近日，中印高层互动频繁，两国关系呈现回暖迹象。印度外长苏杰生六年来首次访华，中国外长王毅随后回访印度并 会见莫迪总理，双方在边境问题、稀土出口等敏感议题上取得了更多共识。在这一背景下，莫迪即将访华参加上合组 织天津峰会，成为七年来其对中国的首次访问，引发国际社会广泛关注。 值得注意的是，此次访问正值美印关系因关税问题陷入紧张之际。美国对印度商品加征高达50%的关税，包括对购买 俄罗斯石油的印度商品额外征税，引发印度各界强烈不满。 Chinial Researc Foundat 作为中国驻印度最高外交代表，徐大使的言论既是对美国单边主义政策的批评，也是对印度维护自身权益的支持。印 度媒体敏锐地捕捉到这一信号，认为这预示着中印两国可能在应对美国贸易保护主义方面找到更多共同语言。 中国驻印度大使徐飞洪在公开论坛上的表态格外引人注目。他直指美国为"恶霸"，批评其滥用关税作为谈判筹码，违 背世贸组织原则，并明确表示中国将"坚定地与印度站在一起"。 首页 / 新闻 / 印度 沉默只会让恶霸感到大胆：中国大使对 美国关税 中国驻印度大使徐飞鸿表示,中国与印度站在一起,并指责 美国"利用关税作为讨价还价还价,要求高昂的价格" ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent developments in U.S.-China trade relations, particularly focusing on President Trump's request for China to increase soybean imports from the U.S. by four times, amidst ongoing tariff negotiations and trade tensions [1][3]. Group 1: U.S.-China Soybean Trade Dynamics - Trump requested China to increase soybean imports from the U.S. to address a supply gap and reduce the trade deficit, framing it as a win-win situation [1][3]. - In 2016, China imported 40% of its soybeans from the U.S., but this figure dropped to 21% by 2024 due to deteriorating U.S.-China relations and retaliatory tariffs [3][5]. - The U.S. imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese goods citing the "fentanyl" issue, leading China to retaliate with tariffs on U.S. agricultural products, further diminishing soybean trade [3][5]. Group 2: China's Import Preferences - If China were to increase U.S. soybean imports as Trump suggested, over 80% of its soybean imports would come from the U.S., contradicting its risk diversification strategy [5]. - The cost of Brazilian soybeans is approximately 15% lower than U.S. soybeans post-tariff, making Brazil a more attractive supplier for China [5]. - Brazil's President Lula reached out to China to reinforce cooperation and express concerns over the potential impact of U.S. soybean imports on Brazil's market position [5][7]. Group 3: China-Brazil Relations - China expressed support for Brazil in its trade disputes with the U.S., emphasizing the need for countries to unite against unilateralism and protectionism [7]. - The collaboration between China and Brazil is positioned as a counterbalance to U.S. trade policies, with both countries advocating for mutual interests in the agricultural sector [7].

Group 1 - Europe should deepen cooperation with China in areas such as green transition, technological innovation, digital economy, and industrial upgrading to build a more resilient autonomous development capability and promote a more balanced multipolar structure [1][3] - The U.S. unilateral tariff measures will directly impact European exports, leading to continuous outflow of industrial capital to the U.S. market, resulting in job losses and a decline in domestic demand, accelerating Europe's deindustrialization process [3] Group 2 - China has the confidence and capability to respond to U.S. unilateral tariff measures, with a rising proportion of exports to markets outside the U.S. and a booming domestic consumption market [2] - China's strategic ability to safeguard national interests is strengthened, focusing on self-innovation and expanding consumption demand while promoting agricultural modernization and urban-rural integration [2]

美国大豆产业正承受前所未有的打击。失去中国市场份额后，大量大豆积压在仓库，加工企业开工率不足，整个产业链陷入停滞。美国农业部报告显示，过 去两年美国大豆库存同比增长超过 30%，部分产区甚至出现仓储设施不足的情况。 美国农民的处境更为艰难。收入较关税战前锐减，许多家庭难以偿还农场贷款。美国农场局统计，仅去年一年，美国农场破产数量同比上升 15%。尽管政 府推出补贴政策，但补贴金额远不足以弥补市场流失带来的损失，且这种输血式的救助无法从根本上解决问题。特朗普曾提出让中国将大豆订单增加三倍， 以此削减贸易逆差。这一提议忽略了市场规律和中国的实际需求，显得不切实际。中国早已与巴西等国建立起稳定的供应链，从种植、运输到加工的全链条 合作日趋成熟，不会因外部压力轻易改变采购策略。 中国作为全球最大的大豆进口国，每年需求量巨大。美国加征关税后，中国开始重新评估供应链安全，将采购重心转向巴西。数据显示，在关键的 9 月采购 期，中国从南美锁定的大豆订单约 800 万吨；10 月这一数字虽降至约 400 万吨，但来源仍以巴西为主。美国大豆在传统销售旺季被明显冷落，巴西则借此 机会巩固了在全球大豆贸易中的地位。 据路透社消息， ...

Group 1 - The report reveals that American-style human rights have been distorted into tools for political spectacle and chips in the power casino, deviating from the core values and essential requirements of human rights [1] - The report highlights that in 2024, which was supposed to be a key year for American citizens to exercise political rights, money controls politics, political manipulation of the judiciary occurs, election rules suppress voters, and political violence is rampant, leading to widespread disappointment among the American public regarding American democracy [1] - The report indicates that high inflation exacerbates the wealth gap in the U.S., with low- and middle-income families facing catastrophic impacts, and the number of homeless individuals reaching new highs [1] Group 2 - The report emphasizes that racial discrimination is rampant in the U.S., with systemic discrimination against minority groups in various aspects of life, and environmental racism raising new concerns [1][2] - The report states that workplace gender discrimination has significantly expanded, with persistent issues of sexual assault across multiple fields, and domestic violence worsening [2] - The report points out that the humanitarian crisis at the U.S. border continues to deteriorate, with immigrants facing torture and inhumane treatment, and many immigrant children being exploited and enslaved [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article critiques Trump's recent global tax agreements, highlighting the immediate negative repercussions from the labor market, the Federal Reserve, and international relations, suggesting that unilateral actions will ultimately backfire [3][5][7]. Group 1: Labor Market Impact - The U.S. labor market showed disappointing job growth with only 19,000 jobs added in May and 14,000 in June, which is significantly low for a country with over 300 million people [3]. - The stock market reacted negatively to these labor statistics, with the Dow Jones dropping 542 points and the Nasdaq falling 472 points [3]. Group 2: Federal Reserve Response - The Federal Reserve, led by Jerome Powell, has resisted pressure to lower interest rates despite Trump's calls for action, indicating a lack of alignment between the administration's fiscal policies and the Fed's monetary strategy [5]. - The article suggests that Trump's global tax strategy could lead to inflation and economic instability, which the Fed is unwilling to support through rate cuts [5]. Group 3: International Relations - Russia's response to U.S. military posturing indicates a potential escalation in tensions, with Medvedev stating that the U.S. is pushing towards the brink of war [5]. - The article emphasizes that Trump's approach to international trade and taxation is misguided, viewing it as a zero-sum game rather than a mutually beneficial arrangement [5][7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of U.S. tariffs on soybean imports from China, highlighting a significant shift in China's sourcing from the U.S. to Brazil due to price competitiveness and trade policies [1][3][29]. Group 1: U.S.-China Soybean Trade Dynamics - Trump has urged China to increase soybean orders from the U.S. by four times, but recent reports indicate that China has sourced all its September and October soybean needs from Brazil and other South American countries, leaving U.S. suppliers empty-handed [3][5]. - The U.S. soybean import tariff to China has reached 23%, making U.S. soybeans significantly more expensive compared to Brazilian soybeans, which are approximately 200 yuan per ton cheaper [5][12]. - China's soybean imports from the U.S. have drastically decreased from 30 million tons in 2016 to an estimated 22.13 million tons in 2024, while imports from Brazil surged from 11.65 million tons to 74.65 million tons in the same period [7][25]. Group 2: Competitive Advantages of Brazilian Soybeans - Brazilian soybeans are favored due to lower production costs and stable supply, enhanced by a currency swap agreement with China that allows transactions without using U.S. dollars [10][12]. - Brazil's soybean production exceeds 160 million tons annually, ensuring a reliable supply to meet China's demands, while U.S. soybean quality has declined, failing to meet the increasing demand for high-protein soybeans in China [10][12]. - The efficiency of Brazilian ports has improved significantly, with a 48% increase in the number of vessels unloading Brazilian soybeans at Ningbo-Zhoushan port compared to the previous year [12]. Group 3: Economic Impact on U.S. Farmers - The U.S. soybean export value to China is projected to drop by at least several billion dollars due to the current trade dynamics, with soybean prices falling from $13-$15 per bushel in 2023 to around $9 [14][20]. - The financial strain on U.S. farmers is evident, with many facing bankruptcy risks and significant losses in income, affecting local economies reliant on agricultural revenue [16][18]. - The increase in tariffs has led to a rise in costs for agricultural machinery and fertilizers, further exacerbating the financial challenges faced by U.S. farmers [20][22]. Group 4: China's Strategic Shift in Soybean Sourcing - China is diversifying its soybean import sources to enhance food security, with projections indicating that by 2024, 71% of its soybean imports will come from Brazil, while only 21% will be from the U.S. [25][27]. - The Chinese government is also investing in domestic soybean production, aiming to increase output from 20.65 million tons in 2024 to 23 million tons by 2025 through various initiatives [25][27]. - The development of non-GMO soybean futures by the Dalian Commodity Exchange positions China as a global pricing center for non-GMO soybeans, reflecting a strategic move to gain control over its agricultural supply chain [27][29].

Group 1 - The G7 summit in June 2025 highlighted the economic tensions between the US and Europe, particularly regarding the proposed 200% tariffs on Chinese goods linked to Russian energy purchases, which left European leaders in silence due to their economic dependencies [1][3][5] - Europe’s economic reliance on China is significant, with trade volumes reaching $785.8 billion in 2024, making China a crucial market for major European economies like Germany, France, and Italy [3][5] - The proposed tariffs would severely impact European industries, particularly the German automotive sector, which relies heavily on Chinese sales, and the French luxury goods market, which is significantly dependent on Chinese consumers [5][11] Group 2 - The US has a history of exerting economic pressure on Europe, as seen in the 2025 tariff negotiations that resulted in a $1.3 trillion investment commitment from the EU and a $750 billion purchase of US energy, leading to a decline in trust among European nations [7][9] - European leaders are increasingly cautious of US unilateralism, with France and Germany expressing the need for Europe to maintain its independence and not become a pawn in US strategies [9][11] - In response to US pressures, Europe is strengthening ties with China, exemplified by a significant agreement on electric vehicle tariffs and ongoing high-level visits to enhance bilateral cooperation in various sectors [11][13] Group 3 - The silence from European leaders at the G7 summit signifies a rejection of US unilateralism and reflects a shift in the global economic landscape, where emerging economies are also moving towards a more multipolar approach [13][15] - The challenge for Europe lies in balancing its security reliance on the US with its economic ties to China, as any aggressive tariff actions from the US could provoke substantial retaliatory measures from Europe targeting key US industries [15]

Core Points - The event commemorated the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War [1] - The Chinese Consul General emphasized China's significant contribution to the victory in the global anti-fascist struggle, highlighting the long duration and early start of the Chinese resistance [1] - The event underscored the importance of international cooperation and dialogue in addressing global challenges and maintaining peace [1] Summary of Related Content - The photo exhibition showcased dozens of images reflecting the struggles of the Chinese people against Japanese invaders, open to the public until September 30 [2]

2025.08. 16 本文字数：1354，阅读时长大约3分钟 作者 | 第一财经 冯迪凡 据悉，中国在世贸组织（WTO）就加拿大钢铁等产品进口限制措施提起诉讼。 据商务部信息显示，当地时间7月16日，加拿大财政部网站发布公告，表示为应对美国钢铁关税和全 球钢铁产能过剩，自8月1日起，将扩大进口钢铁关税配额适用范围、收紧现有配额，对配额外进口 征收附加税。此外，将对自美国以外国家进口的含有在中国熔化和浇铸钢铁的产品征收25%的附加 税。 对此，商务部新闻发言人在7月18日表示，加方以保护本国产业为由，宣布采取对含有中国钢铁成分 的产品加征关税等单边措施，有关做法违反WTO规则，扰乱国际贸易秩序，损害中方利益，是典型 的单边主义、保护主义行径。 商务部新闻发言人还表示，事实上，造成加国内钢铁产业遭遇困境的主要原因是美国的单边关税措 施，但加政府却回避主要矛盾，还试图将产业损害转嫁给包括中国在内的其他贸易伙伴。加方做法于 理不合、于法无据、于事无补，将严重损害中加两国正常经贸合作。 商务部发言人还表示，中方希望加方从维护多边贸易体制、维护中加经贸关系大局出发，立即纠正错 误做法，停止限制措施。中方将采取一切必要措 ...