| 行业名 | 成交量（亿 | 成交量较昨日增减 | 换手率 | 涨跌幅 | 今日主力资金净流入（亿 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 称 | 股） | （%） | （%） | （%） | 元） | | 计算机 | 80.08 | 16.11 | 4.54 | 3.65 | 56.72 | | 电子 | 73.37 | 23.97 | 2.68 | 2.64 | 46.98 | | 非银金 融 | 42.19 | 31.55 | 1.02 | 1.38 | 24.29 | | 机械设 备 | 90.99 | 18.74 | 3.40 | 3.04 | 22.76 | | 有色金 属 | 43.08 | 42.69 | 1.97 | 2.57 | 20.75 | | 通信 | 31.97 | 41.66 | 1.85 | 3.59 | 20.12 | | 电力设 备 | 54.55 | 8.54 | 2.26 | 2.16 | 15.08 | | 汽车 | 53.94 | 4.84 | 2.51 | 2.20 | 13.02 | | 传媒 | 41.10 | 1 ...

Market Overview - Major industry ETFs in the US stock market experienced declines, with the biotechnology index ETF dropping nearly 2%, the global technology stock index ETF falling 1.5%, and the semiconductor ETF decreasing by 1.4% [1]. Industry Performance - Biotechnology Index ETF: Current price at 123.54, down 2.32 (-1.84%), with a year-to-date decline of 6.47% [2]. - Global Technology Stock ETF: Current price at 78.07, down 1.19 (-1.50%), with a year-to-date decline of 7.88% [2]. - Semiconductor ETF: Current price at 214.60, down 3.01 (-1.38%), with a year-to-date decline of 11.38% [2]. - Technology Sector ETF: Current price at 212.73, down 2.73 (-1.27%), with a year-to-date decline of 8.35% [2]. - Networking Stock Index ETF: Current price at 235.52, down 2.82 (-1.18%), with a year-to-date decline of 3.15% [2]. - Healthcare ETF: Current price at 136.63, down 1.51 (-1.09%), with a year-to-date decline of 0.30% [2]. - Banking Sector ETF: Current price at 51.71, down 0.50 (-0.96%), with a year-to-date decline of 6.11% [2]. - Regional Bank ETF: Current price at 55.55, down 0.49 (-0.87%), with a year-to-date decline of 7.34% [2]. - Financial Sector ETF: Current price at 49.05, down 0.39 (-0.79%), with a year-to-date increase of 1.86% [2]. - Consumer Discretionary ETF: Current price at 197.72, down 1.57 (-0.79%), with a year-to-date decline of 11.63% [2]. - Global Airline ETF: Current price at 20.93, down 0.11 (-0.52%), with a year-to-date decline of 17.44% [2]. - Consumer Staples ETF: Current price at 81.19, down 0.30 (-0.37%), with a year-to-date increase of 3.83% [2]. - Utilities ETF: Current price at 79.97, up 0.42 (+0.53%), with a year-to-date increase of 6.40% [2]. - Energy Sector ETF: Current price at 80.97, up 0.47 (+0.58%), with a year-to-date decline of 4.74% [2].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - The investment rating for the US stock market is "Neutral - Maintain" [4] - The investment rating for the US dollar bond market is "Neutral" [1] 2. Core Viewpoints - The "rush to import" led to a 0.3% decline in the US GDP in Q1 2025, the first contraction since 2022. However, the trade deficit is expected to narrow in Q2, and imports may boost GDP [1] - The US April non - farm payroll data was robust, with stable unemployment and slowing wage growth. The Fed is likely to keep rates unchanged in May and may cut rates in July [2] - The volatility of US Treasury bonds has slowed, with flat rates in the past two weeks and a slightly narrowed term spread. The US Treasury bond market is expected to remain volatile [3] 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 US Treasury Benchmark Interest Rates - The yields of 1 - year/2 - year/3 - year/5 - year/10 - year/20 - year/30 - year US Treasury bonds changed by 1/2/0/ - 3/ - 1/ - 1/ - 1bp respectively in the past two weeks. The 10Y and 2Y yields were 4.33% and 3.83% respectively, and the 10Y - 2Y spread narrowed to 50bp [3] 3.2 US Macroeconomy and Liquidity - In Q1 2025, the US real GDP annualized quarterly growth rate was - 0.3%, the first contraction since 2022. The main reasons were a sharp increase in imports and a decline in government spending. However, business equipment spending increased by 22.5% [1] - In April, the US non - farm employment increased by 177,000, the unemployment rate remained at 4.2%, and the average hourly wage growth slowed [2] - The Fed is likely to keep rates unchanged in May and may cut rates in July due to inflation still above the 2% target and the impact of tariff policies on inflation [2] 3.3 Exchange Rates - No specific analysis content about exchange rates is provided in the text, only related chart descriptions are given [53][59][61] 3.4 Overseas US Dollar Bonds - The US dollar bond market is affected by trade negotiations, Fed interest rate policy expectations, and inflation data, and is expected to remain volatile [3] 3.5 Chinese - Issued US Dollar Bonds - In the past two weeks, the three major international rating agencies took one rating action on Chinese - issued US dollar bond issuers, with S&P giving Guangdong Energy Group Natural Gas Co., Ltd. an initial rating of BBB+ [89] 3.6 Rating Actions - S&P gave Guangdong Energy Group Natural Gas Co., Ltd. an initial rating of BBB+ on April 22, 2025 [90]

于是，伯克希尔的2025年业绩，很可能成为股神;亲自主持下的最后一年业绩。 在年度股东大会召开前夕，伯克希尔公布了2025年第1季业绩，对比于巴菲特的金句，这份业绩所体现 的投资结果;，或更能体现股神;的投资理念和风格。 投资本钱还有利息可收 今年五月初投资界的头等盛事莫过于在奥马哈举行的伯克希尔（BRK.B.US）年度股东大会，这次与别 不同的是，巴菲特在股东大会临近结束时宣布将于2026年1月1日退休，而63岁的副董事长格雷格·阿贝 尔（Greg Abel）将为其接班人，但巴菲特仍担任伯克希尔董事长一职。 从并表的主营业务来看，伯克希尔旗下的子公司经营稳定，第1季并表收入为897.25亿美元，按年微跌 0.16%；主营业务的税前利润为114.57亿美元，按年下降14.10%；但真正令其业绩与上年同期拉开距离 的是投资亏损64.35亿美元，相较上年同期为投资收益18.76亿美元，差距达83亿美元。 不过需要注意的是，这笔投资亏损主要来自未出售投资，只是因为期内股价出现波动而暂时亏损而已， 这也是巴菲特多次强调短期投资损益只是会计处理需要，并不能作为投资业绩准绳的原因。当股价回 升，未来的投资收益可能显著上升 ...

| 略 | | 投资策略 | | --- | --- | --- | | | [Table_MainInfo] 全 A | 净利边际改善，价格和政策有支撑的领域占优 | | 研 | | ——A 股市场 2025 年一季报业绩综述 | | 究 | 分析师： 宋亦威 | SAC NO： S1150514080001 2025 年 05 月 06 日 | | | [Table_Analysis] 证券分析师 | [Table_Summary] | | | 宋亦威 | 投资要点： | | | 022-23861608 |  2025Q1 全 A 单季营收同比增速较 2024Q4 出现回落，而单季归母净利 | | | songyw@bhzq.com | 同比增速由负转正显著改善。具体而言，2025Q1 全 单季营收和净利 A | | | [Table_Author] 严佩佩 | | | | | 同比增速分别为-0.2%/3.7%，前者较 2024Q4 回落 1.7 个百分点，后者 | | | 022-23839070 SAC No:S1150520110001 | 较 2024Q4 回升 17.5 个百分点。 | | ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the content. 2. Core View of the Report The allocation value of ultra - long credit bonds has increased, with rising trading volume and a higher proportion of low - valuation transactions. The trading volume and price performance vary among different regions and industries of ultra - long urban investment bonds and ultra - long industrial bonds [1][2][3]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Ultra - long Credit Bonds: Rising Trading Volume and Higher Proportion of Low - valuation Transactions - **Trading Volume**: The daily trading activity of ultra - long credit bonds increased this week. The average daily trading volume was 3.3 transactions, up from 3.0 last week. The trading volume of ultra - long credit bonds with a remaining maturity of 7 - 10 years increased significantly. The total trading volume this week was 30.3 billion yuan, a 12.64% increase from last week. The trading activity of industrial bonds was higher than that of urban investment bonds [2][11]. - **Trading Term**: The institutional preference for duration decreased. The average trading term of ultra - long credit bonds was 9.83 years, a decrease of 0.31 years from last week. The average trading term of ultra - long urban investment bonds decreased by 1.07 years, and that of industrial bonds decreased by 0.14 years [3][12]. - **Trading Price**: The trading yield of ultra - long credit bonds increased by 1bp to 2.37%. The trading yield of ultra - long urban investment bonds increased by 8bp, while that of ultra - long industrial bonds decreased by 1bp. The proportion of low - valuation transactions of ultra - long credit bonds rose to 53%, with a significant increase in ultra - long industrial bonds from 38% last week. The proportion of low - valuation transactions of credit bonds with a remaining maturity of 15 - 20 years decreased by about 55 percentage points [3][13]. 3.2 Ultra - long Urban Investment Bonds: Rising Trading Volume in Xinjiang and Sichuan, Marginal Increase in the Proportion of Low - valuation Transactions in Hebei - **Trading Volume**: The trading volume of ultra - long urban investment bonds in Xinjiang was relatively high at 1.47 billion yuan this week. The trading volume in Hebei and Shandong decreased significantly compared to last week, by 870 million yuan and 490 million yuan respectively, while that in Xinjiang and Sichuan increased [15]. - **Trading Term**: The average trading term of ultra - long urban investment bonds was 8.68 years. The trading term of ultra - long urban investment bonds in Liaoning increased by 0.12 years compared to last week, while that in Anhui decreased by 14.03 years [17]. - **Trading Price**: The trading yields of urban investment bonds in Liaoning and Shandong were relatively high, exceeding 3%. The trading yields of ultra - long urban investment bonds in Shandong and Beijing increased by 38bp and 32bp respectively compared to last week, while those in Fujian and Zhejiang decreased by 21bp and 16bp respectively. The proportion of low - valuation transactions of ultra - long urban investment bonds in Xinjiang decreased by 86 percentage points compared to last week, while that in Hebei and Hubei increased [17]. 3.3 Ultra - long Industrial Bonds: Rising Trading Volume in Utilities and Petrochemical Industries, Decreasing Proportion of Low - valuation Transactions in Commerce and Retail and Coal Industries - **Trading Volume**: The trading volume of ultra - long industrial bonds in the utilities industry was relatively high at 9.86 billion yuan this week. The trading volume of ultra - long industrial bonds in the utilities and petrochemical industries increased significantly compared to last week, by 5.76 billion yuan and 2.11 billion yuan respectively. The trading volume of ultra - long industrial bonds in the comprehensive industry decreased by about 3.49 billion yuan [20]. - **Trading Term**: The trading terms of ultra - long industrial bonds in the utilities and comprehensive industries shortened significantly this week, by 2.31 years and 0.85 years respectively compared to last week. The trading terms of ultra - long industrial bonds in the non - ferrous metals and transportation industries lengthened significantly, by 9.79 years and 5.92 years respectively [23][24]. - **Trading Price**: The trading yields of ultra - long industrial bonds in the social services and coal industries increased by 65bp and 48bp respectively compared to last week. The proportion of low - valuation transactions of ultra - long industrial bonds in the electronics industry was relatively high at 100%. The proportion of low - valuation transactions of ultra - long industrial bonds in the commerce and retail and coal industries decreased significantly this week [24].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article indicates that market sentiment is recovering, with a model perspective leaning towards bullishness as the sentiment index rose to 0.8 as of April 30, following a continuous upward trend for eight trading days since the low on April 18 [2][3] - The A-share market continues to show signs of sentiment recovery, with notable improvements in the main buying power indicator and price-volume consistency indicator, both of which have increased scores compared to the previous week [3][4] - The model suggests that sectors such as beauty care, public utilities, banking, and oil and petrochemicals have short-term bullish signals, while most other sectors, including real estate, retail, and construction decoration, have seen significant declines in short-term scores [13][14] Group 2 - The model indicates that the overall market continues to favor large-cap and value styles, although there is a short-term strengthening trend in growth and small-cap styles [15][16] - The main funds have seen a net outflow from the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, with a cumulative net outflow exceeding 2.72 billion RMB over three trading days, indicating a shift in investment focus [8][10] - The recent trading volume for the entire A-share market was approximately 1.2 trillion RMB on Wednesday, showing stability compared to the previous week [5]

以下文章来源于聪明投资者，作者聪明投资者 北京时间 5 月 3日 晚上 9点 ，伯克希尔 ·哈撒韦股东大会将在奥马哈拉开帷幕。 今年 主席台上 跟 沃伦 ·巴菲特 一道的仍然是 格雷格 ·阿贝尔（Greg Abel） 以及 阿吉特 ·贾恩（Ajit Jain） ，尤其是作为继任者的阿贝尔将陪同坐满全程。 202 0 年 5月1日的股东大会 ， 由于新冠疫情影响，以线上形式举行， 而 阿贝尔和 贾恩 分别代表非 保险和保险业务，首次与巴菲特共同参与问答环节 。 自查理 ·芒格在2023年11月离世后，伯克希尔经历了第一个没有芒格的年度大会（2024年），阿贝尔 则 以 继任者 身份 坐在了巴菲特的左手边位置。 在今年 2月的 股东信中，巴菲特 数 次 、专程 提到阿贝尔。 在讨论伯克希尔的资本配置时，巴菲特赞扬阿贝尔在股票和子公司投资方面展现出的 跟芒格相似的 等 待耐心，在机会来临时能大刀阔斧地果断出手。 巴菲特 在提及对于 日本 五大商社 投资 时 写道： "随着时间的推移，我们对这些公司的欣赏之情不断 加深。格雷格与他们多次会面，我也定期关注他们的进展。我预计格雷格和他的继任者将持有这部分日 本投资数十年 ...

4月30日沪指下跌0.23%，市场两融余额为17864.83亿元，较前一交易日减少157.89亿元。 证券时报·数据宝统计显示，截至4月30日，沪市两融余额9097.76亿元，较前一交易日减少82.62亿元； 深市两融余额8716.69亿元，较前一交易日减少73.59亿元；北交所两融余额50.38亿元，较前一交易日减 少1.68亿元；深沪北两融余额合计17864.83亿元，较前一交易日减少157.89亿元。 分行业看，申万所属行业中，融资余额增加的行业有3个，增加金额最多的行业是银行，融资余额增加 3.25亿元；其次是美容护理、机械设备行业，融资余额分别增加784.92万元、598.69万元。 具体到个股来看，融资余额出现增长的股票有1130只，占比30.71%，其中，198股融资余额增幅超过5% 。融资余额增幅最大的是闽东电力，该股最新融资余额2.67亿元，较前一交易日增幅达83.24%；股价表 现上，该股当日下跌1.10%，表现弱于沪指；融资余额增幅较多的还有博创科技、芭薇股份，融资余额 增幅分别为69.00%、61.15%。 融资余额增幅前20只个股中，从市场表现来看，平均上涨2.67%，涨幅居前的有大 ...

截至4月30日，市场融资余额合计1.78万亿元，较前一交易日减少156.33亿元，其中，沪市融资余额 9022.97亿元，较前一交易日减少81.79亿元；深市融资余额8683.58亿元，较前一交易日减少72.87亿元； 北交所融资余额50.37亿元，较前一交易日减少1.68亿元。 证券时报·数据宝统计显示，具体到个股，4月30日共有1130只股获融资净买入，净买入金额在千万元以 上的有203只，其中26只融资净买入额超5000万元。江淮汽车融资净买入额居首，当日净买入2.46亿 元，其次是招商银行、华夏银行，融资净买入金额分别为2.09亿元、1.83亿元，融资净买入金额居前的 还有博创科技、利欧股份、闽东电力等。 分行业统计，获融资客净买入超5000万元个股中，汽车、电力设备、银行等行业最为集中，分别有6 只、4只、3只个股上榜。板块分布上，大手笔净买入个股中，主板有20只，创业板有3只，科创板有3 只。 融资客大手笔净买入个股中，从最新融资余额占流通市值比例看，算术平均值为4.34%，融资余额占比 最高的是优刻得，该股最新融资余额8.53亿元，占流通市值的比例为9.44%，融资余额占比较高的还有 祥鑫科技、 ...