Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry has shifted from a "scale-oriented" approach to one that emphasizes "performance," with investors now favoring fund managers who can deliver consistent and stable returns [2] Group 1: Fund Performance - Chen Ying's three main funds have shown varying performance, with the "Jin Ying Core Resource Mixed A" fund achieving a total return of 196.8% over 6 years, translating to an annualized return of 18.4% [4][5] - In 2023, the "Jin Ying Core Resource Mixed A" fund generated a return of 37.25%, significantly outperforming the CSI 300 index, which fell by 11.38% [8][6] - The "Jin Ying Dividend Value Mixed A" fund performed better during the bear market in 2022, with a loss of only 5.24%, outperforming the CSI 300 index by nearly 16 percentage points [9][10] Group 2: Manager Background and Strategy - Chen Ying has a background in technology and finance, having worked in various roles before joining Jin Ying Fund in 2012, where he has been for over a decade [11][12] - His investment strategy has focused heavily on technology sectors, particularly electronics, computing, and media, with these sectors comprising over 60% of his portfolio in recent years [22][24] - Chen Ying has shown a tendency to frequently adjust his holdings, with an average turnover rate of 315% over his tenure, indicating a dynamic trading approach [27][28] Group 3: Market Recognition and Fund Management - Chen Ying's funds have seen increasing institutional ownership, particularly the "Jin Ying Technology Innovation Stock A," which reached nearly 50% institutional ownership by the end of 2023 [17] - The overall management scale of Jin Ying Fund is relatively small compared to competitors, ranking 74th among public funds, with only 10 fund managers managing over 2 billion yuan [19][21] - The fund's performance and the manager's reputation are closely tied, with investor retention largely dependent on recent performance [15][14] Group 4: Risk and Diversification - Chen Ying's concentrated holdings in technology stocks can lead to significant volatility, with potential drawdowns of up to 50% during extreme market conditions [24][49] - In response to market fluctuations, Chen Ying has begun diversifying his portfolio by including defensive sectors such as non-bank financials and utilities to mitigate risks [24][42] - The "Jin Ying Dividend Value Mixed A" fund has demonstrated better risk control, maintaining drawdowns below 30% since Chen Ying's tenure began [46]

Group 1 - In 2025, over 2000 listed companies have been surveyed by brokers, with more than 700 in May alone [1][2] - The electronic, machinery equipment, and pharmaceutical industries are favored by institutions, with over 30% of surveyed companies in these sectors [2][3] - The electronic industry has the highest survey activity, with over 90 companies surveyed in May, focusing on electronic components, integrated circuits, and semiconductor materials and equipment [2][3] Group 2 - Companies like Anji Technology (688019.SH) have been heavily surveyed, with 56 brokers participating in its research [2] - The pharmaceutical industry has also seen significant interest, with over 230 companies surveyed this year, and more than 60 in May [2] - Recent interest has also risen in the non-ferrous metals and defense industries, with around 20 companies surveyed in May [3] Group 3 - Brokers are optimistic about low-valuation defensive sectors and high-growth tracks, with over 130 companies being increased or newly held in Q1 2025 [3] - The focus for the second half of the year includes dividend sectors, domestic consumption, and technology tracks, driven by policy dividends and industrial upgrades [4][5] - Analysts suggest that investment strategies should consider geopolitical risk premiums and domestic demand activation, with a focus on sectors like military and gold as new safe-haven assets [4][6]

2025.04. 28 本文字数：2849，阅读时长大约4分钟 作者 | 第一财经 曹璐 在一季度市场回暖带动下，主动权益产品实现业绩与规模双升，基金经理格局迎来重要变化。凭借业绩反弹，部分顶流基金经理强势 "回血"，如"一哥"张 坤的管理规模重回"600+"亿元。同时，也有一些基金经理凭借精准的赛道布局与亮眼收益，携百亿规模产品火速跨入百亿阵营。 不过，由于此前业绩承压、"去明星化"战略推进、人才流动等多重因素交织，"顶流"们纷纷被动上演"消失"。数据显示，今年一季度末，百亿级主动权益 基金经理数量降至87人，较两年前同期已大幅减少四成。 老将回血与新锐突围 Choice数据显示，截至一季度末，全市场基金总规模超过32万亿元，其中主动权益类基金（包含普通股票型、灵活配置型、偏股混合型、平衡混合型基 金，下同）规模近3.5万亿元，由2172位基金经理参与管理。 第一财经根据Choice数据初步统计，若以主动权益产品规模占在管规模60%以上为筛选标准，主动权益类基金经理的数量则为1725人。其中管理规模超 过百亿元的达到87人，较去年底增加2人。 景顺长城基金刘彦春、中欧基金葛兰分别以410.2亿元和404.4 ...

Core Insights - The public fund industry in China shows a stable development trend, with 162 licensed public fund institutions managing a total of 31.27 trillion yuan as of the end of Q1 2023, remaining largely unchanged from the end of Q4 2022 [1] - A significant concentration effect is observed, with the top ten public fund institutions managing 7.35 trillion yuan, accounting for 40.76% of the total public fund scale [2] - The growth of non-monetary fund management scale is primarily driven by leading institutions, which have strong research capabilities and brand competitiveness, leading to increased market preference [3] Group 1: Industry Overview - As of Q1 2023, 44 licensed public fund institutions achieved positive growth in management scale, with four institutions seeing growth rates exceeding 100% compared to the end of the previous year [4] - The top public fund institutions, such as E Fund Management Co., Ltd. and Huaxia Fund Management Co., Ltd., dominate the market, with non-monetary management scales of 1.31 trillion yuan and 1.09 trillion yuan respectively [2] Group 2: Growth Dynamics - Among the 50 public fund institutions that experienced growth, four institutions increased their non-monetary management scale by no less than 100 billion yuan, with China Universal Asset Management Co., Ltd. leading with an increase of 380.48 billion yuan, a 12.25% increase from the previous quarter [3] - The rapid growth of the technology sector has provided differentiated development opportunities for smaller public fund institutions, allowing them to capture structural opportunities through specialized product design and flexible investment strategies [4] Group 3: Strategic Recommendations - Public fund institutions are advised to balance scale expansion with investor returns, incorporating long-term performance and compliance risk control into core assessment indicators [5] - There is a suggestion for innovation in product design, such as developing pension FOFs and quantitative hedging products, to meet medium to long-term funding needs and enhance investor loyalty through stable returns [5]

Market Overview - The A-share market exhibited significant structural differentiation from April 14 to April 18, with major indices showing mixed performance. The Shanghai Composite Index rose by 1.19%, while the Shenzhen Index and the ChiNext Index fell by 0.54% and 0.64%, respectively [1] - The market sentiment was influenced by a shift in investment style, with funds moving from high-volatility technology sectors to traditional industries with stable cash flows. Blue-chip and high-dividend strategies performed well, while growth sectors continued to decline [1] Industry Performance - Concerns over supply chain disruptions led to a slowdown in economic recovery, affecting sectors such as industrials, consumer discretionary, healthcare, and information technology, with the latter experiencing the largest decline, though not exceeding 0.8% [1] - Real estate, telecommunications services, and utilities showed relatively strong performance, with real estate rising by 3.47% [1] Fund Issuance and Performance - A total of 25 funds were issued last week, including 17 equity funds, 7 bond funds, and 1 fund of funds (FOF), with a total issuance of 20.476 billion units [2][18] - The total index for Chinese funds increased by 0.02%, while the ordinary equity fund index decreased by 0.08%, and the mixed equity fund index fell by 0.04% [2] Global Asset Review - Global asset prices showed mixed performance, with U.S. indices under pressure, while European markets strengthened. The Dow Jones and Nasdaq indices fell by over 2%, while major Asian indices rose by over 2% [4] - In commodities, the energy sector led gains, while industrial metals showed mixed results. Gold prices rose nearly 3% due to increased risk aversion, reaching over $3,300 per ounce [4] Domestic Bond Market - The bond market remained stable, with the 10-year government bond futures rising by 0.04% and the 30-year futures increasing by 0.03%. Domestic long-term interest rates remained at historical lows [16]