新华社北京11月15日电 11月16日出版的第22期《求是》杂志将发表中共中央总书记、国家主席、中央 军委主席习近平的重要文章《因地制宜发展新质生产力》。这是习近平总书记2023年9月至2025年4月期 间有关重要论述的节录。 文章强调，"十五五"时期，必须把因地制宜发展新质生产力摆在更加突出的战略位置，以科技创新为引 领、以实体经济为根基，加快建设现代化产业体系。各地要坚持从实际出发，根据本地的资源禀赋、产 业基础、科研条件等，有选择地推动新产业、新模式、新动能发展，加快推动作为经济增长和就业收入 基本依托的传统产业改造升级，推动新旧发展动能平稳接续转换。 责任编辑：凌辰 文章强调，新质生产力是创新起主导作用，摆脱传统经济增长方式、生产力发展路径，具有高科技、高 效能、高质量特征，符合新发展理念的先进生产力质态。它由技术革命性突破、生产要素创新性配置、 产业深度转型升级而催生，以劳动者、劳动资料、劳动对象及其优化组合的跃升为基本内涵，以全要素 生产率大幅提升为核心标志，特点是创新，关键在质优，本质是先进生产力。 文章指出，科技创新和产业创新，是发展新质生产力的基本路径。科技创新能够催生新产业、新模式、 新动 ...

《报告》课题组认为，前四名城市得分差距在毫厘之间，表明全球产业创新的顶峰已形成一个实力极为 接近、竞争异常激烈的"第一梯队"。 其中，深圳的卓越表现，代表了中国城市在应用创新和成果产业化上的全球领先水平。作为市场牵引型 创新的典范，深圳在"ICT（信息与通信技术）产品出口占比"（41.3%，全球第一）"PCT（专利合作条 约）专利申请量"（6463件，全球第二）"劳动力年龄人口占比"（79.53%，全球第一）等方面表现抢 眼。深圳与东京的对比，在某种程度上来说也是两种创新模式的对话：一种是基于长期技术积累，另一 种是基于市场反应的效率。 创新成为经济高质量发展的底层逻辑 《报告》另一个核心结论是，亚洲城市在产业创新领域的集体性突破。在全球产业创新前十强中，亚洲 城市占据六席，除了东京和深圳，还有北京（第5）、首尔（第6）、新加坡（第8）和上海（第9）。 11月14日，上海交通大学深圳研究院（深圳行业研究院）与中国发展研究院联合编制的《全球城市产业 创新指数报告2025》（以下简称《报告》）在第二十七届中国国际高新技术成果交易会上正式发布。这 份追踪研究揭示了一个正在显现并强化的趋势：全球产业创新重心正在向亚洲 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the need to increase household consumption and promote technological and industrial innovation, which requires support from the capital market and a shift in household wealth allocation towards risk financial assets [2][3][16] Group 2 - The decline in household consumption growth is linked to the decrease in property income growth, with retail sales growth falling to 3% in September 2025, indicating ongoing pressure on consumption [3] - From 2021 to 2024, urban residents' property income growth dropped from 10.2% to 2.2%, further declining to 1.7% in the first three quarters of 2025 [3] - The overall decline in household wealth, driven by a 33% drop in the CSI 300 index and a 13.5% decrease in housing prices, has exerted downward pressure on consumption [3][8] Group 3 - The structure of household wealth is heavily skewed towards real estate, with property accounting for approximately 60% of total household assets, significantly higher than in the US and other developed countries [6][12] - The proportion of financial assets held in low-risk investments exceeds 80%, limiting the potential for generating property income [9][11] Group 4 - The article suggests that the current asset allocation structure poses challenges for household wealth and consumption, particularly as property values decline and the demand for real estate decreases [8][24] - It highlights the need for a shift towards risk financial assets to stabilize and increase property income growth, thereby promoting household consumption [16][24] Group 5 - Recommendations for improving the situation include enhancing the profitability of listed companies, increasing household investment in risk financial assets, reducing market volatility, and stabilizing the real estate market [16][20][22] - The article stresses that a transition in household asset allocation will require a concerted effort and may take 10 to 20 years to achieve [24]

Core Insights - The "Global City Industry Innovation Index Report 2025" indicates a significant shift of global industrial innovation focus towards Asia, with six out of the top ten cities for industrial innovation located in Asia [1][3][8] Group 1: Global Industrial Innovation Landscape - The report evaluates 27 major innovative cities globally, assessing them across four dimensions: environment, investment, output, and performance [3] - Industrial innovation, rather than mere technological innovation, is identified as the core engine driving economic rise and sustainable development for cities and nations [3][8] Group 2: Top Performing Cities - Tokyo, Shenzhen, New York, and San Francisco form the "first tier" of global industrial innovation, with very close overall scores: Tokyo at 46.84, Shenzhen at 46.79, New York at 46.72, and San Francisco at 46.11 [4][6] - Tokyo's top position is attributed to its strong industrial foundation and continuous innovation investment, leading in PCT international patent applications (11,664), high-tech product export ratio (67.4%), and number of Forbes Global 2000 companies (82) [6][8] - Shenzhen exemplifies China's leading position in application innovation and industrialization, with notable metrics such as ICT product export ratio (41.3%, the highest globally), PCT patent applications (6,463, second globally), and a labor force age population ratio (79.53%, the highest globally) [6][7] Group 3: Asian Cities' Collective Breakthrough - Six Asian cities occupy the top ten positions in industrial innovation, including Beijing (5th), Seoul (6th), Singapore (8th), and Shanghai (9th), indicating a clear shift of the global innovation balance towards the East [7][8] - Asian cities demonstrate significant advantages in electronic information and high-end equipment sectors, rapidly converting technological innovations into globally competitive products and services [7][8] Group 4: Comparative Analysis with Western Cities - While European cities like London (7th) and Paris (10th) and North American cities like New York and San Francisco maintain some advantages in innovation environment and performance, they face strong challenges from Asian cities in terms of innovation output scale and speed [8] - Traditional innovation strongholds such as Seattle and Boston have been pushed out of the top ten, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the global innovation landscape [8]

11月12日，《全球城市产业创新指数报告2025》（以下简称《报告》）在第二十七届高交会上正式发 布。报告显示，东京排名第一、深圳第二，纽约和旧金山分列第三、四位，这四座城市以极其接近的综 合得分构成全球产业创新的"第一梯队"。 作为本次评估的明星城市和报告发布地，深圳的未来发展成为《报告》重点关注议题。 报告首席专家、上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院教授陈宪在接受记者采访时表示，深圳的奇迹，源于 其市场需求直接牵引技术攻关，形成了快速试错、迭代升级的创新节奏。但报告也发现深圳在创新投 入，尤其是基础研究投入和高端创新平台（如孵化器、加速器）数量上，与顶尖城市仍有差距。 深圳商报·读创客户端记者 刘琼 吴素红 知名经济学家、上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院教授陈宪 "深圳的卓越表现，代表了中国城市在应用创新和成果产业化上的全球领先水平。" 同时，《报告》建议，深圳应围绕科技创新与产业创新深度融合以及创新生态建设和优化两大核心，在 六个方向上发力。 一是明确差异化战略定位：绘制产业创新地图，聚焦1-2个真正具备优势的核心赛道，避免同质化竞 争。 二是构建"雨林式"创新生态：建立"企业出题、科研解题"的协同机制，完善 ...

Group 1 - National fixed asset investment decreased by 0.5% year-on-year in the first three quarters and by 1.7% from January to October [1] - Real estate investment significantly impacted the overall investment growth, with a 14.7% year-on-year decline in real estate development investment from January to October, pulling down total investment by 3 percentage points [1] - External environmental complexities and fierce domestic market competition have led to cautious investment decisions among market entities, resulting in weakened corporate profitability and a slowdown in private investment [1] Group 2 - Despite the slowdown in investment growth, the investment structure is optimizing, with manufacturing investment increasing by 2.7% year-on-year from January to October, accounting for 25.6% of total investment, an increase of 1.1 percentage points compared to the same period last year [2] - Continuous advancements in technological innovation, industrial innovation, and green energy transition are driving related investment growth [2] - The investment landscape should be viewed with a long-term perspective, as China remains the largest developing country with significant investment potential to reach the level of moderately developed countries [2]

Group 1: Economic Overview - The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) is projected to reach an economic total of 14.79 trillion yuan by 2024, surpassing New York and San Francisco Bay Areas, showcasing strong development momentum [1] - The GBA contributes approximately 1/9 of the national economic total while occupying less than 1% of the land area and about 6% of the population [1] Group 2: Innovation and Technology - The "Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou" tech cluster has ranked first globally in the Global Innovation Index 2025, surpassing the "Tokyo-Yokohama" cluster [2] - The GBA has a robust patent strength, with PCT international patent applications accounting for 12% of the global total and SCIE paper publications representing 2.4% of the global output [2] - Venture capital transactions in the GBA are expected to exceed 120 billion USD by 2025, establishing the region as a strong magnet for global capital [2] Group 3: Infrastructure Development - The Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge has facilitated over 93.34 million passenger trips and 19.42 million vehicle trips since its opening, with a 19.4% year-on-year increase in daily traffic in the first three quarters of this year [2] - The Shenzhen-Zhongshan Link has recorded an average daily traffic of 90,900 vehicles in the first half of this year, enhancing connectivity across the Pearl River Estuary [2] Group 4: Manufacturing and Industry - Guangdong is home to 9 Fortune Global 500 manufacturing companies and has established 9 trillion-yuan industrial clusters, supported by a large pool of skilled talent [3] - Shenzhen leads in emerging industries such as pharmaceuticals, new energy vehicles, and artificial intelligence, with 7 companies listed among the top global humanoid robot firms [3] Group 5: Future Outlook - Guangdong aims to accelerate the construction of a vibrant and internationally competitive first-class bay area and world-class city cluster, focusing on the deep integration of technological and industrial innovation [4]

Core Viewpoint - The interdependence of technology, industry, and finance is emphasized, highlighting the crucial role of financial support, particularly from capital markets, in fostering technological and industrial innovation [1] Group 1: Financial Support for Innovation - Financial services must align with the complexity of the technology innovation process, requiring tailored support at each stage [1] - Direct financing, primarily through equity rather than bank loans, is deemed more beneficial for the integration of technology and capital [1] Group 2: Collaboration with Financial Institutions - The existing banking-dominated financial system should enhance collaboration with venture capital and other financial institutions [1] - Financial institutions are encouraged to provide loans to technology-focused enterprises and specialized innovative companies that show investment potential [1]

Core Viewpoint - The National Intellectual Property Administration has announced modifications to the Patent Examination Guidelines, effective from January 1, 2026, focusing on improving patent examination standards for new fields and industries [1] Group 1: Enhancing Protection for New Fields and Industries - The definition of plant varieties will be clarified, expanding the scope of patentable subjects and strengthening intellectual property protection in the seed industry [2] - Consideration of artificial intelligence ethics will be included, providing examples for creative examination and clarifying application document requirements to meet the needs of AI technology development [2] - Specific regulations for the examination of bitstream patent applications will be added, clarifying the circumstances under which patent rights can be granted, in response to the rapid development of the streaming media industry [2] Group 2: Optimizing Examination Standards and Rules - The handling of same-day applications will be improved, allowing for the acquisition of invention patent authorization only by waiving utility model patent rights, returning to the legislative intent [3] - Clarification of characteristics that do not contribute to solving technical problems in claims, which typically do not confer creativity, will enhance examination efficiency and improve patent application quality [3] - Requests for invalidation that do not reflect the true intent of the requester will not be accepted, regulating malicious invalidation behaviors [3] Group 3: Solidifying Mature Practices in Examination - The concept of need-based examination and related rapid examination regulations will be clarified to meet the actual needs of innovative entities [4] - Examination rules for divisional applications without declared priority will be specified, ensuring the rights of divisional applicants to claim priority [4] - Requirements for submitting proof of priority transfer will be clarified, facilitating applicants' understanding of examination standards [4]

科技创新过程的复杂性，每个阶段都需要与之匹配的金融服务。在王一鸣看来，与商业银行贷款相比， 股票为主的直接融资更有利于科技与资本的结合。在现有的以商业银行为主导的金融体系下，可以加强 与风投机构等金融机构合作，对投资机构通过净值调查意向投资的科创企业、专精特新企业相应地提供 贷款。 新一轮科技革命在加速突破，人工智能是核心驱动力，带来了广泛的各领域的深刻变革和创新。王一鸣 表示，我们要把握主动权就要加强原始创新和关键核心技术攻关，实现科创和产业创新的深度融合，未 来要推动三方面的转变，从过去的跟跑转向更多领域的领跑；从终端产品的创新转向关键核心技术的突 破；从鼓励集成创新转向鼓励原始创新。 北京商报讯（记者 马换换 王蔓蕾）11月13日，在"太湖世界文化论坛·钱塘对话"上，中国国际经济交流 中心副理事长、国务院发展研究中心原副主任王一鸣表示，科技、产业与金融彼此独立运行又相互联 系。无论是科技创新还是产业创新都离不开金融特别是资本市场的支持，金融可以在创新投入、降低创 新风险、提高创新效率方面发挥极其重要的作用。 ...