Group 1 - The U.S. is pressuring Vietnam to reduce reliance on Chinese technology in equipment assembled and exported to the U.S., indicating a broader strategy to decouple from China in high-tech sectors [1] - Since April, the U.S. has been using "reciprocal tariffs" as a tool to exert unilateral pressure on trade partners, significantly impacting the international trade system and increasing economic pressures on export-oriented economies [1][2] - Historical examples, such as Canada's concessions in the past, illustrate that appeasement does not guarantee protection from U.S. tariffs, as the U.S. continues to impose additional tariffs regardless of prior agreements [2] Group 2 - The unilateral concessions by trade partners do not lead to U.S. economic prosperity, as high tariffs negatively affect both supply and demand, ultimately increasing costs for U.S. suppliers and reducing global competitiveness [2][3] - The World Trade Organization (WTO) has played a crucial role in maintaining a multilateral trade system based on mutual respect and equal benefits, and any unilateral concessions could undermine this foundational principle [3] - Countries are prioritizing the maintenance of a stable international order and enhancing supply chain resilience, recognizing that the U.S. market, while important, is not the only option for export-oriented economies like Vietnam [4]

Core Viewpoint - China is willing to implement a 100% zero-tariff policy on products for 53 African countries with diplomatic relations, through the signing of a Joint Development Economic Partnership Agreement, as part of efforts to enhance economic cooperation and respond to global trade challenges [1][2]. Group 1: Joint Development Economic Partnership Agreement - The Joint Development Economic Partnership Agreement is an innovative free trade agreement between China and African countries, aimed at promoting economic cooperation and implementing the zero-tariff policy [1]. - This initiative reflects the spirit of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and aims to expand autonomous opening-up, serving as a concrete action to further the outcomes of the Beijing Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation [1][2]. - The agreement is expected to provide institutional guarantees for deepening economic and trade cooperation between China and Africa, setting a new benchmark for South-South cooperation [2]. Group 2: Implementation and Future Steps - The Ministry of Commerce will collaborate with relevant departments to promote the signing of the agreement based on principles of equality and mutual benefit, considering the specific needs of African countries [2]. - The agreement will focus on facilitating trade, inclusive growth, resilient supply chains, and modern development areas, aiming for a swift conclusion that aligns with World Trade Organization rules [2]. - As of December 1, 2024, China has already granted 100% zero-tariff treatment to products from 33 African countries and other least developed countries with diplomatic relations with China [3].

Core Viewpoint - The statement emphasizes that there are no winners in trade wars and that unilateralism, protectionism, and hegemonism ultimately harm all parties involved [1] Group 1 - The current global situation is characterized by accelerated changes and a new period of turmoil and transformation [1] - The importance of fairness, justice, and mutual benefit is highlighted as essential for maintaining world peace and achieving common development [1] - The call for unity and the rejection of a return to the "law of the jungle" is made, advocating for the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the significance of the Economic Partnership Agreement as an innovative free trade agreement between China and African countries, aiming to implement zero tariffs on 100% of products for 53 African countries that have diplomatic relations with China [1] - This agreement is a concrete action to expand autonomous opening-up and reflects the spirit of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, further promoting the outcomes of the China-Africa Cooperation Forum Beijing Summit [1] - The initiative is a response to the rising trends of unilateralism and protectionism, showcasing the determination of China and Africa to jointly address challenges and inject stability and positive energy into global trade development [1] Group 2 - The agreement aligns with the direction of economic globalization, meets the expectations of African countries, and complies with World Trade Organization rules [1]

新华社阿斯塔纳6月17日电 当地时间6月17日上午，国家主席习近平在阿斯塔纳出席第二届 中国－中亚峰会期间会见吉尔吉斯斯坦总统扎帕罗夫。 习近平指出，建交33年来，中吉关系实现跨越式发展，处于历史最好时期。今年2月我 们在北京举行富有成果的会晤，达成一系列重要共识，为两国合作注入新的强劲动力。中方 愿同吉方一道，持续深化发展战略对接，在涉及彼此核心利益和重大关切问题上继续坚定相 互支持，维护好双方共同和长远利益。 习近平强调，中吉合作大有可为。双方要扩大贸易和投资规模，深化金融合作；完善互 联互通网络，高质量推进中吉乌铁路建设；拓展新兴领域合作，在清洁能源、绿色矿产、人 工智能等方面培育新的增长点；深化文化、旅游、教育、卫生等领域交流，实施更多惠民项 目。中吉两国都是经济全球化的受益者，要共同反对单边主义，坚定维护国际经贸秩序，推 动构建更加公正合理的全球治理体系。双方将先后担任上海合作组织轮值主席国并主办峰 会，中方愿同吉方相互支持，共同推动上合组织取得更大发展。 扎帕罗夫表示，在习近平主席卓越领导下，中国沿着繁荣富强的道路奋力前行，取得伟 大发展成就，在国际舞台上发挥着关键引领作用。吉方高度重视发展对华关 ...

Core Viewpoint - The EU has canceled the high-level economic dialogue with China due to perceived lack of progress on trade issues, which raises concerns about the future of China-EU relations [1] Group 1: China-EU Relations - This year marks the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and the EU, highlighting the historical significance of their partnership [1] - The current international situation is characterized by increased instability, unilateralism, and economic bullying, which underscores the need for strengthened strategic communication and cooperation between China and the EU [1] - China expresses willingness to work with the EU to implement important consensus reached by both leaders and to enhance high-level exchanges and dialogue cooperation, aiming for stable and long-term relations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article critiques the United States' approach to trade, particularly its emphasis on "reciprocal tariffs," which the author argues is a double standard that overlooks the significant service trade surplus the U.S. enjoys [3][5]. Trade Balance - The U.S. service trade surplus is projected to reach nearly $300 billion in 2024, highlighting a significant imbalance in how the U.S. discusses its trade position, focusing on goods trade deficits while ignoring service trade advantages [3]. - The U.S. often claims to be at a disadvantage in goods trade, yet fails to acknowledge its substantial gains in service trade, which is seen as a selective narrative [3][5]. Global Trade Dynamics - The global service industry now accounts for over two-thirds of GDP, with high-value services like finance and IT predominantly controlled by the U.S. and other developed nations, raising questions about the fairness of the U.S. trade narrative [5]. - The article suggests that the U.S. is not genuinely advocating for free trade but rather seeks to maintain a system that benefits itself while imposing restrictions on others [7]. International Reactions - The European Union, particularly Germany, is expressing concerns over unilateral trade actions and the need for stronger multilateral coordination to avoid a trade war, indicating a shift in sentiment among global partners [7]. - China's recent statements at the WTO are framed as a call for a more equitable global trade environment, challenging the notion that might makes right in international trade [9]. Future Implications - The article raises concerns about the sustainability of the U.S. trade strategy, questioning how long it can continue to operate under a logic that demands reciprocity while maintaining flexibility for itself [9].

Group 1 - The global multilateral trade system is facing unprecedented challenges, particularly since the implementation of U.S. tariff policies, which contradict the fundamental principles of multilateral trade and impact economic stability in developing regions, including Africa [4] - The U.S. unilateral actions have led to inflation, rising unemployment rates, and economic slowdown, significantly affecting African countries [4] - Countries, including China, are attempting to mitigate the impacts of U.S. tariff policies through consensus and agreements, reflecting a protective and alternative approach to multilateralism [4] Group 2 - The rise of BRICS nations is providing real momentum to the long-standing calls for a new international economic order, contributing approximately one-quarter of global GDP and half of the world's population [5] - BRICS countries are working towards creating a more inclusive new mechanism to replace the old Western-dominated system, with plans to use local currencies for settlements and promote the emergence of new currencies to reduce the dominance of the U.S. dollar [5] - Despite the profound changes and challenges in the international order, there is a belief that these challenges will lead to new response mechanisms, revitalizing multilateralism through the efforts of global South countries [5]

从西安到阿斯塔纳，六国领导人将再次齐聚一堂，共叙传统友谊，共谋未来发展。 中国驻哈萨克斯坦大使韩春霖：峰会继续坚持元首引领。以落实六国元首共识为根本遵循，筑牢睦邻友好、团结互信的政治基础。中方坚定支持涉及彼此主 权、独立、安全和领土完整等核心利益，支持六国联合自强。当前，世界百年变局加速演进，国际和地区形势中的不稳定因素明显增多，中国同中亚国家坚 持睦邻友好、团结携手、深化合作、共同支持多边主义、维护多边贸易体制，将为地区繁荣发展注入新动力、为地区和平稳定增加确定性。 近年来，在元首外交战略引领下，中国—中亚机制日臻完善，各领域合作硕果累累。 第二届中国—中亚峰会即将在哈萨克斯坦举行。中国和中亚五国领导人将齐聚阿斯塔纳，共同擘画中国中亚关系和中国—中亚机制发展新蓝图。本届峰会意 义重大，各界高度期待。通过本次峰会，中国同中亚五国将进一步夯实互信基础，凝聚合作共识，深化战略对接，推动各领域合作提质升级，为构建更加紧 密的中国—中亚命运共同体注入更多正能量。 两年前，首届中国—中亚峰会在中国西安成功举办，中国—中亚元首会晤机制正式建立，中国同中亚国家关系迈入了新时代，双方合作持续走深走实，为地 区发展源源不断注入 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent joint statement by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and representatives from 53 African countries criticizes the United States for its unilateralism and economic bullying, calling for fair and reciprocal solutions to trade disputes [1][3]. Group 1: Context and Background - The joint statement follows the U.S. imposing high tariffs on several African countries, with some reaching as high as 47% [3]. - The timing of the statement is significant, occurring immediately after the conclusion of U.S.-China negotiations in London, indicating China's firm stance on trade issues [3][7]. Group 2: China's Position and Strategy - The statement serves as a counter to U.S. claims of aiding Africa, highlighting that while the U.S. imposes high tariffs, China is genuinely assisting African nations through infrastructure and agricultural projects [5][9]. - The declaration aims to strengthen China's influence in the Global South, expanding its diplomatic relationships and positioning itself as a more reliable partner compared to the U.S. [7][9]. Group 3: Implications for International Relations - The joint statement is seen as a strategic move in the ongoing U.S.-China rivalry, with China leveraging this opportunity to assert its moral high ground and agenda-setting power in future negotiations [7]. - The document reflects a broader effort by China to reshape the current international order, moving beyond traditional platforms like G7 and WTO to engage with developing nations [7][9].