"近年来，公司助力苏州本土绿的谐波、国芯科技等21家企业成功登陆资本市场、12家企业完成再融 资，为10余家企业提供跨境服务，还为苏州银行（002966）等企业累计发行161只债券、融资规模超千 亿元，目前正在辅导度亘、鼎镁、猎奇等15家苏州企业IPO。"朱健表示。 5月28日，苏州市政府与国泰海通（601211）证券签署战略合作协议，国泰海通证券苏州分公司揭牌。 根据协议，苏州市政府与国泰海通证券将在金融服务实体经济、产业升级与创新发展、资本市场建设、 金融科技应用、人才培育与引进、民生保障等领域开展全面合作。 此次揭牌的国泰海通证券苏州分公司为公司一级创新型分公司，下辖11家营业部。 国泰海通证券党委书记、董事长朱健在致辞时表示，国泰海通将充分发挥自身在资本市场的专业优势和 资源整合能力，做好金融五篇大文章，聚焦苏州"1030"产业体系，专注科创全链赋能；发挥好金融机构 联动服务牵引功能，共建金融服务生态；提升区域服务能级，加强"投行+商行"的联动，全力当好苏州 高质量发展的"金融合伙人"。 积极参与苏州"金融超市"构建 今年4月初，国泰君安和海通证券对等合并，正式更名为国泰海通，公司总资产超1.7万亿元 ...

ETF Industry News - Major indices experienced fluctuations with the Shanghai Composite Index down 0.02%, Shenzhen Component down 0.26%, and ChiNext down 0.31. Multiple transportation sector ETFs saw gains, including the Logistics Express ETF (516530.SH) up 1.23%, Logistics ETF (516910.SH) up 1.15%, and Transportation ETF (561320.SH) up 0.93 [1] - The logistics industry is expected to maintain rapid growth in 2024, despite a decline in package value and ticket prices due to trends towards smaller packages. Rail passenger volume is projected to grow at a double-digit rate in 2024, while road freight and passenger transport will continue to increase [1] - In the ETF market, as of the end of April, the Shanghai Stock Exchange had 680 ETFs with a total market value of 2.96 trillion yuan and total shares of 1.75 trillion. The Shenzhen Stock Exchange had 467 ETFs with a total market value of 1.09 trillion yuan and total shares of 866.68 billion [3][4] - The top three brokers in terms of ETF trading volume on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in April were Huatai Securities, China Galaxy, and CITIC Securities, with market shares of 10.94%, 8.52%, and 7.94% respectively [4] - The overall performance of ETFs showed that strategy-based ETFs had the best average return of 0.43%, while thematic ETFs had the worst average return of -0.37% [11] - The top three performing stock ETFs for the day were Communication ETF (515880.SH) with a return of 1.42%, 800 Cash Flow ETF (563990.SH) with 1.37%, and 180 Governance ETF (510010.SH) with 1.24% [13] - The top three stock ETFs by trading volume were A500 ETF Fund (512050.SH) with 2.798 billion yuan, A500 Index ETF (159351.SZ) with 2.533 billion yuan, and CSI 300 ETF (510300.SH) with 2.130 billion yuan [17]

国泰海通证券股份有限公司 关于上海索辰信息科技股份有限公司 差异化权益分派特殊除权除息事项的核查意见 国泰海通证券股份有限公司（以下简称"国泰海通"或"保荐机构"）作为 上海索辰信息科技股份有限公司（以下简称"索辰科技"或"公司"）首次公开 发行股票并在科创板上市及持续督导的保荐机构，根据《中华人民共和国公司法》 《中华人民共和国证券法》 《证券发行上市保荐业务管理办法》 《上海证券交易所 科创板股票上市规则》《上海证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第 7 号——回购 股份》等相关规定，对公司 2024 年度利润分配所涉及的差异化权益分派特殊除 权除息事项进行了审慎核查，具体情况如下： 一、本次差异化分红的原因及方案 （一）本次差异化分红原因 公司已于 2024 年 2 月 5 日召开第二届董事会第七次会议，审议通过了《关 于以集中竞价交易方式回购公司股份方案的议案》，同意公司以超募资金通过上 海证券交易所股票交易系统以集中竞价交易方式回购公司已发行的部分人民币 普通股（A 股）股票，回购资金总额不低于人民币 2,000 万元（含），不超过人 民币 4,000 万元（含），回购股份将在未来适宜时机全部用于公司员工 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights that ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds) are becoming a key driver for brokerage firms' wealth management transformation and business innovation [1] - As of the end of April, the Shanghai Stock Exchange had 846 fund products with a total asset management scale of 3.1 trillion yuan, while the Shenzhen Stock Exchange had 756 fund products with a total asset management scale of 1.13 trillion yuan [2] - The total number of ETF products in the market reached 1,181 as of May 27, showing a year-on-year growth of 23.28%, with total shares of 2.75 trillion, up 28.85% year-on-year [5] Group 2 - Leading brokerages are leveraging their comprehensive strength and rich business experience to rank high in ETF trading volume, with Huatai Securities, China Galaxy, and CITIC Securities leading the Shanghai market in April [2] - The brokerage with the highest market share in ETF holdings as of the end of April was China Galaxy, with a market share of 24.57%, followed by Shenwan Hongyuan Securities at 17.87% [3] - Huatai Securities led the market in the number of ETF trading accounts, holding an 11.8% market share as of the end of April [4] Group 3 - The rapid expansion of the ETF market is expected to drive growth in brokerage retail business and create favorable conditions for expanding institutional services and market-making activities [5] - Brokerages are actively increasing their presence in the ETF market, with firms like China Merchants Securities focusing on expanding quality product offerings and creating an ETF ecosystem [5]

国泰海通证券股份有限公司 关于华海清科股份有限公司 首次公开发行部分限售股上市流通的核查意见 国泰海通证券股份有限公司（以下简称"国泰海通"或"保荐机构"）作为 华海清科股份有限公司（以下简称"华海清科"或"公司"）首次公开发行股票 并在科创板上市及持续督导的保荐机构，根据《证券发行上市保荐业务管理办法》 《上海证券交易所科创板股票上市规则》《上海证券交易所科创板上市公司自律 监管指引第 1 号——规范运作》等法律法规的相关规定，对华海清科首次公开发 行部分限售股上市流通事项进行了核查，核查情况及核查意见如下： 一、本次上市流通的限售股类型 根据中国证券监督管理委员会于 2022 年 4 月 27 日出具的《关于同意华海清 科股份有限公司首次公开发行股票注册的批复》（证监许可2022890 号），同 意公司首次公开发行股票的注册申请。华海清科股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"） 首次向社会公开发行人民币普通股 26,666,700 股，并于 2022 年 6 月 8 日在上海 证券交易所科创板上市，发行完成后总股本为 106,666,700 股，其中有限售条件 流通股 82,769,851 股，无限售条件流通股 ...

债券简称：19 深圳能源绿色债 01、 债券代码：1980049.IB、 国泰海通证券股份有限公司 关于深圳能源集团股份有限公司涉及信息披露事务负责人 发生变动的临时债权代理事务报告 债权代理人 （住所：中国（上海）自由贸易试验区商城路 618 号） 二〇二五年五月 重要声明 根据发行人披露的《深圳能源集团股份有限公司关于聘任董事会秘书的公 告》，2025 年 5 月 20 日，公司董事会八届三十四次会议审议通过了《关于聘任 董事会秘书的议案》。 本报告依据《公司债券发行与交易管理办法》 《2018 年深圳能源集团股份有 限公司绿色公司债券债权代理协议》等相关规定和约定、公开信息披露文件以及 深圳能源集团股份有限公司（以下简称公司、深圳能源或发行人）出具的相关说 明文件以及提供的相关资料等，由债权代理人国泰海通证券股份有限公司（以下 简称国泰海通证券）编制。 公司董事会近日收到董事会秘书周朝晖先生提交的书面辞职报告。周朝晖先 生因工作变动不再担任公司董事会秘书职务，离任后将继续在公司全资子公司深 圳市能源运输有限公司担任执行董事、总经理职务。周朝晖先生原定任期至公司 第八届董事会任期届满时止。 根据相关法律、 ...

经查明，国泰海通、贾超、陈金科、容诚所、陈莲、崔芳林、陈凯在执业过程中存在以下违规行为： 一、未充分关注发行人存在的重大内部控制缺陷，未对发行人财务信息的可靠性予以审慎核查，发表的 核查意见不准确 招股说明书（申报稿）显示，2020年和2021年发行人母公司单体财务报表中资产总额分别为1.39亿元、 5.29亿元，净资产分别为0.64亿元、3.95亿元，营业收入分别为0.61亿元、1.29亿元，净利润分别为0.14 亿元、0.32亿元。报告期内，发行人存在转贷、实际控制人占用资金等财务内控不规范的情形。保荐人 及保荐代表人在向深圳证券交易所提交的审核问询回复中发表核查意见称，发行人报告期内的内部控制 不规范行为已完整披露且整改完毕，整改后内部控制健全并有效运行。 中国证监会现场检查发现，发行人对报告期内部分原始业务资料进行重新制作，对2020年至2022年6月 的财务核算进行重新整理（以下简称理账）。一是理账前后财务数据差异较大。2020年，发行人母公司 单体报表资产总额和净资产理账前后差异率分别为43%和36%，营业收入和净利润的差异率分别为20% 和24%。二是存货理账未依据原始业务单据。招股说明书（申报 ...

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is expected to continue its consolidation next week, influenced by technical indicators and upcoming holiday-related risk aversion among investors [1][2]. Market Analysis - The liquidity shock indicator for the CSI 300 index was 1.13 on Friday, lower than the previous week (2.63), indicating current market liquidity is 1.13 times above the average level of the past year [2]. - The put-call ratio for the SSE 50 ETF options decreased to 0.94 from 1.03, suggesting a decline in investor caution regarding the short-term performance of the SSE 50 ETF [2]. - The five-day average turnover rates for the SSE Composite Index and Wind All A were 0.85% and 1.40%, respectively, indicating a decrease in trading activity, positioned at the 58.47% and 68.54% percentiles since 2005 [2]. Macro Factors - The RMB exchange rate fluctuated last week, with onshore and offshore rates increasing by 0.2% and 0.52%, respectively [2]. - Historical data shows that from May 2005 onwards, the probability of the SSE Composite Index, CSI 300, CSI 500, and ChiNext Index rising in the latter half of May was 45%, 45%, 50%, and 47%, with average gains of -0.1%, -0.02%, 0.67%, and 1.71% [2]. Event-Driven Factors - The US stock market experienced a downward trend last week, with the Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq indices reporting weekly returns of -2.47%, -2.61%, and -2.47%, respectively [2]. - The People's Bank of China conducted a 500 billion yuan MLF operation on May 23, with a one-year term, resulting in a net injection of 375 billion yuan for May, marking the third consecutive month of increased liquidity [2]. Technical Analysis - The Wind All A index broke below the SAR point on May 23, but the moving average strength index remains above average, indicating no bottoming pattern has emerged [2]. - The current market score based on the moving average strength index is 154, positioned at the 62.5% percentile since 2021 [2]. Performance Overview - For the week of May 19-23, the SSE 50 index fell by 0.18%, the CSI 300 index also decreased by 0.18%, the CSI 500 index dropped by 1.1%, and the ChiNext index declined by 0.88% [3]. - The overall market PE (TTM) stands at 19.0 times, which is at the 50.6% percentile since 2005 [3]. Factor Crowding Observations - The crowding degree for low valuation factors has decreased, with small-cap factor crowding at 0.91, low valuation factor crowding at 0.25, high profitability factor crowding at -0.23, and high profitability growth factor crowding at -0.03 [3]. - Industry crowding is relatively high in machinery equipment, comprehensive, retail, environmental protection, and automotive sectors, while transportation and non-ferrous metals sectors have seen a significant increase in crowding [3].

Core Insights - The article predicts the adjustment list for major market index constituents as of June 2025, utilizing refined financial loss identification rules and a review mechanism for securities [1][2] - It highlights significant Alpha return characteristics in the sample combinations of stocks added or removed during index adjustments, particularly through liquidity shock factor grouping [1][2] Market Index ETF Scale - As of April 2025, the scale of various ETFs such as SSE 50, STAR 50, CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, and ChiNext Index are 170.6 billion, 166.4 billion, 1077.3 billion, 144.1 billion, 140.9 billion, and 115.6 billion respectively [1] - The overall scale of these index ETFs has increased nearly fourfold compared to the end of 2021, indicating a growing trend towards index-based investment [1] Index Adjustment Rules and Historical Testing - The article outlines that the CSI and National Index series are adjusted twice a year, with a high prediction accuracy and coverage rate of around 90% for the CSI 300 index adjustments [2] - It emphasizes the significant Alpha return characteristics observed in the sample combinations during the prediction and announcement periods of index adjustments [2] Arbitrage Strategy Research - Since the second half of 2019, single adjustment absolute returns have been 18.36%, with long-short returns at 23.89% and excess returns at 15.10% [2] - Annual adjustment absolute returns reached 40.09%, with long-short returns at 50.84% and excess returns at 33.47% [2]

Market Overview - Global stock markets experienced a correction last week, with a risk preference retreating from high levels. The MSCI Global Index fell by 1.9%, with developed markets down by 2.1% and emerging markets down by 0.5% [3][10] - The Hang Seng Index showed the best performance among emerging markets, increasing by 1.1%, while the Korean Composite Index was the weakest, declining by 1.3% [3][10] Sector Performance - In the US market, defensive sectors such as utilities and consumer staples performed well, while technology sectors faced adjustments. The S&P 500 saw a decline of 2.6% [10] - In the European market, utilities and communication services led with gains of 2.6% and 2.3%, while consumer discretionary and energy sectors lagged behind [10] - The Hong Kong market saw significant gains in the materials and healthcare sectors, with increases of 6.1% and 5.6%, respectively [10] Valuation Trends - Developed markets' overall valuation decreased, with the latest PE and PB ratios at 21.9x and 3.5x, respectively, placing them at the 86% and 97% percentile levels since 2010 [21] - Emerging markets' valuations improved, with PE and PB ratios at 15x and 1.9x, respectively, at the 72% and 85% percentile levels since 2010 [22] Earnings Expectations - Earnings expectations for global markets were mostly revised downwards, with Hong Kong showing a notable upward revision. The Hang Seng Index's 2025 EPS forecast was adjusted from 2214 to 2222 [27] - The S&P 500's 2025 EPS forecast was revised down from 264 to 263, with the consumer discretionary sector seeing the largest upward revision of +0.2% [27][28] Liquidity Conditions - Global liquidity conditions tightened marginally last week, with macro liquidity indicators showing a mixed trend across regions. The US and China saw interest rates decline, while European rates slightly increased [30] - The tightening of liquidity was reflected in the increase of long-term bond yields in major countries, with the UK, Japan, and the US seeing the largest increases [30] Economic Outlook - The economic outlook showed divergence, with the US economy experiencing a marginal decline in sentiment, as indicated by a drop in the manufacturing PMI to 48.7% [35] - In contrast, the European economy maintained stability, with the Eurozone manufacturing PMI at 49% and service PMI at 50.1%, indicating continued expansion [43]