某著名公众号近期推送了一篇以"大涨0.03，韩国生育率超过上海了"为标题的文章。文章将上海市与韩国进行比较，并讨论了韩国2024年生育率较2023年 有所上升的原因。但问题是，上海市和韩国的生育水平真的可比吗？ 因此，不宜直接比较上海市和韩国的生育水平，要比较两个地区生育水平的高低，需要根据研究目的合理选取指标的口径。若想讨论中国和韩国的生育水 平，可直接比较中国和韩国整体生育水平的大小。而若想讨论中国和韩国（大）城市生育水平的状况，可比较上海市（或北京市）和首尔市的总和生育 率。数据显示，首尔市2024年的生育水平仅为0.58，远低于同时期韩国的0.75，也低于上海市的0.72。因而，仅从（大）城市的视角看，中国的总和生育 率并不低于同时期韩国的水平。 上海市的生育水平低在何处？ 2024年上海市的总和生育率非常低，从人口学的视角看其背后的原因主要可归因于两个方面：其一是多孩的生育水平低，其二是生育的推迟。 从2024年时期出生人数中的孩次比例看，2024年上海市多孩占比显著低于同时期的首尔市。上海市户籍人口和常住人口二孩及以上孩次在总出生人数中的 占比分别为22.5%和29.8%，较首尔市31.1%分别低 ...

Core Insights - The city of Tianmen is experiencing a "counter-trend rebound" in birth rates, with approximately 7,217 newborns expected in 2024, a 17% increase from 2023, while the national birth population is projected to rise by about 5.8% to 9.54 million [2][4][10] - This increase is attributed to Tianmen's substantial fertility support policies, with over 300 million yuan planned for investment from 2024 to 2026 to encourage childbirth [2][4][11] - However, experts caution that the total fertility rate (TFR) is the key indicator for assessing fertility levels, and the current increase in birth numbers does not necessarily indicate a fundamental improvement in fertility intentions [3][5][10] Policy Measures - Tianmen has implemented several policies to encourage childbirth, including increased maternity leave, financial rewards for families with two or three children, and housing purchase vouchers [4][5] - Families can receive up to 287,188 yuan for having a second child and up to 355,988 yuan for a third child, excluding national-level childcare subsidies [4][10] Demographic Analysis - The increase in birth rates may be influenced by cultural factors, such as the "Year of the Dragon," and a release of pent-up demand for childbirth following the easing of pandemic restrictions [5][10] - The local population's growth is also affected by migration, as families with Tianmen residency may return to register births and claim subsidies, thus inflating local birth statistics [5][10] Statistical Challenges - There are significant challenges in accurately measuring the total fertility rate in Tianmen due to discrepancies in population data sources and the high proportion of migrant workers [6][7] - Current statistics primarily reflect the number of births registered in Tianmen, which may not accurately represent the local population's fertility behavior [6][7] Long-term Considerations - Experts suggest that the observed increase in birth numbers may be a short-term effect rather than a sustainable trend, emphasizing the need for consistent and authoritative data monitoring [3][5][8] - The effectiveness of Tianmen's policies in improving fertility rates on a broader scale remains uncertain, and a more substantial national investment in fertility support is deemed necessary to address the low birth rate issue effectively [10][11]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is experiencing a continuous population decline for 16 years, with the latest statistics showing a decrease of 908,000 people, marking the largest drop since records began. The total population is now 120.65 million [4][6]. Group 1: Population Decline - Japan's population has decreased by nearly 7 million since 2008, equivalent to the disappearance of two Osaka cities [6]. - The birth rate in Japan reached a historic low of 686,000 in 2024, while the death toll rose to nearly 1.6 million, indicating a significant demographic crisis [8][10]. - The median age in Japan is 49.4 years, with approximately 29.6% of the population aged 65 and older, highlighting the severe aging issue [12][14]. Group 2: Government Response - Japan has invested approximately 66 trillion yen (around 3.2 trillion yuan) over the past 20 years to combat the declining birth rate, but the effectiveness of these measures is questioned [6][20]. - The total fertility rate in Japan is now at 1.15, significantly below the replacement level of 2.1, although it is not the lowest in East Asia [20][22]. - The government has implemented extensive financial support for families, including a total average subsidy of 3.52 million yen (about 164,000 yuan) for children aged 0-18 [26][29]. Group 3: Comparison with Other Regions - The European Union's population reached 450.4 million in 2024, marking a continuous increase, with 19 out of 27 member states experiencing population growth [33][34]. - The EU's natural population decline is offset by immigration, with over 2.3 million net immigrants in 2024, contrasting with Japan's reluctance to accept immigrants [38][40]. - Japan's immigration policy may need to shift in response to its declining population, as the number of foreign residents has increased by 350,000 in the past year, reaching a total of 3.77 million [44][45].

Core Points - Japan's population has decreased to 120.65 million as of January 1, 2025, marking a record decline of 908,000 people from the previous year, the largest drop since records began [1] - The country has experienced a continuous population decline for 16 years, totaling a reduction of nearly 7 million people since 2008, equivalent to the disappearance of two Osaka cities [3][5] - Japan has invested approximately 66 trillion yen (about 3.2 trillion yuan) over the past 20 years to address the declining birth rate, viewing it as a national crisis [4] Population Trends - In 2024, Japan recorded its lowest birth rate of 686,000, while the death toll reached nearly 1.6 million, the highest on record [6] - The dual pressures of declining birth rates and an aging population are contributing to the ongoing population decrease [8] - Japan's median age is 49.4 years, with approximately 29.6% of the population aged 65 and older, making it the oldest country globally [11][13] Regional Disparities - Population decline is widespread across Japan, with only Tokyo experiencing growth among the 47 prefectures; other regions are seeing declines [14][15] - Some areas, like Tottori Prefecture, have populations dropping below 100,000, facing a "disappearance crisis" [16] Education and Infrastructure Impact - The population decrease has led to the closure of over 400 schools annually, with more than half of private universities failing to meet enrollment targets [17] - Some schools have been repurposed for other uses, such as agricultural parks or aquariums [18] Government Response and Policies - Japan's total fertility rate fell to 1.15 in 2024, the lowest since records began in 1947, significantly below the 2.1 replacement level [21] - The government has implemented extensive financial support measures, including a comprehensive subsidy system for families with children, averaging 3.52 million yen (approximately 164,000 yuan) per child from birth to age 18 [31] - New policies include full tuition waivers for national universities for families with three or more children, alongside various other financial incentives [32][34] Comparison with Other Regions - Despite Japan's low birth rate, it is not the lowest in East Asia, with South Korea's rate at 0.75 [24] - The European Union has seen population growth, with 19 out of 27 member states increasing their populations, largely due to immigration, which Japan has been historically resistant to [37][42][43] - Japan's recent increase in foreign residents, reaching 3.77 million, indicates a potential shift in immigration policy as domestic population decline continues [48][49]

Group 1 - The total fertility rate (TFR) in China has been declining, reaching approximately 1.0 in 2023, which is among the lowest in major economies globally [2][12][15] - The number of women of childbearing age is decreasing, with projections indicating a reduction of over 16 million by 2025 compared to 2020, contributing to downward pressure on future birth rates [16][20] - The Chinese government has initiated a series of policies to support childbearing, including the establishment of a cash subsidy system for families with children under three years old, aimed at increasing birth rates [3][24][27] Group 2 - The child-rearing subsidy policy framework in China has evolved into a progressive model that includes support for childcare infrastructure, economic relief, and direct cash subsidies [3][24] - Local governments have been innovating in subsidy policies, with various models emerging, such as monthly cash payments and tax deductions for childcare expenses [28][29] - The experience of low-fertility countries like Japan and South Korea provides valuable lessons for China, particularly in terms of increasing family-related social spending to improve birth rates [36][37]

Group 1 - In April, South Korea's newborn population reached 20,717, marking an 8.7% year-on-year increase, the highest monthly growth since April 1991 [1] - The total fertility rate in South Korea rose to 0.79 in April, an increase of 0.06 compared to the previous year, although it remains significantly below the replacement level of 2.1 [1] - The rise in birth rates is attributed to an increase in marriage rates, a growing population of women in their early 30s, and various government policies aimed at promoting childbirth [1][2] Group 2 - The number of marriages in April increased by 4.9% year-on-year, reaching 18,921 couples, marking the 13th consecutive month of growth [2] - The population of women aged 30 to 34 has grown from 1.51 million in 2020 to 1.65 million in May this year, contributing to higher marriage and birth rates [2] - Despite the positive trends, experts express skepticism about the sustainability of these increases due to structural issues such as high housing costs, intense educational competition, and changing attitudes towards marriage and family among the younger generation [2][3] Group 3 - The South Korean government has implemented measures such as a monthly childcare allowance of 300,000 KRW (approximately 1,740 RMB) for parents of children under one year old and increased parental leave [2] - A recent UN report categorizes South Korea as a "super low fertility" country, estimating only a 0.1% chance of restoring the total fertility rate to a level that can achieve generational replacement within the next 30 years [2] - Economic challenges related to population issues are prompting both the government and major companies to take action to reverse the declining birth rate trend [2]

Core Viewpoint - Vietnam has abolished its long-standing two-child policy, allowing families to decide the number of children they wish to have, reflecting a shift in demographic strategy to address declining birth rates and an aging population [1][3]. Group 1: Policy Changes - The National Assembly of Vietnam has passed an amendment to the Population Law, removing the previous restriction of "one or two children per couple" [1]. - The new law allows individuals or couples to autonomously decide on the number of children based on various personal factors such as age, health, and financial capability [3]. Group 2: Demographic Trends - Vietnam's total fertility rate has been declining, projected to be 1.91 in 2024, significantly below the replacement level of 2.1 [1][3]. - The fertility rate has dropped from 2.01 in 2022 to 1.96 in 2023, indicating a continuous downward trend [3]. Group 3: Societal Impacts - In urban areas like Ho Chi Minh City, young people face increased pressure and reduced social circles, leading to a decline in marriage and childbearing intentions [4]. - The government recognizes that merely changing laws may not suffice to boost birth rates, as societal attitudes towards family size have evolved [5]. Group 4: Economic Considerations - Vietnam is experiencing a demographic dividend with a large young workforce, which is crucial for its economic growth amid global supply chain shifts [5]. - The country is one of the fastest-aging populations globally, with projections indicating that over 25% of the population will be 60 years or older by 2050 [5]. Group 5: Gender Imbalance Issues - Vietnam faces a gender imbalance, with the male-to-female birth ratio at 111.4 in 2024, above the natural level [6]. - The government has implemented strict penalties for illegal sex-selective practices, proposing to increase fines to deter such actions [6].

Core Insights - Japan's newborn population for 2024 is projected to be 686,061, marking a record low since statistics began [1] - The total fertility rate in Japan has dropped to 1.15, the lowest level since 1947 [1] Group 1: Demographic Trends - The number of newborns in Japan has declined for nine consecutive years, with a decrease of 41,227 from the previous year [1] - The newborn count has fallen below 700,000 for the first time since comparable data became available in 1899 [1] Group 2: Regional Disparities - Tokyo's total fertility rate stands at 0.96, the lowest in the country [1]

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry Overview - The conference call discusses the evolution and effectiveness of China's fertility policies, particularly focusing on the implementation of the three-child policy and associated subsidies since 2021 [1][3][4]. Core Insights and Arguments - China's fertility policy has shifted from strict limitations to a more supportive approach, with the three-child policy introduced in 2021, but the implementation and subsidy levels vary significantly across regions [1][3]. - Most regions favor subsidies for three children, but the overall subsidy amounts are low, with many areas providing less than 20% of annual income as subsidies [1][6]. - The city of Tianmen in Hubei has effectively increased birth rates and stimulated the real estate market through a combination of cash and housing vouchers, leading to over a six percentage point increase in real estate investment and sales [1][7][8]. - The effectiveness of fertility policies varies widely; for instance, Tianan's substantial subsidies led to significant improvements in birth rates, while regions like Heilongjiang, despite high subsidies, continue to see poor birth rates due to population outflow [1][9]. - Evaluating the impact of fertility policies requires considering economic conditions, housing prices, fertility willingness, and population structure, with total fertility rate being a more suitable measure than birth rate alone [1][10]. Additional Important Content - Local government fertility subsidy policies have had limited effects, primarily due to macroeconomic pressures leading to population outflow and insufficient fiscal capacity to support substantial subsidies [1][11][12]. - The current decline in China's total fertility rate is largely attributed to a significant drop in the one-child birth rate, necessitating a shift in policy focus towards supporting one-child families [2][13]. - Recommendations for optimizing the fertility support system include increasing overall subsidy amounts, focusing on one-child families, and implementing comprehensive coverage to alleviate financial burdens on young families [14][15]. - International experiences suggest that high fertility subsidies can positively correlate with increased birth rates, but East Asian countries face unique challenges that require more than just financial incentives to address low birth rates [16][17][18]. Recommendations for Investors - Investors should pay attention to sectors related to maternal and infant needs, as these may benefit from comprehensive fertility subsidy policies. However, the overall downward trend in newborn numbers and the decreasing population of women of childbearing age should be carefully considered when making investment decisions [21].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the declining birth rates in various Chinese cities and the introduction of substantial fertility subsidies as a response to this demographic challenge, highlighting the effectiveness and potential impact of these policies on increasing birth rates [1][2][3]. Group 1: Birth Rate Trends - Hohhot's birth rate dropped from 6.85‰ to 5.58‰ in 2023, with deaths surpassing births for the first time, indicating a negative natural population growth [1]. - The city of Tianmen has seen a continuous decline in birth rates since 2016, but after implementing fertility subsidies in 2024, the birth rate increased by 17% compared to the previous year [2]. Group 2: Fertility Subsidy Policies - Hohhot introduced a comprehensive subsidy policy, offering 10,000 yuan for the first child, 50,000 yuan for the second child, and 100,000 yuan for the third child, with additional annual payments until the children reach certain ages [1]. - Tianmen's subsidy includes a one-time birth reward of 3,000 yuan, monthly child-rearing subsidies totaling 36,000 yuan, and housing subsidies that can exceed 220,000 yuan, significantly alleviating financial burdens for families [3]. Group 3: Types of Subsidies - Fertility subsidies differ from maternity allowances; the former incentivizes childbirth while the latter compensates for income loss during maternity leave [4][5]. - Various types of subsidies include one-time birth rewards, ongoing child-rearing subsidies, medical subsidies for prenatal care, and educational subsidies for preschool children [5]. Group 4: Economic Considerations - The average cost of raising a child in China is estimated at 540,000 yuan, with annual expenses around 30,000 yuan; Hohhot's subsidy can cover about 30% of these costs for families with three children [10]. - The disparity in subsidy effectiveness is highlighted by the varying costs of living in different cities, where the same subsidy amount can have vastly different impacts on families [23]. Group 5: International Comparisons - Countries like South Korea and Japan have faced similar demographic challenges, with South Korea's birth rate dropping to 0.72 in 2024, prompting urgent policy responses [14]. - Japan has been more effective in maintaining its birth rate through substantial government support, with cash subsidies significantly higher than those in South Korea [17][18]. Group 6: Lessons from Global Experiences - Successful fertility policies require timely and adequate financial support targeted at the right demographics, as demonstrated by France's early and robust interventions [18][20]. - The article emphasizes the importance of addressing both the financial and social barriers to childbirth, noting that different regions may require tailored approaches to effectively encourage higher birth rates [22].