商务部1月6日发布2026年第1号关于加强两用物项对日本出口管制的公告。根据《中华人民共和国出口管制法》等法律法规有关规定，为维护国家安全和 利益、履行防扩散等国际义务，决定加强两用物项对日本出口管制。现将有关事项公告如下：禁止所有两用物项对日本军事用户、军事用途，以及一切有 助于提升日本军事实力的其他最终用户用途出口。任何国家和地区的组织和个人，违反上述规定，将原产于中华人民共和国的相关两用物项转移或提供给 日本的组织和个人，将依法追究法律责任。本公告自公布之日起正式实施。 商务部8日举行例行新闻发布会，商务部新闻发言人何亚东在回答有关加强两用物项对日本出口管制的提问时说，高市早苗首相涉台错误言论侵害中国主 权和领土完整，公然干涉中国内政，对中方发出武力威胁。高市首相上台以来，推进修订"安保三文件"，其侧近人士发表拥核言论，这是在试图挑战国际 社会底线，暴露出高市首相和日本右翼势力的一贯错误主张和持续推动"再军事化"野心，挑战战后国际秩序，势必损害地区和平稳定，危及世界和平与安 全。 何亚东表示，中国作为负责任大国，一贯积极履行防扩散国际义务。依法依规针对所有两用物项，禁止对日本军事用户、军事用途，以及一切 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 日本舆论关于"中国举措对经济影响"的担忧找错了"病根"，也不排除是刻意制造扭曲叙事。千叶大学客 座教授高口康太6日撰文质问："高市首相是否预见到这种局面？是否已准备好应对措施？这些都是令人 关切的问题。2026年才刚刚开始，却已骤然陷入火烧眉毛的危机。"这两个追问，直击高市内阁对华政 策的短视与轻率。高市早苗政府激进的"再军事化"政策，才是将日本拖入外交与经济双重被动的症结所 在。日本若真想摆脱当前的困境，就应立即停止在台湾问题上危险玩火，以实际行动恪守中日四个政治 文件精神，摒弃军国主义倾向，践行和平发展承诺。无论是地区和平、国际道义还是中日共赢，都不是 可以忽略的大账，日本应该算清楚。 中方加强对日两用物项出口管制后，日经指数7日一度较前日下跌超过400点，这是对日本近期错误外交 防务政策一次明确的"代价提示"。中日关系能否走出当前的困局、摆脱"火烧眉毛的危机"，关键在于日 本是否愿意摒弃对抗思维、拿出诚意和实际行动。日方迄今的"抗议"反应，恰恰是中方"绝对无法接受 且令人深感遗憾"的。若沿着军事化冒险的道路继续狂奔，等待日本的可能是更多"不可接受"的后果。 来源：环球时报 1月6日 ...

Core Viewpoint - The fourth meeting of the China-Poland Intergovernmental Cooperation Committee highlighted significant developments, particularly China's decision to relax export restrictions on key minerals and dual-use items, which is expected to enhance Poland's position in the European supply chain [1][3]. Group 1: Key Minerals and Economic Impact - Key minerals such as nickel, lithium, and rare earths are crucial for the new energy vehicle and battery industries, and Poland aims to strengthen its role in the European new energy supply chain [3]. - The relaxation of export restrictions is seen as a breakthrough for Poland, potentially leading to increased trade numbers and domestic processing and employment opportunities [3][5]. - Poland's acquisition of mineral resources is expected to provide it with greater negotiating power within the EU, especially in ongoing disputes over energy and mineral distribution [3][5]. Group 2: China-Poland Cooperation and Strategic Implications - The mineral export relaxation is mutually beneficial, as it stabilizes the China-Europe supply chain and enhances bilateral relations, countering discussions in Europe about reducing dependency on Chinese products [5][19]. - The "China-Europe Railway Express" has become a focal point of cooperation, with Poland's geographical position making it a key transit hub for goods moving from China to Europe [5][9]. - Both parties have agreed to optimize customs efficiency and increase transport capacity, which could alleviate financial pressures on businesses by reducing shipping times [7][9]. Group 3: Geopolitical Context and Security Concerns - The ongoing Ukraine conflict has heightened security concerns for Poland, which is directly affected by the war, leading to discussions on defense capabilities and military technology [11][12]. - Poland views China as a significant player that can maintain communication with Moscow, providing a potential avenue for conflict resolution [14][19]. - The EU's reaction to the China-Poland cooperation indicates concerns about Poland's rising influence within the EU, as it gains strategic resources that could enhance its bargaining power [16][19]. Group 4: Regional Reactions and Future Prospects - Eastern European countries have responded positively to Poland's actions, seeing it as a potential model for their own bilateral engagements with China [19]. - The EU has emphasized that all bilateral cooperation must align with EU rules, reflecting a cautious approach to Poland's growing autonomy in negotiations [19]. - China's strategic choice to highlight its cooperation with Poland serves to position itself as a collaborative partner in Europe, rather than an external disruptor [19].