Group 1: Company Overview - Zhongtung High-tech (000657.SZ) is a leading tungsten integrated giant backed by the Minmetals Group, completing a full industry chain layout from tungsten ore to powder, alloy, and tools, with global leading capacity levels [21][23]. - The company has benefited from the injection of the Shizhu Garden tungsten mine, which has filled resource gaps and contributed to non-tungsten revenue through by-products like fluorite, bismuth, and molybdenum [23]. - Revenue projections for Zhongtung High-tech are estimated at 15.6 billion, 16.5 billion, and 17.1 billion yuan for 2025, 2026, and 2027 respectively, with net profits of 1.08 billion, 1.24 billion, and 1.32 billion yuan, corresponding to PE ratios of 24.3, 21.3, and 20.0 times [23]. Group 2: Industry Insights - The tungsten market is expected to benefit from rising tungsten prices, with the company poised to gain from the steady progress of the Shizhu Garden tungsten mine expansion project [23]. - The PCB micro-drill business is identified as a significant growth driver for deep processing revenue [23]. - The overall performance of the tungsten industry is influenced by manufacturing growth rates and supply risks, which could impact future profitability [23].

广发证券首席经济学家 郭磊 guolei@gf.com.cn 摘要 第一， 2025年6月BCI读数为49.3，较前值下行1.0个点。这与前期出来的EPMI数据在指向上一致。6月经济继续确认边际放缓迹象。 第二， 销售和利润前瞻指数同步回落，环比分别下行2.7、2.9个点。我们估计可能和需求端一系列边际变化有关：一是房地产在经历放缓脉冲，6月前28天30城 成交同比为-17.8%；二是从港口集装箱吞吐量和EPMI的6月出口订货指标来看，外需存在放缓特征，可能和海外进口商利用关税平静期补库需求已集中释放有 关；三是"国补"换档、第三批资金待下达期间，家电3C产品等终端销售不排除存在短期扰动。 第三， 企业库存前瞻指数环比上行1.5个点。在销售和利润下降的条件下，逻辑上企业不会主动补库；所以库存上升属于需求放缓带来的被动补库。实际上5月规 上工业企业数据就已经显现出类似特征，在报告《5月企业盈利增速出现调整的原因》中，我们指出"价格回落下拉名义库存；但需求弱于供给、产销率下降导致实 际库存有一定程度的被动上升"。 第四， 企业投资和招工前瞻指数一上一下，投资小幅上行0.1个点，招工下行1.4个点。我们理解投资存在 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the significant fluctuations in the Hong Kong dollar exchange rate since May, highlighting its movement between strong and weak exchange guarantees and the underlying causes and potential market impacts [7][8]. - It addresses the recent pause in local government subsidies, examining the changes in the "old for new" mechanism compared to 2024 and the rapid usage of subsidies in certain regions [9][8]. - The article analyzes the rebound in M1 growth as of May, attributing it to the introduction of new policy financial tools and the expectation of stable credit performance [12][12]. - It explores the divergence between consumption and production, citing factors such as holiday distribution, e-commerce promotions, and declines in exports and investments [16][16]. - The geopolitical situation in the Middle East is noted as a driver for rising gold and oil prices, indicating external influences on domestic markets [18][18]. Group 2 - The article outlines the recent policy initiatives in Shenzhen aimed at deepening reform and innovation, including enhancing collaboration between industry and academia, improving financial services for the real economy, and promoting talent acquisition [22][22]. - It highlights the Federal Open Market Committee's decision to maintain the federal funds rate at 4.25-4.50%, along with adjustments to economic and inflation forecasts, suggesting a potential for interest rate cuts in the future [25][25]. - The macroeconomic outlook is discussed, with a focus on the potential for "stagflation" and the implications for future economic policies and market conditions [26][26].

增量政策方面，最大的可能是落实前期提出的"设立新型政策性金融工具"，用作项目资本金，进而提振 投资。 6月20日，中国人民银行授权全国银行间同业拆借中心公布，2025年6月20日贷款市场报价利率（LPR） 为：1年期LPR为3.0%，5年期以上LPR为3.5%。在上月双双下调10bp之后，6月均维持不变。 多位业内人士分析称，6月LPR不变符合市场预期，短期内将进入政策观察期，LPR报价有可能继续保 持稳定。 6月LPR为何维持不变？ 6月LPR报价维持不变，主要源于两方面原因。一是近期政策利率持稳，二是银行息差继续承压，LPR 继续下调受限。 6月政策利率保持不变，影响LPR报价加点的因素也没有发生重大变化。中国民生银行首席经济学家温 彬分析，当前，国内外形势发生了一定变化，使得短期内国内货币政策再度加码的必要性不强，政策利 率预计持稳，LPR报价也会维持稳定。 伴随5月降准落地、存款挂牌利率再度下调，商业银行负债成本得以继续改善，但存款定期化、长期化 趋势日益加剧，约束了存款成本的下降幅度。数据显示，2025年4月，居民和企业定期存款的占比分别 达到74.3%和74%，呈不断上升态势。此外，前期对公存款和 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Loan Prime Rate (LPR) for June remains unchanged, with the 1-year LPR at 3.00% and the 5-year LPR at 3.50%, aligning with market expectations [2][4][12]. Summary by Relevant Sections LPR Stability - The stability of the LPR is attributed to the recent policy rate cuts by the central bank and the unchanged 7-day reverse repurchase rate at 1.40% [4][12]. - The current LPR levels are seen as adequate for both corporate and personal loan rates, which are already low [7][12]. Banking Sector Insights - Commercial banks are facing pressure on net interest margins, which have decreased to 1.43%, down 9 basis points from the previous quarter, limiting their ability to lower LPR further [7][10]. - The focus for banks is on managing liability costs and optimizing asset structures to stabilize margins [10]. Economic Context and Future Outlook - The economic environment suggests that there is no immediate need for further monetary policy easing, with expectations that LPR will remain stable in the short term [9][12]. - The central bank's monetary policy aims to balance supporting the real economy while maintaining the health of the banking system, indicating a multi-faceted approach to monetary policy [9][12]. Financing Costs and Policy Measures - The current financing costs for enterprises and residents have significantly decreased, with "expensive financing" no longer being a primary concern [12]. - Future efforts to reduce overall financing costs may focus on lowering non-interest costs such as collateral and service fees rather than solely relying on LPR adjustments [12]. Potential Policy Changes - There is speculation about potential incremental policy measures in the second half of the year, particularly in response to economic conditions and external pressures [15][16]. - The introduction of new policy financial tools is anticipated to stimulate investment, with estimates suggesting that such measures could leverage significant amounts of credit demand [16].

Group 1: Policy Financial Tools - Historical policy financial tools were introduced as counter-cyclical measures to stabilize the economy and enhance local investment capabilities, characterized by low costs, quick deployment, and market-oriented operations [1][20][21] - New policy financial tools are expected to focus more on technology innovation, consumption, and foreign trade, with significant attention on their scale, leverage effects, and issuance rhythm [1][22] Group 2: Banking Sector - The loan interest rate is expected to decline significantly slower in 2025, with the LPR reform leading to a rapid decline in loan rates during certain periods, but a slowdown is anticipated moving forward [3][31][32] - The banking sector is likely to see a stabilization in performance due to reduced pressure on interest margins, with a recommendation to focus on high-quality regional small banks and stable state-owned banks [3][32] Group 3: Non-Banking Sector - Guoyin Financial Leasing - Guoyin Financial Leasing is projected to achieve total revenue of 28.56 billion yuan in 2024, with a year-on-year growth of 7.2%, and a net profit of 4.5 billion yuan, up 8.5% [3] - The company has seen rapid growth in its ship leasing segment, with revenue reaching 7.7 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 32.4% [3] Group 4: Non-Banking Sector - Blue Sky Technology - Blue Sky Technology reported a revenue of 2.554 billion yuan in 2024, a year-on-year increase of 2.6%, with a net profit of 787 million yuan, up 9.8% [24] - The company’s adsorption materials business has shown strong growth, while the lithium extraction project has seen a significant decline in revenue [24][25] Group 5: Non-Banking Sector - Ruile New Materials - Ruile New Materials achieved a revenue of 1.459 billion yuan in 2024, with a year-on-year growth of 20.7%, and a net profit of 252 million yuan, up 87.6% [27] - The display materials segment has become the largest business area for the company, driven by the increasing penetration of OLED panels [27][28][29]

Group 1: Historical Policy Financial Instruments - Historical policy financial instruments were introduced during counter-cyclical adjustments to stabilize the economy and enhance local investment capabilities, characterized by their ability to leverage social funds into long-term infrastructure investments, low costs, and rapid deployment [1][7][8] - The Special Construction Bonds, created in 2015 to address domestic economic downturn pressures, helped alleviate local expenditure pressures and meet funding needs for key projects, becoming a crucial tool for stabilizing growth in infrastructure [9][15] - In 2022, the Policy Development Financial Instruments were launched to actively expand effective investment, with a rapid implementation timeline that allowed for quick project initiation and support for infrastructure investment growth [21][27] Group 2: New Policy Financial Instruments - The new policy financial instruments are expected to focus on technology innovation, consumption, and foreign trade, with a market-oriented mechanism to address fiscal shortfalls and support key project capital needs [31][36] - Recent meetings in various regions indicate a proactive approach to deploying these new financial tools, with local governments emphasizing the importance of leveraging these instruments to stimulate effective investment [33][35] - The operational model for the new instruments will likely continue to involve policy banks leading the initiatives, with the central bank providing funding support through structural monetary policy tools [36]

Economic Performance - In May, industrial added value increased by 5.8% year-on-year, while the service production index rose by 6.2%[3] - Retail sales grew by 6.4% year-on-year, up 1.3 percentage points from the previous month[3] - Fixed asset investment accumulated a year-on-year growth of 3.7%, down 0.3 percentage points from last month[3] Sector Analysis - Infrastructure and manufacturing investment grew by 10.4% and 8.5% respectively in the first five months of the year[3] - New energy vehicle production surged by 40.8%, while industrial robots increased by 32%[3] - Real estate sales and investment saw declines of -2.9% and -10.7% respectively in the first five months[3] Price Trends - The Producer Price Index (PPI) fell from -2.7% to -3.3% year-on-year, indicating price pressures affecting investment[3] - Consumer Price Index (CPI) showed signs of stabilization, nearing the mid-level of 2022-2024[3] Future Outlook - The economy is expected to meet the annual growth target of around 5%, but structural changes will depend on the evolution of the current economic narratives[3] - Key issues to monitor include the potential overconsumption of durable goods, export growth rates, and the government's policy responses[3]

关注、加星，第一时间接收推送！ 文 | 赵伟、贾东旭 联系人| 贾东旭 摘要 核心观点：随后续政策性金融工具推出，信贷表现或趋于稳定持续走强。 5 月金融数据中最突出的变化是 M1 增速回暖，主要原因或有两点：其一，去年 "资金防空转" 政策下的低基数效应；其二，房地产销售边际回暖带 动资金注入企业端。 5月M1同比回升0.8个百分点，一方面源于去年"资金防空转"治理，使企业活期存款基数快速下降；另一方面，5月商品房成交 同比降幅收窄，部分资金转化为企业活期存款。 信贷持续性偏弱主要归因于企业部门，企业中长期贷款已连续两个月同比少增超1500亿元，这与PPI同比降幅扩大、企业未来预期不确定性仍存密切 相关。 企业投资计划与价格走势紧密相连，5月PPI同比降幅扩大至-3.3%，这或许预示着企业投资计划将进一步削减。同时，5月PMI中的企业生产 经营预期指数为也处于2024年10月以来的较低水平。 新增社会融资规模同比多增幅度收窄，主要是由于政府债净融资的基数抬升，财政融资"前置"推动社融快速改善的阶段可能已趋于结束。 社融存量 同比从2024年底的8.0%上升至8.7%，主因政府债净融资"前置" 。5月政府债净 ...

关注、加星，第一时间接收推送！ 文 | 赵伟、贾东旭 联系人| 贾东旭 摘要 事件：6月13日，央行公布2025年5月中国金融数据，信贷余额同比下行0.1个百分点至7.1%，社融存量同比持平于至8.7%，M2同比下行0.1个百 分点至7.9% 。 增长同经济增长、价格总水平预期目标相匹配。 常规跟踪：M1同比回暖。 5月新增信贷6200亿，同比少增3300亿，拖累仍主要源于企业中长贷。 居民部门贷款新增540亿，同比少增217亿，其中短贷减少208亿，同比多 减451亿，中长贷新增746亿，同比多增232亿。企业部门方面，票据融资新增746亿，同比少增2826亿，短期贷款新增1100亿，同比增加2300 亿。非银贷款新增589亿，同比多增226亿。 5月新增社融22871亿，同比多增2248亿，主要源于政府债券。 人民币贷款新增5960亿，同比少增2237亿。政府债券新增14633亿，同比多增 2367亿。企业债券新增1496亿，同比多增1211亿。委托贷款减少167亿，同比多减158亿，信托贷款新增173亿，同比少增51亿，未贴现汇票减少 1162亿，同比少减169亿。 5月M2同比下行0.1个百分点至7. ...