"切菜案板直接切鸡排""没放西兰花直接抓两个放里面"……8月13日，一段外卖骑手拍摄街头暗道外卖 小作坊的视频在社交平台传播。视频中，位于上海浦东新区长青路一家外卖店后厨卫生状况堪忧。 8月13日下午2点，上海室外温度逼近38℃。新京报贝壳财经记者与浦东新区市场监督管理局执法人员根 据视频举报线索，找到了位于长青路2114号2层的"胡先生·蛋包咖喱饭店"。一进门店，新京报贝壳财经 记者就闻到了酸臭味混合着焦煳油味从门窗缝隙中飘出。 根据外卖平台售卖信息，一份日式厚切猪排饭售价27.8元，使用优惠券后仅12.8元。在单一平台上，该 店铺月销量达到400+。 隔成九个外卖档口，店员徒手抓食物 "刨除成本，一个档口月赚1.2万-1.5万元左右。"一名自称负责人的女士透露，档口与操作人员实行"五 五分成"，无需支付租金，只需分摊食材和水电费。这种模式与2024年曝光的"共享厨房"如出一辙：用 廉价场地和共用证照降低成本，利用平台审核漏洞批量开设"幽灵店铺"。 贝壳财经记者和执法人员踏入二楼档口，刺鼻的气味不时令人干呕。不足百平方米的空间被隔成九个外 卖档口，每个仅用简易塑钢板隔开。生鸡排、熟咖喱饭和切了一半的蔬菜堆满 ...

Summary of Key Points Overall Situation - A total of 231 batches of food were tested in the recent food safety supervision sampling, with 225 batches passing and 6 batches failing the quality standards [4]. Breakdown of Tested Items - The tested items included: - Biscuits: 2 batches - Catering food: 101 batches - Starch and starch products: 4 batches - Condiments: 11 batches - Bean products: 3 batches - Pastries: 5 batches - Alcohol: 6 batches - Frozen drinks: 5 batches - Grain processing products: 21 batches - Meat products: 17 batches - Dairy products: 4 batches - Edible agricultural products: 37 batches - Edible oils and fats: 7 batches - Vegetable products: 3 batches - Frozen foods: 3 batches - Beverages: 2 batches [4]. Specific Cases of Non-compliance - The announcement includes an attachment detailing the specific cases of non-compliance, which provides insights into the types of food products that failed the safety tests [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the newly released draft regulations by the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) aimed at enhancing food safety responsibilities for online food trading platforms, amidst a competitive landscape marked by significant subsidy wars among major players like JD.com, Ele.me, and Meituan [1][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The draft regulations cover various online food trading platforms, including delivery services, live streaming, social media, short video platforms, community group buying, and self-built websites [1]. - The regulations consist of 23 articles focusing on five main areas: overall requirements, responsibility allocation, personnel requirements, violations, and penalties [3]. Group 2: Responsibilities and Compliance - Platforms are required to ensure that their branches, agents, and partners comply with food safety management responsibilities [3]. - If platforms engage in self-operated food sales, they must fulfill the responsibilities of food sales enterprises [4]. Group 3: Personnel and Monitoring - The regulations mandate platforms to establish a "daily control, weekly inspection, monthly scheduling" system and appoint food safety directors and personnel commensurate with transaction volumes [4]. - Food safety personnel are encouraged to utilize AI and big data for compliance monitoring and risk assessment of food producers and sellers on the platform [4]. Group 4: Addressing Food Safety Risks - The article highlights that previous regulations lacked clarity in management responsibilities, necessitating more detailed guidelines for platforms to implement food safety management effectively [5]. - Instances of food safety risks have been noted, with platforms being urged to adhere strictly to food safety laws and regulations following multiple discussions with regulatory authorities [6]. Group 5: AI and Marketing Practices - The article points out concerns regarding the use of AI-generated images by merchants, which can mislead consumers about the actual conditions of food establishments [6][9]. - Platforms like Meituan and JD.com have responded by tightening their review processes for merchant images to prevent misleading marketing practices [8][9].

Group 1 - The Nanjing market supervision authority reported four food safety cases, highlighting serious violations in local food establishments [1][2] - A restaurant in Xuanwu District was found using oxalic acid to clean crayfish, leading to the revocation of its food business license and a fine equivalent to 4.5 times the annual income of its main responsible person [1][2] - A food workshop in Liuhe District was penalized for operating without a valid food workshop registration certificate, resulting in confiscation of illegal gains and a fine [1] - A food company in Lishui District was found to exceed the maximum allowable limit of preservatives in its products, leading to a directive for correction, confiscation of illegal gains, and a fine [1] Group 2 - A food workshop in Jiangning District was cited for poor hygiene practices, including improper storage of raw materials and unclean equipment, resulting in a warning and directive for correction [2]

Group 1 - The company Anhui Jinzhongzi Liquor Co., Ltd. has received a new consumer complaint regarding potential food safety issues related to its products [1] - The complaint was filed by a consumer who purchased liquor online on July 27, 2025, and requested a refund and resolution of infringement responsibilities [1] - The complaint was addressed and a mediation agreement was reached on August 9, 2025, with the involvement of the local market supervision authority [2] Group 2 - Anhui Jinzhongzi Liquor Co., Ltd. was established on July 23, 1998, and is located in Hefei Road, Yingshou District, Fuyang City, Anhui Province [2] - The company primarily engages in the manufacturing of liquor, beverages, and refined tea, with a registered capital of approximately 6.58 billion RMB [2] - The legal representative of the company is He Xiuxia [2]

Core Viewpoint - The recent special inspection by the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) on popular internet celebrity restaurants across 24 major cities in China indicates a stable overall food safety status, but highlights specific issues that require attention [1][2]. Group 1: Inspection Overview - The inspection covered over 200 popular restaurants, including various cuisines such as Chinese, Western, hot pot, and barbecue, with a total of 500 batches sampled [1]. - Key focus areas included pesticide residues in vegetables and meat, food additives in pickled vegetables and noodles, and quality indicators like peroxide values in oils and seasonings [1]. Group 2: Inspection Results - The overall food safety status of internet celebrity restaurants is stable, with no violations found in hot pot base materials, chili powder, or duck blood, and no pathogenic bacteria detected in self-made dishes [2]. - However, issues were found, including pesticide residues exceeding limits in ginger, scallions, and bean sprouts, with a banned pesticide detected in scallions from a restaurant in Hubei [2]. - Residues of veterinary drugs were found in freshwater fish, pig throat, and bullfrogs, with a banned drug detected in live fish from a restaurant in Guangdong [2]. Group 3: Compliance and Enforcement - Some restaurants were found to have mixed food and non-food items, staff not wearing masks or hats, and improper temperature control for refrigerated and frozen ingredients [2]. - A few restaurants had disinfected utensils with excessive levels of coliform bacteria and anionic synthetic detergents, likely due to insufficient disinfection temperature or time [2]. - The SAMR has urged local market regulation departments to investigate and address the non-compliant samples, emphasizing the importance of food safety responsibility for businesses [2].

抽检结果显示，网红餐厅食品总体安全状况稳定，火锅底料、辣椒粉、鸭血等均未检出违规添加非 食用物质问题，餐厅的自制菜品也未检出致病菌。但抽检中也发现存在以下问题，需引起关注：姜、 葱、豆芽检出噻虫胺等农药残留超标，其中在湖北一家餐厅抽检的葱中检出禁用农药克百威；淡水鱼、 猪黄喉、牛蛙中检出恩诺沙星等兽药残留超标，其中在广东一家餐厅抽检的活鱼中检出禁用药物孔雀石 绿；个别火锅店粉条疑似掺杂使假，未检出配料表标识的红薯淀粉；个别餐厅存在食品和非食品混放、 厨房工作人员未佩戴口罩厨帽、冷藏冷冻储存的食材温度未达标等问题。此外，还有个别餐厅检出消毒 餐具大肠菌群和阴离子合成洗涤剂超标，可能是餐具消毒温度、时间不足或者冲洗不干净等原因所致。 对本次专项抽检发现的不合格样品，市场监管总局已督促属地市场监管部门开展核查处置，严控食 品安全风险，压实企业食品安全主体责任。下半年，市场监管总局将持续开展餐饮领域抽检，全力保障 人民群众餐饮消费安全。 央视网消息：据"市说新语"公众号消息，近期，市场监管总局在北京、上海、广州、深圳等全国24 个大中城市，对200余家大众关注度高、网络点评活跃的网红餐厅开展专项抽检，涵盖中餐、西餐、 ...

顶流酸辣粉品牌"麻六记"又承包热搜榜了。 不过这回不是因为汪小菲和张兰的直播间轶事，是因为食品安全问题： 最近，许多消费者在社交媒体平台发帖投诉，称自己在开市客超市买到了发霉的麻六记酸辣粉，随后多地开市客门店对麻六记酸辣粉做出全部下架处理。 7月27日，本次发霉粉饼的生产商，麻六记酸辣粉代工厂白家阿宽发布声明称，问题出现在两个批次的产品"生产过程中消杀环节存在不足，可能导致部分 产品受环境细菌污染，出现湿粉饼保质期缩短或霉变"。 7月28日，麻六记发布道歉声明，称"全力推进退货及妥善的补偿方案"。 作为网红品牌常驻话题中心这么多年，麻六记头一次让网友们的心态从"看热闹"变成了"天塌了"。 事发渠道开市客的麻六记以一箱8桶装规格售卖，标价65.9元，折合一桶售价8块多，在速食酸辣粉品类绝对算得上中高端； 厌倦了传统油炸方便面的年轻人，付出更高的单价，想吃点口味更丰富新鲜的方便食品，却被长出霉菌的米粉狠狠"背刺"。就算大家心理预期没把它当什 么健康食品，但谁成想并不便宜的知名品牌也能吃出如此惊人的安全问题—— "我们就喜欢嗦个粉儿的馋嘴懒人，难不成是触犯天条了？" 麻六记塌房，网红速食粉集体地震 这段时间的麻六记 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article investigates the varying cleanliness and quality of crayfish served in restaurants and delivered through takeout, highlighting concerns over the use of cleaning agents and the impact on food safety [1][2][3] Group 1: Crayfish Quality and Cleanliness - Consumers have noticed significant differences in the cleanliness of crayfish from different vendors, with some exhibiting darkened shells and unpleasant odors [2][3] - The presence of blackened shells may be attributed to inadequate cleaning or the use of certain spices, rather than solely due to seasoning [6][7] - A professional in the crayfish industry indicated that the color of crayfish can vary based on factors such as species, growth conditions, and cleaning methods [7][8] Group 2: Use of Cleaning Agents - Some vendors reportedly use "washing powder" to clean crayfish, which can be effective but raises concerns about the safety and compliance of the ingredients used [10][12] - The article notes that while some cleaning agents are permissible, there are risks associated with using non-food-grade substances, such as oxalic acid, which is banned for cleaning crayfish [14][15] - The presence of oxalic acid in some cleaning products sold online poses a significant food safety risk, as it can lead to health issues if ingested [24][25] Group 3: Regulatory and Safety Concerns - Regulatory bodies have previously issued warnings against the use of non-compliant cleaning agents, emphasizing the need for proper labeling and adherence to safety standards [14][23] - Experts suggest that while the use of cleaning agents can be beneficial, it is crucial for vendors to ensure that these products are food-grade and used within safe limits [12][26] - The article highlights the importance of consumer awareness regarding the cleaning processes used by restaurants and the potential risks associated with improperly cleaned seafood [28][30]

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The Yan Ta District Market Supervision Administration conducted food safety inspections, revealing 39 batches of qualified products and 2 batches of unqualified products, highlighting the importance of food safety in the region [2][3]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 39 batches of food products passed the safety inspection, which included categories such as condiments, dairy products, edible agricultural products, and catering foods [3][6]. - The inspection was based on various national food safety standards, including GB 26878-2011 for iodine content in edible salt and GB 25190-2010 for sterilized milk [3][6]. Group 2: Non-compliance Details - Two batches of food products were found to be non-compliant, specifically related to the presence of coliform bacteria, which is not allowed in food products [6]. - The non-compliant products were linked to specific establishments in Yan Ta District, indicating potential risks in food handling practices [6]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework - The inspections were conducted under the guidelines of multiple food safety standards and regulations, ensuring comprehensive coverage of food safety metrics such as additives, contaminants, and pesticide residues [3][6]. - The regulatory framework aims to maintain high food safety standards and protect consumer health in the region [3][6].