【整理/观察者网 唐晓甫】 以美国为首的西方突然发现世界不听话了，一研究，觉得根源在中国，于是中美关系肯定不好。一个基本事实已经发生：美国两党达成共识，中国是唯一能 够挑战美国的国家。这意味着中美关系进入结构性紧张。 从结构上讲，未来中美关系肯定不可能回到从前的状态。逻辑很简单：世界在大变，中国是变量，美国是既有秩序的主导方，对中国崛起引发的变化不满， 然后就要"整我们"。现在美国两党达成了共识：中国是唯一对手。 拜登和特朗普在其他政策上都会吵架，但只有一个政策完全一致：对付中国。两党都把中国当"唯一对手"，这比对方把你当"第一对手"的情况还要差。因 为"第一"至少意味着后面还有第二、三、四、五、六，"唯一"就是只有你。 而且现在理论上美国力量还是比我们大，美国是一把手，一把手把我们当唯一对手，你想我们日子会多难过。这就是现在的中美关系。 因此，中美关系的性质变了：原来是既竞争又合作，现在是全面竞争。 我们大致可以把新中国跟美国的关系划分成几个阶段。1949年到1972年尼克松访华前是第一阶段，中美关系当时是绝对的敌对。当时中美之间真打仗，在朝 鲜、越南、台海，美国给了很多支持。所以，1949到1972年这2 ...

Group 1 - Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar expressed the country's willingness to join BRICS, highlighting the platform's role in fostering a more just and equitable global governance system [1] - Anwar's statement reflects Malaysia's proactive stance on multilateral cooperation and the shared desire among developing countries to enhance their international voice and improve global governance [1] - The current global governance system is primarily dominated by a few developed countries, leading to the underrepresentation of developing nations' interests in key decision-making processes [1] Group 2 - The growth rate of emerging markets and developing economies is projected to be 4.2% in 2024, more than double that of developed economies, indicating a significant shift in global economic dynamics [1] - Over the past 20 years, developing countries have contributed 80% to global economic growth, underscoring their increasing importance in the international economic landscape [1] - The BRICS cooperation mechanism has gained widespread recognition among global South countries, providing new development opportunities and promoting a more democratic international relationship [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government supports Malaysia's application to become a formal member of the BRICS group, aligning with Brazil's stance on the matter [1] Group 1: BRICS Membership - The BRICS group is recognized as an important platform for cooperation among emerging market countries and developing nations, contributing to global multipolarity and the democratization of international relations [1] - The Chinese government welcomes Malaysia and other like-minded partners to participate in BRICS cooperation, aiming to promote a more just and reasonable international order [1]

Core Insights - CTI华测检测 has completed the acquisition of 100% of Safety SA, a leading TICT service provider in South Africa, marking its entry into the African and Middle Eastern markets [1][3] - Safety SA, established in 1952, is a recognized authority in food safety and HSEQ services in Africa, operating 6 laboratories and 15 training centers, serving over 14,000 clients [1][2] - The acquisition aims to integrate Safety SA's global network with CTI华测检测's local service advantages, creating a comprehensive TICT service platform across China, Africa, and the Middle East [3] Company Overview - CTI华测检测, founded in 2003 and headquartered in Shenzhen, is the first publicly listed company in China's testing and certification industry, providing a wide range of services including testing, inspection, certification, and training [6] - Safety SA specializes in TICT services focused on food safety and occupational health and safety, offering a full chain of solutions and is one of the few institutions in South Africa capable of providing comprehensive TICT services [4] - 诺诚企业顾问, as the operational entity of NOSA in China, has over 20 years of experience in providing international standard training, consulting, and certification services [5]

Group 1 - The BRICS Industrial Capability China Center was inaugurated in Xiamen as a significant step to deepen cooperation among BRICS nations [1][2] - The center will be guided and supported by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, with specific construction work undertaken by the Xiamen Municipal Bureau of Industry and Information Technology and the International Economic and Technical Cooperation Center [2] - The center aims to leverage Xiamen's high-level openness and resources from various innovation platforms to promote industrial policy coordination and technology standard alignment among BRICS countries [2][3] Group 2 - The center will establish a secretariat and a specialized, international team to support daily operations and project implementation [2] - It will enhance digital transformation capabilities in smart manufacturing by collaborating with existing platforms and participating in projects related to industrial digital transformation [2] - The center plans to compile country-specific guides for industrial capability cooperation, providing precise services to enterprises and promoting demonstration projects [3]

Group 1 - The core point of the news is that Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi will visit India from August 18 to 20, marking the first visit by a Chinese foreign minister to India in over three years, and this visit is seen as a significant step in maintaining diplomatic contact between the two countries [1][2] - During the visit, Wang Yi is expected to hold talks with Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, focusing on measures to increase mutual trust and discussing the resumption of border trade and a mutually acceptable framework for resolving border issues [1][2] - The backdrop of this visit includes previous meetings between Doval and Wang Yi, where they reached six points of consensus regarding the border issue, indicating a constructive dialogue aimed at normalizing bilateral relations [2][3] Group 2 - The news highlights the current tension in India-US relations due to the US imposing a 25% tariff on Indian goods and threatening further penalties, prompting India to seek stronger ties with China [3] - Following Wang Yi's visit, S. Jaishankar is scheduled to visit Russia, indicating India's strategic balancing act between China and Russia amid its strained relations with the US [3][4] - Both China and India are actively participating in multilateral forums such as BRICS, SCO, and G20, demonstrating their commitment to cooperation on global platforms despite bilateral tensions [3][4]

Core Insights - The article discusses the impact of the U.S. imposing tariffs on India, which has unexpectedly strengthened the unity among BRICS nations, particularly with India aligning more closely with Russia and China [1][10]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Impact - In August 2025, the U.S. announced a 25% additional tariff on Indian exports, raising the total tariff rate to 50%, significantly affecting India's textile, chip, and pharmaceutical industries [1][3]. - The Indian government responded by continuing to import oil from Russia and signaling its willingness to engage with China through participation in various initiatives [1][3]. Group 2: India's Diplomatic Shift - India's Ministry of External Affairs criticized the U.S. actions as "unfair" and indicated a shift towards a more independent foreign policy, distancing itself from the U.S. [3][12]. - India has shown a willingness to cooperate within the BRICS framework, participating actively in discussions and initiatives led by Brazil and China [5][6]. Group 3: China’s Response - China adopted a dual strategy of cooperation and control, signaling its willingness to support India while maintaining its own interests through actions like terminating anti-dumping investigations against Indian products [3][5]. - The Chinese government emphasized the importance of sincerity in cooperation, indicating that while collaboration is welcome, there are non-negotiable boundaries [8][10]. Group 4: BRICS Cooperation - The BRICS nations are moving towards a more coordinated economic alliance, with India transitioning from a passive participant to an active collaborator [6][12]. - Brazil's President Lula played a crucial role in initiating collective actions against U.S. tariffs, fostering a sense of unity among BRICS members [5][10]. Group 5: Future Prospects - The BRICS alliance is evolving into a platform for effective cooperation, with India no longer seen as a disruptive force but as a constructive participant [12]. - The dynamics of global south countries are shifting, as they redefine their roles and assert their interests in the face of U.S. policies [12].

Group 1 - The 14th BRICS Summit successfully established a foundation for high-quality partnerships among BRICS nations amid challenging global economic conditions [1] - BRICS countries have seen their GDP share in the global economy rise to 25.24% last year, reflecting the benefits of their cooperative efforts over the past 16 years [1] - The BRICS cooperation mechanism has evolved from a dual-political and economic approach to a tripartite model that includes economic, security, and cultural exchanges, enhancing its inclusivity [2] Group 2 - China, as the 2022 BRICS chair, emphasized deepening cooperation in trade, finance, innovation, digital economy, green development, and poverty alleviation to accelerate global development [2] - The "BRICS+" dialogue format has been elevated to the foreign minister level, allowing more countries to join in the development initiatives [2] - BRICS nations aim to contribute to global development by addressing challenges such as food and energy security, digital economy transitions, and pandemic cooperation [2][3]

Core Viewpoint - The imposition of high tariffs by the U.S. on 50% of Brazilian goods marks a significant event affecting Brazil's sovereignty, BRICS cooperation, and the global trade landscape. Brazilian President Lula's strong response reflects a profound shift in Brazil's economic structure and the maturation of BRICS mechanisms [1]. Group 1: Economic Impact - The U.S. tariff policy severely impacts Brazilian agriculture, particularly in soybean, coffee, and meat exports, potentially leading to business bankruptcies and rising unemployment [3]. - Lula emphasizes that if the U.S. does not purchase Brazilian goods, Brazil will seek alternative buyers, indicating a shift in trade relationships [3]. Group 2: Strategic Response - In response to U.S. trade aggression, Lula prioritizes engagement with China and India, marking a critical transition of BRICS from a forum to an action-oriented alliance [3]. - Brazil, as the rotating chair of BRICS, plans to initiate a "leaders' crisis hotline," which is a pioneering move in addressing common trade threats [3]. Group 3: Domestic and International Dynamics - Lula faces domestic pressure from conservatives advocating for negotiations with the U.S. to avoid greater repercussions, yet the prevailing sentiment criticizes U.S. tariff abuses as violations of Brazilian sovereignty [5]. - The tariff conflict may accelerate the trend towards a multipolar global trade structure, as more countries collaborate to rewrite trade rules, indicating a decline in U.S. dominance [5].

Group 1 - The core issue is the deterioration of US-India relations, primarily due to Trump's accusations of unfair trade practices by India, including high tariffs and non-tariff barriers [1][2] - Trump announced a tariff increase of up to 25% on Indian goods, specifically targeting copper exports, which is significantly higher than tariffs imposed on other countries like the EU and Japan [1][2] - India's response emphasizes its right to choose energy suppliers and questions why the US does not impose similar sanctions on European countries that also trade with Russia [5][6] Group 2 - Trump's tariffs aim to weaken India's export industry and manufacturing competitiveness, serving as a warning to other nations about potential economic sanctions for non-compliance with US policies [2][6] - The situation reflects a broader trend of US attempts to exert control over the global economy, while China is increasing its influence through initiatives like the Belt and Road and cooperation with developing countries [6][8] - India's economic strategy may need reevaluation in light of the changing global economic landscape, particularly in relation to China's advancements in various sectors [10][11]