证券代码：300999 证券简称：金龙鱼 公告编号：2025-046 益海嘉里金龙鱼食品集团股份有限公司 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确和完 整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 关于2026年度日常关联交易预计的公告 一、日常关联交易基本情况 （一）日常关联交易概述 益海嘉里金龙鱼食品集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）根据公司业务 发展及日常经营的需要，2026 年度预计将与关联方发生的日常关联交易总额不 超过 668.30 亿元人民币，关联交易主要内容包括采购商品与服务、销售商品、 提供劳务或服务。 公司于 2025 年 11 月 27 日召开的第三届董事会第八次会议审议通过了《关 于 2026 年度日常关联交易预计的议案》的两个子议案，其中：以 5 票同意、0 票反对、0 票弃权的表决结果审议通过了《关于公司与丰益国际有限公司及其子 公司 2026 年度日常关联交易预计的议案》，关联董事 Kuok Khoon Hong（郭孔 丰）、Pua Seck Guan（潘锡源）、穆彦魁、Tong Shao Ming（唐绍明）已对此议 案回避表决；以 3 票同意、0 票反对、0 票弃权的表 ...

证券代码：300999 证券简称：金龙鱼 公告编号：2025-040 益海嘉里金龙鱼食品集团股份有限公司 一、召开会议的基本情况 1、股东大会届次：2025 年第一次临时股东大会 2、会议召集人：董事会 3、会议召开的合法、合规性：公司第三届董事会第八次会议审议通过《关 于召开 2025 年第一次临时股东大会的议案》。本次股东大会的召集、召开符合 有关法律、行政法规、部门规章、规范性文件和《公司章程》等相关规定。 4、会议召开时间 （1）现场会议召开时间：2025 年 12 月 19 日（星期五）下午 15:00 （2）网络投票时间： 通过深圳证券交易所（以下简称"深交所"）交易系统进行网络投票的具体 时间为：2025 年 12 月 19 日上午 9:15-9:25，9:30-11:30，下午 13:00-15:00； 关于召开2025年第一次临时股东大会的通知 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确和完 整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 根据《中华人民共和国公司法》和《益海嘉里金龙鱼食品集团股份有限公司 章程》（以下简称"《公司章程》"）的有关规定，经益海嘉里金龙鱼食品集团 股份有限公司 ...

证券代码：300999 证券简称：金龙鱼 公告编号：2025-049 益海嘉里金龙鱼食品集团股份有限公司 第三届监事会第七次会议决议公告 本公司及监事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确和完 整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、监事会会议召开情况 益海嘉里金龙鱼食品集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）第三届监事会 第七次会议于 2025 年 11 月 27 日以通讯表决方式召开。会议通知已于 2025 年 11 月 21 日以电子邮件方式送达各位监事。本次会议由监事会主席张建新召集， 会议应出席监事 3 人，实际出席监事 3 人，公司董事会秘书列席了本次会议。本 次会议的通知、召集、召开和表决程序符合《中华人民共和国公司法》（以下简 称"《公司法》"）和《益海嘉里金龙鱼食品集团股份有限公司章程》（以下简 称"《公司章程》"）的有关规定。 二、监事会会议审议情况 1、审议通过《关于 2026 年度对外担保额度预计的议案》。 公司本次拟新增的对外担保额度为 347.37 亿元人民币（或等值外币），其 中为资产负债率大于等于 70%的子公司提供担保额度为 334.99 亿元人民币（或 等值外币），为资产 ...

益海嘉里金龙鱼食品集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）第三届董事会 第八次会议于 2025 年 11 月 27 日以通讯表决方式召开。会议通知已于 2025 年 11 月 21 日以电子邮件方式送达各位董事。本次会议由董事长 Kuok Khoon Hong （郭孔丰）召集，会议应出席董事 9 人，实际出席董事 9 人，公司全体监事、全 体高级管理人员列席了本次会议。本次会议的通知、召集、召开和表决程序符合 《中华人民共和国公司法》（以下简称"《公司法》"）和《益海嘉里金龙鱼食 品集团股份有限公司章程》（以下简称"《公司章程》"）的有关规定。 二、董事会会议审议情况 1、审议通过《关于 2026 年度向银行及其他金融机构申请融资额度预计的议 案》。 董事会同意公司及子公司拟向银行及其他金融机构申请综合授信额度，授信 额度在 2026 年度（2026 年 1 月 1 日至 2026 年 12 月 31 日）内可循环使用，决 议在 2026 年度内有效。如单笔融资的存续期超过了决议的有效期，则决议的有 效期自动顺延至单笔融资终止时止。公司及各子公司的实际授信额度可相互调剂。 公司在银行及其他金融机构处实际获得的未偿 ...

因称金龙鱼"运油以后连清洗都不清洗"，湖北前首富兰世立日前被判向金龙鱼公开道歉，而后突然"翻脸"向金龙鱼宣战。 11月25日晚，金龙鱼母公司益海嘉里在官方账号发布声明回应此事，否认兰世立对其隐匿收款的指控，并称将视情况采取法律手段。 南都·湾财社记者注意到，兰世立此前召开新闻发布会，称已向上海市浦东新区人民法院递交了对金龙鱼的起诉书。 对此，11月25日，益海嘉里相关负责人回应南都·湾财社记者称，目前公司还没有接到任何法院通知，公司将依法维护公司的合法权益。11月25日，记者 再次尝试联系采访兰世立，截至发稿前未得到回应。 兰世立公开道歉后又"翻脸"称不服 益海嘉里认为兰世立仍然发布不实言论 兰世立与金龙鱼的纠纷始于2024年。 当年7月11日，兰世立发布了标题为《武汉用油罐车运食油的事太离谱了！》的视频，称"金龙鱼两天之内跌了6500亿""你以为为了省两个成本干了这种事 情没有报应""运油以后连清洗都不清洗""金龙鱼第一个就该退市"等，被益海嘉里告上了法庭，后经一审、二审判决，兰世立均败诉，被认定侵犯了益海 嘉里的名誉权。 今年11月11日，兰世立发布道歉声明称，现经法院调查，上述言论均与事实不符。兰世立承 ...

（文/解红娟 编辑/张广凯） 兰世立公开宣战五天后，金龙鱼决定进行反击。 11月25日深夜，益海嘉里通过官方微信号发布《关于兰世立先生相关不实言论的声明》（以下简称"《声明》"），针对兰世立在其多个自媒体账号上发布大 量与我司有关的不实言论进行公开澄清。 《声明》首先从此前的法律判决结果切入，表明法院已认定兰世立言论侵权。上海市浦东新区法院及上海市第一中级人民法院的判决共同认定，兰世立于 2024年7月11日在其自媒体账号上发布的视频侵犯了益海嘉里的权益，判令兰世立公开道歉、消除影响并支付30700元。 针对兰世立质疑金龙鱼玩弄法律游戏这一说法，《声明》详细说明了判决执行过程，强调其合法合规。《声明》指出，判决生效后，兰世立先生未按期履 行，法院依法强制执行冻结了兰世立先生一个银行账户中的30700元，后兰世立先生支付了10万元并进行了公开道歉，法院于2025年11月10日解除了冻结。 我司于11月18日将其多付的款项69300元退回。 此外，对于兰世立11月20日召开新闻发布会公开宣战一事，《声明》指出，兰世立在发布会上声称没有收到其多付的款项、法院冻结其全部银行账户、并仍 未解冻等相关不实言论，严重侵犯了 ...

Core Viewpoint - The dispute between former Hubei billionaire Lan Shili and Jinlongyu (Golden Dragon Fish) has escalated from a defamation case into a complex legal battle involving execution procedures and public statements [3][25]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - The conflict originated from a video posted by Lan Shili in July 2024, where he accused Jinlongyu of improper practices, claiming that the company lost 650 billion in two days and should be the first to delist [3][4]. - Jinlongyu's parent company, Yihai Kerry, sued Lan for defamation, leading to a court ruling that found Lan guilty of infringement, requiring him to apologize and pay 30,700 yuan [8][9]. Group 2: Developments in the Legal Proceedings - On November 20, 2025, Lan held a press conference claiming that despite transferring 100,000 yuan to Jinlongyu, his account was still frozen due to the company's application for enforcement [4][6]. - Yihai Kerry stated that the enforcement was lawful, as Lan did not comply with the court's ruling in a timely manner, and they later returned the excess payment of 69,300 yuan after unfreezing his account [9][11]. Group 3: Public Statements and Reactions - Both parties have issued conflicting statements, with Jinlongyu accusing Lan of spreading false information regarding the refund and account status, while Lan insists that he fulfilled his payment obligations [7][10]. - Lan provided evidence of his payment and claimed that the enforcement action taken by Jinlongyu was unjustified, suggesting that the company concealed the receipt of his payment [14][22]. Group 4: Legal Implications and Future Actions - The case has raised questions about the execution of court orders, particularly regarding the distinction between monetary compensation and the obligation to apologize [24][25]. - Lan has indicated plans to appeal to the Shanghai High Court, suggesting that the legal battle is far from over [25].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal dispute between Lan Shili, a former billionaire from Hubei, and Jinlongyu (Golden Dragon Fish) has escalated from a defamation case into a complex legal battle involving execution procedures and public statements [2][28]. Group 1: Incident Background - The conflict began in July 2024 when Lan Shili posted a video claiming that Jinlongyu was using oil tankers to transport cooking oil, leading to a significant drop in the company's market value by 650 billion [2][3]. - Jinlongyu's parent company, Yihai Kerry, filed a lawsuit against Lan for defamation, resulting in a court ruling that mandated Lan to apologize and pay 30,700 yuan [3][8]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings and Statements - Following the court's decision, Lan Shili claimed to have transferred 100,000 yuan to Jinlongyu, but the company still sought enforcement of the judgment, freezing his accounts [5][6]. - Yihai Kerry issued a statement asserting that the execution process was lawful and that Lan had not complied with the court's order in a timely manner, leading to the account freeze [11][12]. Group 3: Discrepancies and Reactions - Both parties have made conflicting statements regarding the execution of the court's ruling, with Lan accusing Jinlongyu of deceit and Yihai Kerry denying any wrongdoing [9][25]. - Legal experts noted that the case involves two types of obligations: monetary compensation and the act of public apology, suggesting that the freezing of assets may not be a standard response for failure to apologize [27][28]. Group 4: Future Developments - Lan Shili plans to appeal to the Shanghai High People's Court, indicating that the dispute is far from resolved and may continue to attract public and legal scrutiny [28].

Core Viewpoint - The company Jinlongyu (Yihai Kerry) has received a first-instance criminal judgment regarding its subsidiary Guangzhou Yihai's involvement in a contract fraud case, leading to a fine and shared compensation responsibility for significant economic losses [2][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Guangzhou Yihai was found to be an accomplice in a contract fraud case involving Anhui Huawen International Trade Co., Ltd. and Yunnan Huijia Import and Export Co., Ltd., resulting in a fine of 1 million yuan and a joint compensation responsibility for 1.881 billion yuan in economic losses [3]. - The case originated from palm oil import business activities between 2008 and 2014, where Guangzhou Yihai was accused of assisting in the forgery of documents and inventory checks [3]. - The company has expressed its disagreement with the judgment and has filed an appeal, asserting that it did not participate in any fraudulent activities [3][4]. Group 2: Company Position - Jinlongyu emphasized that all transactions were conducted with proper authorization from Anhui Huawen and that the losses were due to internal collusion between Anhui Huawen's employees and Yunnan Huijia [3]. - The chairman of Guangzhou Yihai stated that the company will defend its legal rights through the appeal process and highlighted that storage companies should not bear the consequences of financing trade failures [4].

Core Viewpoint - Yihai Kerry Foods Marketing Co., Ltd. issued a statement regarding false statements made by Lan Shili, emphasizing the legal actions taken against him for defamation [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Court Rulings - The Shanghai Pudong New Area Court and the Shanghai First Intermediate People's Court ruled that Lan Shili's statements on July 11, 2024, infringed on the company's rights, ordering him to publicly apologize, eliminate the impact, and pay 30,700 yuan [2]. - Following the court's ruling, Lan Shili failed to comply, leading to the freezing of 30,700 yuan in one of his bank accounts, which was later resolved when he paid 100,000 yuan and issued a public apology [2]. - The company refunded the excess payment of 69,300 yuan to Lan Shili after the court lifted the freeze on November 10, 2025 [2]. Group 2: Continued Misrepresentation - Despite receiving the refund, Lan Shili held a press conference on November 20, 2025, where he made further false claims regarding the payment and the status of his bank accounts, which severely infringed on the company's legal rights [3]. - The company will continue to monitor Lan Shili's actions and may take legal measures to protect its legitimate rights [4].