Core Points - The outdoor brand Arc'teryx collaborated with artist Cai Guoqiang to create an "art fireworks show" named "Ascension" in the Himalayas, which sparked controversy due to potential ecological damage [1][4] - Following public backlash, both the brand and the artist issued apologies and expressed willingness to remedy any environmental impact [1][3] - An investigation has been initiated by local authorities to assess the situation and determine appropriate actions based on findings [1][14] Group 1: Event Details - The fireworks show took place at an altitude of 5,500 meters, lasting 52 seconds and featuring 1,050 fireworks [9][11] - The event was located approximately 30 meters from the nearest water body and 6 kilometers from the nearest glacier [9][11] - Local villagers reported significant noise and vibrations during the event, with concerns about its impact on wildlife and agriculture [16][19] Group 2: Environmental Concerns - Environmental experts indicated that the fireworks could have adverse effects on the fragile ecosystem of the Tibetan Plateau, which is home to unique flora and fauna [19][21] - The use of biodegradable materials in the fireworks does not guarantee environmental safety, especially in high-altitude regions where decomposition rates are slow [21][23] - The destruction of the grass mat layer in alpine meadows could lead to soil erosion and long-term ecological damage, potentially taking decades to recover [23][25] Group 3: Legal and Ethical Implications - The event may have violated several environmental protection laws, including the Grassland Law of the People's Republic of China, which prohibits damaging activities in ecologically fragile areas [14][26] - Legal experts emphasized that the environmental impact of the fireworks show contradicts the principles of ecological conservation, regardless of the materials used [26]

Core Viewpoint - The fireworks show "Ascend Dragon," sponsored by outdoor brand Arc'teryx and artist Cai Guoqiang, has sparked significant public backlash due to environmental concerns, particularly regarding its impact on the fragile ecosystem of the Tibetan Plateau [1][2][3]. Group 1: Event Details - The fireworks display took place on September 19 in Shigatse, Tibet, lasting 52 seconds and featuring 1,050 fireworks [2]. - The event was designed to celebrate dragon culture and the spirit of "endless life," but instead of applause, it ignited environmental controversies [2][3]. - The local government is currently investigating the aftermath of the event and its ecological impact [1][5]. Group 2: Environmental Concerns - Experts and local residents have raised alarms about potential pollution to soil, vegetation, and water bodies due to the fireworks [1][3]. - The area, characterized by a high-altitude ecosystem, is particularly sensitive, and the use of biodegradable materials has been questioned regarding their effectiveness in such conditions [3][4]. - Concerns include whether small animals were effectively relocated before the event and the potential disruption to local wildlife and plant life [4][5]. Group 3: Regulatory and Approval Issues - Questions have arisen regarding the approval process for the event, particularly whether environmental assessments were adequately conducted [5][9]. - The local ecological environment bureau indicated that the event was approved based on the use of environmentally friendly materials, without a formal environmental impact assessment [5][9]. - The event's location, while not in a protected area, is still close to water bodies and glaciers, raising further concerns about ecological sensitivity [4][5]. Group 4: Brand Reputation and Marketing Implications - The incident has led to a significant trust crisis for Arc'teryx, which has positioned itself as a brand that respects nature and sustainability [9][13]. - Following the backlash, Arc'teryx issued apologies and stated intentions to cooperate with investigations into the ecological impact of the event [9][13]. - The event has resulted in a notable decline in stock value for parent company Anta Sports, with a market cap loss of approximately 6 billion HKD following the controversy [13][14]. Group 5: Future Considerations and Recommendations - The incident highlights the need for stricter regulations and comprehensive assessments for events in ecologically sensitive areas [14]. - The China Exploration and Research Association has called for a multidisciplinary evaluation mechanism to prevent similar occurrences in the future [14]. - Experts suggest a cautious approach to activities in fragile ecosystems, advocating for thorough pre-event assessments and ongoing ecological monitoring [14].

Core Viewpoint - The outdoor brand Arc'teryx's collaboration with artist Cai Guoqiang for the "Ascend Dragon" fireworks show in the Himalayas has sparked significant controversy over ecological protection, commercial ethics, and government regulation, leading to public outcry and investigations [1][2]. Group 1: Event Overview - The "Ascend Dragon" project is part of Arc'teryx's "Towards Beauty" series, aimed at promoting high mountain culture through art, but it took place in one of the world's most ecologically fragile areas, where recovery periods for ecosystems can last hundreds of years [2]. - The event was criticized for its potential ecological impact, despite claims of using biodegradable materials and having the lowest risk level for fireworks [2][3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Following the controversy, Anta Sports, a major investor in Arc'teryx's parent company Amer Sports, saw its stock price drop by as much as 6% on September 22, ultimately closing at 94.65 HKD per share, a decline of 2.22%, resulting in a market value loss exceeding 7 billion HKD [1]. Group 3: Environmental Concerns - Environmental associations and experts have called for the brand to prioritize ecological ethics over commercial interests, suggesting the establishment of a special fund for wildlife habitat restoration [3][4]. - Experts have raised concerns about the effectiveness of the proposed ecological remediation measures, arguing that the fireworks display could cause irreversible damage to the fragile high-altitude ecosystem [4][5]. Group 4: Brand Response - In response to public criticism, Arc'teryx and Cai Guoqiang issued apologies, acknowledging insufficient assessment of the boundaries of artistic expression and committing to cooperate with third-party ecological evaluations [2][3]. - Despite the brand's previous commitments to sustainability, including a goal to reduce emissions by 90% by 2030, the incident has intensified public scrutiny regarding its environmental practices [3].

近日，杭州市区气温直逼40摄氏度，而在仅一小时车程的浙江天目山国家级自然保护区，凉风习习，成 为众多游客纳凉避暑的理想去处。 "我们月亮桥村紧邻天目山保护区，作为缓冲区，村民生态保护意识很强。山下怎么发展？就搞旅游 业。"杭州市临安区天目山镇月亮桥村党总支书记、村委会主任张卫荣介绍，通过"千万工程"和农村风 貌提升，村里整体环境大变样。通过流转闲置房和土地，引进民宿产业，成立强村公司开发漂流项目， 带动了旅游热潮。今年，村集体经营性收入预计能达到150万元。 金华退伍军人吕瑞豪在月亮桥村承包了200亩生态农田。他在部队炊事班时就与生态农业结缘，被月亮 桥村优良的生态环境和便捷的区位优势吸引——这里背靠天目山，山泉清澈、空气优质，距杭州市区仅 一小时车程，供应链畅通。1998年出生的他是团队中最年长的，带领一群00后伙伴，坚持自然农法种植 稻米和小香薯。他们通过构建稻蛙田、稻鸭田和稻螺田实现种养循环，杜绝使用化肥农药。目前，这片 农田年产稻米约4万公斤，并生态养殖约300只鸭、60万只青蛙和35万只田螺。 走在山间小路上，天目山保护区科研科科长赵明水对这里的每一棵树都如数家珍。作为我国最早建立的 自然保护区之一 ...

前不久，2025年中国国际服务贸易交易会（简称"服贸会"）在北京落下帷幕。自2022年首次设立环境服 务专题展以来，服贸会每年都有新的"绿色惊喜"带给观众，今年服贸会的"绿意"更浓。 无论是亮马河从"小河沟"变身为北京潮流经济带，还是"爱回收"为垃圾带来"新生"，抑或是一瓶瓶白桦 树汁实现生态保护与经济发展共赢，从中都可以看到，生态保护、绿色低碳与人们的生活联系越来越紧 密。 一条河串起绿色空间 走进环境服务专题展区，亮马河国际风情水岸展示区令人眼前一亮——桨板、躺椅、VR眼镜，当下午 的阳光透过展区玻璃洒下，观众仿若置身亮马河上，享受那份松弛与惬意。 全长9.3公里，亮马河是大运河文化带的重要组成部分。 AECOM中国区景观设计总监李彦军表示，亮马河的滨水空间，将周围商圈的消费带联通起来，激活了 经济的发展引擎。这种集休闲生活、国际交往、商业活力和自然生态于一体的绿色空间解决方案，正在 越来越多地方得到实践。 据《朝阳文史》记载：亮马河最初是一条大车道，因地势低洼，每年汛期雨水汇聚到这里，形成了一条 季节性河道。 不妨把目光投向北京温榆河公园。作为首都城区的重要"绿肺"，温榆河公园拥有18平方公里连片生态空 ...

大江东去，穿巫山、削三峡，奔流至海。地处三峡库区腹心地带的重庆，是长江上游生态屏障的最后一 道关口。 谁能想到，这里曾因开采石膏矿，处处都是"天坑""白肚"。2017年，猎神村痛定思痛，先后关停5座石 膏矿。 2024年4月，习近平总书记在重庆考察时指出："大力推动绿色发展，建设美丽重庆，筑牢长江上游重要 生态屏障。" 牢固树立和践行绿水青山就是金山银山理念，重庆统筹推进高水平保护、高质量发展、高品质生活、高 效能治理，奋力建设美丽重庆。 以底线思维防治污染，绘就生态底色—— 漫步长寿区桃花溪两岸，碧波荡漾，草木繁茂，飞鸟翩然。 作为长江一级支流，桃花溪曾被沿岸工业污染、农业面源污染、生活污水等"多病"缠身。"看起来又黑 又脏，都不想往那边走。"附近居民张霞回忆。现在她常来河边散步，"这是家门口的幸福。" 为恢复清水绿岸，长寿区开展桃花溪污染综合整治行动，连通水系，整改小水电站23座，改造污水处理 厂，建设二三级污水管网。连续5年，桃花溪年均水质稳定达Ⅲ类。 桃花溪的蝶变，是重庆深入打好蓝天碧水净土保卫战的生动实践。 助绿水长流，重庆排查整治1.5万个入河排污口，搭建数字化监管平台，守好入河"关口"；促蓝天常 ...

Core Viewpoint - The extravagant firework display in the Himalayas, intended as an artistic tribute to nature, has sparked significant public backlash and led to apologies and investigations due to its environmental implications [1][2][4]. Group 1: Event Overview - The firework show took place at the Qiaoqiang Gangri ridge in Tibet, an ecologically fragile area with altitudes ranging from approximately 4600 meters to 5050 meters [1]. - The event was sponsored by the outdoor brand "Origin Bird," which aimed to enhance its brand image of "respecting nature" through collaboration with renowned artist Cai Guoqiang [2]. Group 2: Environmental Concerns - Critics highlighted the ecological risks associated with the firework display, questioning the effectiveness of biodegradable materials in the harsh environment of the Tibetan Plateau, where low temperatures and minimal rainfall slow down degradation [1][3]. - The local ecological environment is particularly vulnerable, with thin organic soil layers that could exacerbate pollution if disturbed [1]. Group 3: Regulatory and Ethical Implications - The event was reportedly compliant with local regulations, as confirmed by the local ecological environment bureau, which stated that the activity had been filed and approved [3]. - However, the lack of specific technical standards for evaluating the ecological impact of firework displays raises concerns about the adequacy of existing regulations in sensitive ecological areas [3]. Group 4: Societal Reflection - The controversy surrounding the firework event reflects a broader societal need to shift from anthropocentrism to ecocentrism, emphasizing the importance of respecting natural ecosystems for sustainable development [4]. - The public's reaction indicates a growing environmental awareness in China, suggesting that this incident could serve as a pivotal moment for enhancing ecological protection practices [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that laws should not only serve as tools for post-event accountability but should also act as proactive safeguards for ecological protection. It argues that government approval powers must align with ecological responsibilities and foresight [1][4]. Group 1: Event Overview - The fireworks display in the Himalayas, branded as a tribute to nature, ended with apologies and investigations due to public backlash over its ecological impact [1]. - The event took place at a sensitive ecological site in Tibet, raising concerns about the environmental consequences despite claims of using biodegradable materials [1][2]. Group 2: Public and Regulatory Response - Initial criticism focused on the commercial logic of the event, questioning how a brand that promotes respect for nature could sponsor such an environmentally damaging display [2]. - Public scrutiny shifted towards local regulatory bodies, questioning the compliance of the event's approval process and the adequacy of environmental assessments in sensitive areas like the Tibetan Plateau [3]. Group 3: Legal and Environmental Implications - The article highlights a gap between outdated views of compliance equating to safety and modern environmental governance that emphasizes prevention and holistic approaches [4]. - It stresses that all commercial activities, including artistic expressions, must adhere to ecological protection obligations as established by legal principles [3][4]. Group 4: Societal Reflection and Future Directions - The controversy surrounding the fireworks event reflects a broader societal need to shift from anthropocentrism to ecocentrism, recognizing humanity as part of the natural community [4]. - The article advocates for increased public awareness and action towards ecological protection, suggesting that this incident could serve as a turning point for sustainable development practices [4].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the firework display organized by the outdoor brand Arc'teryx and artist Cai Guo-Qiang in the Himalayas has sparked significant public discussion and backlash, leading to a decline in the stock price of Anta Sports, the parent company of Arc'teryx [2][3]. Group 1: Environmental Impact - Experts have criticized the notion that using biodegradable materials absolves the event from ecological responsibility, emphasizing that the degradation process is highly dependent on local biological activity, which is fragile in the area [2][3]. - The ecological restoration of alpine meadows can take decades or even centuries, highlighting the long-term impact of such events [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Oversight - The local government had previously approved the firework display, maintaining that the procedures were compliant and that the ecology was not harmed, despite the subsequent backlash [3][4]. - The environmental impact assessment law requires projects with minimal environmental impact to file a registration form, but the approval process for this event appears to have overlooked stricter regulations applicable to the Himalayas [3][5]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The event was part of Arc'teryx's "Upward to Beauty" series, which aimed to promote cultural tourism in the region, suggesting that economic incentives may have influenced the decision-making process [4]. - The investigation into the firework display should extend beyond this incident to examine other projects that may also be violating ecological regulations under the guise of compliance [5].

Core Viewpoint - The fireworks display in the ecologically fragile Himalayan region has raised significant concerns regarding environmental damage and the need for strict adherence to ecological protection standards [1][4][8]. Group 1: Environmental Impact - The fireworks event in the high-altitude area of Tibet poses a risk of irreversible damage to the local ecosystem, which is already vulnerable due to its unique climatic conditions [4][8]. - Chemical residues from the fireworks can infiltrate the soil and water sources, leading to long-term harm to local flora, fauna, and drinking water [2][8]. - Experts emphasize that the local soil structure is unstable, and any disruption could lead to severe ecological consequences, including landslides and the destruction of plant roots [7][8]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - The local government has established an investigation team to assess the situation and will take appropriate legal actions based on the findings [1][6]. - The sponsoring brand and the artist involved have publicly apologized and committed to cooperating with environmental assessments and remediation efforts [6][8]. - There are concerns about whether the environmental impact assessments were adequately conducted prior to the event, highlighting the need for stricter regulatory measures [1][6]. Group 3: Ecological Significance - The Tibetan Plateau serves as a crucial ecological safety barrier and is home to various high-altitude species, making its protection vital for biodiversity [8]. - The area is characterized by a delicate balance in its ecosystem, where even minor human activities can lead to significant disruptions [8]. - The ecological protection laws in Tibet prohibit any activities that could harm natural landscapes or wildlife, underscoring the importance of maintaining high standards for environmental conservation [8].