Workflow
大国关系再平衡
icon
Search documents
国际时政周评:俄乌和谈不确定性持续
CMS· 2025-08-24 10:35
证券研究报告 | 宏观定期报告 2025 年 08 月 24 日 魏芸 S1090522010002 weiyun@cmschina.com.cn 定期报告 敬请阅读末页的重要说明 1)俄乌冲突:美国、乌克兰、欧洲多国及欧盟、北约领导人会晤于华盛 顿,讨论俄乌冲突问题;特朗普威胁若俄乌两周内未直接会晤,可能施 加"大规模制裁或关税"。在俄乌和谈不确定性持续的情况下,本周俄 罗斯 RTS 指数下跌 4.7%,布伦特油价上涨 1.7%。两周后若未取得突破 性进展,美国是否会对俄新一轮制裁,或取决于俄罗斯是否能让特朗普 相信俄方已有充分谈判诚意。和谈中乌克兰的安全保障议题或对世界影 响更深远,不仅牵涉到俄乌,更涉及俄美关系、美欧关系、俄欧关系, 是一种战后秩序的重新确立。 2)美国关税:美国与欧盟发表联合声明双方已就贸易协定框架达成一致; 加拿大宣布取消多项针对美国的报复性关税。 ❑ 未来一周关注: 1)8 月 31 日-9 月 1 日上合组织峰会,国家主席习近平将出席。 2)俄乌冲突:关注俄乌和谈进展,短期"边打边谈"或将持续。关注俄美 后续互动及大国关系变化。 3)美国关税:在美俄缓和情况下,关注美国与印度贸易 ...
国际时政周评:如何理解“普特会”?
CMS· 2025-08-17 04:34
证券研究报告 | 宏观定期报告 2025 年 08 月 17 日 如何理解"普特会"? ——国际时政周评 上周回顾:俄美首脑会晤;中美再次暂停实施相互 24%关税 90 天。 未来一周:美乌会谈;美国关税持续拉扯;地缘冲突。 ❑ 上周时政回顾: 定期报告 魏芸 S1090522010002 weiyun@cmschina.com.cn 敬请阅读末页的重要说明 1)俄美首脑会晤于阿拉斯加,双方表示取得进展,尚未达成协议;特朗普 表示将暂时搁置对俄实施进一步制裁或其他严重后果的计划。本周俄罗 斯 RTS 指数继续上涨。会谈没有达成协议符合预期,此次会谈更多的是 启动一个进程,关注后续俄乌美欧各方沟通。无论是否就俄乌冲突达成 协议,俄美领导人会晤本身对于俄罗斯属于重要外交胜利。相较于未达 成的和平协议,"普特会"对俄美两国关系的意义或更为重要,关注后 续俄美互动和大国关系。 2)美国关税:8 月 12 日中美宣布再次暂停实施相互 24%关税 90 天;当地 时间 8 月 15 日美国宣布扩大对钢铁和铝进口征收 50%关税的范围,8 月 18 日生效;特朗普称两周内宣布半导体关税,税率或达 300%。日 本、越南关税 ...
国际时政周评:俄美关系缓和再起波折?
CMS· 2025-07-13 14:05
Group 1: US Tariff Policies - Trump announced a delay in the implementation of "reciprocal tariffs" to August 1, with tariffs on imports from 14 countries ranging from 25% to 40%[8] - A 50% tariff on imported copper and a potential high tariff on pharmaceuticals were threatened, with a 35% tariff on Canadian goods also announced[8] - Countries facing tariffs may see comprehensive tariffs of 15% to 20% if they have not yet received tariff notifications[8] Group 2: Geopolitical Developments - Trump approved additional defensive weapon shipments to Ukraine and is considering further sanctions against Russia, indicating a shift to a tougher stance on unresolved issues[4] - The EU's Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the need for economic rebalancing and "de-risking" in relations with China, highlighting a strategic shift in European diplomacy[14] - The upcoming August 1 deadline for trade negotiations may lead to a framework agreement, despite existing tensions and differing national interests among negotiating countries[12] Group 3: Market Implications - The ongoing high tariffs may serve as a tool to accelerate trade negotiations, but the long-term risks of these policies remain significant[12] - The US is focusing on strategic supply chains, with ongoing investigations into sectors like copper, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors under Section 232[17] - The geopolitical landscape is shifting, with potential for increased cooperation among non-US regions as they respond to US tariff pressures[16]
国际时政周评:关税谈判期限临近,特朗普党内地位再巩固
CMS· 2025-07-06 12:05
Group 1: Trade Negotiations and Tariffs - Trump announced a trade agreement with Vietnam, imposing a 20% tariff on Vietnamese goods and a 40% tariff on goods transshipped through Vietnam, while Vietnam maintains zero tariffs on U.S. goods[9] - New unilateral tariffs may range from 10% to 70%, with implementation expected around August 1[6] - The U.S. is conducting a 232 investigation into sectors like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, which began in April, indicating potential short-term tariff risks[15] Group 2: Political Developments - Trump's position within the Republican Party has strengthened following a series of political successes since June, including the signing of the "Big and Beautiful" tax and spending bill[6] - The U.S. Supreme Court has supported Trump's executive powers, allowing him to pursue his policy agenda without significant judicial challenges[13] - The upcoming G20 finance ministers' meeting and the BRICS+ summit are critical events to monitor for international economic discussions[3] Group 3: Geopolitical Risks - Ongoing geopolitical tensions include the Israel-Palestine conflict and U.S.-Iran negotiations, with a focus on potential ceasefire outcomes and nuclear discussions[16] - The U.S. aims to rebalance its relations with major powers, particularly in the context of the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, which presents significant negotiation challenges[18] - The potential for a framework agreement in trade negotiations exists, but countries may shift conflicts to third parties to achieve short-term wins[12]
国际时政周评:伊美底线再确认,美国关税谈判冲刺
CMS· 2025-06-29 12:43
Group 1: Geopolitical Developments - Iran and Israel announced a ceasefire, with concerns about the potential for renewed military action if negotiations fail[5] - NATO summit agreed to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, with 3.5% for core defense and 1.5% for broader measures[10] - Ongoing U.S. trade negotiations with multiple countries, including China, Japan, and South Korea, with a focus on tariffs and trade barriers[13] Group 2: Trade and Economic Policies - U.S. tariffs on various goods remain a critical issue, with a focus on semiconductor and pharmaceutical investigations initiated in April[16] - The U.S. is considering extending tariff suspension for countries participating in trade negotiations until July 9[16] - The potential for a shift in U.S. trade policy towards more strategic protectionism, particularly in key supply chains[16] Group 3: Risks and Future Outlook - Risks include unexpected changes in U.S. policy and international relations, particularly regarding Iran and trade negotiations[4] - The geopolitical landscape is shifting, with a focus on balancing relations between major powers, including the U.S., Russia, and China[19] - Long-term uncertainties may arise from internal U.S. political dynamics affecting foreign policy and trade strategies[20]
国际时政周评:中美通话;特朗普政府内部路线之争
CMS· 2025-06-08 13:25
Group 1: Recent Developments - On June 5, a call took place between the leaders of China and the U.S., where Trump emphasized the importance of U.S.-China relations and expressed willingness to work together on agreements reached in Geneva[7] - The U.S. is engaged in new trade negotiations with India and Japan, focusing on tariff discussions and market access[4] - A public dispute erupted between Trump and Musk, highlighting internal political divisions within the Trump administration[8] Group 2: Upcoming Events and Risks - The U.S.-China London talks are scheduled for June 9, with a focus on non-tariff issues and technology restrictions[13] - Ongoing geopolitical conflicts, particularly in the Middle East and Ukraine, are expected to continue affecting U.S. foreign policy and diplomatic efforts[17] - Long-term risks include a potential rebalancing of major power relations, with U.S. trade policies increasingly focusing on strategic supply chains and key industries[19]
国际时政周评:中美通话,特朗普政府内部路线之争
CMS· 2025-06-08 10:01
Group 1: Recent Developments - The call between Chinese and American leaders on June 5 emphasized the importance of US-China relations and successful trade talks in Geneva, with both sides agreeing to continue discussions[7] - The ongoing political struggle within the Trump administration is highlighted by the public dispute between Trump and Musk, reflecting deeper ideological divides[10] - New rounds of trade negotiations between the US and India, as well as Japan, are underway, focusing on tariff and non-tariff issues[4] Group 2: Future Outlook - The upcoming US-China talks in London on June 9 will involve key officials and may address non-tariff issues, indicating a shift in focus[13] - The US is expected to continue its judicial review of tariff policies, with significant implications for trade negotiations with Japan and India[15] - Ongoing geopolitical conflicts, particularly in the Middle East and Ukraine, are likely to distract US diplomatic efforts and complicate trade discussions[17] Group 3: Long-term Risks - The report warns of potential shifts in US policy due to internal political dynamics and unexpected changes in international relations, which could impact market stability[3] - The rebalancing of major power relationships is anticipated, with a focus on strategic supply chains and key industries such as semiconductors and pharmaceuticals[19] - The report suggests that if Trump fails to achieve satisfactory trade outcomes, more aggressive geopolitical stances may emerge, increasing market volatility[19]