Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding "pre-made dishes" has escalated between Luo Yonghao and Xibei, with both parties presenting conflicting narratives, leading to significant public discourse [1]. Group 1: Controversy Overview - Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei for serving mostly pre-made dishes at high prices, calling for legislation to require restaurants to disclose the use of pre-made ingredients [1]. - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, announced plans to sue Luo for damaging the restaurant's reputation and invited customers to observe the cooking process in their kitchens [1]. Group 2: Employee Insights - A former Xibei kitchen employee commented on the perception of pre-made dishes, acknowledging that while the portions may be small and prices high, the preparation involves fresh ingredients and cooking processes [3][4]. - The employee explained that dishes like "potato stewed beef" are prepared fresh in the morning and served later, which may lead to consumer confusion regarding the freshness of the food [6][7]. Group 3: Cooking Processes - The cooking process involves preparing ingredients in advance, with some dishes being cooked on-site while others are reheated from earlier preparations [19][20]. - The employee clarified that while some items are prepared ahead of time, they are not classified as pre-made dishes in the traditional sense, as they still undergo cooking processes before serving [23][28]. Group 4: Menu and Pricing - A detailed menu was provided, showcasing various dishes and their prices, indicating a total bill of 663.00 [16]. - The pricing reflects the perceived quality and preparation methods, with some dishes being freshly cooked while others are prepared in advance [19][20].

Group 1 - The public sentiment towards Jia Guolong's confrontation with Luo Yonghao is largely negative, questioning the rationale behind his actions [1][2] - Luo Yonghao expressed confusion and fatigue over the situation, indicating that he finds the confrontation unnecessary [2][4] - There is a perception that Jia Guolong, as a prominent restaurant owner, should not engage in disputes with influential figures like Luo Yonghao, as the odds are against him [5][11] Group 2 - The underlying logic suggests that one should only engage in battles they can win, highlighting the disparity in influence between Jia Guolong and Luo Yonghao [6][10] - Observers believe that Jia Guolong's response may inadvertently reveal operational secrets about his restaurant chain, which could be detrimental to his business [13][16] - The public's concern seems to stem from a desire to protect the status quo of perceived business practices, even if they are not entirely transparent [14][15] Group 3 - Luo Yonghao's past experiences of standing up to bullies are referenced to illustrate the importance of asserting oneself in the face of adversity [17] - The discussion raises questions about consumer rights to know the origins of food products, particularly regarding pre-prepared dishes served in restaurants [18][19] - The narrative suggests that consumers may prefer to remain unaware of certain business practices to maintain a sense of comfort regarding their dining experiences [16][19]

对此，贾国龙表示，按照国家六部门今年3月发布的最新定义，罗永浩当日所点菜品"没有一道是预制 菜"，并称其"全是预制菜，太恶心了"的说法"挺伤害我们的"。目前西贝门店的所有菜品都不是预制 菜，并从9月12日开始将推出罗永浩同款菜单，全国370多家门店后厨将对外开放，消费者可以在保证卫 生标准的前提下参观任何一道菜品的制作过程。 对于贾国龙的发声，罗永浩11日晚间再次发布微博回应称，"好，来吧，如果不是预制菜，那就太牛 了。能把现做的菜做得全是重新加热的味道，这肯定是高科技了。" 本报讯(记者李静)9月11日下午，西贝餐饮集团(以下简称"西贝")在西贝北京中粮祥云小镇店召开媒体沟 通会，会上，西贝创始人贾国龙对媒体表示，西贝没有任何一道预制菜。他同时称，罗永浩的发言对西 贝商誉影响非常大，将走法律程序进行起诉。 据了解，事件起源于9月10日罗永浩通过社交平台发文称，"好久没吃西贝了，今天下飞机跟同事吃了一 顿，发现几乎全都是预制菜，还那么贵，实在是太恶心了。"同时，他还表示，希望国家尽早推动立 法，强制饭馆注明是否用了预制菜。 ...

9月11日，西贝创始人CEO贾国龙针对罗永浩"西贝使用预制菜"的吐槽公开回应，手持后者用餐菜单还原场景，强调西贝无一道菜是预制菜，直言事件严重 损害品牌商誉，明确表态"一定会起诉罗永浩"。在业内人士看来，该事件或冲击西贝品牌，其背后也折射出消费者与餐厅对"预制"的定义分歧及消费者对食 品安全、性价比的顾虑。 | 商品名 | | 数量 单价 金额 | | --- | --- | --- | | 草原嫩烤羊排(份) 1 119.0 | | | | 0119.00 | | | | 包括地区 | 1 | 89.00 89.00 | | 敏烤DHA大黄色 | 1 | 39.00 39.00 | | 胡麻油调黄瓜 | 1 | 23.00 23.00 | | 一把羊肉串配现烤 | | | | '蒙(6串) | 1 | 43.00 43.00 | | 西贝面筋 | 1 | 39.00 39.00 | | 葱油罗马生菜 | 1 | 29.00 29.00 | | 五种番茄酸汤夜由 | | | | 鱼鱼(婉) | 1 | 29.00 29.00 | | 黄米凉糕(6块) | 1 | 29.00 29.00 | | 小炒草原牛 | ...

Group 1: Starbucks China Sale - Starbucks is preparing to sell its controlling stake in its China business, with final bids expected by early October from firms including Carlyle, Hillhouse, Sequoia China, and Boyu Capital [1] - The deal structure remains negotiable, but Starbucks aims to retain control over its coffee roasting facilities in China to maintain quality [1] - CEO Brian Niccol expressed confidence in the Chinese market and indicated that Starbucks is evaluating over 20 interested institutions for potential partnerships to expand its store count significantly [1] Group 2: Competitive Landscape - Luckin Coffee reported a 47.1% year-on-year revenue growth in Q2, reaching 12.36 billion yuan, significantly outpacing Starbucks, which saw an 8% revenue increase to 7.9 billion USD (approximately 56.25 billion yuan) [2] - Luckin's same-store sales grew by 13.4% in Q2, driven primarily by an increase in cup volume, while Starbucks experienced a 2% increase in same-store sales with a 4% decline in average transaction value [2] - The competitive dynamics in the Chinese coffee market are shifting, prompting local capital to pursue Starbucks due to its potential for localized growth [2]

海南代表团的参赛项目涵盖多个行业领域，其中，前沿项目有云计算、数控铣、飞机维修、数字建 造、增材制造、区块链技术、鸿蒙应用开发、数字孪生应用技术、人工智能工程技术、机电一体化、无 人机系统等。传统项目有育婴、美容、美发、花艺、零售、焊接、烘焙、烹饪、中式面点、餐厅服务、 酒店接待等。 海南日报海口9月11日讯（海南日报全媒体记者 易宗平）9月11日，省人力资源开发局汇总数据显 示，海南代表团88名选手将参加中华人民共和国第三届职业技能大赛（以下简称第三届全国技能大 赛），涉及82个竞赛项目。 9月19日至23日，第三届全国技能大赛将在河南省郑州市举办，共设置106个竞赛项目。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving Luo Yonghao's criticism of Xibei's pre-made dishes has escalated into a legal dispute, highlighting the ongoing debate over the use of pre-made food in restaurants and consumer rights in China [2][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei's pre-made dishes on social media, claiming they were overpriced and of poor quality, which led to a significant backlash [2]. - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, announced plans to sue Luo Yonghao in response to the allegations, asserting that their dishes are freshly prepared [5]. - Following Luo's comments, Xibei-related restaurant stocks experienced a notable decline, with a market value loss exceeding 2 billion RMB [5]. Group 2: Reactions and Implications - Luo Yonghao responded to the lawsuit announcement by challenging Xibei's claims and offering a reward of 100,000 RMB for evidence of Xibei using pre-made dishes [5]. - The incident has sparked discussions about consumer rights and the need for legislation regarding the disclosure of pre-made food in restaurants [5].

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights that Shanghai Xiaonan Guo's shareholders deposited stocks into Yuan Ku Securities, with a market value of HKD 6.1442 million, accounting for 5.78% of the total [1] - For the first half of 2025, Shanghai Xiaonan Guo reported revenue of RMB 102 million, representing a year-on-year decline of 44.2% [1] - The company recorded a loss attributable to shareholders of RMB 18.248 million, which is a year-on-year reduction of 38% [1] - The basic loss per share was reported at 0.80 cents [1]

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights that Shanghai Xiao Nan Guo (03666) has seen a significant decline in revenue and is facing losses, with a 44.2% year-on-year decrease in revenue for the first half of 2025 [1] - As of September 11, shareholders deposited stocks into Yuan Ku Securities, with a market value of 6.1442 million HKD, representing 5.78% of the total [1] - The company reported a loss attributable to shareholders of 18.248 million RMB, which is a 38% year-on-year reduction, with a basic loss per share of 0.80 cents [1]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around a public dispute between Xi Bei and Luo Yonghao regarding the classification of Xi Bei's food offerings as "pre-made dishes" [1][6] - Xi Bei's founder, Jia Guolong, stated that the company will pursue legal action against Luo Yonghao for his comments, asserting that none of Xi Bei's dishes qualify as pre-made according to national definitions [1][2] - Jia emphasized that Xi Bei's operations include a central kitchen for ingredient pre-processing, but they do not sell pre-made dishes that are fully cooked and packaged [1] Group 2 - Luo Yonghao's initial comments on social media criticized Xi Bei for serving what he perceived as pre-made dishes, calling the experience "disgusting" and urging for legislation requiring restaurants to disclose the use of pre-made food [6] - The controversy has sparked public debate, with some customers expressing concerns about the quality of food at Xi Bei, while the company's customer service has defended the freshness of their ingredients and cooking methods [7] - Previous statements from Luo indicate a stance against undisclosed pre-made dishes in restaurants, labeling it as deceptive, while a video by Xi Bei's co-founder showed that most dishes are prepared on-site, with only a few items being delivered from a central kitchen [8]