Core Viewpoint - The ongoing controversy surrounding Juzhi Biotechnology's alleged product fraud has escalated into a significant conflict within the medical aesthetics industry, involving major players like Huaxi Biotechnology and self-media influencer Gao Yu [1][3]. Group 1: Incident Development - The scandal began with allegations of Juzhi Biotechnology's collagen product being falsely represented, leading to a public dispute with Gao Yu, who claimed the product contained only 0.0177% of the required collagen, below the legal threshold of 0.1% [4][9]. - On May 30, the testing agency that supported Gao Yu retracted its report, which Juzhi interpreted as an apology, while still contesting the validity of Gao Yu's testing methods [2][3]. - The controversy has prompted other companies in the industry to begin testing their products, with over 100 samples submitted for testing by nine different companies [7]. Group 2: Industry Impact - The product in question, "Kefumei Human-Like Recombinant Collagen Essence," has been a core revenue driver for Juzhi, generating approximately 4.542 billion yuan in revenue in 2024, accounting for about 82% of the company's total revenue [9]. - Huaxi Biotechnology's involvement has intensified the situation, as they publicly supported Gao Yu and criticized the tactics used by Juzhi, suggesting a broader industry conflict [12][15]. - Following Huaxi's announcement, their stock rose by 6.94%, while Juzhi's stock fell by 4.69%, reflecting the market's reaction to the unfolding drama [16].

Core Viewpoint - Recent data breach incidents involving luxury brands Cartier and Dior have raised concerns about customer data security, with both companies confirming the leaks and taking steps to address the situation [1][4]. Group 1: Cartier Data Breach - Cartier has confirmed that customer data, including names and birth dates, was leaked, but financial information such as bank details was not compromised [2][4]. - The data breach affects customers globally, not just in the Chinese market, and the company is currently investigating the incident while collaborating with external cybersecurity experts [4]. Group 2: Dior Data Breach - Dior also reported a data breach where unauthorized external personnel accessed some customer data, which was discovered on May 7, 2025 [4]. - Similar to Cartier, the leaked information does not include financial data but involves personal details such as names, gender, and contact information [4]. - Dior has taken immediate action by hiring a professional cybersecurity team to investigate and has advised affected customers to remain vigilant against suspicious communications [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding Wahaha Group's decision to outsource the production of its bottled water, highlighting the internal reforms led by the new successor, Zong Fuli, and the implications for the company's operational strategy and brand image [2][3]. Group 1: Outsourcing Controversy - Wahaha Group has engaged in outsourcing its bottled water production to companies like Jinmailang, which has sparked public debate about the brand's commitment to self-production [4][6]. - The outsourcing arrangement began in May 2024, with Jinmailang producing over 500 million bottles for Wahaha, raising questions about pricing and consumer choice [6][7]. - The involvement of other companies in the outsourcing process, including those controlled by Hongsheng Beverage, has led to concerns about the legitimacy of the contracts and potential profit-sharing issues [8][9]. Group 2: Internal Reforms and Production Changes - Since Zong Fuli took over, Wahaha has closed 18 production lines across various locations, despite claiming a need for increased production capacity [10][11]. - The closures have affected factories that are not part of the "Hongsheng system," indicating a strategic shift in production management [11][12]. - Zong Fuli's reforms appear to be aimed at consolidating control over Wahaha by mirroring the management practices of Hongsheng Beverage, which has been expanding its production capabilities [13][14]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Future Challenges - The article suggests that Zong Fuli's approach may lead to a significant restructuring of Wahaha's business model, with a focus on integrating operations with Hongsheng Beverage [15][16]. - The transition has faced resistance from employees and stakeholders, indicating potential challenges in balancing internal reforms with market demands [17][18]. - The ongoing changes in production, sales, and management structures reflect a broader strategy to reshape Wahaha's market presence and operational efficiency [18].

"我们不知道人工智能在未来10年会有什么能力，让它自由发展，束缚国家的手脚，这是潜在的危 险。"她补充说。 以下文章来源于财联社 ，作者黄君芝 财联社 . 财联社是上海报业集团主管主办，定位资本市场报道财经通讯社，以"准确、快速、权威、专业"为准 则，提供7x24小时金融信息服务。 来源|财联社 继马斯克后，又一特朗普"亲密盟友"、共和党众议员玛乔丽·泰勒·格林（Marjorie Taylor Greene）对其"大而美"预算法案发起了攻击。她此前在众议院表决中还投票支持该法案。 格林呼吁删除"大而美"预算法案中一项禁止各州监管人工智能（AI）的条款，认为这侵犯了各州的 权利。她表示，她此前不知道该法案中包含了这项条款。 据了解，该法案要求在10年内暂停制定监管人工智能模型、系统或自动决策系统的州法律。这包括 在州一级执行现有和未来的法律。支持者认为，各州"凌乱制定法律"可能会让科技公司在全美多个 地区进行创新时感到困惑或负担沉重。 格林周二在社交媒体平台X上写道："坦白说，我根本不知道法案中有这么一节，它剥夺了各州10年 内制定法律或监管人工智能的权利。我坚决反对这项法案，它侵犯了各州的权利。如果我早知道里 ...

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding White Elephant instant noodles stems from the misleading use of the trademark "Duoban" (meaning "more than half"), which consumers interpreted as indicating a larger quantity, rather than a brand name [1][2][3]. Group 1: Trademark Issues - The term "Duoban" is confirmed to be a registered trademark of White Elephant, not an indication of increased product weight [4][5]. - White Elephant's other trademark applications, such as "Duoban" bags and buckets, have been rejected and are currently invalid [5][6]. - The "Duoyiban" (meaning "more than half") product only offers a 25% increase in noodle quantity compared to standard products, raising further consumer concerns [2][7]. Group 2: Industry Trends - The phenomenon of "trademark edge cases" is prevalent in the food industry, where companies exploit descriptive terms to mislead consumers [2][11][13]. - This practice reflects a deeper conflict between corporate profit motives and consumer rights protection, as companies prioritize market share over transparency [3][14]. Group 3: Consumer Reactions - Following the revelation about the "Duoban" trademark, public backlash against White Elephant has intensified, with consumers expressing disappointment and distrust [16][18]. - The incident highlights the gap between consumer expectations for brand integrity and the reality of misleading marketing practices [18]. Group 4: Company Background - White Elephant Food Co., established in 1997, focuses on producing high-quality noodle products and has expanded its operations across multiple provinces in China [10]. - The company has completed a B+ funding round, attracting investments from notable firms like Fosun Group and GF Securities [10]. Group 5: Regulatory Context - The use of misleading trademarks contradicts the principles outlined in the Trademark Law, which mandates honesty and transparency in marketing [14][15]. - The National Food Safety Standards require that food labeling be truthful and objective, further emphasizing the need for compliance in marketing practices [14].

美东时间周二，美股三大指数集体收涨，截止收盘，道指涨0.51%，纳指涨0.81%，标普500指数涨 0.58%。 热门科技股多数上涨，博通涨超3%，英伟达涨超2%。计算机硬件、加密货币概念股涨幅居前，安森美 半导体涨超11%，纳微半导体涨超7%，超微电脑、Coinbase涨近5%，美光科技涨超4%，戴尔科技、希 捷科技涨超3%，英特尔、AMD涨超2%。 纳斯达克中国金龙指数收涨0.56%，热门中概股多数上涨，理想汽车涨超6%，爱奇艺涨超3%，拼多 多、小鹏汽车涨近2%，哔哩哔哩跌超2%，京东跌超1%。 01 特朗普急了 美国限时要求各国提贸易谈判最佳方案 据路透社报道，距离"对等关税"恢复期限仅剩5周，特朗普政府发出紧急信函，要求各国"在本周三前提 交贸易谈判的最佳方案"，包括购买美国工农业产品的关税和配额方案。 报道称，美国政府内部对完成交易有紧迫感，尽管白宫反复承诺"多项协议即将达成"。但迄今为止，美 国仅与英国这一主要贸易伙伴达成协议，且该协议更像是持续谈判的框架而非最终交易。 库克周二参加了美国外交关系委员会（Council on Foreign Relations）举办的活动，她表示："我认为美 国 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article promotes the fourth-generation multi-functional airbag massage mattress developed by Dr. Ho, a Canadian chiropractor, highlighting its affordability and effectiveness in providing relaxation and relief from body aches at home [19][50][41]. Group 1: Product Features - The massage mattress features 18 3D airbag units, 6 kneading heads, and 4 vibration motors, covering the neck, back, waist, and legs [51][60]. - It offers three massage modes and three intensity levels, with a default massage duration of 15 minutes, making it user-friendly and suitable for various users [100][51]. - The mattress is designed to be foldable and easy to store, making it convenient for users with limited space [106][21]. Group 2: Target Audience - The product is ideal for individuals suffering from neck, back, and leg discomfort, including office workers, homemakers, and the elderly [12][37]. - It caters to those who cannot afford frequent visits to massage parlors or do not have space for bulky massage chairs [14][16]. - The mattress is particularly beneficial for people with sedentary lifestyles or those who stand for long periods, helping to alleviate muscle fatigue [95][37]. Group 3: Pricing and Promotion - The mattress is currently offered at a promotional price of 599 yuan, significantly lower than its market price of 1299 yuan, with limited stock available [46][110]. - The promotion includes additional items, such as two bags of mugwort patches, enhancing the value proposition for potential buyers [6][110]. - The article emphasizes the cost-effectiveness of the mattress, suggesting that it can replace multiple expensive massage sessions [35][41].

凤凰网科技讯（作者/于雷）6月3日，一段贾跃亭在首届"FFAI首年度股东日"活动上的讲话视频流出。 据悉，一位从乐视早期就开始追随贾跃亭投资乐视、FF的股民，自费从国内飞到洛杉矶参加活动，表 达投资乐视、FF的全部心路历程，以及对贾跃亭东山再起的期盼。贾跃亭现场数度哽咽，他表示， "（FF能够活下去）的确是散户支持了我们，甚至是散户救了我们的命。" 贾跃亭在发言中坦承， FF曾一度面临生死存亡的危机 。他透露，去年三四月份时，公司几乎濒临倒 闭，"可以说90%以上公司内部的人都认为要倒闭，只有极少数的人认为我们还有机会。"目前FF虽然仍 处于艰难时期，但贾跃亭认为与去年同期相比已有显著改善。 回顾FF的艰难历程，贾跃亭表示，去年公司同时面临多重危机： 股价跌至几分钱 ，随时面临退市风 险；账面资金极度紧张，濒临破产边缘；董事会多次召开紧急会议商讨对策。 对于未来发展，贾跃亭表示，希望通过接下来1-2年重要战略目标的实现，让乐视和FF的投资者能够挽 回过去的损失，甚至获得更大回报。 来源|凤凰网科技 【 热门视频推荐 】 点击在 看 持续关注↓↓↓ 贾跃亭坦言，此前公司过度重视机构投资者，"我们对机构投资者可以 ...

Core Viewpoint - Major institutional investors in the U.S. bond market, such as DoubleLine Capital, are either avoiding or shorting 30-year U.S. Treasuries due to concerns over rising government budget deficits and debt burdens [2][6][7] Group 1: Market Sentiment and Trends - The yield on 30-year U.S. Treasuries reached 5.15%, nearing the highest level since 2007, driven by fears of increased bond issuance to cover deficits [3][5] - The yield curve has steepened significantly this year, with the 30-year yield rising sharply while shorter-term yields have declined [2][3] - The difference between the 30-year and 5-year yields has exceeded 100 basis points for the first time since 2021, indicating pressure on long-term bonds [3][5] Group 2: Investment Strategies - Investors are shifting their focus from long-term to shorter-term bonds, favoring those with lower interest rate risk but still offering decent returns [2][6] - Pimco and other firms are advocating for a cautious stance on 30-year Treasuries, preferring the 5-year and 10-year segments of the yield curve [6][7] - There is speculation about the U.S. Treasury potentially reducing or halting the auction of long-term bonds due to weak demand [5][7][8] Group 3: Future Outlook - The upcoming 30-year Treasury auction on June 12 is anticipated to be a critical test for market confidence in long-term bonds [9] - Recent weak demand for long-term bonds in both the U.S. and Japan has raised concerns about the sustainability of long-term bond issuance [9]

Core Viewpoint - Yongkun Gold has been reported unable to fulfill redemption requests, leading to significant losses for investors and affecting employees, with the Hangzhou police having initiated a case and the company's headquarters being sealed [1] Group 1: Company Overview - Yongkun Gold is operated by Zhejiang Yongkun Holdings Co., Ltd., established in 2014, primarily dealing in gold jewelry and related products, with Wang Guohai as the actual controller [5] - The company’s business model includes sales, custody, and repurchase services, promising investors annual returns of 5% to 9% on gold custody [7][30] - A collective insurance document indicates that Yongkun Gold has a gold inventory of 5,359 kilograms, valued at over 4.1 billion yuan as of April 28, 2025 [3][19] Group 2: Business Practices and Risks - The company engaged in aggressive marketing, continuing promotional activities even as it faced financial difficulties, such as a "May Pet Season" event that offered free gold beans to attract investors [12][14] - The operational model resembles a Ponzi scheme, relying on new investor funds to pay returns to earlier investors, which is unsustainable [30][31] - Yongkun Gold's operations were conducted without the necessary financial licenses, exposing it to significant regulatory risks [29] Group 3: Recent Developments - On May 20, Yongkun Gold was reported to have "exploded" financially, yet it was still promoting sales just days prior [2][12] - The company’s online platforms remain operational, but transaction data has ceased, indicating a potential cover-up of its financial troubles [3][11] - The Hangzhou police have confirmed that a case has been opened against Yongkun Gold, with the company’s headquarters sealed off [19]