卢拉在美国《纽约时报》撰文：巴西民主与主权不容谈判 中新网9月15日电 当地时间9月14日，美国《纽约时报》发布了巴西总统卢拉发表的署名文章。卢拉表 示，巴西愿意与美国就任何能够互利互惠的议题进行谈判，但巴西的民主和主权不在谈判范围之内。 卢拉表示，"当美国背弃与巴西延续了200多年的关系时，所有人都会受损。两国政府在拥有共同目标的 领域开展合作，不应被任何意识形态差异阻碍。" 最后，卢拉指出，他对巴西和美国关系的看法是：两国能够相互尊重，并为两国人民的福祉进行合作。 资料图：巴西总统卢拉。 针对美国特朗普政府对巴西商品加征50%关税，卢拉表示，美国推动就业回流和再工业化无可厚非，但 对其他国家采取单边行动是"错误的药方"。 他批评道，美国对巴西加征关税是"被误导"和"不合逻辑"的。卢拉指出，过去15年，美国与巴西的双边 贸易累计顺差达4100亿美元，近75%的美国产品进入巴西时已免关税。 文章指出，美方举措背后缺乏经济依据，这表明其有政治动机。 卢拉援引美国高官的观点称，美政府正在利用关税和《马格尼茨基法案》为巴西前总统博索纳罗寻求豁 免。巴西联邦最高法院11日宣布，博索纳罗策划政变罪名成立，获刑27年零3 ...

Group 1: Challenges in Internationalization of Chinese Automotive Industry - The rise of regional integration and the trend of multi-center globalization will lead to increased fragmentation in industry standards, markets, and supply chains [2] - Trade protectionism is intensifying, with multiple countries imposing tariffs and raising technical standards, which undermines China's price advantage and increases compliance complexity [3] - The phenomenon of "involution" among Chinese brands may affect sustainable international expansion, potentially impacting supply chain quality and reducing trust among overseas consumers [4] Group 2: Data Cross-Border Issues - As the scale of Chinese automotive exports continues to grow, the competition over trade rules and digital economy regulations between China, the US, and Europe is intensifying, making data cross-border a critical issue for the automotive export industry [5] - There are currently about 146 countries that have enacted over 190 data security-related laws and regulations, with increasing demands for data localization and stricter compliance requirements [5] Group 3: Battery Recycling and Compliance - The rapid development of the new energy sector has positioned China as a leader in the lithium-ion battery industry, with manufacturing costs reduced to one-eighth of what they were a decade ago [7] - Many countries, particularly in Europe, are emphasizing the importance of battery recycling, with established regulatory frameworks that set clear requirements for recycling capacity and lithium recovery rates [7] Group 4: Intellectual Property Challenges - Despite the growth in automotive exports, China's intellectual property layout remains relatively lagging, with a noticeable increase in patent litigation against Chinese companies as export volumes rise [8] - The cost of intellectual property litigation can significantly impact profit margins, with estimates suggesting that the return on investment for intellectual property is approximately 1:10 [9] Group 5: Technical Barriers - The automotive industry faces complex and multi-dimensional technical certification barriers, especially under the trends of smart connectivity and new energy, requiring compliance with various standards [10] - New emerging barriers, such as ethical and green barriers, necessitate a comprehensive understanding of related industries to meet market entry requirements [12] Group 6: Logistics and Shipping Challenges - Roll-on/roll-off shipping remains the primary method for automotive exports, with 75% of vehicles shipped this way in the first half of the year, but domestic shipping capacity is still insufficient [13] - The number of Chinese roll-on/roll-off ships is limited, accounting for only 7.6% of the global fleet, which poses challenges for the growth of automotive exports [13] Group 7: Export Credit Insurance - Export credit insurance is a government-supported tool designed to assist domestic companies in expanding into international markets, particularly during challenging global economic conditions [14] - Companies are advised to consider various insurance products, including comprehensive export trade insurance and specific contract insurance for individual countries [14]

当下正值美国大豆收获季，美国农民却深陷焦虑。曾经的大豆进口大国中国迟迟未下订单，美国农民面临的形势愈发严 峻。美国豆农的销售情况异常艰难。因中国未下单，高达 1400 万至 1600 万吨的对华大豆订单无法落实，大量大豆积 压。豆农们望着堆积如山的大豆却找不到销路，心急如焚。 美国农民的绝望情绪日益浓烈。不少农民通过 TikTok 等平台喊话，试图引起关注。美国大豆协会主席在信中指出，农 户们正承受着极大的财务压力。一方面，大豆价格持续下跌，收入大幅缩水；另一方面，种植成本不断上涨，这一增一 减让农民苦不堪言。 对于当前困境，美国豆农期望强烈。他们纷纷敦促特朗普在贸易谈判时优先考虑大豆议题，希望早日恢复与中国的正常 贸易往来，让大豆有稳定销路。 未来中美农产品贸易走向充满不确定性。但从长远看，中美两国都是农业大国，在农产品领域有广阔的合作空间。只有 摒弃贸易保护主义，遵循市场规则，通过平等、互利的谈判，才能实现双方农业的共赢发展。 若美国能在贸易谈判中展现诚意，优先解决大豆贸易问题，恢复与中国的正常贸易往来，美国农民或许能摆脱销路困 境。而中国也会基于市场需求和公平原则，合理安排农产品进口。如此，中美农产品贸 ...

Group 1 - The recent U.S.-China trade tensions have escalated, particularly highlighted by Trump's call for NATO countries to impose tariffs on China, which he claims supports Russia in the Ukraine conflict [1][2] - Trump's approach of leveraging NATO for economic pressure is unprecedented, as NATO is primarily a military alliance, complicating the situation for European countries that rely on Russian energy [2][6] - The European Union has expressed concerns that sanctions and economic pressure will complicate the resolution of the conflict rather than simplify it [2][6] Group 2 - In response, China has initiated anti-dumping investigations into certain U.S. semiconductor imports, specifically targeting analog chips, which are not as advanced as high-end chips [4][6] - The investigation is based on a significant increase in import volume (37% from 2022 to 2024) and a substantial price drop (52%), indicating potential harm to China's domestic industry [4] - China has also launched a discrimination investigation against U.S. chip exports, claiming that U.S. export controls violate World Trade Organization principles [4][6] Group 3 - The atmosphere of the Madrid talks has shifted due to these developments, with both sides attempting to gain leverage before negotiations [6][8] - Trump's strategy appears to be more about domestic political performance rather than genuine negotiation, as he seeks to rally support by showcasing a tough stance against China [2][6] - The ongoing trade tensions are part of a broader pattern of U.S.-China friction, with potential implications for global trade dynamics and supply chain adjustments [8]

Group 1 - The upcoming high-level economic talks between China and the U.S. in Madrid will focus on three core issues: U.S. punitive tariffs, export control expansions, and TikTok ownership negotiations [3][5] - The tariff issue is critical as it relates to the U.S. "America First" trade policy initiated by the Trump administration, which has been a cornerstone of its trade strategy since April 2024 [5] - The U.S. has increasingly weaponized economic tools under the guise of national security, particularly in sectors like semiconductors and biotechnology, complicating negotiations on export controls [5][9] Group 2 - The TikTok ownership debate highlights the ideological and economic tensions in the digital economy, with both sides unlikely to compromise due to national pride and political considerations [7] - Recent trade data shows a stark contrast between China's overall trade growth of 5.9% and a 13% drop in U.S.-China trade, indicating a trend of economic decoupling [9] - The U.S. is attempting to form an anti-China tariff coalition, pressuring allies to impose significant tariffs on Chinese goods, while China is focusing on expanding domestic demand and enhancing its strategic positioning [11]

Group 1 - The Trump administration's unilateral tariff policy has faced widespread international opposition, particularly in the context of US-China trade relations, leading to a prolonged negotiation period [1] - The US has shifted to a more covert strategy, encouraging EU member states to impose tariffs on Chinese goods, with a recent proposal to impose punitive tariffs of up to 100% on Russian energy imports, indirectly targeting China [1][3] - Many European countries recognize that blindly following US policies could jeopardize their energy security, as evidenced by the significant trade volume between China and the EU, which reached 3.88 trillion yuan in the first eight months of 2025, a 4.3% year-on-year increase [3] Group 2 - The US's actions have caused significant internal divisions within the EU, potentially leading to a trade war that would primarily benefit the US [4] - Major European nations, such as Germany and France, have expressed concerns that imposing tariffs on China would harm their national interests and manufacturing sectors [6] - Mexico's recent decision to raise tariffs on over 1,400 products from China, with rates up to 50%, has sparked domestic backlash, as local businesses fear increased production costs and diminished international competitiveness [6]

Group 1 - The new policy in the U.S. is expected to lead to an 81% drop in small package shipments from around the world, with 88 postal operators from countries like France and Italy suspending their services to the U.S. due to unclear customs guidelines [2][5] - The average American household is projected to spend an additional $2,400 annually due to increased costs from taxes and customs, impacting low-income families significantly [11] - The U.S. retail sector is facing challenges, with 62% of small retailers identifying "supply chain disruption" as their biggest operational risk this year [11] Group 2 - The policy aims to protect domestic manufacturing but may result in a "self-inflicted wound," similar to the EU's past experience with tariffs on Chinese solar products, which did not benefit local industries as intended [4][10] - The disruption of global supply chains is evident, with U.S. businesses struggling to maintain inventory levels, leading to empty shelves and potential store closures [5][11] - The U.S. is attempting to hinder Chinese e-commerce platforms like Shein and Temu through tax increases, but market dynamics suggest that such administrative measures may not effectively alter competitive advantages [7][8] Group 3 - The policy reflects a misunderstanding of globalization, where interdependence among economies is crucial, and protectionist measures may lead to inflation and economic downturns [10][14] - Chinese companies have demonstrated resilience and adaptability in the face of trade tensions, optimizing supply chains and exploring new markets to mitigate the impact of U.S. policies [10][13] - The long-term sustainability of U.S. businesses may be jeopardized if they continue to isolate themselves from global supply chains, as seen in the struggles of local retailers to maintain profitability [14]

13日晚，商务部连发两份公告，公布对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片、美国对华集成电路领域相关措施发起调查。（此前 报道》》） 商务部公告2025年第50号 公布就美国对华集成电路领域相关措施发起反歧视立案调查 依据《中华人民共和国对外贸易法》第七条、第三十六条规定，任何国家或地区在贸易方面对中华人民共和国采取歧视性的 禁止、限制或者其他类似措施的，中华人民共和国可以根据实际情况对该国家或者该地区采取相应的措施。商务部可自行或 会同国务院其他有关部门发起相关调查。 商务部获得初步证据和信息显示，美国对华集成电路领域相关措施（以下称被调查措施）符合《中华人民共和国对外贸易 法》第七条规定的"在贸易方面对中华人民共和国采取歧视性的禁止、限制或者其他类似措施"的情形。 依据《中华人民共和国对外贸易法》第三十六条、第三十七条规定，商务部决定自2025年9月13日起就美国被调查措施启动 反歧视调查。现将有关事项公告如下： 一、被调查措施 根据获得的初步证据和信息，本次调查对象为美国对华集成电路领域相关措施，可包括： （一）2018年以来，美国政府基于对华301调查结果，已经或将要对包括集成电路在内的中国产品加征关税，以及其 ...

| | 中华人民共和国商务部 | Q 请输入关键字 | | --- | --- | --- | | | 首页 > 政务公开 > | 政策发布 | | | 来源:贸易救济局 类型:原创 | 2025-09-13 19:25 | | 首 页 | | 商务部公告2025年第27号 公布对原产于美国的进口 | | 机构设置 | 相关模拟芯片发起反倾销立案调查 | | | 新闻发布 | | | | 目 政务公开 | | | | 园 政务大厅 | 【发布单位】贸易救济局 | | | | 【发布文号】商务部公告2025年第27号 | | | ■ 互动交流 | 【发文日期】2025年09月13日 | | | ◇ 公共服务 | | | 商务部新闻发言人就对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片发起反倾销调查答记者问时表示， 近期，美国政府泛化国家安全概念，滥用出口管制和"长臂管辖"，对中国芯片产品和人工智能产业进行 恶意封锁和打压，严重违反世贸组织规则，损害中国企业正当权益，中方对此坚决反对。 来源：商务部官网、新华社 今天，商务部连发两条公告，公布对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片发起反倾销立案调查、就美国对华 集成电路领域相关措施发起反 ...

9月13日晚间，商务部发布2025年第50号公告，公布就美国对华集成电路领域相关措施发起反歧视立案调查。商务部发布2025年第27号公告，公布对原产于美国 的进口相关模拟芯片发起反倾销立案调查。 此外，商务部新闻发言人就美将我多家实体列入出口管制"实体清单"事答记者问。 商务部公告2025年第50号 公布就美国对华集成电路领域相关措施发起反歧视立案调查 依据《中华人民共和国对外贸易法》第七条、第三十六条规定，任何国家或地区在贸易方面对中华人民共和国采取歧视性的禁止、限制或者其他类似措施的，中华 人民共和国可以根据实际情况对该国家或者该地区采取相应的措施。商务部可自行或会同国务院其他有关部门发起相关调查。 商务部获得初步证据和信息显示，美国对华集成电路领域相关措施（以下称被调查措施）符合《中华人民共和国对外贸易法》第七条规定的"在贸易方面对中华人民 共和国采取歧视性的禁止、限制或者其他类似措施"的情形。 依据《中华人民共和国对外贸易法》第三十六条、第三十七条规定，商务部决定自2025年9月13日起就美国被调查措施启动反歧视调查。现将有关事项公告如下： 一、被调查措施 根据获得的初步证据和信息，本次调查对象为美国 ...