新华财经日内瓦1月9日电（记者焦倩）总部位于瑞士日内瓦的世界经济论坛8日发布报告说，当前全球 合作在多边主义持续面临强劲逆风的背景下展现出韧性，合作的结构和形式正在发生变化。 （文章来源：新华社） 报告指出，近年来全球合作的总体水平基本保持不变，但合作的结构和形式正在发生变化。随着多边合 作渠道的弱化，更具创新性、规模较小的合作机制正在兴起，这些机制往往在区域内部或跨区域之间展 开。 世界经济论坛总裁布伦德表示，尽管如今合作模式与过去有所不同，协作对于发展经济、加速创新以及 应对更多不确定性带来的挑战至关重要。 世界经济论坛当天发布的"全球合作晴雨表"报告采用41项指标，通过贸易与资本、创新与技术、气候与 自然资本、卫生与健康、和平与安全五个领域来评估全球合作趋势。 在全球重点议题上，气候与技术领域的合作增幅相对较大，融资规模扩大以及全球供应链体系的完善推 动清洁技术应用规模在2025年中期达到历史最高水平。健康与贸易领域的合作水平总体保持平稳。 报告指出，和平与安全领域的合作则出现了最为显著的下滑。冲突升级，军费开支增加，全球多边机制 在缓和危机方面举步维艰。截至2024年底，全球被迫流离失所者人数达到创纪 ...

Core Insights - The World Economic Forum's "2026 Global Cooperation Index" indicates a shift towards trade and technology cooperation among like-minded countries, while peace and security cooperation has significantly declined [1] Trade and Capital - Overall cooperation in trade and capital remains above the 2019 baseline, but structural changes are profound; global goods trade continues to grow, yet at a slower pace than global economic development [3] - Trade flows are increasingly concentrating among like-minded partners, with many countries forming smaller alliances due to rising barriers in the multilateral trade system [3] Innovation and Technology - Cooperation in innovation and technology is strengthening despite tightening technology controls, leading to new development momentum [3] - There has been a significant increase in information technology services and talent mobility, with international bandwidth capacity expanding fourfold compared to pre-pandemic levels [3] - Restrictions on the flow of key resources, technologies, and knowledge are increasing, while new cooperation models are emerging, particularly in cutting-edge technologies like AI and 5G infrastructure among aligned nations [3] Climate and Natural Capital - Progress in climate and natural capital cooperation has been made, but it still falls short of global expectations [3] - The deployment of clean technologies reached a historical high in 2025, driven by expanded financing and global supply chain collaboration [3] - China contributed two-thirds of the new capacity in solar, wind, and electric vehicles, with other developing economies accelerating their efforts [3] Health and Wellness - Cooperation in health and wellness remains stable, showing resilience, but the global health assistance system faces significant pressure [4] - The overall level of health cooperation has not declined, partly due to ongoing improvements in health indicators post-pandemic [4] - However, the pressure on multilateral institutions has led to a blockage in health support funding, significantly reducing development aid, which poses severe challenges for low- and middle-income countries [4] Peace and Security - Cooperation in peace and security is continuously shrinking, with all monitored indicators below pre-pandemic levels [4] - Escalating conflict situations and rising military expenditures are evident, while global multilateral mediation mechanisms struggle to alleviate crises [4] - By the end of 2024, the number of forcibly displaced persons is projected to reach 123 million, a historical high, prompting new cooperation dynamics through regional peacekeeping mechanisms [4]

Group 1 - The United Nations spokesperson stated that if the United States continues to delay its payment of dues, it may lose its voting rights in the UN General Assembly [1] - The U.S. has accumulated over $3 billion in unpaid dues, including more than $820 million for the regular budget for 2025 and outstanding peacekeeping contributions [1] - The UN Secretary-General expressed regret over the U.S. decision to withdraw from several UN agencies, emphasizing that all member states, including the U.S., are legally bound to pay their assessed contributions [2][3] Group 2 - The U.S. administration has announced its intention to withdraw from 66 international organizations, including 31 UN agencies, citing that they no longer align with U.S. interests [3][4] - European leaders criticized the U.S. withdrawal from international agreements, particularly regarding climate change, highlighting the importance of global cooperation in addressing environmental issues [6][7] - The U.S. approach to funding UN initiatives has shifted to a "selective payment" model, only supporting projects that align with the current administration's agenda [3]

特朗普去年1月重返白宫后，美国已宣布退出联合国教科文组织、世界卫生组织、联合国人权理事会 等，并且停止向联合国近东巴勒斯坦难民救济和工程处提供支持。按美联社说法，美国对联合国的经费 支持也逐渐转为"选择性买单"的模式，只为那些符合特朗普施政议程、不背离美国利益的项目和机构提 供资金。 特朗普政府近期一边以军事手段干预或威胁他国，例如突袭委内瑞拉、威胁动用美军来夺取格陵兰岛； 一边又再次宣布退出数十个国际组织，表明美国在全球合作领域的退缩态势进一步加剧。 当地时间1月8日，联合国秘书长古特雷斯通过发言人发表声明表示，对美国白宫宣布将退出若干联合国 机构的决定表示遗憾。 声明强调，根据《联合国宪章》，经联合国大会批准的联合国经常预算和维和预算分摊会费，对所有会 员国均具有法律约束力，包括美国在内。 声明指出，所有联合国机构都将继续履行会员国赋予的授权任务。联合国有责任为依赖联合国工作的各 方提供服务，并将以坚定的决心继续落实各项使命。 当地时间1月7日，美国白宫发布声明表示，美国总统特朗普当日签署了一份总统备忘录，指示美国退出 66个"不再符合美国利益"的国际组织。该备忘录命令所有行政部门和机构停止参与和资助35 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the U.S. government's decision to withdraw from 66 international organizations, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which is seen as a significant retreat from global cooperation and multilateralism [1][5][7]. Group 1: Withdrawal from International Organizations - The U.S. will exit 31 UN agencies and 35 non-UN organizations, including the UN International Law Commission and the UN Human Settlements Programme, as part of a broader review of U.S. participation in international organizations [2][4]. - The White House claims these organizations promote agendas contrary to U.S. interests, labeling them as redundant and inefficient [4][7]. Group 2: Impact on Climate Agreements - The withdrawal from the UNFCCC is particularly notable, as it is considered the cornerstone of major international climate agreements, including the Paris Agreement [5][6]. - Experts warn that this decision could hinder global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and may provide other countries with excuses to delay their climate commitments [6][8]. Group 3: Shift in U.S. Foreign Policy - The decision reflects a long-standing skepticism towards multilateral institutions, with the current administration prioritizing unilateral actions over international consensus [7][8]. - The U.S. government aims to concentrate taxpayer funds on enhancing its influence in specific UN standard-setting bodies, particularly in areas where it competes with China [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration has announced the withdrawal of the United States from 66 international organizations deemed "not in the interest of the United States," significantly impacting global cooperation in various sectors, particularly climate change and women's rights [1][5]. Group 1: Environmental Impact - Approximately 20 of the organizations being exited are related to climate change, sustainable development, and environmental protection, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which is considered the legal foundation for global climate cooperation [1]. - The U.S. will be absent from the 30th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in 2025, marking the first absence in nearly 30 years [1]. Group 2: Women's Rights and Health - The U.S. will terminate its participation and funding for the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and the United Nations Population Fund, which are crucial for global gender equality and maternal health initiatives [2]. - The U.S. had already cut funding to the United Nations Population Fund last year, and this announcement formalizes the withdrawal [2]. Group 3: Global Development - The withdrawal list includes organizations such as the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and the International Energy Forum, which are vital for global economic development and social affairs [4]. - Several UN bodies focused on regional economic development, including the UN Economic and Social Affairs Department and various regional economic commissions, are also affected by this decision [4]. Group 4: Broader Implications - Trump's memorandum states that the operations of these organizations contradict U.S. national interests, security, economic prosperity, or sovereignty, indicating a broader trend of the U.S. stepping back from global cooperation [5]. - The decision to exit these organizations is seen as a continuation of efforts to undermine global systems, particularly in areas related to development, women's issues, and climate change [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration has announced the withdrawal of the United States from 66 international organizations deemed "not in the interest of the United States," significantly impacting global cooperation in various sectors, particularly in climate change and women's rights [1][5]. Environmental Protection Impact - Approximately 20 of the organizations being exited are related to climate change, sustainable development, and environmental protection, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which is considered the legal foundation for global climate cooperation [1] - The U.S. will be absent from the 30th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in 2025, marking the first absence in nearly 30 years [1] Women's and Children's Rights Impact - The U.S. will terminate its participation and funding for the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and the United Nations Population Fund, which are crucial for global gender equality and maternal health initiatives [2] - The withdrawal also includes exiting from the United Nations Human Settlements Programme and various UN special representatives focused on issues like child conflict and sexual violence [2] Global Development Impact - The withdrawal list includes organizations such as the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and the International Energy Forum, which are vital for global economic development and social affairs [4] - Several UN regional economic commissions, including those for Africa and Latin America, are also part of the exit strategy, indicating a broader impact on global and regional economic cooperation [4] Overall Implications - Trump's memorandum states that the operations of these organizations contradict U.S. national interests, security, economic prosperity, or sovereignty, reflecting a continued effort to withdraw from global cooperation [5] - This move is seen as part of a broader trend of the current administration to undermine global systems, particularly in areas related to development, women's issues, and climate change [3]

Group 1 - The event "World Mayors Dialogue·Harbin" opened in Harbin, Heilongjiang, focusing on the theme "Ice and Snow Connect the World, Cooperation for a Win-Win Future" [2] - Mayors and representatives from various countries, including Canada, Finland, Germany, Greece, South Korea, Thailand, Turkey, and China, participated to exchange practices in developing the ice and snow economy [2] - Attendees visited key locations such as Harbin Ice and Snow World and Harbin Industrial University to understand sustainable development and technological empowerment in the ice and snow industry [2] Group 2 - The main dialogue of the "World Mayors Dialogue" is scheduled for January 7, where international guests will share experiences in ice and snow industry development and urban governance [2] - The event is guided by the State Council Information Office and serves as an important platform for global exchange and cooperation, aiming to enhance international trust and deepen mutual learning [2]

Core Viewpoint - The global economy is expected to experience a slowdown in growth in 2025, with ongoing pressures from trade, investment, and supply chains, amidst geopolitical tensions that create uncertainty for recovery [1][4]. Group 1: Economic Growth and Trends - The United Nations report indicates that global economic growth expectations for 2025 are significantly lower than previous years, with a notable decline from 2.9% in 2024, reflecting an overall slowdown in economic momentum [4]. - The international trade sector is under pressure due to uncertainties in trade policies and rising tariffs, leading companies to delay investment decisions, which in turn affects global supply chains [4]. - Emerging markets and developing economies are showing relative resilience due to internal demand and growth potential, while the digital economy and green technology investments are becoming key drivers for future growth [5]. Group 2: Geopolitical Dynamics - The relationship between the US and Europe is undergoing structural adjustments, revealing increasing complexities in areas such as industrial policy, trade rules, and energy transition, which puts additional pressure on the multilateral trade system [6]. - Germany's Chancellor has indicated that Europe must prepare for fundamental changes in its relationship with the US, reflecting a desire for greater strategic autonomy in the face of external uncertainties [6]. Group 3: Global Cooperation and Challenges - The UN Secretary-General emphasizes the need for enhanced global cooperation to coordinate trade policies, stabilize investment environments, and promote peace negotiations, which are essential for achieving sustainable development goals [7]. - Despite the resilience of the global economy, the slowdown in growth dynamics and ongoing geopolitical tensions continue to create uncertainty for development, necessitating dialogue and cooperation among nations to address these challenges [7].

Core Viewpoint - The global supply chain is undergoing significant restructuring, making the security of key mineral resources, including iron ore, a strategic priority that must be addressed in the current era [1]. Group 1: Industry Developments - The China Minmetals Trade Association (CMTA) has been actively working on high-quality development and resource security in the steel industry, focusing on regulating the import and export order of bulk commodities [1]. - Starting in 2023, CMTA is responsible for collecting, organizing, analyzing, and verifying import and export information for iron ore, copper concentrate, crude oil, potash, and rare earths, providing services to over 3,000 enterprises and reporting early data to relevant departments [1]. - CMTA is committed to representing the collective interests of the industry and providing professional guidance for companies facing international trade challenges, opposing unilateralism and trade bullying to maintain the stability and security of China's steel industry chain [1]. Group 2: Green Transformation and Standards - CMTA has developed four international standards related to sustainable minerals, with the "China Mineral Supply Chain Due Diligence Management Guidelines" recognized by major international institutions like the London Metal Exchange (LME), allowing Chinese companies to use "Chinese standards" in international transactions [2]. - The establishment of the "Green Minerals Committee" aims to create a collaborative mechanism for responsible sourcing and sustainable supply chain governance, helping companies gain a competitive edge in global markets [2]. Group 3: Global Cooperation and Resource Supply - CMTA is exploring the construction of a diversified and resilient global resource supply network, including hosting "China-Africa Green Mineral Cooperation Exchange Activities" to help enterprises discover new resource cooperation opportunities [2]. - The organization emphasizes that ensuring resource security requires strategic leadership, policy coordination, and active participation from all enterprises, as well as dialogue and cooperation from the international community [2].