在当前市场环境以及未来很长时间，主动权益基金依然会有不错的超额收益，但是这类基金也存在一些缺点。 我们来认识这些缺点并非全盘否定主动权益基金的价值，而是为了全面认识它们，并建立更理性的投资框架。 一、业绩魔咒：难以持续的辉煌 主动权益基金的业绩依赖基金经理的投资风格与市场风格的匹配，受市场风格轮动的因素影响，绝大多数基金无法连续跑赢市场。 最典型的现象是"冠军魔咒"，一旦市场风格切换，业绩会迅速变脸。而追逐冠军，是普通投资者最大的陷阱之一。 二、基金经理的个体风险 主动基金的核心是基金经理，他的投资理念、能力圈、情绪控制甚至身体健康状况都直接影响基金业绩。 离职风险：优秀的基金经理是稀缺资源，可能被挖角、跳槽或"公奔私"。 风格漂移：有些基金经理为了短期排名压力，可能会去追逐市场热点。 三、基金公司与投资者利益错位 基金公司收入源于管理费（规模驱动），与投资者追求的净值增长目标并不完全一致。 这可能导致公司更追求扩大规模，而非尽全力提高投资者的绝对回报。 极少数情况下，还会出现抬轿子和老鼠仓的问题。 抬轿子：在同一个公司内部，用其他基金为旗下的"明星基金"拉升股价，美化其业绩。 老鼠仓：基金经理可能利用未公开 ...

以下文章来源于我画你财 ，作者我画你财 我画你财 . 告别枯燥理论，看图学习理财。 第一个坑： 冠军魔咒 基金圈有个怪象，某基金经理当年拿到第一后，就像受到了"诅咒"，很难再继续保持领先。 因为市场是周期轮动的，有时候金融板块涨的多，有时候科技涨的多，但不会有一个行业永远上涨。 而基金经理擅长的能力圈是固定的，冠军基金多是押对了当年风口，一旦市场风格切换，业绩难免回落。 ⚠️ 避坑攻略：选基金时，关注基金经理的长期业绩，千万别被短期排名迷了眼。 第二个坑： 挂羊头卖狗肉 ⚠️避坑攻略：买基金前，关注基金实际持仓以及持仓变化，避雷有风格漂移历史的基金经理。 第三个坑： 无效分散 很多新手热衷于跟着大V买基金，殊不知，被推送在首页的大V，多半买的都是最近的热门行业。 看似跟着5位大V买了5只不同的基金，实际5只基金都重仓同一行业，一旦该行业遇到风险，那么所有基金就会同步下跌，无法实现降低风险的目的。 ⚠️ 避坑攻略：真正有效的分散，不是名字或数量上的分散，而是底层资产的分散： 有些基金经理为了吸引客户，会在基金名称上蹭当下最火的行业和题材，但实际投资方向和名称毫不相关。 还有些基金在成立时，宣称投资某某赛道，但随 ...

此外，泰信基金旗下产品中，泰信汇鑫三个月定开债券、泰信智选量化选股混合发起式、泰信鑫瑞债券 发起式、泰信优势领航混合、泰信优势增长混合、泰信发展主题混合、泰信智选成长灵活配置混合、泰 信均衡价值混合与泰信互联网+主题混合规模均不足5000万元。 公司权益产品业绩则出现明显分化。同花顺数据显示，泰信医疗服务混合发起式A、泰信中小盘精选混 合、泰信鑫选混合A等近一年以及最近数年业绩较好且大幅超越同期基准收益率。而泰信发展主题混 合、泰信现代服务业混合、泰信均衡价值混合A、泰信景气驱动12个月持有期混合A等产品近年业绩不 佳：泰信现代服务业混合、泰信发展主题混合、泰信互联网+主题混合、泰信智选成长灵活配置混合A 等6只产品近两年收益率至少跑输同期基准20个百分点；黄潜轶管理的泰信现代服务业混合、泰信发展 主题混合近三年净值跌幅在50%左右，王博强旗下的泰信均衡价值混合A、泰信景气驱动12个月持有期 混合A、泰信先行策略混合等近3年净值跌幅超过20%。 【深圳商报讯】（记者 詹钰叶）泰信基金旗下产品业绩分化：泰信中小盘精选混合等基金长期收益向 好，也有部分权益产品近年业绩不佳并大幅跑输同期基准收益。公司旗下2只产品被 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the phenomenon of "style drift" in public funds, where several funds have deviated significantly from their stated investment themes, raising concerns in the market [1][11]. Fund Analysis - The Qianhai Kaiyuan Great Security Core Mixed Fund, despite being themed around "Great Security," shows a notable deviation in its actual holdings, which span various sectors including semiconductors, software development, aerospace equipment, insurance, and automotive parts [2][11]. - As of the second quarter of 2025, the fund's top ten holdings include companies like Jiehuate, Guiding Compass, and China Ping An, with a sector distribution of 45.31% in technology, 34.64% in manufacturing, and 16.86% in finance [2][3]. Investment Performance - The fund manager, Liu Hong, has achieved a total return of 53.27% since taking over the fund on August 8, 2022, with an annualized return of 14.80% [4]. - As of September 2025, the fund's performance over the past year reached 105.62%, with two-year and five-year returns of 87.02% and 81.70%, respectively, leading to a total return of 199.80% and an annualized return of 10.91% [5]. Trading Activity - The fund exhibits a highly aggressive investment style, with a turnover rate of 1143.55% in the first half of 2025 and 813.82% at the end of 2024, indicating frequent adjustments in its portfolio [7][8]. - This high turnover rate, combined with the deviation from its investment theme, raises questions about the sustainability and stability of its investment strategy [7]. Market Context - Liu Hong noted that the fund's performance was impacted by the imposition of reciprocal tariffs by the U.S. and China, leading to significant market fluctuations. However, subsequent negotiations and supportive domestic policies resulted in a rebound in A-shares [10]. - The fund's strategy focuses on mid-term performance trends of listed companies and industry trends, particularly in TMT (Technology, Media, and Telecommunications), non-bank financials, and machinery sectors [10]. Fund Characteristics - The fund has a scale of 153 million yuan, which, while not large, is stable and far from the liquidation threshold [11]. - The article serves as a warning to investors about the importance of scrutinizing a fund's actual holdings and investment logic rather than relying solely on its name, to avoid falling into the "style drift" trap [11].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the performance of military-themed funds, particularly focusing on the BoShi Military Theme A fund, which has shown impressive returns but raises concerns about its investment strategy and potential style drift due to significant holdings in AI chip stocks like Cambricon [1][3][11]. Fund Performance - As of September 4, 2023, 11 military-themed funds have achieved over 10% returns this year, with three exceeding 24%. BoShi Military Theme A leads with a return of 30.56%, followed closely by Changxin National Defense Military A at 30.42%, and Huaxia Military Security A at 24.68% [1][7]. - BoShi Military Theme A's total assets amount to 2.951 billion yuan, placing it in the mid-range among military-themed funds [9]. Investment Strategy - The fund manager, Zeng Peng, indicated a high allocation to the missile industry and maintained investments in sectors like military AI, drones, satellite industries, and information security [7][11]. - The fund's top ten holdings account for 63.25% of its net value, with over 30% in information technology stocks [7]. Holdings Analysis - Cambricon, an AI chip company, has become the fourth-largest holding in BoShi Military Theme A, with a market value of 200.3 million yuan, representing 6.79% of the fund's net value [4][5]. - In contrast, other top-performing military funds maintain a higher concentration in traditional military stocks, indicating a more focused investment strategy [7]. Institutional Investor Sentiment - Institutional ownership in BoShi Military Theme A is only 11.6%, significantly lower than other military funds, such as Huaxia Military Security A at 63.3% and Guotai Zhongzheng Military ETF at 61% [7][11]. Managerial Changes - The current fund manager, Zeng Peng, has a total return of -13.04% since taking over in June 2022, despite the fund's strong performance this year [9][11]. - The previous manager, Lan Dong, achieved a total return of 107.80% over nearly five years, indicating a stark contrast in performance and investment philosophy [9][11].

Core Viewpoint - The article aims to demystify the jargon associated with quantitative investing, making it more accessible to a broader audience [2]. Group 1: Key Concepts in Quantitative Investing - Beta represents the market's earnings, while Alpha refers to the excess returns earned beyond the market, also known as "excess returns" [5]. - Factors are elements that influence the price movements of a stock [9]. - Fundamental factors are a series of quantitative indicators based on a company's financial and operational data [13]. - Technical factors are quantitative indicators derived from market trading behavior data, such as historical prices, trading volumes, and positions [16]. - Alternative factors are constructed using non-traditional, non-financial alternative data [20]. - Industry deviation, also known as risk exposure, indicates the extent to which a product's industry allocation differs from its benchmark index [22]. - Style drift occurs when a quantitative product's holdings significantly deviate from the benchmark index, leading to a mismatch between actual investment style and declared investment strategy [27].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the phenomenon of "style drift" in public funds, particularly focusing on the Jiashi Green Theme Stock Fund, which has deviated significantly from its stated investment theme of environmental and low-carbon investments, concentrating instead on the semiconductor sector [1][7]. Fund Performance - Since its inception in February 2023, the Jiashi Green Theme Stock Fund has achieved a return of 45.76% in 2025 and 111.57% over the past year, ranking 25th out of 946 in the ordinary stock fund category [2]. - The fund's total return since inception is 27.64%, with an annualized return of 10.15%, outperforming its benchmark and the CSI 300 Index [2]. - The fund exhibits high volatility, with a maximum consecutive six-month return of -38.34%, indicating the risks associated with betting on a single sector [2]. Investment Strategy - Fund manager Cai Hongfeng emphasizes a focus on the semiconductor industry, particularly chip design, which is characterized by high beta attributes and significant performance elasticity during periods of high demand or new product cycles [4][5]. - The investment strategy is based on identifying "blockbuster" stocks using a quantitative model, which is misaligned with the fund's green theme [5]. Fund Structure and Investor Composition - The fund has a total size of 155 million yuan, but its actual strategy diverges significantly from its contractual obligations, raising compliance concerns regarding style drift [5]. - The proportion of institutional investors has decreased from 91.61% in mid-2023 to 35.32% in the 2024 annual report, indicating a declining appeal to institutional investors [5][6]. Conclusion - The Jiashi Green Theme Stock Fund serves as a typical case of "style drift" in thematic funds, presenting both opportunities and risks for investors, and raising questions about compliance and investor suitability in public fund management [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the performance issues of two funds under the Jiashi brand, specifically Jiashi Green Theme Stock A and Jiashi Cultural and Entertainment Stock A, which have been flagged for "style drift" and "punitive non-rating" due to significant deviations from their benchmarks in the second quarter [1][3][7]. Fund Performance - Jiashi Green Theme Stock A reported a net value growth rate of -1.11% in Q2, lagging its benchmark by 2.72 percentage points, resulting in a loss of 485,000 yuan for A shares and 4.77 million yuan for C shares [3]. - Jiashi Cultural and Entertainment Stock A achieved a net value growth rate of 8.94% in Q1, outperforming its benchmark by 3.87 percentage points, but its sector allocation showed a heavy concentration in technology, with 46.55% in information transmission and software services, while only 13.21% in cultural and entertainment sectors [5][11]. Investment Strategy - Jiashi Green Theme Stock A's strategy focuses on the semiconductor industry, with increased concentration in stocks like 澜起科技 and 思特威, leading to a significant style drift as it became heavily weighted in high-beta technology stocks [3][5]. - Jiashi Cultural and Entertainment Stock A's portfolio reflects a dual focus on technology and entertainment, with top holdings in semiconductor and media stocks, indicating a shift away from its stated theme [5][7]. Market Context - The overall market for active equity funds has shown a strong recovery, with over 98% of funds reporting positive returns year-to-date as of August 21, 2023, highlighting a broad market uptrend [1][8]. - Jiashi New Consumption Stock A, another fund, has underperformed with a return of -2.87%, indicating challenges in the consumer sector despite a general market rebound [8][11].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights a divergence in performance between actively managed equity funds and ETFs, where actively managed funds have outperformed in terms of returns, but ETFs have seen greater growth in scale [1][2][3] - The innovation drug sector has driven significant performance for both actively managed funds and ETFs, with a notable number of funds achieving double returns this year, particularly in the innovation drug theme [2][3] - Despite strong performance, actively managed funds have not attracted as much capital as ETFs, which have expanded significantly in scale, particularly in response to high-performing sectors like innovation drugs and humanoid robots [3][4] Group 2 - Data shows that 10 actively managed innovation drug funds had a total scale of only 9.4 billion yuan at the end of Q2, with a modest increase of 5.8 billion yuan during the quarter, while 7 ETFs saw an increase of 12.9 billion yuan, reaching a total scale of 28.4 billion yuan [3] - The rapid growth of ETFs is attributed to their passive tracking mechanism, which allows them to capture industry beta returns effectively, leading investors to prefer ETFs for quick exposure to high-growth sectors [4][5] - The management fees for ETFs are generally lower than those for actively managed funds, providing a cost and efficiency advantage that attracts investors, especially when returns are comparable [6][7] Group 3 - The increasing popularity of ETFs has pressured actively managed funds, as the latter struggle to attract new capital despite their strong performance, with many investors favoring the transparency and flexibility of ETFs [5][6] - The shift in focus towards passive investment strategies by fund companies further constrains the space for actively managed funds, as new ETF products are increasingly being launched in high-demand sectors [6][7] - The current trend indicates that ETFs are more appealing to investors compared to actively managed funds, prompting the latter to seek differentiated strategies for survival [7]

Macro Insights - The Caixin China Manufacturing PMI fell to 48.3 in May, marking the first contraction since October of the previous year, with production and new orders both dropping to their lowest levels since December 2022 and October 2022 respectively [3] - The OECD has revised down its global GDP growth forecast for 2025 to 2.9%, previously at 3.1%, and also lowered the 2026 forecast from 3.0% to 2.9% [4] Bond Market Insights - In May, the issuance of ETFs experienced a decline for the fourth consecutive month, with only 11.068 billion units issued, the lowest in five months, while bond funds dominated the market with a 55.07% share [6] Corporate Alerts - Longshan City Investment announced that its chairman is under investigation for serious violations of discipline and law [7] - The Shaanxi Xixian New Area Development Group has 70.399 billion yuan in restricted assets, accounting for 88.87% of its net assets, with overdue financing amounts reaching 443 million yuan [8] - Shenzhen Longguang Holdings announced that its restructuring and grace period proposals were not approved, with total debts of 27.8532 billion yuan as of April 30, 2025 [9] - The Qinhan New City project has generated only 8.1 million yuan in revenue against an expected 260.2 million yuan due to macroeconomic slowdown [10] - Wenzhou Public Utilities Group reported an increase in borrowings of 3.824 billion yuan, representing 29.52% of its net assets as of the end of the previous year [11] Stock Market Insights - The Shenzhen Component Index and ChiNext Index will undergo sample adjustments, effective June 16, with multiple stocks being added [13] - NIO reported a Q1 2025 adjusted net loss of 6.279 billion yuan, compared to a net loss of 4.903 billion yuan in the same period last year [15] Industry Alerts - The Ministry of Commerce responded to the EU's proposed restrictions on Chinese companies participating in public procurement for medical devices, condemning it as a discriminatory measure [36] - The National Federation of Industry and Commerce's automotive dealers' association called for a resistance against "involutionary" competition, particularly price wars [37] - The domestic refined oil prices have increased for the fourth time this year, with gasoline and diesel prices rising by 65 yuan and 60 yuan per ton respectively [39] - The China Coal Transportation and Marketing Association reported weak coal consumption since April, with high inventory levels and declining prices [40]