商标侵权
Search documents
北京市市场监管部门查处侵犯“泡泡玛特”商标专用权案
Bei Jing Ri Bao Ke Hu Duan· 2025-09-22 09:25
Core Points - The Haidian District Market Supervision Administration has taken legal action against a retail store for selling products that allegedly infringe on the registered trademark rights of "Pop Mart" [1] - The infringing products, including blind boxes and plush keychains, were found to closely resemble genuine Pop Mart products in design and branding, but lacked proper anti-counterfeiting measures [1] - The total illegal operating revenue from the sale of these infringing goods amounted to 2,322 yuan [1] Consumer Advisory - The "Pop Mart" trademark and related products have high market recognition, while infringing products often exhibit poor material quality and craftsmanship, posing potential health risks to consumers [2] - Consumers are encouraged to report suspected infringing products by calling the market supervision hotline at 12315 or 12345 to help maintain a fair market environment [2] Business Advisory - The Beijing Market Supervision Administration advises businesses to strictly adhere to the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China and related regulations, avoiding the procurement and sale of unauthorized or infringing products [3]
借“暖暖”引流《以闪》落槌:叠纸胜诉,祖龙被裁定强制执行
Guo Ji Jin Rong Bao· 2025-09-19 14:18
Core Viewpoint - The trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute between Die Paper and Zulong has concluded with Zulong being ordered to pay 150,000 yuan in damages, highlighting the importance of protecting intellectual property rights in the gaming industry [1][6][9]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The dispute originated in January 2024 when Die Paper discovered Zulong using its registered trademarks as search keywords on WeChat, leading to a lawsuit filed in March 2024 [6]. - The Jiangsu Provincial Intermediate People's Court upheld the initial ruling, confirming Zulong's infringement and ordering compensation of 150,000 yuan to Die Paper [6][9]. - Zulong failed to comply with the court's ruling, resulting in a forced execution of the payment [1][6]. Group 2: Company Backgrounds - Die Paper, established in 2013, has successfully dominated the dress-up game sector with its "Nuan Nuan" series and is expanding its IP through various initiatives, including a clothing brand and virtual idols [7]. - Zulong, founded in 1997 and listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in 2020, has faced ongoing financial losses, with cumulative losses exceeding 2.4 billion yuan from 2020 to 2024 [9][10]. - Despite recent revenue growth of 44.4% in the first half of 2025, Zulong reported a net loss of 11.73 million yuan, indicating ongoing challenges in profitability [9][10]. Group 3: Industry Insights - The use of competitors' trademarks for promotional purposes is seen as a risky strategy that can lead to legal repercussions and may not be sustainable in a competitive market [7]. - The gaming industry is witnessing a shift, with companies needing to innovate to keep pace with rapidly evolving consumer preferences and competitive dynamics [10].
胖东来优选=胖东来?最新回应
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-09-17 02:24
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the unauthorized use of the "胖东来" trademark by various online stores, raising concerns about potential trademark infringement and consumer confusion [1][10]. Group 1: Trademark Infringement Concerns - Consumers have reported finding products labeled with "胖东来" on e-commerce platforms, leading to doubts about their authenticity [1]. - A lawyer indicated that using the "胖东来" trademark without authorization constitutes infringement, regardless of whether the products were previously sold by the brand [10]. - The store manager of "胖东来" confirmed that they are collecting evidence against these online shops for trademark infringement [2][11]. Group 2: Online Store Practices - Multiple online stores were found selling products with "胖东来" in their titles, including food items and personal care products, often claiming to be similar to those sold in "胖东来" supermarkets [3][8]. - Customer service representatives from these stores often failed to provide clear answers regarding whether they had obtained trademark usage authorization [5][10]. - Some stores claimed that the use of "胖东来" in their product descriptions was merely to indicate sales channels, not implying any trademark infringement [10]. Group 3: Brand's Official Stance - "胖东来" has issued statements highlighting the unauthorized use of its trademark across various online platforms and has set up a reward mechanism for reporting such violations [12]. - The brand clarified that the only authorized channels for purchasing its products are specific physical stores and its official online platforms [12].
宗馥莉冒险扶正“娃小宗”
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-09-15 16:14
Core Viewpoint - Wahaha Group has announced the launch of a new brand "Wah Xiaozong" starting from the 2026 sales year, due to compliance issues surrounding the use of the "Wahaha" trademark, which has a brand value of 91.187 billion yuan [1][3][4] Brand Change - The decision to switch to "Wah Xiaozong" is aimed at maintaining compliance with trademark usage, as the "Wahaha" trademark has faced legal risks due to unresolved historical issues [3][4] - The new brand will cover existing product categories and expand into new ones, including beer, as registered under the "Wah Xiaozong" trademark [4] Shareholder Dynamics - The complex shareholding structure of Wahaha Group involves three parties: Hangzhou Shangcheng Cultural Tourism Investment Holding Group (46%), Zong Fuli (29.4%), and the employee shareholding committee (24.6%), which limits Zong Fuli's control over trademark usage [5][6] - Internal conflicts among shareholders have led to the decision to rebrand, as Zong Fuli has faced challenges in managing the company since the passing of the founder [6][7] Legal Risks - The legal risks associated with the use of the "Wahaha" trademark have become apparent since Zong Fuli took over, as the macro beverage group operates under a separate entity, Macro Beverage Group, which has no direct equity ties to Wahaha Group [8][9] - Unauthorized use of the "Wahaha" trademark by Macro Beverage Group could lead to trademark infringement claims, as they lack the necessary authorization from Wahaha Group [9]
“娃小宗”浮出水面,宗馥莉再造“娃哈哈第二”?
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-09-15 14:28
Core Viewpoint - Wahaha Group has announced the launch of a new brand "Wah Xiaozong" starting from the 2026 sales year, due to compliance issues surrounding the use of the "Wahaha" trademark, which has a brand value of 91.187 billion yuan [1][3]. Brand Change - The decision to change the brand was made to address legal risks associated with the "Wahaha" trademark, which cannot be used without unanimous consent from all shareholders of Wahaha Group [3][5]. - The new brand "Wah Xiaozong" will cover a wide range of products, including existing categories and new ones like beer, as registered by Hongsheng Beverage Group [4]. Shareholder Dynamics - The complex shareholding structure of Wahaha Group involves three parties: Hangzhou Shangcheng Cultural Tourism Investment Holding Group (46%), Zong Fuli (29.4%), and the employee shareholding committee (24.6%), limiting Zong Fuli's control over trademark usage [5][6]. - Internal conflicts among shareholders have led to the decision to create a new brand, as Zong Fuli has faced challenges in managing the company since the founder's passing [6]. Legal Risks - The use of the "Wahaha" trademark by Hongsheng Beverage Group has raised legal concerns, as it operates without direct equity ties to Wahaha Group, leading to potential trademark infringement issues [7][8]. - Legal experts indicate that Hongsheng's unauthorized use of the trademark could result in claims for damages and injunctions from Wahaha Group [8]. Company Response - Wahaha Group has not publicly responded to inquiries regarding the trademark compliance issues and the new brand launch [9].
“反诈老陈”打假“五星茅台酒”,五星酒业最新回应
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-09-15 07:44
Core Viewpoint - Guizhou Wuxing Liquor Industry Group has raised concerns over the unauthorized promotion and sale of a product labeled "Wuxing Moutai Wine," which infringes on its trademark rights and constitutes unfair competition [1][2]. Company Overview - Guizhou Wuxing Liquor Industry Group was established in 1993 and is located in Renhuai City, known as the "Liquor Capital of China." It is among the "Top 100 Private Enterprises in Guizhou" [2]. - The company has over 600 traditional fermentation pits and an annual production capacity of over 6,000 tons of high-quality sauce-flavored liquor. It also has a storage capacity of 50,000 tons and operates five modern bottling and packaging production lines, with a daily output of up to 30,000 boxes [2]. - The company employs over 600 staff members, has total assets of 3 billion yuan, and a brand value of 15.855 billion yuan as of 2024 [2]. Legal Actions - The company has previously filed a lawsuit regarding the infringing product "Wuxing Moutai Wine" and has won a court ruling in its favor. It reserves the right to pursue legal actions against any unauthorized production or sale of this product [1][2]. Product Misrepresentation - A social media influencer, known as "Anti-Fraud Old Chen," reported purchasing a product labeled "Wuxing Moutai" at a price of approximately 140 yuan for two bottles, raising questions about its authenticity [2]. - Guizhou Moutai Co., Ltd. clarified that the authentic "Wuxing Moutai" should be labeled as "Guizhou Moutai Wine" and does not include the term "Wuxing" on its packaging [2][3].
广东辰奕智能科技股份有限公司因出口商品商标侵权被行政处罚
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-09-14 10:28
Group 1 - The Dapeng Customs of the People's Republic of China announced an administrative penalty against Guangdong Chanyi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. for exporting goods that infringed on the trademark rights of "SONY" and "LG" [1][2] - On June 24, 2025, the company declared the export of a batch of remote controls to the Netherlands, which included 3,024 units marked with the "SONY" trademark and 5,040 units marked with the "LG" trademark [1][2] - The total value of the infringing goods was reported to be 108,043.62 RMB, and the company was fined 16,220 RMB in addition to the confiscation of the infringing goods [1][2][3] Group 2 - Guangdong Chanyi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. was founded in 2004 and successfully listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's Growth Enterprise Market on December 28, 2023, with the stock code 301578 [5] - The company has been engaged in the research, development, manufacturing, and sales of various smart products, including remote controls, cameras, and microphones for over twenty years [5]
吉林省市场监督管理厅“守护消费”铁拳行动和雷霆2025综合执法行动(第二批)典型案例
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-05 03:58
Core Viewpoint - The Jilin Provincial Market Supervision Administration is actively conducting the "Guarding Consumption" and "Thunder 2025" enforcement actions to address violations related to consumer safety and rights protection, focusing on key products and industries. Group 1: Enforcement Actions - The Longcheng District Market Supervision Bureau in Changchun investigated a clothing studio for selling goods that infringed on trademark rights, resulting in the confiscation of infringing products and a fine [2] - The Nanguan District Market Supervision Bureau in Changchun also took action against a clothing store for selling goods that violated trademark rights, leading to similar penalties [3] - The Longtan District Market Supervision Bureau in Jilin City found a liquor store selling goods that infringed on trademark rights, resulting in confiscation and fines [4] - The Lishu County Market Supervision Bureau investigated an electric bicycle shop for selling products that did not meet national standards, leading to penalties [5] - The Yalu River City Market Supervision Bureau found a company using misleading packaging and branding that closely resembled a well-known brand, resulting in penalties for unfair competition [6][7] - The Baishan City Market Supervision Bureau penalized a trading company for false advertising regarding health benefits of a product, which was found to be a regular food item [8] - The Songyuan City Market Supervision Bureau penalized an electric bicycle shop for selling non-compliant products, including discrepancies in vehicle coding [9] - The Meihekou City Market Supervision Bureau investigated an automotive maintenance center for selling goods that infringed on trademark rights, resulting in confiscation and fines [10] Group 2: Future Actions - The provincial market supervision departments will continue to conduct special enforcement actions against various illegal activities in the consumer sector, maintaining a high-pressure stance to protect consumer and business rights [10]
替人“刷脸”注册的店铺售卖假冒商品 要承担赔偿责任吗?
Ren Min Wang· 2025-09-05 01:02
Core Points - A university student, Li, was held liable for trademark infringement after lending his personal information to register an online store that sold counterfeit goods [1][2] - The court ruled that Li, despite claiming he was registered without consent, knowingly provided his ID and participated in the registration process, thus facilitating the infringement [2] - The court ordered Li to compensate the trademark owner 200,000 yuan for economic losses and reasonable legal fees [2] Group 1 - The case highlights the risks associated with sharing personal information for job opportunities, especially in the context of online platforms [1][3] - The court emphasized that individuals must be aware of the legal risks when lending their personal information, as it can lead to liability for facilitating illegal activities [2][3] - The ruling serves as a warning to the public about the importance of protecting personal information in the digital age [3]
新疆乌苏市市场监管局公布查处一起某店销售侵犯注册商标专用权典型案例
Zhong Guo Shi Pin Wang· 2025-08-28 04:16
Case Overview - On May 7, 2025, the market supervision bureau of Urumqi City, Xinjiang, conducted an inspection based on complaints and discovered counterfeit betel nut products being sold in a store [1] - The product in question was labeled as "Betel Nut Dry (Golden Stone Connection)" with a net weight of 48 grams per package, a selling price of 50 yuan per package, and was produced by Shaoyang Kouwei Wang Technology Development Co., Ltd. [1] - The inspection revealed that the product was not genuine, as confirmed by a report from Hainan Hecheng Tianxia Technology Development Co., Ltd. on June 1, 2025, which stated that the product infringed on the trademark rights of the company [1] Investigation Findings - The seller purchased five bags of the counterfeit product from a mobile vendor for 43 yuan per bag and had sold one bag by the time of the inspection [2] - The seller could only provide a purchase invoice that lacked supplier information and other necessary documentation, violating the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China [2] Penalty Outcome - On August 15, 2025, the Urumqi City market supervision bureau ordered the immediate cessation of the infringement, confiscated the counterfeit products, and imposed a fine of 1,000 yuan [2] Significance - The case highlights the risks associated with counterfeit products, which often compromise quality and safety, thereby endangering consumer health [2] - It emphasizes the importance of respecting intellectual property rights and encourages businesses to verify the trademarks of products they sell, promoting a safer market environment [2] - The case aims to enhance consumer awareness regarding counterfeit goods, reducing potential losses from purchasing such products and fostering a trustworthy consumption environment [2]