Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Education issued a notification on September 19 regarding the management of school uniforms, aiming to enhance the quality and service level of school uniforms through a democratic, fair, transparent, and compliant management system [1][2]. Group 1: School's Role and Governance - The notification emphasizes the school's primary role in the procurement process, requiring schools to organize and manage the selection of uniforms with significant involvement from parents and students [2][3]. - It mandates that the representation of parents and students in decision-making must not be less than 80%, thus restructuring the management authority and ensuring that schools are not merely passive executors of administrative orders [2][4]. Group 2: Transparency and Participation - The notification integrates principles of democracy and transparency throughout the procurement process, ensuring that parents and students have a say in the style and pricing of uniforms [4][6]. - It addresses existing issues such as quality discrepancies and potential corruption in the procurement process, advocating for a transparent system to protect the rights of students and parents [4][7]. Group 3: Fair Competition and Local Protection - The notification includes strict regulations against local protectionism and quality risks, prohibiting discriminatory practices that favor local enterprises in the procurement process [7][8]. - The introduction of the Fair Competition Review Regulation in 2024 is expected to enhance market fairness and invigorate the school uniform industry by curbing local protection and relationship-based marketing [7][8]. Group 4: Sustainable Procurement Practices - The notification proposes a three-year procurement cycle to reduce decision-making costs for schools and suppliers, allowing for a stable and consistent school uniform design that reflects the school's culture [8][9]. - This approach aims to minimize waste and ensure that school uniforms serve as a cultural symbol, thereby enhancing the educational environment [8][9]. Group 5: Implementation and Governance - The notification's guidelines are seen as a microcosm of educational governance, emphasizing the need for effective implementation to avoid policy stagnation [9][10]. - The success of these measures will depend on the ability to translate knowledge into action, ensuring that the principles of democratic decision-making and transparency are effectively practiced [9][10].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. has announced unilateral measures against China's maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors, prompting China to implement countermeasures to protect its domestic industries [1] Group 1: U.S. Measures - On April 17, the U.S. Trade Representative's Office announced final measures from the 301 investigation targeting China's maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors [1] - The U.S. will impose port fees on Chinese vessels starting October 14, which is seen as a discriminatory action harming Chinese enterprises [1] Group 2: China's Response - In response, China will impose special port fees on vessels with U.S. elements, including those flagged, built, or owned by U.S. companies, effective October 14 [1] - China's countermeasures are described as a "justifiable defense" aimed at maintaining fair competition in the international shipping and shipbuilding markets [1] - China urges the U.S. to reconsider its actions and seek resolution through equal negotiations and cooperation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, effective from October 15, aims to address new challenges in market competition, particularly in the digital economy, by targeting new forms of unfair competition and enhancing regulatory measures [2][3]. Group 1: New Market Characteristics - The rapid development of platform and sharing economies has led to significant changes in market competition, with data becoming a key element and technologies like algorithms and artificial intelligence being widely applied [2]. - Increased market concentration and scale effects have made it easier for leading platforms to establish dominant market positions, presenting new challenges for anti-unfair competition [2]. Group 2: Key Provisions of the New Law - The law specifically targets false transactions, aiming to dismantle the gray industrial chain of fake reviews and sales, which mislead consumers and create a vicious cycle of poor quality [3]. - It emphasizes the protection of data rights, prohibiting illegal data acquisition and interference with others' data products, thus ensuring safe and regulated data utilization [3][4]. - The law clarifies the responsibilities of platform operators, requiring them to provide a fair competitive environment and not to exploit their advantages to engage in monopolistic practices [4]. Group 3: Implementation Challenges - Effective implementation of the law requires enhanced regulatory enforcement to detect hidden violations, utilizing technologies like big data and artificial intelligence for real-time monitoring [4]. - There is a need for mechanisms that encourage consumers and businesses to assert their rights, addressing the high costs and difficulties associated with legal recourse [5].

浙江杭州一名区级政府招商人员直言，"低价出让一块地，再给予税收减免"等旧招式不灵了，现在招商 引资需要有新思路。 在广东湛江经营研学公司的一名企业负责人坦言，以前去广西开拓业务总会被所谓的"名录库"卡住，自 当地为经营主体"破壁清障"以来，生意顺利多了。 来源：人民日报 加快建设全国统一大市场，必须在完善制度规则、打通要素市场、消除地方保护和市场分割上持续用 力，为各类经营主体提供稳定、高效、可预期的发展环境 以全国统一大市场为发展坐标，一地区一领域的发展不断向全国乃至全球延展，新机遇更多、新赛道更 宽、新天地更广 当前，政府招商引资、企业投资兴业，与以往有何不同？来自基层的声音颇有说服力。 一难一易，尽显营商环境之变，也折射出全国统一大市场建设在促进公平竞争、激发市场活力方面的成 效。 促进公平竞争，不仅要有改革举措，更要优化制度供给。健全政府不当干预市场竞争行为治理规则，细 化反垄断反不正当竞争配套规则，完善数字经济领域公平竞争规则……加快建设全国统一大市场，必须 在完善制度规则、打通要素市场、消除地方保护和市场分割上持续用力，为各类经营主体提供稳定、高 效、可预期的发展环境。 没了地方保护，地方企业就一 ...

Group 1 - The construction of a nationwide unified market requires continuous efforts in improving institutional rules, breaking down factor markets, and eliminating local protectionism and market segmentation to provide a stable, efficient, and predictable development environment for various business entities [1][2] - The shift in government investment attraction and enterprise investment strategies reflects a need for new approaches, moving away from traditional methods like low land prices and tax reductions [1][2] - The promotion of fair competition is essential for market vitality, as past practices of creating "policy lowlands" and local protectionism have hindered fair competition [1][2] Group 2 - The introduction of the "Fair Competition Review Regulations" at the national level aims to eliminate practices that hinder a unified market and ensure equal access to production factors for all business entities [2] - Local innovations, such as lifecycle service lists and integrated service reforms, are being implemented to optimize the business environment, shifting focus from competing on "policy lowlands" to creating "service highlands" [2] - The establishment of a fair competition review mechanism in Jiangxi has demonstrated that removing local protection can enhance market competition and increase the competitiveness of local enterprises [3] Group 3 - A well-regulated, fair, and fully open nationwide unified market is seen as a fertile ground for societal creativity and vitality, leading to improved resource allocation efficiency and market potential [3] - Identifying roles and comparative advantages within the nationwide unified market is crucial for enhancing government services and contributing to high-quality economic development in China [3]

Core Viewpoint - The newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, effective from October 15, addresses the unique challenges of market competition in the digital economy, focusing on issues such as false transactions, data rights protection, and platform responsibilities, thereby providing a stronger legal foundation for fair competition and high-quality development [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Provisions - The revised law enhances regulations on online unfair competition behaviors, detailing various forms of malicious transactions and prohibiting operators from abusing platform rules to harm the legitimate rights of other operators [4][5]. - It mandates that platform operators clarify fair competition rules in service agreements and establish mechanisms for reporting and resolving unfair competition disputes [4][5]. - The law aims to establish a fair competition review system and strengthen the review process to ensure equal access to production factors for all operators [5]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The law addresses the rise of "involution" competition, which disrupts the market environment, and emphasizes the need for a systematic governance framework involving administrative, judicial, and corporate collaboration [5][6]. - It specifically prohibits platform operators from forcing or indirectly compelling operators to sell products below cost, which disrupts market order and harms merchants' interests [5][6]. - The law is expected to provide stronger legal protection for merchants' reasonable profit margins and legitimate rights, promoting a healthier business ecosystem [6].

Core Points - The newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China will take effect on October 15, 2023, addressing new challenges in market competition in the digital economy era [6] - The law aims to regulate unfair competition behaviors such as false transactions, data rights protection, and platform responsibilities, providing a legal framework to promote high-quality development [6] - The law specifically prohibits platform operators from forcing or indirectly forcing platform operators to sell goods below cost, which disrupts market competition [7][8] Summary by Category Regulatory Changes - The revised law includes specific provisions against various forms of malicious transactions, such as false transactions, false reviews, and malicious returns, which harm the legitimate rights of other operators and disrupt market order [6][7] - It establishes obligations for platform operators to clarify fair competition rules in service agreements and transaction rules, and to create mechanisms for reporting and resolving unfair competition complaints [7] Market Impact - The law addresses the issue of "involution" competition, which has been detrimental to the market environment, and aims to create a healthier competitive ecosystem by promoting innovation and fair competition [7][8] - It highlights the need for collaboration among administrative agencies, judicial bodies, platforms, and related enterprises to effectively implement the law and address the challenges posed by digital economy development [7] Consumer and Business Protection - The law provides stronger legal protection for the reasonable profit margins and legitimate rights of businesses, ensuring that low-price promotions do not lead to a decline in quality control and result in disorderly competition [8]

Group 1 - The newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China will take effect on October 15, addressing new challenges in market competition in the digital economy, including issues related to false transactions, data rights protection, and platform responsibilities [1][2] - The law aims to enhance market order and provide a solid legal foundation for promoting high-quality development by responding to the characteristics of unfair competition in the digital age [1][2] - The law specifies that platform operators must clarify fair competition rules in their service agreements and take necessary measures against unfair competition behaviors, including false transactions and malicious returns [2][3] Group 2 - The law addresses the issue of "involution" competition, which disrupts the market environment, and emphasizes the need for a collaborative governance system involving administrative, judicial, and platform entities [2][3] - It prohibits platform operators from forcing or indirectly forcing merchants to sell products below cost, which can lead to disorderly competition and affect product quality [2][3] - The law provides stronger legal protection for merchants' reasonable profit margins and legitimate rights, encouraging long-term innovation and healthy competition within the industry [3]

Core Points - The newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China will take effect on October 15, 2025, addressing new challenges in market competition, particularly in the digital economy [3][4] - The law aims to regulate unfair competition behaviors such as false transactions, data rights protection, and platform responsibilities, thereby promoting fair competition and high-quality development [3][4] Group 1: Regulation of Unfair Competition - The law prohibits platform operators from forcing or indirectly forcing platform operators to sell goods below cost, which disrupts market competition [4][5] - It addresses various forms of malicious trading, including false transactions and malicious returns, to protect the legitimate rights of operators [3][4] - The law establishes a system for fair competition review and requires timely reporting of unfair competition behaviors to relevant authorities [4] Group 2: Impact on Market Practices - The law responds to the rise of "involution" competition, which harms the market environment, by including it in the scope of regulation [4][5] - It emphasizes the need for collaboration among administrative agencies, judicial bodies, platforms, and enterprises to create a comprehensive governance system [4] - The law provides stronger legal protection for merchants' reasonable profit margins and legitimate rights, encouraging long-term innovation and healthy competition [5]

加快建设全国统一大市场，必须在完善制度规则、打通要素市场、消除地方保护和市场分割上持续用 力，为各类经营主体提供稳定、高效、可预期的发展环境 以全国统一大市场为发展坐标，一地区一领域的发展不断向全国乃至全球延展，新机遇更多、新赛道更 宽、新天地更广 促进公平竞争，不仅要有改革举措，更要优化制度供给。健全政府不当干预市场竞争行为治理规则，细 化反垄断反不正当竞争配套规则，完善数字经济领域公平竞争规则……加快建设全国统一大市场，必须 在完善制度规则、打通要素市场、消除地方保护和市场分割上持续用力，为各类经营主体提供稳定、高 效、可预期的发展环境。 没了地方保护，地方企业就一定发展不好吗？江西创设"公平竞争审查评估"机制后，江西石城县城投公 司建充电桩的特许经营权被取消，其他投资者顺利入场。直面市场竞争，县城投增装大功率重卡充电 桩，每月增收2万多元，升级既有充电桩，每月降低成本约7000元，企业更具竞争力。可见，打掉壁 垒，市场不是小了而是更大了，竞争力不是低了而是更高了。 一个高效规范、公平竞争、充分开放的全国统一大市场，是全社会创造力、活力的丰厚土壤。当物流通 道更加高效顺畅、经营主体被平等对待、执法监管更加 ...