Group 1 - China National Fisheries announced that its shareholder, China State-Owned Enterprises Mixed Ownership Reform Fund Co., Ltd., reduced its stake from 5.7076% to 5% by selling 2.5888 million shares at an average price of 10.31 yuan per share [1] - China National Fisheries, established in April 1998, focuses on deep-sea fishing, seafood processing and trade, and marine fishery services [2] Group 2 - Guilin Tourism plans to publicly select a partner for the "Living Lotus" project to build a theater and related facilities, with the partner responsible for investment, construction, and operation [2] - Guilin Tourism, founded in April 1998, operates in boat passenger transport, scenic tourism, hotels, and road passenger transport [2] Group 3 - Zhaomin Technology intends to issue convertible bonds to raise no more than 590 million yuan for new projects related to automotive components and precision engineering plastics [3] - Zhaomin Technology, established in October 2011, specializes in the R&D, production, and sales of precision injection parts and molds [3] Group 4 - Zhaomin Technology plans to establish overseas subsidiaries in Singapore and Thailand, focusing on wholesale trade and technology development in automotive precision components [4] - The registered capital for the Singapore subsidiaries is set at 1,000 USD, while the Thai subsidiary will have a capital of 500,000 THB [4] Group 5 - Yiyigou's subsidiary plans to increase capital by 8 million yuan to an associated company, with a pre-investment valuation of 42 million yuan [5] - Yiyigou, founded in April 2007, provides full-channel pharmaceutical distribution services [6] Group 6 - Yunda Express reported a 0.88% year-on-year decline in October express service revenue, totaling 4.495 billion yuan, with a business volume decrease of 5.11% [7] - Yunda Express, established in April 1996, operates in comprehensive express logistics [8] Group 7 - SAIWO Technology announced the first batch delivery of light transfer films for perovskite tandem components, marking a significant step in commercial application [8] - The current delivery is small-scale and will not significantly impact the company's revenue in 2024 [8] Group 8 - Hunan Baiyin's shareholder plans to reduce its stake by up to 1.95%, equating to a maximum of 55 million shares [9] - Hunan Baiyin, founded in November 2004, specializes in the smelting and sales of precious metals [9] Group 9 - Ningbo Construction's acquisition of Ningbo Transportation Engineering Construction Group has been approved by the Shanghai Stock Exchange [10] - Ningbo Construction, established in December 2004, focuses on construction engineering and related services [10] Group 10 - Sudar's shareholder plans to reduce its stake by up to 3%, which amounts to a maximum of 2.28 million shares [11] - Sudar, founded in July 2009, provides aftermarket services for hydraulic supports in coal mining machinery [12] Group 11 - Aeston plans to establish a joint venture with BOE Technology Group, focusing on the development and sales of drive technology products [13] - Aeston, established in February 2002, specializes in automation core components and industrial robotics [13] Group 12 - CICC is planning to absorb and merge Dongxing Securities and Xinda Securities through a stock exchange, with trading suspended for up to 25 days [14] - CICC, founded in July 1995, provides investment banking and asset management services [14] Group 13 - Dongjie Intelligent plans to purchase robots from an associated company for a total of 24.325 million yuan [15] - Dongjie Intelligent, established in December 1995, focuses on intelligent production systems and logistics [15] Group 14 - Shentong Express reported an 11.84% year-on-year increase in October express service revenue, totaling 4.95 billion yuan [16] - Shentong Express, founded in November 2001, operates in the express service industry [17] Group 15 - Zhongfu Industrial plans to invest 259 million yuan in a project to produce 3 million aluminum wheels [18] - Zhongfu Industrial, established in January 1997, specializes in aluminum processing and related industries [18] Group 16 - Maoshuo Power's director plans to reduce his stake by up to 980,300 shares, representing 0.2749% of the total shares [19] - Maoshuo Power, founded in March 2006, focuses on the R&D and production of power supplies [19] Group 17 - Wentai Technology's control over Anshi Semiconductor remains limited despite the lifting of an asset freeze order [20] - Wentai Technology, established in January 1993, specializes in mobile communication and semiconductor technology [20] Group 18 - Zhongyida's actual controller is involved in the merger of Xinda Securities by CICC, with no impact on Zhongyida's equity structure [20] - Zhongyida, founded in June 1992, produces and sells fine chemical products [20] Group 19 - Jinlongyu's subsidiary received a criminal judgment for contract fraud, with penalties imposed on both the company and an individual [20] - Jinlongyu, established in June 2005, focuses on kitchen food and oil products [20]

本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完 整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 益海嘉里金龙鱼食品集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）下属子公司益 海（广州）粮油工业有限公司（以下简称"广州益海"）于近日收到淮北市中级 人民法院作出的（2024）皖 06 刑初 3 号一审《刑事判决书》，具体内容详见公司 于 2025 年 11 月 20 日在巨潮资讯网（www.cninfo.com.cn）披露的《关于下属子 公司收到刑事起诉书进展情况的公告》（公告编号：2025-038）。 为加强与投资者的沟通和交流，公司将于 2025 年 11 月 21 日（星期五） 15:30-17:30 在上海证券报·中国证券网召开关于广州益海一审刑事判决投资者 说明会（以下简称"说明会"），与投资者进行互动交流。本次说明会将采用网络 远程的方式举行，投资者可登录上海证券报·中国证券网路演中心（https://road show.cnstock.com/）或者直接进入公司路演厅（https://roadshow.cnstock.com/fbh/j ly202502）参与本次说明会。 证券代码：300999 证券简称： ...

Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute between former Hubei billionaire Lan Shili and Yihai Kerry, the parent company of Jinlongyu, stems from allegations regarding food safety and the improper transportation of edible oil, leading to significant reputational damage for the company [2][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Background - The controversy began in July 2024 when media reported on the "mixed transport of edible oil by tankers," raising public concerns about food safety [8][9]. - On July 9, 2024, multiple media outlets highlighted that mixed oil tankers had visited factories of COFCO and Jinlongyu, prompting a response from Yihai Kerry, which emphasized its strict regulations on bulk edible oil transport [9]. - Despite the company's assurances, Lan Shili released a video on July 11, 2024, claiming that Jinlongyu's stock had dropped by 650 billion due to unsafe practices, equating the situation to "toxic milk" [11][12]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - On October 21, 2024, Yihai Kerry filed a lawsuit against Lan Shili for defamation, claiming his statements were false and damaging to the brand's reputation [15][16]. - The Shanghai court ruled in favor of Yihai Kerry, ordering Lan Shili to publicly apologize and pay a total of 30,000 yuan in damages [17]. - Lan Shili appealed the decision, arguing that he was exercising his right to express concerns about public safety [18]. Group 3: Escalation of Dispute - Following the court's decision, a new issue arose when Lan Shili mistakenly transferred 100,000 yuan instead of the ordered 10,000 yuan to Yihai Kerry, leading to further legal complications [20][21]. - Lan Shili accused Yihai Kerry of bad faith for not reporting the receipt of the funds and continuing to seek enforcement actions, which resulted in the freezing of his bank account [21][22]. - The dispute has evolved from a defamation case to a complex legal battle involving claims of unjust enrichment, with Lan Shili seeking the return of the excess payment and additional damages [22][23].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the food safety issue related to the transportation of edible oil has escalated into a legal battle involving former Hubei billionaire Lan Shili and the company behind Jinlongyu, Yihai Kerry. The situation has raised significant public concern and led to legal actions over defamation and claims of improper gains [1][5]. Group 1: Incident Background - The incident began in July 2024 when multiple media outlets reported on the "chaotic transportation of edible oil by tankers," which included allegations that tankers had previously transported non-food substances [6][7]. - On July 9, 2024, Lan Shili released a video claiming that a tanker transported edible oil to Jinlongyu's factory without proper cleaning, leading to a significant drop in the company's stock value [7][8]. - The video gained substantial traction on social media, amassing 46,000 likes and over 20,000 shares on Douyin by July 30, 2024 [8]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Yihai Kerry filed a lawsuit against Lan Shili for defamation on October 21, 2024, claiming that his statements were false and damaging to the company's reputation [11][12]. - The Shanghai court ruled in favor of Yihai Kerry, ordering Lan Shili to publicly apologize and pay a total of 30,000 yuan (approximately 4,600 USD) in damages [13]. - Lan Shili appealed the decision, arguing that he was exercising his right to express concerns about public safety [14]. Group 3: Escalation of Disputes - Following the court's decision, a new dispute arose when Lan Shili mistakenly transferred 100,000 yuan (approximately 15,400 USD) instead of the ordered 10,000 yuan to Yihai Kerry [17][18]. - Lan Shili claimed that Yihai Kerry did not inform the court about receiving the payment and instead sought to freeze his bank account, causing him significant distress [18]. - The legal conflict has now expanded to include claims of unjust enrichment, with Lan Shili seeking the return of the excess payment and additional damages [19].

千亿市值粮油巨头金龙鱼（300999）（300999.SZ）子公司涉诉案，一审判决结果出炉。 11 月 19 日晚间，金龙鱼公告，公司下属子公司益海（广州）粮油工业有限公司（以下简称"广州益海"）收到淮北市中级人民法 院作出的（2024）皖06刑初3号一审《刑事判决书》。 根据《刑事判决书》，广州益海构成合同诈骗罪，系从犯，判处罚金人民币100万元；被告人柳德刚（广州益海原总经理）构成 合同诈骗罪、非国家工作人员受贿罪，决定执行有期徒刑19年，并处罚金人民币280万元。 同时，法院责令被告单位广州益海对被害单位安徽华文国际经贸股份有限公司（以下简称"安徽华文"）的经济损失人民币18.81 亿元与云南惠嘉进出口有限公司（以下简称"云南惠嘉"）承担共同退赔责任。 值得一提的是，今年前三季度，金龙鱼净利润合计27.49 亿元，去年全年，公司净利润为25.02 亿元。此次《刑事判决书》涉及 的18.81亿元经济损失，约占金龙鱼去年全年净利润的近七成。 金龙鱼在公告中表示，广州益海当庭已提出上诉，广州益海与公司均不认可一审判决，公司亦会依法全力支持广州益海上诉。 合同诈骗"罗生门" 事情要从2024年1月12日金龙鱼发 ...

Core Insights - The overall ESG management level in the agricultural industry is moderate, with a normal distribution of ESG practice scores peaking in the 0.55-0.60 range, indicating a "middle large, two ends small" distribution characteristic [1] - Leading sectors include agricultural services and dairy, with companies like Jinlongyu (300999), COFCO Sugar (600737), China Shengmu (000048), and Jingji Zhino (000048) setting benchmarks for ESG leadership [1] - 41% of companies are in the excellent stage of ESG integration, while 38% are in the proactive stage, 17% in the development stage, and 4% in the initial stage [1] ESG Performance Analysis - Companies show uneven performance across key ESG issues, with water and marine resource management scoring highest in environmental topics, while biodiversity protection remains a common shortcoming [2] - In social issues, consumer rights protection is strong, but investment in rural revitalization is relatively insufficient and homogeneous [2] - Governance issues show strong performance in identifying and addressing sustainable risks, but stakeholder communication mechanisms and anti-competitive practices need significant improvement [2] Management Effectiveness - There is notable differentiation in management effectiveness among sample companies, with leading firms establishing standardized ESG management systems, while many small and medium enterprises struggle with goal quantification and process standardization [2] - The dairy industry exhibits stricter food safety and quality regulations compared to other sectors, aided by centralized regulation and high industry concentration [2] - Overall, companies show structural differences in risk coverage, opportunity capture, and long-term impact identification, with a weak capacity for green transformation and long-term ecological and social impact recognition [2] ESG Value Accounting - The research introduces ESG value accounting in the agricultural sector, analyzing 153 agricultural listed companies based on industry risk characteristics and business exposure [2][4] Industry Trends - The number and proportion of companies creating positive ESG impacts are on the rise across four categories: agriculture, liquor, dairy, and food processing, with respective positive impact proportions of approximately 30%, 14%, 30%, and 20% [4] - In agriculture, carbon emission intensity is decreasing, with over 80% of companies showing effective greenhouse gas management [4] - The liquor industry has a 14% positive impact rate, with decreasing environmental and resource usage intensity [4] - In the dairy sector, harmful solid waste emission intensity is declining, with about 60% of companies showing ESG opportunities [4] - The food processing industry has nearly 70% of companies generating positive social impacts, with over 40% showing ESG opportunities [4] Recommendations for Improvement - The report suggests three core recommendations: encourage leading enterprises to build ESG collaborative mechanisms, develop common industry indicators and efficient data collection tools, and enhance ESG performance orientation in fiscal subsidies and green credit policies to support small and medium enterprises [5]

智通财经11月19日讯（记者 吴蔚玲）时隔近两年，金龙鱼下属子公司益海（广州）粮油工业有限 公司（下称"广州益海"）被刑事起诉迎来一审判决。法院裁定广州益海构成合同诈骗罪从犯，但广州益 海对此并不认可，并当庭提出上诉，金龙鱼则表示依法全力支持广州益海上诉。 今日晚间，金龙鱼发布公告，广州益海收到淮北市中级人民法院的《刑事判决书》。一审判决结果 显示，广州益海构成合同诈骗罪，系从犯，判处罚金100万元。对安徽华文国际经贸股份有限公司（下 称"安徽华文"）的经济损失18.81亿元，广州益海与云南惠嘉进出口有限公司（下称"云南惠嘉"）承担 共同退赔责任。 2024年1月12日，金龙鱼曾披露，广州益海被淮北市人民检察院提起公诉。《起诉书》认为，2008 年到2014年期间，广州益海作为中转仓储方，与安徽华文和云南惠嘉签订《中转协议书》，负责储存安 徽华文代理云南惠嘉进口的棕榈油。检查机关认为，广州益海在此期间配合云南惠嘉及其负责人张利华 等人实施合同诈骗犯罪，构成合同诈骗罪的帮助犯。 金龙鱼表示，根据本案开庭时查明的事实，在安徽华文与云南惠嘉违规从事融资性贸易过程中，云 南惠嘉通过长期行贿"被害人"安徽华文高管及员工 ...

Core Viewpoint - The subsidiary of Golden Dragon Fish, Guangzhou Yihai, has been convicted of contract fraud and fined 1 million yuan, while the company plans to appeal the decision [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Guangzhou Yihai was found guilty of contract fraud as a secondary offender and was sentenced to a fine of 1 million yuan [1]. - The individual defendant, Liu Degang, received a 19-year prison sentence and a fine of 2.8 million yuan for contract fraud and bribery [1]. - The court ordered Guangzhou Yihai to jointly compensate the victim, Anhui Huawen, for economic losses amounting to 1.881 billion yuan [1]. Group 2: Company Position - Golden Dragon Fish asserts that Guangzhou Yihai did not participate in any fraudulent activities and was unaware of any wrongdoing [4]. - The company claims that all transactions were conducted with proper authorization and at market prices, thus not constituting contract fraud [4]. - Legal experts have been consulted, and they unanimously agree that Guangzhou Yihai does not constitute contract fraud [4]. Group 3: Financial Performance - For the first three quarters of 2025, Golden Dragon Fish reported a revenue of 184.27 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 5.02% [5]. - The net profit attributable to shareholders was 2.749 billion yuan, reflecting a significant year-on-year growth of 92.06% [5]. - The adjusted net profit was 2.017 billion yuan, showing a remarkable increase of 745.88% year-on-year [5]. Group 4: Market Information - As of November 19, Golden Dragon Fish's stock price was 32.74 yuan per share, with a total market capitalization of 177.5 billion yuan [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The subsidiary of the company, Guangzhou Yihai, has been convicted of contract fraud and fined 1 million yuan, while the company plans to appeal the decision [2][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The court ruled that Guangzhou Yihai was an accomplice in contract fraud, resulting in a fine of 1 million yuan and a joint compensation responsibility for economic losses amounting to 1.881 billion yuan with another entity [2][4]. - The individual involved, Liu Degang, received a 19-year prison sentence and a fine of 2.8 million yuan for contract fraud and bribery [2][4]. Group 2: Company Defense - The company asserts that Guangzhou Yihai did not participate in any fraudulent activities and was unaware of any wrongdoing, claiming that all transactions were conducted with proper authorization and at market prices [4][5]. - Legal experts have been consulted, and they unanimously agree that Guangzhou Yihai does not constitute contract fraud, supporting the company's decision to appeal the ruling [5]. Group 3: Financial Performance - For the first three quarters of 2025, the company reported a revenue of 184.27 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 5.02%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 2.749 billion yuan, reflecting a significant year-on-year growth of 92.06% [5].

人民财讯11月19日电，金龙鱼（300999）11月19日公告，11月19日，公司下属子公司广州益海收到淮北 市中级人民法院作出的(2024)皖06刑初3号一审《刑事判决书》，淮北市中级人民法院的一审判决结果 如下：1、被告单位广州益海构成合同诈骗罪，系从犯，判处罚金100万元；2、被告人柳德刚构成合同 诈骗罪、非国家工作人员受贿罪，决定执行有期徒刑19年，并处罚金280万元；3、责令被告单位广州益 海对被害单位安徽华文的经济损失18.81亿元与云南惠嘉承担共同退赔责任；被告人柳德刚的违法所得 依法予以追缴，上缴国库。广州益海不认可一审判决，并当庭提出上诉，公司亦会依法全力支持广州益 海上诉。 ...