Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided Core Viewpoints of the Report - The styrene industry chain starts from crude oil, goes through the production of benzene and ethylene, then to the production of styrene and its derivatives, and is finally applied in multiple fields such as packaging, automotive, electronics, and construction. It is an important part of the petrochemical industry, with characteristics of high dependence on crude oil, a long chain, and wide - ranging demand. The factors affecting styrene futures prices are complex. Fundamental quantitative factors cover 9 aspects, and volume - price factors include 7 aspects. By back - testing and screening, setting parameters such as back - testing time, handling fees, and leverage, and combining factors in a simple equal - weight addition way, a trend strength signal can be output [3]. - The fundamental multi - factor portfolio has an annualized return of 50.7% and a Sharpe ratio of 2.85 since 2019. The volume - price multi - factor portfolio has an annualized return of 35.3% and a Sharpe ratio of 2.14 since 2019. In the comprehensive model, all single factors are equally weighted, with an annualized return of 32.2% and a Sharpe ratio of 1.86 since 2019. Fundamental factors and volume - price factors have a low correlation. Investors can adjust the proportion of fundamental and volume - price factors in the comprehensive model according to their target returns and risk requirements [4]. Summary According to the Directory 1. Styrene Single - Commodity Timing Factor Framework - Styrene is an important organic chemical raw material with a clear upstream - downstream industrial chain. The model divides factors into two categories: fundamental quantitative factors and volume - price factors. Fundamental factors are constructed from dimensions such as inventory, basis, upstream inventory, profit, and overseas prices. Volume - price factors are constructed from dimensions such as momentum, moving averages, and technical indicators based on daily - frequency market data. As of the writing of the report, the model includes 9 fundamental quantitative factors and 7 volume - price factors [8][10]. - When back - testing and screening factors, the back - testing time for most fundamental factors and volume - price factors starts from October 2019, with the out - of - sample back - testing starting from January 2023 and ending in December 2024. The handling fee is set at a bilateral rate of 0.03%, and the leverage is 1x. Other settings such as cumulative return calculation, factor value mapping, and signal update rules are also specified [11][12][13] 2. Introduction and Back - Testing Results of Styrene Fundamental Quantitative Factors 2.1 Styrene Weekly Shipment Volume - A significant increase in styrene weekly shipment volume may lead to an oversupply situation if downstream demand does not increase synchronously, causing price decline. The data used is from the East China region, Jiangsu Province, China, and is published every Monday. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 30.3%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.68, a Calmar ratio of 1.23, a win rate of 51.0%, an average holding period of 13.7 days, and a maximum drawdown of 24.6% [19]. 2.2 Styrene Overseas Price - An increase in overseas styrene prices may push up domestic prices, while a decrease may suppress domestic prices. This factor mainly considers prices in the US Gulf, Rotterdam, and South Korea. The data is published with a one - day lag. Since 2016, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 19.6%, a Sharpe ratio of 0.99, a Calmar ratio of 0.73, a win rate of 52.5%, an average holding period of 19.1 days, and a maximum drawdown of 27% [21]. 2.3 Styrene Basis - When the market supply is tight, the basis widens; when the supply is excessive, the basis narrows. The data is from the Guojun Futures database and is published daily. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 27.7%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.12, a Calmar ratio of 0.71, a win rate of 51.9%, an average holding period of 2.6 days, and a maximum drawdown of 39.1% [23]. 2.4 Pure Benzene: Port Inventory - A low level of pure benzene port inventory may increase the production cost of styrene. The data is from the East China region and is published every Friday. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 15.8%, a Sharpe ratio of 0.67, a Calmar ratio of 0.42, a win rate of 50.8%, an average holding period of 38.2 days, and a maximum drawdown of 37.3% [25]. 2.5 Styrene: Non - Integrated Plant: Production Gross Margin - A high production gross margin of non - integrated styrene plants may encourage enterprises to increase production, leading to an increase in market supply. The data is from the Steel Union and is published after the market closes. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 12.5%, a Sharpe ratio of 0.46, a Calmar ratio of 0.3, a win rate of 50.4%, an average holding period of 11.3 days, and a maximum drawdown of 34.4% [27]. 2.6 Styrene Capacity Utilization Rate - An increase in styrene capacity utilization rate may lead to an oversupply situation and price decline. The data is from the Steel Union and is published weekly. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 16.5%, a Sharpe ratio of 0.91, a Calmar ratio of 0.85, a win rate of 50%, an average holding period of 28.6 days, and a maximum drawdown of 19.4% [27]. 2.7 Styrene Warehouse Receipts - An increase in warehouse receipts indicates sufficient market supply, while a decrease indicates tight supply. The data is from Flush and is published after the market closes. Since 2020, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 22.6%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.34, a Calmar ratio of 1.04, a win rate of 50.2%, an average holding period of 9.6 days, and a maximum drawdown of 21.7% [30]. 2.8 Styrene Arbitrage Spread - The internal - external spread has a mean - reversion characteristic. This factor considers styrene prices in Europe, Asia, and the Americas. The data is from the Steel Union and is updated with a one - day lag. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 33.8%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.68, a Calmar ratio of 0.93, a win rate of 53.2%, an average holding period of 12.5 days, and a maximum drawdown of 36.4% [32]. 2.9 Styrene: Spot Inventory - High inventory usually means sufficient or excessive market supply, while low inventory may indicate tight supply. The data is from the Steel Union and is updated every Monday. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 25.9%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.45, a Calmar ratio of 1.52, a win rate of 52.3%, an average holding period of 114.6 days, and a maximum drawdown of 17.1% [35]. 2.10 Fundamental Multi - Factor - By equally weighting the above 9 fundamental single factors to form a long - short timing model, since 2019, the back - testing shows an annualized return of 50.7%, a Sharpe ratio of 2.85, a Calmar ratio of 2.08, a win rate of 52.6%, an average holding period of 6 days, and a maximum drawdown of 24.4% [37]. 3. Introduction and Back - Testing Results of Styrene Volume - Price Factors 3.1 Intraday Momentum - Intraday momentum is defined as the average of the daily high and low prices divided by the opening price. A larger value indicates a faster price increase. Since 2020, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 27.6%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.51, a Calmar ratio of 1.7, a win rate of 47.2%, an average holding period of 3.7 days, and a maximum drawdown of 16.2% [40]. 3.2 Median Double Moving Averages - Similar to double moving averages, but the price for calculating the moving average is the median of the daily high and low prices. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 18%, a Sharpe ratio of 0.81, a Calmar ratio of 0.56, a win rate of 51.6%, an average holding period of 8.5 days, and a maximum drawdown of 32.4% [42]. 3.3 Kaufman Adaptive Moving Average (KAMA) - Calculated through steps such as efficiency coefficient (ER) and smoothing constant (SC). Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 21.1%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.23, a Calmar ratio of 1.19, a win rate of 48.8%, an average holding period of 30.6 days, and a maximum drawdown of 17.8% [45]. 3.4 On - Balance Volume (OBV) - Calculated based on the relationship between daily closing prices and trading volumes, and a long - short double moving average strategy is constructed. Since 2020, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 21.2%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.17, a Calmar ratio of 1.28, a win rate of 50.4%, an average holding period of 72.4 days, and a maximum drawdown of 16.6% [49]. 3.5 Commodity Channel Index (CCI) - When CCI breaks through + 100, it is a potential selling signal; when it breaks through - 100, it is a potential buying signal. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 28.9%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.72, a Calmar ratio of 1.98, a win rate of 51.0%, an average holding period of 29.9 days, and a maximum drawdown of 12.0% [53]. 3.6 TRIX - Defined through exponential moving averages and a long - short double moving average strategy is constructed based on its daily change rate. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 28.9%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.72, a Calmar ratio of 1.98, a win rate of 51.0%, an average holding period of 29.9 days, and a maximum drawdown of 14.6% [55]. 3.7 MESA Adaptive Moving Average - Hilbert transform is used to process price data. MAMA and FAMA lines are calculated, and a double moving average strategy is constructed for timing. Since 2019, its back - testing performance shows an annualized return of 20.5%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.11, a Calmar ratio of 1.11, a win rate of 49.8%, an average holding period of 29.3 days, and a maximum drawdown of 18.5% [55]. 3.8 Volume - Price Multi - Factor - By equally weighting the above 7 volume - price single factors to form a long - short timing model, since 2019, the back - testing shows an annualized return of 35.3%, a Sharpe ratio of 2.14, a Calmar ratio of 2.41, a win rate of 51.5%, an average holding period of 10.3 days, and a maximum drawdown of 14.7% [59]. 4. Fundamental Quantitative and Volume - Price Multi - Factor Comprehensive Model 4.1 All - Factor Portfolio Long - Short Model - By equally weighting all 16 single factors to form a long - short timing model, since 2019, the back - testing shows an annualized return of 32.2%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.86, a Calmar ratio of 2.07, a win rate of 46.6%, an average holding period of 5.1 days, and a maximum drawdown of 15.6% [61]. 4.2 Only - Long Model - Fundamental only - long model: By equally weighting the first 9 single factors, when a short - selling signal is generated, it is regarded as closing the existing long position or staying in cash; when a long - buying signal is triggered, open a long position or hold the existing long contract. Since 2019, the back - testing shows an annualized return of 29.6%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.89, a Calmar ratio of 1.31, an average holding period of 6.7 days, and a maximum drawdown of 22.6%. - Volume - price only - long model: By equally weighting the latter 7 single factors, with similar signal - handling rules. Since 2019, the back - testing shows an annualized return of 22.1%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.57, a Calmar ratio of 1.68, an average holding period of 10.6 days, and a maximum drawdown of 13.1%. - All - factor comprehensive only - long model: By equally weighting all 16 single factors, with similar signal - handling rules. Since 2019, the back - testing shows an annualized return of 20.0%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.32, a Calmar ratio of 1.27, an average holding period of 7.6 days, and a maximum drawdown of 15.8% [64][67][69]. 4.3 Only - Short Model - Fundamental only - short model: By equally weighting the first 9 single factors, when a long - buying signal is generated, it is regarded as closing the existing short position or staying in cash; when a short - selling signal is triggered, open a short position or hold the existing short contract. Since 2019, the back - testing shows an annualized return of 20.0%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.48, a Calmar ratio of 1.28, an average holding period of 6.3 days, and a maximum drawdown of 15.7%. - Volume - price only - short model: By equally weighting the latter 7 single factors, with similar signal - handling rules. Since 2019, the back - testing shows an annualized return of 12.5%, a Sharpe ratio of 0.87, a Calmar ratio of 0.9, an average holding period of 16.7 days, and a maximum drawdown of 13.9%. - All - factor comprehensive only - short model: By equally weighting all 16 single factors, with similar signal - handling rules. Since 2019, the back - testing shows an annualized return of 11.8%, a Sharpe ratio of 0.87, a Calmar ratio of 0.82, an average holding period of 9 days, and a maximum drawdown of 14.4% [72][75][76].

Industry Overview - Cyclohexanone, an organic compound with the chemical formula C6H10O, is a saturated cyclic ketone that is colorless and transparent, with a soil-like odor and a minty scent when containing trace amounts of phenol [1][3] - The production methods for cyclohexanone mainly include oxidation and amination [1][3] Industry Status - In recent years, to meet the growing demand from downstream markets, cyclohexanone companies in China have actively expanded their production capacity, leading to a continuous increase in national production capacity, which is projected to grow from 5.21 million tons in 2018 to 10.92 million tons by 2024 [5] - The production capacity utilization rate has improved, with the national cyclohexanone output reaching 7.66 million tons in 2024, a year-on-year increase of 19.69% [5] Consumption Market - The downstream consumption structure of cyclohexanone in China is relatively simple, with 90.24% of the demand coming from the production of caprolactam and adipic acid, with caprolactam accounting for approximately 64.37% and adipic acid for 25.87% [7] Import and Export - China transitioned from a net importer to a net exporter of cyclohexanone in 2019, maintaining a trade surplus since then. The export volume reached 74,300 tons in the first eleven months of 2024, a year-on-year increase of 49.11% [9][11] - The net export volume for cyclohexanone in 2024 reached 74,100 tons, with a trade surplus of 668 million yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 52.51% [11] Competitive Landscape - The cyclohexanone industry in China is characterized by increasing capacity concentration and the emergence of leading companies, with major players like China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) and others holding over 60% of the total production capacity [13] - The implementation of environmental policies has led to increased pressure on production capacity, causing many small enterprises to exit the market, thereby enhancing industry concentration [13] Key Companies - **Ruihua Technology**: Focuses on chemical process packages and has developed efficient cyclohexanone production technology, achieving a revenue of 279 million yuan in the first three quarters of 2024, up 34.48% year-on-year [15] - **Lanhua Technology**: Engaged in coal, fertilizer, and chemical production, with a revenue of 8.419 billion yuan in the first three quarters of 2024, down 12.34% year-on-year [17] Development Trends - Environmental policies are accelerating technological innovation in the cyclohexanone industry, creating more opportunities for development [19] - The market demand for cyclohexanone is expected to continue growing, particularly in the production of caprolactam and adipic acid, as well as in solvent and coating applications [20]

Group 1: CPI Analysis - The CPI year-on-year growth rate decreased to -0.7% in February, down 1.2 percentage points from the previous month, primarily due to the impact of the Spring Festival timing [1][4] - Excluding the Spring Festival effect, the CPI year-on-year increased by 0.1% in February, indicating a moderate recovery in prices [1][4] - Food prices contributed over 80% to the total decline in CPI, with fresh vegetable prices dropping by 12.6% year-on-year [5][6] Group 2: PPI Analysis - The PPI year-on-year decline narrowed to 2.2% in February, with the average for January-February also showing a 2.2% decrease compared to the previous year [2][7] - The main reasons for the PPI decline include the off-peak industrial production season and weak demand for construction materials [2][7] - The prices of production materials fell by 2.5%, while living materials prices decreased by 1.2%, with specific industries like coal processing seeing significant price drops [7][8] Group 3: Market Sentiment and Future Outlook - The PMI data indicated an increase in raw material and finished product price indices, but the PPI only slightly narrowed, suggesting a discrepancy between perceived and actual market conditions [3] - The current policy uncertainty may lead to a cautious approach from enterprises, affecting production enthusiasm [3] - Positive signals from the upcoming Two Sessions may help restore market demand and improve production and demand dynamics [3]