Core Viewpoint - The recent resignation of prominent fund manager Liu Gesong from managing a long-standing product has raised concerns among investors, although industry insiders confirm he has no plans to leave the company [1][4]. Group 1: Fund Manager Changes - Liu Gesong has made two adjustments to his managed products within six months, with the latest being the resignation from managing the "Guangfa Multi-Asset Emerging Stock" fund, which he had managed for nearly seven years [2][4]. - Following his resignation, Liu's managed product count has decreased to five, with the latest managed scale dropping from 31.295 billion to 29.463 billion yuan, a reduction of 6% from its peak of 84.343 billion yuan [4]. Group 2: Industry Trends - The trend of "reducing burden" among well-known fund managers is becoming more common, with many gradually transferring management responsibilities to newer managers through a process of joint management [5][7]. - The public fund industry is experiencing a significant increase in the turnover of fund managers, with 293 managers having left their positions this year, a 23% increase compared to the same period last year [5][6]. Group 3: Investor Reactions - Investors are often sensitive to changes in fund management, leading to uncertainty about whether to observe patiently or redeem their investments [1][9]. - Historical data shows that after changes in fund managers, many products experience a decline in scale, indicating that investor confidence may wane following such transitions [8][10].

Core Viewpoint - The recent resignation of prominent fund manager Liu Gesong from the management of a long-standing fund has raised concerns among investors, although industry insiders confirm he has no plans to leave the company [3][7]. Group 1: Fund Manager Changes - Liu Gesong has announced his resignation from the management of the "Guangfa Multi-Asset Emerging Stock" fund, which he managed for nearly seven years, with the new manager being Zhou Zhishuo [4][5]. - Following this resignation, Liu's managed products have decreased from six to five, with the total managed assets dropping from 31.295 billion to 29.463 billion yuan, a reduction of approximately 6% from his peak of 84.343 billion yuan [6][7]. Group 2: Industry Trends - The trend of "reducing the burden" among star fund managers is becoming more common, with many experienced managers gradually transferring product management to newer managers through a process of co-management [7][10]. - The public fund industry is witnessing a significant increase in the turnover of fund managers, with 293 managers having left their positions this year, a 23% increase compared to the same period last year [7][9]. Group 3: Investor Reactions - Investors are often uncertain about how to react to changes in fund management, with some expressing concerns about the capabilities of new managers and the potential impact on fund performance [11]. - Historical data shows that fund sizes often decline following the departure of well-known managers, indicating a potential risk for investors [11].

Core Viewpoint - Liu Gesong, a prominent fund manager at GF Fund, has stepped down from managing the GF Multi-Dimensional Emerging Stock Fund, which achieved a return of 140.03% during his tenure, marking it as the best-performing fund under his management [1][4][7]. Fund Management Changes - The change in management is officially termed as "dismissal of the fund manager," with Zhou Zhishuo taking over sole management responsibilities [5]. - The announcement emphasizes that Liu Gesong will remain with GF Fund, indicating that this is a "normal work adjustment" [1][7]. Performance Context - Despite the strong performance of the GF Multi-Dimensional Emerging Stock Fund, questions arise regarding the rationale behind the dismissal of the best-performing fund, especially in light of industry pressures and fee reforms [4][8]. - Liu Gesong continues to manage five other funds with a total scale of 29.463 billion yuan, maintaining a focus on key stocks such as Siasun, Shengbang, Yiwei Lithium Energy, and Sunshine Power [7]. Market Speculation - The management change has led to speculation about whether the scale of 29.463 billion yuan has become overwhelming for Liu, as larger fund sizes complicate asset allocation and rebalancing [8]. - The industry is witnessing a trend of star fund managers stepping down or leaving, with several notable managers transitioning to private equity [9]. Industry Trends - The public fund industry is experiencing a shift from "license dividends" to "capability competition," with a notable decline in the personal brand value of star managers, while platform value is becoming more prominent [9]. - The ongoing management pressures in the industry suggest that while "reducing burden" may alleviate short-term stress, optimizing portfolio strategies and enhancing the performance of remaining products are crucial for maintaining investor trust [9].

Group 1 - The announcement from GF Fund indicates a change in the fund manager for the GF Multi-Dimensional Emerging Stock Fund, with Liu Gesong stepping down and Zhou Zhishuo taking over the management responsibilities [1] - Liu Gesong managed the fund since November 2018, achieving a cumulative return of 140.03% and an annualized return of 13.63%, ranking 118th among 303 similar products [3] - The fund has performed well this year, with a return of 34.14%, focusing on sectors such as defense, electronics, and new energy [3] Group 2 - Zhou Zhishuo joined GF Fund in February this year, previously working at CCB Fund for four years, where he managed assets that peaked at 115 billion but fell to 37 billion in 2023 [4] - Zhou's management style has shown volatility, with a significant drop in performance leading to a reduction in managed assets [4] - Currently, Zhou is co-managing the GF Stable Growth Fund alongside experienced fund manager Fu Youxing [4]

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) aims to address the issue of high management fees in public funds despite poor performance through a floating management fee mechanism, highlighting the industry's long-standing problem of "guaranteed returns" regardless of fund performance [1]. Group 1: Fund Performance and Management Fees - The report indicates that the fund "Guangfa High-end Manufacturing A" has the worst three-year return at -53.01%, while it collected management fees totaling 456 million yuan over the same period [3]. - "China Europe Medical Health A," with a scale of 31.179 billion yuan, experienced a 32.55% decline in three-year performance but still charged 2.2 billion yuan in management fees [3]. - The trend shows that larger funds tend to incur greater losses while charging higher fees, raising concerns about the reasonableness of fees relative to fund managers' performance [3][4]. Group 2: Fund Manager Performance - Fund manager Liu Gesong's funds have underperformed, with a three-year return of -27% and a two-year return of -17%, significantly lagging behind the CSI 300 index [4]. - The total assets under Liu's management decreased by 5.7% to 32.171 billion yuan as of the end of the first quarter of 2024 [4]. - The floating management fee reform may lead to a significant reduction in management fee income for fund managers like Liu, as poor performance could result in a "double whammy" effect [4]. Group 3: Industry Outlook - The CSRC's reform is expected to shift the focus of fund companies from merely pursuing scale to emphasizing investment returns, marking a significant change in the industry [11]. - The industry may witness a trend where stronger firms thrive while smaller institutions face accelerated elimination, making investment research capabilities and risk control systems increasingly critical [11]. - In the long run, more competitive products are likely to attract additional capital and new investors, benefiting investors and promoting sustainable industry development [11].