented" competition [5][6]. Group 5: Future Outlook - The regulatory approach in 2026 will emphasize a systematic and precise strategy, focusing on innovation encouragement, intellectual property protection, and quality standards [8]. - The expectation is that positive changes will manifest within a year in key industries, although the maturation of the entire market ecosystem may take 2 to 3 years [8].

Core Viewpoint - The construction of a unified national market is essential for enhancing China's economic resilience and competitiveness in the face of global challenges and domestic economic pressures [5][6][7]. Group 1: National Unified Market Construction - The construction of a unified national market is a strategic decision made by the central government to transition from a large market to a strong market, addressing both domestic and international challenges [6][7]. - The initiative aims to break down local protectionism and market segmentation, facilitating the smooth flow of goods and resources across the country [6][7]. - Recent measures have included the reduction of market access negative lists from 151 items in 2018 to 106 items, and the implementation of the Fair Competition Review Regulations to eliminate practices that hinder market competition [7][8]. Group 2: Political Supervision and Implementation - Political supervision is crucial for ensuring the effective implementation of the unified market strategy, with a focus on key areas such as anti-monopoly enforcement and fair competition [10][11]. - The establishment of a monitoring system to oversee the construction of the unified market is being prioritized, with specific tasks assigned to various supervisory bodies [9][10]. - The emphasis is on collaborative efforts among central and local governments, as well as between different sectors, to create a cohesive approach to market construction [8][9]. Group 3: Challenges and Opportunities - Despite progress, challenges remain, including persistent local protectionism and market fragmentation that undermine fair competition [17]. - The construction of the unified market is seen as a long-term endeavor that requires continuous efforts to address systemic issues and enhance market efficiency [12][13]. - The initiative is expected to significantly boost domestic demand and economic vitality, contributing to high-quality economic development [7][16].

Policy Direction - The policy emphasizes "stability while seeking progress" and aims for a good start to the "14th Five-Year Plan" with a focus on counter-cyclical adjustments and short-term economic stability, warning against "policy dependency" without reform support[1] - Investment should not follow the old path of "rapid expansion" but focus on the real economy and technological innovation, with an emphasis on improving people's livelihoods and human resource development[2] Investment and Consumption - The government plans to optimize the implementation of "dual heavy" projects and increase central investment subsidy standards, while enhancing the management of local government special bonds to boost project construction[2] - There is a commitment to increase basic pensions for urban and rural residents and to release potential in service consumption sectors such as tourism, events, dining, and health care[3] Market Competition and Industry Development - Measures will be taken to regulate "involution-style" competition through a list of encouraged and prohibited items for local government investment, aiming to create a fair market order[3] - The focus will be on developing emerging pillar industries such as integrated circuits, aerospace, and biomedicine, while emphasizing the importance of artificial intelligence as a key variable[4] Risk Management - The report highlights the need to manage risks in key areas, including supporting reasonable financing needs of real estate companies and preventing debt default risks[9] - It calls for optimizing debt restructuring and replacement methods to mitigate risks associated with local government financing platforms[10]

近年来，民营经济竞争环境深受产业结构调整、供需格局变化等因素相互叠加影响，部分行业的竞争焦 点从提升技术、优化产品转向压低价格、缩减成本，一些民营企业在有限市场空间内相互挤压，导致劳 动强度不断加码，人才对相关行业的预期下降，企业的创新能力和发展后劲受到冲击，"内卷式"竞争引 发社会广泛关注。2025年中央经济工作会议明确提出，"制定全国统一大市场建设条例，深入整治'内卷 式'竞争"。有效引导民营经济走出"内卷困境"、构建民营经济发展新格局，成为推动民营经济实现高质 量发展的关键问题。 一、从政策优化到企业引导 破解民营经济"内卷困境"，需要通过制度和环境改善，形成既放得活又管得好的经济秩序，引导企业竞 争重回价值创造的健康轨道，加快重塑有利于长期投入和公平竞争的民营经济发展新格局。 （一）以更健全的制度供给稳住发展预期。稳住民营企业发展预期，关键在于以制度供给的稳定性对冲 经营环境的不确定性。一是完善公平竞争制度体系，引导资源向高效领域流动。坚持有效市场和有为政 府相结合，加快破除阻碍全国统一大市场建设的堵点卡点，推进市场准入规则透明化和执行标准统一 化，减少不同地区、不同部门之间的制度差异；持续加强公平竞 ...

Core Insights - The article introduces the aβγδ economic dynamic structure model, which integrates various dimensions of economic reform in China, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive analytical framework to understand the structural transformations and collaborative logic behind the reforms [1][2]. Group 1: Economic Dynamic Structure Model - The aβγδ model posits that sustainable socio-economic development results from the organic combination and dynamic evolution of four driving forces: a (production factors), β (operational mechanisms), γ (innovation systems), and δ (systemic synergy) [2]. - Successful transformation is characterized by the sequential evolution of dominant forces (a→β→γ) and the continuous support of δ coupling throughout the process [2]. Group 2: Stages of China's Economic Reform - **First Stage: Reform Initiation and Exploration (1978-early 1990s)** - The focus was on activating a dynamics by restructuring the dual link of production factors, releasing suppressed foundational vitality, with δ coupling primarily based on "mutual adaptability" [3][5]. - **Second Stage: Market Economy System Construction (early 1990s-early 2010s)** - This stage established the β framework and empowered a upgrades, with key developments including: - a dynamics: The core is the capacity for output proliferation through the combination of production factors and their relationships [4]. - β dynamics: This refers to the ability to maintain stable and efficient resource allocation through market and governance mechanisms [4]. - γ dynamics: It represents the evolutionary capacity to break path dependence and achieve qualitative leaps through diverse innovation entities [4]. - δ dynamics: This involves the synergy of the three dynamics, ensuring stability, continuity, and efficiency in the reform process [4][9]. - **Third Stage: High-Quality Development (2010s-present)** - The focus shifted to innovation-driven growth, addressing challenges of traditional growth models, with δ coupling emphasizing "systemic and contradiction transformation" [7]. Group 3: Theoretical Insights and Policy Implications - The study highlights the importance of systematic thinking and structural awareness in promoting sustainable economic development, advocating for a precise understanding of dominant dynamics (currently γ) while reinforcing a foundations and improving β environments [8]. - The sequential evolution of dynamic structures reflects the internal logic of addressing survival, development, and future challenges, while δ coupling serves as a stabilizer and amplifier for successful reforms [9].