Investment Rating of the Report There is no information provided regarding the industry investment rating in the report. Core Viewpoints of the Report The report analyzes the bond custody data for July 2025, indicating that the total bond custody increased month - on - month, with different trends among various bond types and institutions. The leverage ratio of the bond market decreased month - on - month due to the seasonal reduction of the repurchase bond balance [1][2][3]. Summary by Directory 1. Bond Custody Total and Structure - The total bond custody increased month - on - month. As of the end of July 2025, the combined bond custody of China Central Depository & Clearing Co., Ltd. (CCDC) and Shanghai Clearing House was 173.03 trillion yuan, with a net monthly increase of 1.74 trillion yuan, 0.45 trillion yuan more than the month - on - month increase at the end of June [1][10]. - The custody of interest - rate bonds, credit bonds, and financial bonds increased month - on - month, while the custody of inter - bank certificates of deposit (ICDs) decreased. In July 2025, the custody of interest - rate bonds was 118.91 trillion yuan, accounting for 68.72% of the inter - bank bond market custody, with a net increase of 1.51 trillion yuan; the custody of credit bonds was 18.69 trillion yuan, accounting for 10.80%, with a net increase of 0.18 trillion yuan; the custody of non - policy financial bonds was 12.78 trillion yuan, accounting for 7.39%, with a net increase of 0.41 trillion yuan; the custody of ICDs was 20.74 trillion yuan, accounting for 11.99%, with a net decrease of 0.37 trillion yuan [1][10]. 2. Bond Holder Structure and Changes 2.1 Changes in Custody by Institution Month - on - Month - The custody of major bonds by various institutions in the bond market showed differentiation this month. Allocation accounts increased their custody, while trading accounts and overseas institutions decreased theirs. Specifically, policy banks, insurance institutions, and credit unions increased their holdings of major bonds across the board; commercial banks increased their holdings of major interest - rate and credit products but continued to reduce their holdings of ICDs; securities companies increased their holdings of ICDs but reduced their holdings of major interest - rate and credit products; non - legal entity products continued to increase their holdings of major credit products but reduced their holdings of major interest - rate products and ICDs; overseas institutions continued to reduce their holdings of major bonds across the board [2][24]. - In July, the "anti - involution" policy boosted the equity and commodity markets. Under the influence of factors such as the stock - bond seesaw, the bond market significantly corrected. Trading accounts such as securities and broad - based funds quickly took profits and sold, while allocation accounts such as commercial banks and insurance companies bought significantly, acting as a "stabilizer" for the bond market [24]. 2.2 Changes in Custody by Bond Type Month - on - Month - Treasury bond custody continued to increase this month, with commercial banks being the main buyers [2][26]. - Local government bond custody continued to increase this month, and commercial banks continued to significantly increase their holdings [2][26]. - Policy - financial bond custody continued to increase this month, with commercial banks being the main buyers [2][26]. - ICD custody continued to decrease this month, with commercial banks being the main sellers. The continuous decline in ICD custody was mainly due to the slowdown in issuance and relatively large maturity of existing bonds [2][26]. - Corporate bond custody continued to decrease this month, with non - legal entity products being the main sellers [2][29]. - Medium - term note custody continued to increase this month, and non - legal entity products continued to significantly increase their holdings [2][29]. - Short - term and super - short - term financing custody turned to an increase this month, with commercial banks being the main buyers [29]. - Non - publicly - oriented instrument custody continued to decrease this month, with non - legal entity products being the main sellers [30]. 2.3 Holder Structure of Major Bonds - As of the end of July 2025, the holder structure of major bonds varied. For example, commercial banks were the largest holders of treasury bonds, local government bonds, and policy - financial bonds, while non - legal entity products were the largest holders of medium - term notes, short - term and super - short - term financing, and ICDs [33][34][37]. 3. Observation of Bond Market Leverage Ratio - The balance of bonds to be repurchased decreased seasonally, and the bond market leverage ratio decreased month - on - month. As of the end of July 2025, the estimated balance of repurchase - style pledged repos was 110,279.78 billion yuan, a decrease of 11,233.91 billion yuan month - on - month. The leverage ratio was 106.81%, a decrease of 0.83 percentage points month - on - month and 0.24 percentage points year - on - year [3][48].

Group 1 - The total amount of bonds under custody has slightly increased, reaching 171.29 trillion yuan as of June 2025, with a net increase of 1.30 trillion yuan compared to the previous month [3] - The custody of interest rate bonds is 117.40 trillion yuan, accounting for 68.54% of the total, with a net increase of 1.67 trillion yuan [3] - The custody of credit bonds is 18.51 trillion yuan, representing 10.81% of the total, with a net increase of 0.17 trillion yuan [3] Group 2 - Policy banks and insurance institutions have increased their holdings of major bond types, while commercial banks have increased their holdings of interest rate products but reduced their holdings of interbank certificates and major credit bonds [4] - Non-legal person products have significantly increased their holdings of government bonds and medium-term notes, while commercial banks have reduced their holdings of corporate bonds and non-public directed tools [5] Group 3 - The leverage ratio in the bond market has slightly increased, with the estimated balance of repurchase agreements reaching 121.51 trillion yuan, resulting in a leverage ratio of 107.64%, which is an increase of 0.90 percentage points from the previous month [6]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report As of the end of June 2025, the total bond custody decreased on a month - on - month basis. The custody of inter - bank certificates of deposit decreased significantly due to concentrated maturities, while other bonds increased. Different institutions showed distinct trends in bond holding, and the bond market leverage ratio increased slightly [1][11]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Bond Custody Total and Structure - The total bond custody increased less on a month - on - month basis. As of the end of June 2025, the combined bond custody of CCDC and SHCH was 171.29 trillion yuan, with a net increase of 1.30 trillion yuan, 0.87 trillion yuan less than the month - on - month increase at the end of May [1][11]. - Affected by concentrated maturities, the custody of inter - bank certificates of deposit decreased by 0.72 trillion yuan, the largest decline in recent years. The custody of interest - rate bonds, credit bonds, and non - policy financial bonds increased by 1.67 trillion yuan, 0.17 trillion yuan, and 0.20 trillion yuan respectively [1][11]. 3.2 Bond Holder Structure and Changes 3.2.1 Month - on - month Changes in Custody by Institution - Policy banks and insurance institutions increased their holdings of major bond types comprehensively. - Commercial banks increased their holdings of major interest - rate products but continued to reduce their holdings of inter - bank certificates of deposit and major credit products. - Credit unions and overseas institutions reduced their holdings of major bond types comprehensively. - Securities companies and non - legal entity products increased their holdings of major interest - rate and credit products but reduced their holdings of inter - bank certificates of deposit [2][24]. 3.2.2 Month - on - month Changes in Custody by Bond Type - Treasury bond custody continued to increase, with non - legal entity products being the main buyers. - Local government bond custody continued to increase, with commercial banks as the main buyers and policy banks as the main sellers. - Policy financial bond custody continued to increase, with non - legal entity products turning to large - scale buying. - Inter - bank certificate of deposit custody turned to a decrease, with non - legal entity products as the main sellers. - Corporate bond custody continued to decrease, with commercial banks as the main sellers. - Medium - term note custody continued to increase, with non - legal entity products as the main buyers. - Short - term financing and super short - term financing custody continued to decrease, with commercial banks and non - legal entity products as the main sellers. - Non - public directional instrument custody continued to decrease, with non - legal entity products and commercial banks as the main sellers [3][26][27]. 3.2.3 Holder Structure of Major Bond Types - Treasury bonds: Commercial banks held 67.07%, policy banks 11.24%, and non - legal entity products 8.93%. - Policy financial bonds: Commercial banks held 53.65%, non - legal entity products 33.11%. - Local government bonds: Commercial banks held 75.08%, policy banks 9.35%. - Corporate bonds: Non - legal entity products held 53.90%, commercial banks 32.37%. - Medium - term notes: Non - legal entity products held 62.18%, commercial banks 23.01%. - Short - term and super short - term financing: Non - legal entity products held 62.85%, commercial banks 20.05%. - Non - public directional instruments: Non - legal entity products held 59.26%, commercial banks 25.20%. - Inter - bank certificates of deposit: Non - legal entity products held 64.91%, commercial banks 28.17% [32][34][37]. 3.3 Bond Market Leverage Ratio Observation As of the end of June 2025, the estimated balance of repurchase - to - be - acquired pledged repos was 12.151369 trillion yuan, an increase of 1.417041 trillion yuan month - on - month. The leverage ratio was 107.64%, up 0.90 percentage points month - on - month and 0.05 percentage points year - on - year [4][49].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report The report analyzes the bond custody volume data in May 2025, indicating that the month - on - month increase in the total bond custody volume has widened, with different trends in various bond types and significant differences in the custody volume changes of different institutions. The bond market leverage ratio has slightly increased [1][22]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Bond Custody Volume and Structure - The total bond custody volume has a wider month - on - month increase. As of the end of May 2025, the total bond custody volume of CCDC and SHCH was 169.99 trillion yuan, with a net month - on - month increase of 2.16 trillion yuan, 0.56 trillion yuan more than that at the end of April [10]. - The total credit bond custody volume slightly decreased, while the custody volumes of other bonds all increased month - on - month. In May 2025, the interest - rate bond custody volume was 115.73 trillion yuan, accounting for 68.08% of the inter - bank bond market custody volume, with a net increase of 1.70 trillion yuan; the credit bond custody volume was 18.35 trillion yuan, accounting for 10.79%, with a slight month - on - month decrease of 5254 million yuan; the non - policy financial bond custody volume was 12.17 trillion yuan, accounting for 7.16%, with a net increase of 0.22 trillion yuan; the inter - bank certificate of deposit (NCD) custody volume was 21.83 trillion yuan, accounting for 12.84%, with a net increase of 0.27 trillion yuan [10]. 3.2 Bond Holder Structure and Changes 3.2.1 Month - on - Month Changes in Custody Volume by Institution - Policy banks continued to increase their holdings of NCDs and major credit products while continuously reducing their holdings of major interest - rate products. - Commercial banks continued to increase their holdings of major interest - rate products while reducing their holdings of NCDs and major credit products. - Credit unions and non - legal entity products comprehensively increased their holdings of major bond types. - Insurance institutions increased their holdings of major interest - rate products and major credit products while continuously reducing their holdings of NCDs. - Securities companies and overseas institutions comprehensively reduced their holdings of major bond types [22]. 3.2.2 Month - on - Month Changes in Custody Volume by Bond Type - The custody volume of treasury bonds continued to increase month - on - month, with commercial banks continuously increasing their holdings and policy banks continuously reducing their holdings. - The custody volume of local government bonds continued to increase month - on - month, with commercial banks continuously increasing their holdings and policy banks continuously reducing their holdings. - The custody volume of policy financial bonds changed to an increase, with commercial banks being the main buyers. - The custody volume of NCDs continued to increase month - on - month, with non - legal entity products continuously increasing their holdings and commercial banks continuously reducing their holdings. - The custody volume of enterprise bonds continued to decrease month - on - month, and all institutions reduced their holdings. - The custody volume of medium - term notes continued to increase month - on - month, with non - legal entity products significantly increasing their holdings and commercial banks changing to reducing their holdings. - The custody volume of short - term commercial paper and super short - term commercial paper changed to a decrease, with non - legal entity products being the main sellers. - The custody volume of privately placed bonds continued to decrease month - on - month, with commercial banks being the main sellers [24]. 3.2.3 Holder Structure of Major Bond Types - As of the end of May 2025, the holder structure of treasury bonds: commercial banks accounted for 67.72%, overseas institutions 6.11%, policy banks 10.97%, non - legal entity products 8.38%, securities companies 3.10%, insurance institutions 2.56%, and credit unions 1.16% [29]. - The holder structure of policy financial bonds: commercial banks accounted for 54.39%, non - legal entity products 32.12%, overseas institutions 3.32%, credit unions 3.23%, insurance institutions 2.10%, securities companies 1.01%, and policy banks 3.83% [31]. - The holder structure of local government bonds: commercial banks accounted for 75.11%, non - legal entity products 9.07%, policy banks 9.50%, insurance institutions 4.82%, securities companies 0.93%, credit unions 0.55%, and overseas institutions 0.02% [35]. - The holder structure of enterprise bonds: non - legal entity products accounted for 53.61%, commercial banks 32.85%, securities companies 9.09%, insurance institutions 3.29%, policy banks 0.74%, credit unions 0.33%, and overseas institutions 0.09% [37]. - The holder structure of medium - term notes: non - legal entity products accounted for 62.74%, commercial banks 20.49%, nominal holder accounts (domestic) 7.16%, policy banks 4.85%, securities companies 4.32%, others 0.24%, credit unions 0.17%, overseas institutions 0.01%, and insurance institutions 0.00% [41]. - The holder structure of privately placed bonds: non - legal entity products accounted for 59.37%, commercial banks 25.05%, policy banks 1.35%, credit unions 2.10%, others 3.26%, nominal holder accounts (domestic) 2.01%, securities companies 1.18%, overseas institutions 5.60%, and insurance institutions 0.09% [44]. - The holder structure of NCDs: non - legal entity products accounted for 64.77%, commercial banks 28.59%, nominal holder accounts (domestic) 3.32%, securities companies 0.81%, policy banks 1.39%, others 0.25%, insurance institutions 0.09%, credit unions 0.05%, and overseas institutions 0.74% [46]. 3.3 Observation of Bond Market Leverage Ratio As of the end of May 2025, the estimated balance of repurchase - to - be - bought under pledged repurchase was 107,343.28 billion yuan, with a month - on - month increase of 1,870.36 billion yuan. The leverage ratio was 106.74%, with a month - on - month increase of 0.03 percentage points and a year - on - year decrease of 0.05 percentage points [47].

Group 1 - The total amount of bonds under custody has slightly increased, reaching 167.82 trillion yuan as of the end of April 2025, with a net increase of 1.61 trillion yuan compared to the previous month [3] - The structure of bond custody shows that interest rate bonds account for 67.95% of the total, with a net increase of 0.99 trillion yuan, while credit bonds and financial bonds also saw slight increases [3] - The bond holding structure indicates that most institutions, except for policy banks, have increased their bond holdings, with commercial banks continuing to increase their holdings of major interest rate products and credit products [4] Group 2 - The custody of government bonds has continued to increase, while policy banks have significantly reduced their holdings, and commercial banks have increased theirs [6] - The custody of local government bonds has also seen an increase, with policy banks reducing their holdings and commercial banks increasing theirs [6] - The leverage ratio in the bond market has decreased, with the estimated balance of repurchase agreements at 10.55 trillion yuan, down by 1.78 trillion yuan, resulting in a leverage ratio of 106.71% [7]

2025 年 5 月 21 日 总量研究 政策行托管量环比续减，其余机构增持债券 ——2025 年 4 月份债券托管量数据点评 要点 1、 债券托管总量及结构 债券托管总量环比少增。截至 2025 年 4 月末，中债登和上清所的债券托管量合 计为 167.82 万亿元，环比净增加 1.61 万亿元，较 3 月环比少增 1.05 万亿元。 各类型债券托管总量均环比净增。本月（2025 年 4 月，下同）利率债托管量 114.03 万亿元，在银行间债券市场托管量中占比 67.95%，环比净增加 0.99 万亿元； 信用债托管量 18.35 万亿元，占比 10.94%，环比净增加 0.07 万亿元；金融债 券（非政策性）托管量 11.95 万亿元，占比 7.12%，环比净增加 0.18 万亿元， 同业存单托管量 21.56 万亿元，占比 12.85%，环比净增加 0.38 万亿元。 2、债券持有者结构及变动 分机构托管量环比变化： 本月除政策性银行的债券托管量表现为大幅减持外，其他债券市场主要机构均表 现为增持，具体来看： 政策性银行增持同业存单和主要信用品，大幅减持主要利率品； 商业银行持续增持主要利率品和信用品 ...

核 心 观 点 年初以来，资金面维持紧平衡状态，尤其是短端利率明显抬升。那么，一季度政府债供给还剩多少？3月流动 性缺口有多大？资金面后续会改善么？ 政府债供给多少？ 国债方面， 参考1-2月同类型国债单只发行规模，我们预计3月国债或将发行1.4万亿元，考 虑7122亿元的到期量，国债净融资规模或近6500亿元。 地方债方面， 我们预计3月地方政府新增债和普通再融 资债规模分别为4100亿元和4200亿元；今年特殊再融资债发行进度已近半，3月特殊再融资债发行规模或约 4500亿元，则地方债发行总规模近1.3万亿元，净融资规模约1.2万亿元。 总的来看，我们预计3月国债和地方 债发行分别约1.4万亿元和1.3万亿元，政府债净融资规模合计超1.8万亿元。 资金面会改善么？ 从资金供需的角度看，3月政府债净供给规模较高，缴准规模增长也对流动性构成扰动，而 提现回流对流动性有一定补充，在排除逆回购和MLF到期因素的情况下， 我们预计3月流动性缺口约2600亿 元，资金面存在一定的压力。 往后看，"两会"后资金利率有望和往年类似趋于转松，央行净投放也将边际增 加，随着后续国债发行规模提升，政府债供需失衡或边际缓解。在政 ...