Core Viewpoints - The current liquidity easing is primarily driven by the relocation of household deposits, leading to a market logic that favors equities over bonds, rather than a simultaneous bull market in both [3][5][6] - Unlike previous instances where household deposit relocation occurred after economic expectations improved, this time it is policy-driven, with the underlying fundamentals still in a bottoming phase, resulting in strong market expectations for further central bank easing [3][6][19] - Continuous relocation of household deposits may raise concerns for the central bank regarding idle funds, and the necessity for further loans to stimulate investment is decreasing, unless specific adverse economic events occur [3][7][19] Financial Data Summary - In June 2025, new social financing increased by 4.20 trillion yuan, up from 2.29 trillion yuan previously, with a year-on-year growth of 8.9% [2][25] - M2 money supply grew by 8.3% year-on-year, while new M1 increased by 4.6%, indicating a shift in liquidity dynamics [2][28] - The increase in corporate loans was significant, with a total of 2.24 trillion yuan in new loans, reflecting a strong demand for credit [21][27] Analysis of Liquidity Dynamics - When household deposit relocation is the main driver of liquidity, the market logic tends to favor equities, creating a seesaw effect between stocks and bonds [5][12] - The current environment suggests a preference for equities over bonds, as household deposit relocation is not linked to improved economic expectations but rather to policy initiatives [6][15] - The central bank's future actions may focus more on structural adjustments rather than broad monetary easing, aiming to stabilize liquidity in both equity and bond markets [9][19]

Group 1: Macro Overview - In June 2025, new social financing (社融) reached 4.20 trillion, up from 2.29 trillion previously, with a year-on-year growth of 8.9% compared to 8.7% before[1] - M2 growth was 8.3% year-on-year, an increase from 7.9% previously, while new M1 (新口径) grew by 4.6% compared to 2.3% before[1] - The current market logic reflects a "look at stocks, act like bonds" approach rather than a dual bull market for stocks and bonds, primarily driven by the relocation of household deposits[1] Group 2: Liquidity and Policy Implications - The current liquidity easing is mainly driven by policy rather than economic improvement, leading to strong market expectations for further central bank easing[2] - The central bank's probability of further easing is decreasing unless triggered by significant adverse economic events or market shocks[2] - Future central bank actions may focus more on structural adjustments rather than broad monetary easing, aiming to stabilize liquidity in both stock and bond markets[2] Group 3: Financial Data Insights - In June, corporate loans increased by 1.77 trillion, a year-on-year increase of 1.4 trillion, while household loans rose by 597.6 billion[1] - The social financing scale in June showed an increase of 4.2 trillion, with a year-on-year growth of 8.9%, reflecting a significant rise in government bond issuance[1] - The total amount of deposits increased by 3.21 trillion in June, with household deposits rising by 2.47 trillion, indicating a strong inflow into the banking system[1]

Core Viewpoint - The current macro asset allocation logic is primarily driven by the "look at stocks to do bonds" approach, as the main liquidity improvement is due to the migration of household deposits rather than central bank monetary easing [2][9][21]. Group 1: Macro Asset Allocation Analysis - Analyzing the stock-bond relationship is crucial in macro asset allocation, where the environment can either favor "look at stocks to do bonds" or "look at bonds to do stocks" [8][13]. - In a "look at stocks to do bonds" environment, the upward movement of stock prices influences bond trading behavior, while in a "look at bonds to do stocks" environment, falling interest rates affect stock market valuations [8][13]. - The current liquidity improvement is characterized by a significant migration of household deposits to non-bank financial institutions, with approximately 6.2 trillion yuan moving in the first five months of 2025, marking the highest level since 2009 [9][21]. Group 2: Special Characteristics of Current Liquidity - The current migration of household deposits is unique as it does not follow an improvement in economic expectations, contrasting with past trends where such migrations occurred after economic recovery [3][28]. - The "stabilize the stock market" policy from the top down has limited the extent to which risk appetite can express downward movements in the stock market [4][28]. - Financial regulations established in 2017 and 2022 have heightened vigilance against financial practices that lead to asset bubbles, impacting the current liquidity dynamics [5][28]. Group 3: Implications of Current Trends - The current environment suggests that as the stock market strengthens, the risk of systemic asset price bubbles increases, leading to tighter monetary policy and pressure on the bond market [30]. - Conversely, if the stock market weakens, the central bank's focus on stabilizing market expectations increases, potentially leading to short-term dual bullish trends in both stocks and bonds [30].

Group 1: Macro Analysis - Understanding the relationship between stocks and bonds is crucial for macro asset allocation decisions[2] - Current liquidity improvement is primarily driven by the migration of household deposits, differing from the monetary easing seen in 2014-2015[5] - The scale of non-bank liquidity growth in the first five months of 2025 is approximately CNY 6.2 trillion, compared to CNY 1.6 trillion in the same period of 2015[5][20] Group 2: Market Dynamics - The prevailing logic is to "look at stocks to do bonds," indicating a stock-driven market where risk appetite influences bond trading[3][4] - In the current environment, if stocks rise, bond yields are likely to follow, while a decline in stocks may lead to bond price increases[3][4] - The current market is characterized by a "see-saw" effect between stocks and bonds, rather than a simultaneous bullish trend in both[3][4] Group 3: Special Considerations - Unique factors this round include the difficulty for household deposits to return to real estate, leading to a stronger migration towards non-bank institutions[3] - The "stabilize the stock market" policy from the top down limits the downward expression of risk appetite in the stock market[3] - The current liquidity situation is not a result of improved economic expectations, contrasting with past trends where deposit migration followed economic recovery[8][27]

Core Viewpoint - The central theme of the article revolves around the changes and consistencies in the monetary policy framework as discussed in the second quarter monetary policy committee meeting of 2025, highlighting a shift towards strengthening domestic circulation and a flexible approach to policy implementation [2][3][5]. Group 1: Changes Worth Noting - In terms of policy tone, the meeting removed the phrase "combining the strategy of expanding domestic demand with deepening supply-side structural reforms" and added "placing greater emphasis on strengthening domestic circulation while coordinating the relationship between total supply and total demand" [3][7]. - The monetary policy approach has shifted from "timely reduction of reserve requirements and interest rates" to "flexibly grasping the implementation intensity and rhythm of policies" [4][8]. - The statement regarding exchange rates has been altered, removing "strengthening market management and resolutely correcting market pro-cyclical behaviors" [4][9]. Group 2: Consistencies Worth Noting - The central bank maintained the expression of "moderately loose monetary policy" while also emphasizing the need to "smooth the transmission mechanism of monetary policy, improve the efficiency of fund utilization, and prevent fund idling" [5][10]. - The balance between moderately loose monetary policy and preventing fund idling is significantly influenced by the scale of residents' deposits moving to non-bank institutions [10][17]. Group 3: Understanding the Central Bank's Liquidity Injection - Over the past two decades, the central bank's liquidity injection methods have evolved, transitioning from buying foreign exchange (2003-2013) to using re-lending and reverse repos (2014-2023), and now incorporating more comprehensive methods such as open market operations and securities swaps [11][19]. - This change in liquidity injection strategy indicates that the central bank's current approach aims not only to support the credit expansion capacity of commercial banks but also to stabilize liquidity in the stock and bond markets [11][19].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is to "look at stocks and then bonds," indicating that stock market performance should be assessed before making judgments on bonds [2][4] - The current economic state is described as "weak but not collapsing," with policies providing support but not fully lifting the economy, leading to limited downward pressure on corporate profits [2][3] - Inflation is expected to remain low, with CPI and PPI readings unlikely to hit new lows, and a risk of CPI not turning positive in the first half of the year due to weak price increases [2][3] Group 2 - The analysis of stock and bond markets indicates a competitive relationship, where a bull market in stocks could lead to a bear market in bonds, and vice versa [4][5] - The likelihood of a broad-based bull market is low, but there is a significant chance for a "technology sector rally," driven by high growth rates in the information transmission industry [5][6] - The economic environment is favorable for technology stocks, with fiscal spending growth matching nominal GDP growth, creating a conducive atmosphere for tech industry development [6][7] Group 3 - The bond market has likely passed its most severe adjustment phase, with current interest rates challenging the monetary policy framework, and the potential for new investment opportunities in bonds contingent on changes in economic conditions [8][10] - The focus on the second quarter's economic uncertainty suggests that defensive high-dividend sectors and elastic stocks may yield short-term gains, while the bond market could react to expectations of monetary easing [9][10] - The overall asset conclusion indicates a consensus on the technology sector's growth potential, with expectations that Hong Kong stocks may outperform A-shares, and bond investments will primarily focus on yield rather than capital appreciation unless significant economic changes occur [10]

Core Viewpoint - The article suggests that the short-term interbank interest rate, DR007, is expected to fluctuate between 1.7% and 2.0% in the near future, with limited upward or downward potential due to the current monetary policy stance and the behavior of resident deposits [2][4]. Group 1: Monetary Policy Perspective - The central bank's monetary policy is currently in a tight balance, influenced by the release of resident deposits, which has reduced the necessity for further monetary easing [4][6]. - The upward potential for interest rates is constrained by the temporary reverse repurchase agreement rate cap set at 2.0% [6][22]. - The current situation indicates that the need for the central bank to increase liquidity is decreasing as resident deposits transition from accumulation to release [6][21]. Group 2: Resident Deposits and Bond Yield Comparison - The yields on three-year and five-year government bonds are currently higher than the corresponding fixed deposit rates offered by major banks, indicating an attractive opportunity for residents to invest in bonds [7][25]. - As of the end of 2024, the three-year government bond yield is approximately 1.25%, and the five-year yield is about 1.49%, both lower than the fixed deposit rates, suggesting that bond returns are primarily driven by capital gains rather than interest income [25][27]. - Recent adjustments in the bond market show that as of March 21, 2025, the three-year and five-year government bond yields have risen to 1.64% and 1.70%, respectively, indicating a shift in attractiveness towards bonds compared to fixed deposits [25][27]. Group 3: Banking System and Bond Yield Relationship - The inversion between DR007 and the ten-year government bond yield has largely ended, suggesting that the most rapid adjustments in bond yields may have already occurred [8][29]. - However, the one-year interbank deposit rate remains higher than the ten-year government bond yield, indicating that banks are still in a phase of needing to secure liabilities [8][29]. - The current financial environment suggests that as long as the one-year interbank deposit rate exceeds the ten-year government bond yield, the optimal window for banks to invest in ten-year government bonds has not yet arrived [8][29].